[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

An IoT based building health monitoring system supported by cloud

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Reliable Intelligent Environments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we have proposed a smart building health monitoring system to avoid unwanted mishaps. Some accidents take place with no warning. The work in this paper presents an internet of things (IoT) based building health monitoring (BHM) system. The system comprises Piezoelectric sensors, Arduino and ESP8266 Wi-Fi module. Piezoelectric sensor (PZT) is used to generate and receive Lamb waves and the received wave is further analyzed to determine the health of the concrete structure. The approach is unique and uses cloud and mobile app-based monitoring. There are two important features of the suggested system; it monitors the damage in concrete structure and uploads the data to the cloud server. The exclusive technique takes the help of cloud sever system for its favorable position of data usability, ease of access and disaster recuperation. This proposed system generates all details associated with structural health of a specific building and can inform to the responsible authority for corrective measures. So that it can avoid mishaps and save lives, money, and properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. IN (2015) G. Budget 2015: some of the things we’ve announced. GOV. UK

  2. Chen S, Xu H, Liu D, Hu B, Wang H (2014) A vision of IoT: applications, challenges, and opportunities with china perspective. IEEE Internet Things J 1:349–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Asian Development Bank. Urban Development (2019) https://www.adb.org/themes/urban-development/main. Accessed Nov 2019

  4. Dubbudu R (2019) Factly. https://factly.in/more-than-13000-lost-lives-in-structure-collapses-in-the-last-5-years. Accessed Nov 2019

  5. McCann D, Forde M (2001) Review of NDT methods in the assessment of concrete and masonry structures. NDT E Int 34:71–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Malhotra VM, Carino NJ (2003) Handbook on nondestructive testing of concrete. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Maierhofer C (2010) Planning a non-destructive test programme for reinforced concrete structures. In: Non-destructive evaluation of reinforced concrete structures. Woodhead Publishing, pp 3–13

  8. Dai D, He Q (2014) Structure damage localization with ultrasonic guided waves based on a time–frequency method. Signal Process 96:21–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Basharat A, Catbas N, Shah M (2005) A framework for intelligent sensor network with video camera for structural health monitoring of bridges. In: Third IEEE international conference on pervasive computing and communications workshops. IEEE, pp 385–389

  10. Boukabache H, Escriba C, Zedek S, Fourniols JY (2012) Structural health monitoring on metallic aircrafts using flexible and bulk PZT transducers: case of corrosion detection and crack localization. Stress 10:2d

    Google Scholar 

  11. Qatu KM, Abdelgawad A, Yelamarthi K (2016) Structure damage localization using a reliable wave damage detection technique. In: 2016 International conference on electrical, electronics, and optimization techniques (ICEEOT). IEEE, pp 1959–1962

  12. Deraemaeker A, Worden K (2012) New trends in vibration based structural health monitoring, vol 520. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mita A, Yokoi I (2000) Fiber Bragg grating accelerometer for structural health monitoring. In: Fifth international conference on motion and vibration control (MOVIC 2000), Sydney, Australia

  14. De Almeida V, Baptista F, Mendes L, Budoya D (2014) Experimental analysis of piezoelectric transducers for impedance-based structural health monitoring. In: International electronic conference on sensors and applications

  15. Shen Y, Giurgiutiu V (2012) Simulation of interaction between Lamb waves and cracks for structural health monitoring with piezoelectric wafer active sensors. In: ASME 2012 conference on smart materials, adaptive structures and intelligent systems. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection, pp 615–623

  16. Park S, Anton S, Kim J, Inman D, Ha D (2010) Instantaneous baseline structural damage detection using a miniaturized piezoelectric guided waves system. KSCE J Civ Eng 14(6):889–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu X, Cao J, Song WZ, Tang S (2012) Distributed sensing for high quality structural health monitoring using wireless sensor networks. In: 2012 IEEE 33rd real-time systems symposium. IEEE, pp 75–84

  18. Bhuiyan MZA, Wang G, Cao J, Wu J (2013) Deploying wireless sensor networks with fault-tolerance for structural health monitoring. IEEE Trans Comput 64:382–395

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Hackmann G, Guo W, Yan G, Sun Z, Lu C, Dyke S (2013) Cyber-physical codesign of distributed structural health monitoring with wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 25:63–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim S, Pakzad S, Culler D, Demmel J, Fenves G, Glaser S, Turon M (2007) Health monitoring of civil infrastructures using wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Information processing in sensor networks, pp 254–263

  21. Hu X, Wang B, Ji H (2013) A wireless sensor network-based structural health monitoring system for highway bridges. Comput Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 28:193–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Marzi H (2008) Modular neural network architecture for precise condition monitoring. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 57:805–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Malhi A, Yan R, Gao RX (2011) Prognosis of defect propagation based on recurrent neural networks. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 60:703–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Deng W, Xu J, Zhao H (2019) An improved ant colony optimization algorithm based on hybrid strategies for scheduling problem. IEEE Access 7:20281–20292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lazo C, Gallardo P, Céspedes S (2015) A bridge structural health monitoring system supported by the Internet of Things. In: IEEE colombian conference on communication and computing (IEEE COLCOM 2015). IEEE, pp 1–6

  26. Zhang H, Guo J, Xie X, Bie R, Sun Y (2013) Environmental effect removal based structural health monitoring in the internet of things. In: 2013 Seventh international conference on innovative mobile and internet services in ubiquitous computing. IEEE, pp 512–517

  27. Mateescu D, Han Y, Misra A (2007) Dynamics of structures with piezoelectric sensors and actuators for structural health monitoring. In: Key engineering materials, Trans Tech Publications, Zürich, pp 493–498

  28. Park G, Inman DJ (2016) Structural health monitoring using piezoelectric impedance measurements. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 365:373–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Duan WH, Wang Q, Quek ST (2010) Applications of piezoelectric materials in structural health monitoring and repair: selected research examples. Materials 3:5169–5194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Baptista F, Budoya D, Almeida V, Ulson J (2014) An experimental study on the effect of temperature on piezoelectric sensors for impedance based structural health monitoring. Sensors 14:1208–1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Guo H, Xiao G, Mrad N, Yao J (2011) Fiber optic sensors for structural health monitoring of air platforms. Sensors 11:3687–3705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Annamdas KKK, Annamdas VGM (2010) Review on developments in fiber optical sensors and applications. In: Fiber optic sensors and applications VII. International Society for Optics and Photonics, Bellingham, p 76770R

  33. Ye XW, Su YH, Han JP (2014) Structural health monitoring of civil infrastructure using optical fiber sensing technology: a comprehensive review. Sci World J 2014:11

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ramakrishnan M, Rajan G, Semenova Y, Farrell G (2016) Overview of fiber optic sensor technologies for strain/temperature sensing applications in composite materials. Sensors 16:99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Chung HC, Enomoto T, Shinozuka M, Chou P, Park C, Yokoi I, Morishita S (2004) Real time visualization of structural response with wireless MEMS sensors. In: Proceedings of 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, vol 121, pp 1–10

  36. Kumar J, Bajpai R (2012) Application of MEMS in bridge structures health monitoring. Int J Eng Innov Technol (IJEIT) 2(4)

  37. Tokognon CA, Gao B, Tian GY, Yan Y (2017) Structural health monitoring framework based on internet of things: a survey. IEEE Internet Things J 4:619–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Loh KJ, Lynch JP, Kotov NA (2007) Passive wireless strain and ph sensing using carbon nanotube-gold nano composite thin films. In: Sensors and smart structures technologies for civil, mechanical, and aerospace systems 2007. International Society for Optics and Photonics, Bellingham, p 652919

  39. Imam A, Tian GY (2016) Enhanced sensitivity of low frequency (LF) RFID sensor signal for structural health monitoring (SHM) in high temperature environment. In: Proceedings of the 19 world conference on non-destructive testing, Munich, Germany, pp 13–17

  40. Deivasigamani A, Daliri A, Wang C, John S (2013) A review of passive wireless sensors for structural health monitoring. Mod Appl Sci 7(57–76):2013

    Google Scholar 

  41. Park G, Inman DJ (2006) Structural health monitoring using piezoelectric impedance measurements. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 365:373–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Webb G, Vardanega PJ, Middleton CR (2014) Categories of shm deployments: technologies and capabilities. J Bridge Eng 20(04014118):2014

    Google Scholar 

  43. Heo G, Jeon J (2009) A smart monitoring system based on ubiquitous computing technique for infra-structural system: centering on identification of dynamic characteristics of self-anchored suspension bridge. KSCE J Civ Eng 13:333–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Pandey S, Haider M, Uddin N (2016) Design and implementation of a low-cost wireless platform for remote bridge health monitoring. Int J Emerg Technol Adv Eng 6:57–62

    Google Scholar 

  45. Panthati S, Kashyap A (2016) Design and implementation of structural health monitoring based on IoT using lab view. Int J Mag Eng Technol Manag Res 3:77–82

    Google Scholar 

  46. Gao Z, Du Y, Su M, Chen B (2006) Network sensor and its application in structure health monitoring system. In: First international conference on innovative computing, information and control-volume I (ICICIC’06), IEEE, pp 68–71

  47. Jiang XD, Tang YL, Lei Y (2009) Wireless sensor networks in structural health monitoring based on zigbee technology. In: 2009 3rd international conference on anti-counterfeiting, security, and identification in communication, IEEE, pp 449–452

  48. Zhao Z, Wu X, Zhang X, Zhao J, Li XY (2014) ZigBee vs WiFi: understanding issues and measuring performances of their coexistence. In: 2014 IEEE 33rd international performance computing and communications conference (IPCCC). IEEE, pp 1–8

  49. Izadpanah S, Rashed G, Sodagar S (2008) Using ultrasonic guided waves in evaluation of pipes. In: The 2nd international conference on technical inspection and NDT Oct 2008

  50. Eason G (1974) Wave propagation in elastic solids. J Sound Vib 34:575–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Birt EA (1998) Damage detection in carbon-fibre composites using ultrasonic lamb waves. Insight 40:335–339

    Google Scholar 

  52. Moreno E, Otero R, Arregi B, Galarza N, Rubio B (2013) Use of lamb wave’s high modes in weld testing. E-J Nondestr Test (NDT.net J). ISSN:1435–4934

  53. Agency IAE (1999) Ultrasonic testing of materials at level-2. Number 10 in training course series. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna. https://www.iaea.org/publications/5736/ultrasonic-testing-of-materials-at-level-2

  54. Badcock RA, Birt EA (2000) The use of 0-3 piezocomposite embedded Lamb wave sensors for detection of damage in advanced fibre composites. Smart Mater Struct 9(3):291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Diamanti K, Hodgkinson JM, Soutis C (2002) Damage detection of composite laminates using PZT generated Lamb waves. In: 1st European workshop on structural health monitoring, pp 398–405

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Siliguri Institute of Technology, Siliguri, West Bengal, India

    Debajyoti Misra

  2. Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Cooch Behar Government Engineering College, Cooch Behar, West Bengal, India

    Gautam Das

  3. Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Assam University, Silchar, Assam, India

    Debaprasad Das

Authors
  1. Debajyoti Misra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gautam Das
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Debaprasad Das
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debajyoti Misra.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Misra, D., Das, G. & Das, D. An IoT based building health monitoring system supported by cloud. J Reliable Intell Environ 6, 141–152 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40860-020-00107-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40860-020-00107-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation