Property talk:P2635
Latest comment: 11 months ago by Gnom in topic Rename slightly?
Documentation
number of parts of this work
the number of parts that a work comprises
the number of parts that a work comprises
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Type “work (Q386724), album series (Q20671381), item of collection or exhibition (Q18593264), cultural artifact (Q1791627), painting (Q3305213), statute (Q820655), document (Q49848), musical release (Q2031291), group of works (Q17489659), act (Q421744), fictional work (Q124301146)”: item must contain property “instance of (P31)” with classes “work (Q386724), album series (Q20671381), item of collection or exhibition (Q18593264), cultural artifact (Q1791627), painting (Q3305213), statute (Q820655), document (Q49848), musical release (Q2031291), group of works (Q17489659), act (Q421744), fictional work (Q124301146)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P2635#Type Q386724, Q20671381, Q18593264, Q1791627, Q3305213, Q820655, Q49848, Q2031291, Q17489659, Q421744, Q124301146, SPARQL
Range from “0” to “10000000”: values should be in the range from “0” to “10000000”. (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P2635#Range, hourly updated reportInteger: values should be integers (ie. they shouldn't have a fractional part) (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P2635#integer, hourly updated report, SPARQLAllowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P2635#Entity types
Scope is as main value (Q54828448), as qualifier (Q54828449): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P2635#Scope, SPARQL
None of music track with vocals (Q55850593), music track without lyrics (Q55850643), song (Q7366): value must not be any of the specified items.
Replacement property:
Replacement values: audio track (Q7302866) (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). Replacement property:
Replacement values: audio track (Q7302866) (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P2635#none of, SPARQL
|
This property is being used by:
Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
creation of this property
edit@Micru: what about the creation discussion ???? author TomT0m / talk page 15:05, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- @TomT0m: It hasn't been archived yet.--Micru (talk) 15:39, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Micru: On thing that works, which I only found out a few days ago, is to add
|proposed by=Creative work(or another sub page) to the template as long as it is not archived. Very useful. --Srittau (talk) 21:36, 28 March 2016 (UTC)- @Srittau: Thanks for the tip! --Micru (talk) 21:44, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Micru: On thing that works, which I only found out a few days ago, is to add
@Gnom, Thierry Caro, Swpb, He7d3r, Micru: What was wrong with
⟨ Idées noires (Q1631093) 
⟩ has part(s) of the class (P2670) ⟨ page (comic) (Q3391389) ⟩
quantity (P1114) ⟨ 10 ⟩
quantity (P1114)
for example ? This would naturally express the type of the parts. author TomT0m / talk page 11:25, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
- Hi TomT0m, I was unaware with this possibility, and to be honest I find it very difficult. --Gnom (talk) 14:16, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Gnom: Once you're aware of this it's not ;) you just have to know how to add a qualifier, which is a Wikidata basis. The advantage of this one is that it's not restricted to (art)works and the solution work for any objects. As this is more general, this competes with this property for maybe no real good reason ... I like the idea that Wikidata can share some ideas project wide, I think this overall make things simpler. author TomT0m / talk page 14:20, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
I was pinged here; can someone please clarify the question? Is the dispute over whether this property should exist, for instance? --Swpb (talk) 17:28, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
- I pinged you because you were involved in the creation discussion. And yes, this is related as there is a viable alternative - I'm not really fond of equivalent alternatives, this can make things messier than necessary. author TomT0m / talk page 17:51, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
Rename?
editCould this be renamed to "number of parts" or "number of parts of this work"? It seems a bit strange when applied to a non-fiction book series like Documenta Ophthalmologica Proceedings Series (Q57254427). Ghouston (talk) 03:08, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
Rename slightly?
editIt seems much more accurate to rename to "number of parts IN this work"? Thadguidry (talk) 01:59, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- I would not be opposed to this change. Gnom (Diskussion) make Wikipedia green! 07:20, 11 December 2023 (UTC)