[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A New ICT Literacy Test for Elementary and Middle School Students in Republic of Korea

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purposes of our study were to develop and validate a test for measuring Korean elementary and middle school students’ information and communications technology (ICT) literacy and to make suggestions for improving ICT literacy across Republic of Korea. To those ends, we conducted a literature review, consulted expert opinions, administered a pilot test to 1086 students, and ultimately developed and validated an ICT literacy test by measuring and analyzing the ICT literacy of approximately 15,000 students in Korea. Results indicated that the ICT literacy of elementary school students was low (i.e., an average of 19 out of 35 possible points) and that students in lower grades had lower average scores. Regarding abilities within ICT literacy, problem-solving and information analysis and evaluation were relatively high among elementary school students, whereas information organization and creation, computational thinking, information searches, and information communication were relatively low. Among middle school students, ICT literacy was also low (i.e., an average of 18 out of 35 possible points), and eighth-grade students demonstrated lower literacy than seventh- and ninth-grade students. Although the difference among those grades was minor, the gap in ICT literacy did become greater as students get older. Regarding abilities within ICT literacy, information utilization and management was high among middle school students, whereas all others were low, particularly computational thinking. Drawing from those findings, we recommend a few methods of improving the ICT literacy of elementary and middle school students in Korea.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Ahn, S. H., Kim, S. S., Nam, C. W., Kim, C. M., Kim, H. W., & Che, K. H. (2015). Research on ICT literacy level measurement for elementary and junior high school students in 2015. Daegu: Korea Education and Research Information Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahn, T. S., You, J. H., Goo, C. D., Kim, T. H., & Park, S. R. (2016). Research and analysis on the actual status of educational informatization in elementary and secondary schools in 2015. Daegu: Korea Education and Research Information Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainley, J., Fraillon, J., & Freeman, C. (2007). National assessment program: ICT literacy years 6 & 10 report 2005. Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs.

  • Annette, V. (2013). Understanding computer programming as a literacy. Literacy in Composition Studies, 1(2), 42–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bae, Y. K., Shin, S. K., Seo, J. W., & You, Y. J. (2017). Analysis of trends in overseas software education policy. Daegu: Korea Education and Research Information Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, D., Harrison, J., & Conery, L. (2011). Computational thinking: A digital age skill for everyone. Learning & Leading with Technology, 38(6), 20–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. Vancouver: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cha, S. E., Jun, S. J., Kwon, D. Y., Kim, H. S., Kim, S. B., Kim, J. M., et al. (2011). Measuring achievement of ICT competency for students in Korea. Computers & Education, 56(4), 990–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, H. S. (2014). Developing lessons and rubrics to promote computational thinking. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, 18(1), 57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Computer Science Teachers Association (CSTA) & Association for Computing Machinery, (2016). Revised 2016 CSTA K-12 Computer Science Standards. Retrieved August 22, 2017 from https://www.csteachers.org/page/Standards.

  • Department for Education (2013). National curriculum in England: computing programmes of study, Published 11 September 2013. Retrieved August 22, 2017 from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-computing-programmes-of-study.

  • Easterbrook, S. (2014). From computational thinking to systems thinking: A conceptual toolkit for sustainability computing. Proceedings of the 2nd international conference ICT for Sustainability, pp. 235–244.

  • Educational Testing Service. (2002). Digital transformation: A framework for ICT literacy. A report of international information and communication literacy panel. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement(IEA) (2016). The IEA’s International computer and information literacy study (ICILS) 2018: What’s next for IEA’s ICILS 2018. Retrieved August 22, 2017 from http://www.iea.nl/sites/default/files/studies/IEA%20ICILS%202018%20Computational%20Thinking%20Leaflet.pdf.

  • International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) & Computer Science Teachers Association (CSTA) (2011). Operational definition of computational thinking for k-12 education. Retrieved August 22, 2017 from http://www.iste.org/docs/ct-documents/computational-thinking-operational-definition-flyer.pdf.

  • Jeong, Y. S., Kim, K. S., Jeong, I. K., Kim, H. B., Kim, C., Yu, J. S., et al. (2015). A development of the software education curriculum model for elementary students. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, 19(4), 467–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jun, S., Han, S., Kim, H., & Lee, W. (2014). Assessing the computational literacy of elementary students on a national level in Korea. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 26(4), 319–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, G. H., Kang, S. K., Goo, C. D., Kim, S. Y., Kim, H. S., & Suh, S. M. (2017). Research and analysis on the actual status of educational informatization in elementary and secondary schools in 2016. Daegu: Korea Education and Research Information Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. S. (2016). A study of the direction for developing software education operating Guide. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 16(8), 529–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. H., Han, S. G., & Kim, H. C. (2009). How can we teach computational literacy to all levels of students? 2009 Fifth International Joint Conference on INC, IMS and IDC, pp. 1395–1400.

  • Kim, H. S., & Jun, S. J. (2017). Elementary teacher perceptions of evaluation methods about suitability and usefulness in software education. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, 21(3), 267–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. S., Kil, H. J., & Shin, A. N. (2014). An analysis of variables affecting the ICT literacy level of Korean elementary school students. Computers & Education, 77, 29–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. E., Kim, G. S., Kim, J. H., Kim, H., Yang, J. M., Lee, S. J., et al. (2015). Development of software education operation guideline. Daegu: Korea Education and Research Information Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. S., Kim, J. S., Kim, H. S., & Shin, A. N. (2017a). Korea’s educational informatization level through OECD PISA 2015 implications. Daegu: Korea Education and Research Information Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C. M., Lee, M. S., Ahn, S. H., Lim, H., & Kim, H. S. (2017b). In-depth analysis of ICT literacy level of elementary and junior high school students: 2007–2016. Daegu: Korea Education and Research Information Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. S., & Park, H. J. (2008). Korea’s educational informatization level through OECD PISA 2006 implications. Seoul: Korea Education and Research Information Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. M., Green, D. R., Mitzel, H. C., Baum, K., & Patz, R. J. (1998). The Bookmark procedure: Methodology and recent implementations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, San Diego, CA.

  • Lonsdale, M., & McCurry, D. (2004). Literacy in new millennium. Leabrook: National Centre for Vocational Education Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education (2014). 2014 basic education support project plan. Ministry of Education, Korea.

  • Ministry of Education (2015a). 2015 revised curriculum of Korea: Informatics curriculum. Ministry of Education, Korea.

  • Ministry of Education (2015b). 2015 revised curriculum of Korea: Practical Course and Technology Home Economics Curriculum. Korea. Ministry of Education, Korea.

  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. (2016). Improvement of guidelines for teaching and necessary measures of kindergarten, elementary school, junior high school, high school and special support in Japan. Retrieved August 22, 2017 from http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/shingi/chukyo/chukyo0/toushin/1380731.htm.

  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(2003). Feasibility study for the PISA ICT literacy assessment: Report to network A. Paris: OECD.

  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and equity in education. Retrieved August 22, 2017 from http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/education/pisa-2015-results-volume-i_9789264266490-en.WW8JCxXyiUkpage253.

  • Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1993). Mindstorms (Second Edition): Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, S. B., Kim, C., Park, N. J., Kim, K. S., Sung, Y. H., & Jeong, Y. S. (2016). Convergence organization strategies of the computational thinking in informatics curriculums. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, 20(6), 607–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedre, M., & Denning, P. J. (2016). The long quest for computational thinking. Proceedings of the 16th Koli Calling Conference on Computing Education Research, pp. 120–129.

  • Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 49(3), 33–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 366(1881), 3717–3725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Korea Education and Research Information Service (RR 2016-8).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chong Min Kim.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 21 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, H.S., Ahn, S.H. & Kim, C.M. A New ICT Literacy Test for Elementary and Middle School Students in Republic of Korea. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 28, 203–212 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0428-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0428-8

Keywords

Navigation