EM-tla
Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike and you can go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!
Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familiarize yourself with:
- Introduction – An introduction to the project.
- Wikidata tours – Interactive tutorials to show you how Wikidata works.
- Community portal – The portal for community members.
- User options – including the 'Babel' extension, to set your language preferences.
- Contents – The main help page for editing and using the site.
- Project chat – Discussions about the project.
- Tools – A collection of user-developed tools to allow for easier completion of some tasks.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask on Project chat. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.
Best regards! Madamebiblio (talk) 17:20, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
March 2024
edit Hello, I'm Madamebiblio. In case you didn't know, descriptions begin with a lowercase letter except when uppercase would normally be required or expected. Essentially, you should pretend that the description is appearing in the middle of a normal sentence, and then follow normal language rules. Most terms would not be capitalized if they appeared in the middle of a sentence. However terms such as proper nouns (e.g. the names of specific people, specific places, and specific titles) should be capitalized. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Madamebiblio (talk) 17:20, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hello! The same holds for the labels (check out Help:Label#Capitalization). --Horcrux (talk) 18:47, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
subclass of
editHello EM-tla, I noticed some wrong/redundant additions of property subclass of (P279), especially with items in the category artificial physical object (Q8205328). This mistakes involve introducing circularity (1), adding redundant statements (2) and adding statements that don't hold true for all instances of the class (3).
1) One example of wrong addition of a subclass statement introducing circularity concerns item clothing (Q11460). Here you added the (wrong) statement clothing (Q11460)subclass of (P279)traditional costume (Q3172759). That item x is the subclass of item y means that everything that is an x is also an y. But not everything that is clothing is also a traditional costume - it is rather the other way round. The proposition that every traditional costume is also clothing is already expressed at item traditional costume (Q3172759) using traditional costume (Q3172759)subclass of (P279)costume (Q9053464) (because at costume (Q9053464) we have costume (Q9053464)subclass of (P279)clothing (Q11460), which implies the statement traditional costume (Q3172759)subclass of (P279)clothing (Q11460))
2) This brings me to an important characteristic of subclass of (P279): It is transitive, meaning that the statements xsubclass of (P279)y and ysubclass of (P279)z imply also the statement xsubclass of (P279)z. It is not necessary to state xsubclass of (P279)z explicitly; this would not be wrong, but redundant, and for this reason such statements should be omitted.
To have one example of your additions here: You added traditional costume (Q3172759)subclass of (P279)artificial physical object (Q8205328). But this is not necessary because we already have clothing (Q11460)subclass of (P279)artificial physical object (Q8205328) and traditional costume (Q3172759) is an (indirect) subclass of clothing (Q11460). You can see the subclass tree at its talk page, in section Classification of the class ... [expand] (e.g. https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Q3172759)
3) You added statement traditional costume (Q3172759)subclass of (P279)archaeological artefact (Q220659) but this does not hold true for all instances: there do exist traditional costumes that are not archeological artifacts, for example contemporary instances of Bavarian costume (Q13420706).
You may have a look at Help:Basic_membership_properties#Unterklasse_von_(P279) for a thorougher introduction to this property. Depending on your background it may be one of the more difficult properties, so don't worry if it takes a while to understand it and its use completely.
We started to talk about your additions at Talk:Q11460. I'm planning to remove some of them semi-automatically. Please have a look at this discussion and feel free to express any questions or concerns. Kind regards, - Valentina.Anitnelav (talk) 12:58, 29 June 2024 (UTC)