[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Landslide susceptibility zonation in part of Tehri reservoir region using frequency ratio, fuzzy logic and GIS

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A comprehensive study for the identification of landslide susceptible zones using landslide frequency ratio and fuzzy logic in GIS environment is presented for Tehri reservoir rim region (Uttarakhand, India). Temporal remote sensing data was used to prepare important landslide causative factor layers and landslide inventory. Primary and secondary topographic attributes namely slope, aspect, relative relief, profile curvature, topographic wetness index, and stream power index, were derived from digital elevation model. Landslide frequency ratio technique was adopted to correlate factors with landslides. Further, fuzzy logic method was applied for the integration of factors (causative factor) to map landslide susceptible zones. Normalized landslide frequency ratio value was used for the fuzzy membership function and different fuzzy operators were considered for the preparation of landslide susceptibility/hazard index map. The factors considered in this study were found to be carrying a wide range of information. Accordingly, a methodology was evolved to integrate the factors using combined fuzzy gamma and fuzzy OR operation. Fuzzy gamma integration was performed for six different gamma values (range: 0–1). Gamma value of 0.95 was selected for the preparation of final susceptibility map. Landslide susceptibility index map was divided into the following five hazard zones – very low, low, moderate, high, and very high – on the basis of natural break classification. Validation of the model was performed by using cumulative percentage curve technique. Area under curve value of cumulative percentage curve of proposed landslide susceptibility map (gamma = 0.95) was found to be 0.834 and it can be said that 83.4% accuracy was achieved by applying combined fuzzy logic and landslide frequency ratio method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AHEC report for Uttarakhand government 2008 Impact of Tehri dam lessons learnt; www.iitr.ernet.in/centers/AHEC/pages/index.html.

  • Akgun A, Dag S and Bulut F 2008 Landslide susceptibility mapping for a landslide-prone area (Findikli, NE of Turkey) by likelihood-frequency ratio and weighted linear combination models; Environ. Geol. 54 1127–1143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anbalagan R 1992 Landslide hazard evaluation and zonation mapping in mountainous terrain; Eng. Geol. 32 269–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anbalagan R, Chakraborty D and Kohli A 2008 Landslide hazard zonation (LHZ) mapping on meso-scale for systematic town planning in mountainous terrain; J. Sci. Indus. Res. 67 486–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arora M K, Das Gupta A S and Gupta R P 2004 An artificial neural network approach for landslide hazard zonation in the Bhagirathi (Ganga) Valley, Himalayas; Int. J. Rem. Sens. 25 559–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayalew L and Yamagishi H 2005 The application of GIS based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda–Yahiko Mountains, central Japan; Geomorphology 65(1/2) 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begueria S 2006 Validation and evaluation of predictive models in hazard assessment and risk management; Nat. Hazards 37 315–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brabb E E 1984 Innovative approaches to landslide hazard mapping; In: Proceedings 4th International Symposium on Landslides, Toronto 1 307–324.

  • Carrara A, Cardinali M, Guzzeti F and Reichenbach P 1995 GIS technology in mapping landslide hazard; In: Geographical Information Systems in Assessing Natural hazards (eds) Carrara A and Guzzetti F (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers), pp. 135–175.

  • Chakraborty D and Anbalagan R 2008 Landslide hazard evaluation of road cut slopes along Uttarkashi–Bhatwari road, Uttaranchal Himalaya; J. Geol. Soc. India 71 115–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champatiray P K, Dimri S, Lakhera R C and Sati S 2007 Fuzzy-based method for landslide hazard assessment in active seismic zone of Himalaya; Landslides 4 101– 111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chauhan S, Mukta Sharma, Arora M K and Gupta N K 2010 Landslide susceptibility zonation through ratings derived from Artificial Neural Network; Int. J. Appl. Earth Observ. Geoinf. 12 340–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi K H, Park N W and Lee K 2002 Identification of landslide area using Remote Sensing Data and quantitative assessment of landslide hazard; Proc. IEEE Int. Geosci. Rem. Sens. Symp., 19 July Toronto, Canada.

  • Choi S W, Moon W M and S G 2000 Fuzzy logic fusion of W-Mo exploration data from Seobyeog-ri, Korea; Geosci. J. 4 (2) 43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung C F and Fabbiri A G 2002 Prediction models for landslide hazard zonation using a fuzzy set approach; In: Geomorphology & Environmental Impact Assesment (eds) Marchetti M and Rivas V, Balkema Publishers, pp. 31–47.

  • Clerici A, Perego S, Tellini C and Vescovi P 2002 A procedure for landslide susceptibility zonation by the conditional analysis method; Geomorphology 48 349–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahal R K, Hasegawa S, Nonomura S, Yamanaka M, Masuda T and Nishino K 2008 GIS-based weights-of-evidence modelling of rainfall-induced landslides in small catchments for landslide susceptibility mapping; Environ. Geol. 54 (2) 314–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das I, Sahoo S, Van Westen C J, Stein A and Hack R 2010 Landslide susceptibility assessment using logistic regression and its comparison with a rock mass classification system, along a road section in the northern Himalayas (India); Geomorphology 114 627–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das I, Stein A, Kerle N and Dadhwal 2012 Landslide susceptibility mapping along road corridors in the Indian Himalayas using Bayesian logistic regression models; Geomorphology 179 116–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ercanoglu M and Gokceoglu C 2002 Assessment of landslide susceptibility for a landslide-prone area (north of Yenice, NW Turkey) by fuzzy approach; Environ. Geol. 41 720–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ercanoglu M and Gokceoglu C 2004 Use of fuzzy relations to produce landslide susceptibility map of a landslide prone area (West Black Sea Region, Turkey); Eng. Geol. 75(3–4) 229–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ercanoglu M, Kasmer O and Temiz N 2008 Adaptation and comparison of expert opinion to analytical hierarchy process for landslide susceptibility mapping; Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 67 565–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESRI FAQ 2012 What is the Jenks optimization method? http://support.esri.com/en/knowledgebase/techarticles/detail/26442.

  • Ghosh S, Van Westen C J, Carranza E J M, Ghoshal T B, Sarkar N K and Surendranath M 2009 A quantitative approach for improving the BIS (Indian) method of medium-scale landslide susceptibility; J. Geol. Soc. India 74 (5) 625–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh S, Carranza E J M, van Westen C J, Jetten V G and Bhattacharya D N 2011 Selecting and weighting of spatial predictors for empirical modeling of landslide susceptibility in Darjeeling Himalaya (India); Geomorphology 131 35–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta R P, Saha A K, Arora M K and Kumar A 1999 Landslide hazard zonation in a part of the Bhagirathi Valley Garhwal Himalayas using integrated remote sensing–GIS; Him. Geol. 20 71–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Carrara A, Cardinali M and Reichenbach P 1999 Landslide hazard evaluation: A review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, central Italy; Geomorphology 31 181–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P, Cardinali M, Galli M and Ardizzone F 2005 Probabilistic landslide hazard assessment at the basin scale; Geomorphology 72 272–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasekiogullari G D and Ercanoglu M 2012 A new approach to use AHP in landslide susceptibility mapping: A case study at Yenice (Karabuk, NW Turkey); Nat. Hazards 63 1157–1179, doi: 10.1007/s11069-012-0218-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson J N 1995 Landslide hazard assessment; In: Proc. VI Int. Symp. on Landslides Christchurch 1 1805–1842.

  • Kanungo D P, Arora M K, Sarkar S and Gupta R P 2006 A comparative study of conventional, ANN black box, fuzzy and combined neural and fuzzy weighting procedures for landslide susceptibility zonation in Darjeeling Himalayas; Eng. Geol. 85 347–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanungo D P, Arora M K, Sarkar S and Gupta R P 2009a Landslide susceptibility zonation (LSZ) mapping – A review; J. South Asia Dis. Stu. 2 81–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanungo D P, Arora M K, Sarkar S and Gupta R P 2009b A fuzzy set based approach for integration of thematic maps for landslide susceptibility zonation; Georisk Assess. Manage. Risk Eng. Syst. Geohazards 3 (1) 30–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayastha P, Dhital M R and De Smedt F 2012 Landslide susceptibility mapping using weight of evidence in the Tinau watershed, Nepal; Nat. Hazards 63 (2) 479–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayastha P, Dhital M and De Smedt F 2013a Application of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for landslide susceptibility mapping: A case study from the Tinau Watershed, west Nepal; Comput. Geosci. 52 398–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayastha P, Bijukchhen S M, Dhital M and De Smedt F 2013b GIS based landslide susceptibility mapping using a fuzzy logic approach: A case study from Ghurmi-Dhad Khola area, eastern Nepal; J. Geol. Soc. India 82 249–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar R and Anbalagan R 2013 Pixel based terrain analysis for landslide hazard zonation, a case study of Tehri reservoir region, Uttarakhand, India; In: Geosci. Rem. Sens. Symp. (IGARSS), IEEE, Int., pp. 2868–2871.

  • Kundu S, Saha A K, Sharma D C and Pant C C 2013 Remote Sensing and GIS based landslide susceptibility assessment using binary logistic regression model: A case study in the Ganeshganga Watershed, Himalayas; J. Indian Soc. Rem. Sens. 41(3) 697–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S 2005 Application of logistic regression model and its validation for landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and remote sensing data; Int. J. Rem Sens. 26(7) 1477–1491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S and Sambath T 2006 Landslide susceptibility mapping in the Damrei Romel area, Cambodia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models; Environ. Geol. 50 847–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Choi J and Min K 2002 Landslide susceptibility analysis and verification using the Bayesian probability model; Environ. Geol. 43 120–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathew J, Jha V K and Rawat G S 2007 Weights of evidence modelling for landslide hazard zonation mapping in part of Bhagirathi valley, Uttarakhand; Curr. Sci. 92 (5) 628–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathew J, Jha V K and Rawat G S 2009 Landslide susceptibility zonation mapping and its validation in part of Garhwal Lesser Himalaya, India, using Binary Logistic Regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve method; Landslides 6 17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondal S and Maiti R 2012 Landslide susceptibility analysis of Shiv-Khola Watershed, Darjiling: A remote sensing and GIS based Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP); J. Indian Soc. Rem. Sens. 40(3) 483–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon W M 1998 Integration and fusion of geological exploration data: A theoretical review of fuzzy logic approach; Geosci. J. 2(4) 175–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagarajan R, Mukherjee A, Roy A and Khire M V 1998 Temporal remote sensing data and GIS application in landslide hazard zonation of part of Western Ghat, India; Int. J. Rem. Sens. 19(4) 573–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pachauri A K and Pant M 1992 Landslide hazard mapping based on geological attributes; Eng. Geol. 32(1–2) 81–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poudyal C P, Chang C, Oh H and Lee S 2010 Landslide susceptibility maps comparing frequency ratio and artificial neural networks: A case study from the Nepal Himalaya; Environ. Earth Sci. 61 1049–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi H R, Goli Jirandeh A, Pradhan B, Xu C and Gokceoglu C 2013 Landslide susceptibility mapping using support vector machine and GIS; J. Earth Syst. Sci. 122(2) 349–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B 2010 Application of an advanced fuzzy logic model for landslide susceptibility analysis; Int. J. Comput. Intel. Sys. 3(3) 370–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B and Lee S 2010 Delineation of landslide hazard areas on Penang Island, Malaysia, by using frequency ratio, logistic regression and artificial neural network models; Environ. Earth Sci. 60 1037–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Lee S and Buchroithner M F 2009 Use of geospatial data and fuzzy algebraic operators to landslide-hazard mapping; Applied Geomatics 1 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Lee S and Buchroithner M 2010 Remote sensing and GIS-based landslide susceptibility analysis and its cross-validation in three test areas using a frequency ratio model; Photogram. Fernerkundung GeoInf. 1 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha A K, Gupta R P and Arora M K 2002 GIS-based landslide hazard zonation in a part of the Himalayas; Int. J. Rem. Sens. 23 (2) 357–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha A K, Gupta R P, Sarkar I, Arora M K and Csaplovics E 2005 An approach for GIS-based statistical landslide susceptibility zonation with a case study in the Himalayas; Landslides 2 61–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar S and Kanungo D P 2004 An integrated approach for landslide susceptibility mapping using remote sensing and GIS; Photogram. Eng. Rem. Sens. 70(5) 617– 625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar S, Kanungo D P, Kumar P and Patra A K 2008 GIS based spatial data analysis for landslide susceptibility mapping; J. Math. Sci. 5 52–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma S, Raghuvanshi T and Anbalagan R 1994 Plane failure analysis of rock slopes; Geotec. Geol. Eng. Int. J. 13 105–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh T N, Gulati A, Dontha L K and Bharadwaj V 2008 Evaluating cut slope failure by numerical analysis – a case study; Nat. Hazards 47 263–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soeters R and Van Westen C J 1996 Slope stability: Recognition, analysis and zonation; In: Landslides: investigation and mitigation (eds) Turner A and Shuster R (Washington D C: National Academy Press), pp. 129–177.

  • Valdiya K S 1980 Geology of Kumaun Lesser Himalaya; Dehradun: Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology; Interim Report 291.

  • Van Westen C J, Rengers N and Soeters R 2003 Use of geomorphological information in indirect landslide susceptibility assessment; Nat. Hazards 30 399– 419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Westen C J, Van Asch T W J and Soeters R 2006 Landslide hazard and risk zonation – why is it still so difficult? Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 65 167–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varnes D J 1984 International Association of Engineering Geology Commission on Landslides and Other Mass Movements on Slopes: Landslide Hazard Zonation: A Review of Principles and Practice; Paris: UNESCO, 63p.

  • Watershed Management Directorate, Dehradun 2009 Report on Uttarakhand State perspective and strategic planning 2009–2027, file:///D:/For%20review/UTTAR AKHAND%20SOIL.pdf.

  • Wilson J 2011 Digital terrain modelling; Geomorphology 5 269–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yalcin A 2008 GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process and bivariate statistics in Ardesen (Turkey): Comparisons of results and confirmations; Catena 72 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz I 2009 Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, logistic regression, artificial neural networks and their comparison: A case study from Kat landslides (Tokat, Turkey); Comput. Geosci. 35(6) 1125–1138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh L A 1965 Fuzzy sets; Inf. Control 8 253–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann H J 1996 Fuzzy set theory and its applications; Kluwer Academic Publishers, 435p.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Earth Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India

    Rohan Kumar & R Anbalagan

Authors
  1. Rohan Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R Anbalagan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rohan Kumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, R., Anbalagan, R. Landslide susceptibility zonation in part of Tehri reservoir region using frequency ratio, fuzzy logic and GIS. J Earth Syst Sci 124, 431–448 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-015-0536-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-015-0536-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation