[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Entrepreneurial ecosystem research: present debates and future directions

  • Published:
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to review the emerging research on entrepreneurial ecosystem and to guide future research into this promising area. The study presents a critical review on the entrepreneurial ecosystem, starting from its very definition and antecedents. Combining prior research with building on the main concepts that constitute an entrepreneurial ecosystem, we have developed an original set of guidelines that can help scholars and practitioners seeking an answer to the following pressing question: “How can we gain a comprehensive understanding of an entrepreneurial ecosystem?”. We will then discuss the opportunities for expanding our current knowledge on entrepreneurial ecosystems and describe the current debates and directions for future research. Lastly, we will provide guidelines that policymakers may take into consideration when designing and issuing support measures to promote entrepreneurship in their local ecosystems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Being entrepreneurial is defined as exploring, evaluating and exploiting opportunities for creating new goods and services (Schumpeter 1934; Shane and Venkataraman 2000).

  2. Entrepreneurial intention is defined as the conscious state of mind that directs personal attention, experience and behaviour towards planned entrepreneurial behaviour (Bird 1988)

References

  • Acs, Z. J., Autio, E., & Szerb, L. (2014). National systems of entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications. Research Policy, 43(3), 476–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., & Licht, G. (2016). National systems of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 46(4), 527–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J., Estrin, S., Mickiewicz, T., & Szerb, L. (2017a). Institutions, entrepreneurship and growth: the role of national entrepreneurial ecosystems.

  • Acs, Z. J., Stam, E., Audretsch, D. B., & O’Connor, A. (2017b). The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach. Small Business Economics, 1–10.

  • Adams, R., Jeanrenaud, S., Bessant, J., Denyer, D., & Overy, P. (2016). Sustainability-oriented innovation: a systematic review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(2), 180–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, R. J., Smart, P., & Huff, A. S. (2017). Shades of grey: guidelines for working with the grey literature in systematic reviews for management and organizational studies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(4), 432–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: an actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 306–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alchian, A. A. (1950). Uncertainty, evolution, and economic theory. Journal of Political Economy, 58(3), 211–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvedalen, J., & Boschma, R. (2017). A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: towards a future research agenda. European Planning Studies, 25(6), 887–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L., Varga, A., & Acs, Z. (1997). Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. Journal of Urban Economics, 42(3), 422–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aoyama, Y. (2009). Entrepreneurship and regional culture: The case of Hamamatsu and Kyoto, Japan. Regional Studies, 43(3), 495–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arıkan, A. T., & Schilling, M. A. (2011). Structure and governance in industrial districts: implications for competitive advantage. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 772–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asheim, B. T., Smith, H. L., & Oughton, C. (2011). Regional innovation systems: theory, empirics and policy. Regional Studies, 45(7), 875–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2017). Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: establishing the framework conditions. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), 1030–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Link, A. N. (2017). Embracing an entrepreneurial ecosystem: an analysis of the governance of research joint ventures. Small Business Economics, 1–8.

  • Auerswald, P. E. (2015). Enabling entrepreneurial ecosystems: Insights from ecology to inform effective entrepreneurship policy.

  • Auerswald, P. E., & Dani, L. (2017). The adaptive life cycle of entrepreneurial ecosystems: the biotechnology cluster. Small Business Economics, 1–21.

  • Autio, E., & Levie, J. (2015). Management of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Mimeo: Imperial College Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E., & Thomas, L. (2014). Innovation ecosystems. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management, 204–288.

  • Autio, E., Kenney, M., Mustar, P., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2014). Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context. Research Policy, 43(7), 1097–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E., Nambisan, S., Thomas, L. D., & Wright, M. (2017). Digital Affordances, Spatial Affordances, and the Genesis of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems.

  • Bahrami, H., & Evans, S. (1995). Flexible re-cycling and high-technology entrepreneurship. California Management Review, 37(3), 62–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlas, Y. (2007). Leverage points to march “upward from the aimless plateau”. System Dynamics Review, 23(4), 469–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barreto, I. (2010). Dynamic capabilities: A review of past research and an agenda for the future. Journal of Management, 36(1), 256–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell-Masterson, J., & Stangler, D. (2015). Measuring an entrepreneurial ecosystem.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ben Letaifa, S., & Reynoso, J. (2015). Toward a service ecosystem perspective at the base of the pyramid. Journal of Service Management, 26(5), 684–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhawe, N., & Zahra, S. A. (2017). Inducing heterogeneity in local entrepreneurial ecosystems: the role of MNEs. Small Business Economics, 1–18.

  • Bird, B. (1988). Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: The case for intention. Academy of management Review, 13(3), 442–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borissenko, J., & Boschma, R. (2017). A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: towards a future research agenda (No. 2017/3). Lund University, CIRCLE-Center for Innovation, Research and Competences in the Learning Economy.

  • Boschma, R. (2015). Towards an evolutionary perspective on regional resilience. Regional Studies, 49(5), 733–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., & Mason, C. (2017). Looking inside the spiky bits: a critical review and conceptualisation of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 11–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., Gregson, G., & Mason, C. (2016). A post-mortem of regional innovation policy failure: Scotland's Intermediate Technology Initiative (ITI). Regional Studies, 50(7), 1260–1272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, K., Bosma, N., Sanders, M., & Schramm, M. (2017). Searching for the existence of entrepreneurial ecosystems: a regional cross-section growth regression approach. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 31–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavallo, A., Ghezzi, A., Colombelli, A., & Casali, G. L. (2018). Agglomeration dynamics of innovative start-ups in Italy beyond the industrial district era. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1–24.

  • Chapin, F. S., Matson, P. A., & Mooney, H. A. (2002). Terrestrial decomposition (pp. 151–175). Springer New York.

  • Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Bruneel, J., & Mahajan, A. (2014). Creating value in ecosystems: Crossing the chasm between knowledge and business ecosystems. Research Policy, 43(7), 1164–1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B. (2006). Sustainable valley entrepreneurial ecosystems. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B., & Muñoz, P. (2016). The Emergence of the Urban Entrepreneur: How the Growth of Cities and the Sharing Economy Are Driving a New Breed of Innovators: How the Growth of Cities and the Sharing Economy Are Driving a New Breed of Innovators. ABC-CLIO.

  • Colombelli, A., Paolucci, E., & Ughetto, E. (2017). Hierarchical and relational governance and the life cycle of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Business Economics, 1–17.

  • Colombo, M. G., & Grilli, L. (2010). On growth drivers of high-tech start-ups: Exploring the role of founders' human capital and venture capital. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(6), 610–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, M. G., & Murtinu, S. (2017). Venture capital investments in Europe and portfolio firms' economic performance: Independent versus corporate investors. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 26(1), 35–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, M. G., Dagnino, G. B., Lehmann, E. E., & Salmador, M. (2017). The governance of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Business Economics, 1–10.

  • Cooke, P. (Ed.). (2016). Routledge Revivals: Localities (1989): The Changing Face of Urban Britain. Routledge.

  • Cooke, P., Uranga, M. G., & Etxebarria, G. (1997). Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research policy, 26(4-5), 475–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croce, A., Guerini, M., & Ughetto, E. (2016). Angel Financing and the Performance of High-Tech Start-Ups. Journal of Small Business Management.

  • Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of the species by natural selection.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P., Delmar, F., & Wiklund, J. (2006). Entrepreneurship and the Growth of Firms. Edward Elgar Publishing.

  • Davila, A., Foster, G., & Gupta, M. (2003). Venture capital financing and the growth of startup firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(6), 689–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Massis, A., Frattini, F., & Lichtenthaler, U. (2013). Research on technological innovation in family firms: Present debates and future directions. Family Business Review, 26(1), 10–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, M., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2010). Clusters and entrepreneurship. Journal of Economic Geography, 10(4), 495–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Stefano, G., Peteraf, M., & Verona, G. (2010). Dynamic capabilities deconstructed: a bibliographic investigation into the origins, development, and future directions of the research domain. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(4), 1187–1204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drejeris, R. (2015). Entrepreneurship ecosystem: methodological approaches to functions' review of public sector institutions. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 2(3), 118–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubina, I. N., Campbell, D. F., Carayannis, E. G., Chub, A. A., Grigoroudis, E., & Kozhevina, O. V. (2017). The Balanced Development of the Spatial Innovation and Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Based on Principles of the Systems Compromise: A Conceptual Framework. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 8(2), 438–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubini, P. (1989). The influence of motivations and environment on business start-ups: Some hints for public policies. Journal of Business Venturing, 4(1), 11–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, S., & Folta, T. B. (2016). A comparison of the effect of angels and venture capitalists on innovation and value creation. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(1), 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erina, I., Shatrevich, V., & Gaile-Sarkane, E. (2017). Impact of stakeholder groups on development of a regional entrepreneurial ecosystem. European Planning Studies, 25(5), 755–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D. S., & Schmalensee, R. (2016). Matchmakers: the new economics of multisided platforms. Harvard Business Review Press.

  • Feld, B. (2012). Startup communities: Building an entrepreneurial ecosystem in your city. John Wiley & Sons.

  • Feldman, M. P. (2001). The entrepreneurial event revisited: firm formation in a regional context. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 861–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felekoglu, B., & Moultrie, J. (2013). Top Management Involvement in New Product Development: A Review and Synthesis. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(1), 159–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R., Adler, P., & Mellander, C. (2017). The city as innovation machine. Regional Studies, 51(1), 86–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. W. (1970). Urban dynamics. IMR; Industrial Management Review (pre-1986), 11(3), 67.

  • Forrester, J. W. (2007). System dynamics—a personal view of the first fifty years. System Dynamics Review, 23(2–3), 345–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J. H., & Audia, P. G. (2006). Community ecology and the sociology of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 145–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, M. (2013). New business formation and regional development: A survey and assessment of the evidence. Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, 9(3), 249–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W. B. (1985). A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 696–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghaffarzadegan, N., Lyneis, J., & Richardson, G. P. (2011). How small system dynamics models can help the public policy process. System Dynamics Review, 27(1), 22–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghezzi, A., Gabelloni, D., Martini, A., & Natalicchio, A. (2017). Crowdsourcing: a review and suggestions for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews.

  • Grimaldi, R., & Grandi, A. (2005). Business incubators and new venture creation: an assessment of incubating models. Technovation, 25(2), 111–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurevitch, J., Scheiner, S. M., & Fox, G. A. (2006). The ecology of plants (No. QK 901. G87 2006). Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, R., & Autio, E. (2011). A failure trichotomy in knowledge exploration and exploitation. Research Policy, 40(6), 819–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gnyawali, D. R., & Fogel, D. S. (1994). Environments for entrepreneurship development: key dimensions and research implications. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 18(4), 43–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R. T., & Leitch, C. (2010). Voodoo institution or entrepreneurial university? Spin-off companies, the entrepreneurial system and regional development in the UK. Regional Studies, 44(9), 1241–1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J. R., Lin, Z., Carroll, G. R., & Carley, K. M. (2007). Simulation modeling in organizational and management research. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1229–1245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, M. L., Shepherd, D. A., & Griffin, D. (2006). A hubris theory of entrepreneurship. Management Science, 52(2), 160–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrekson, M., & Sanandaji, T. (2014). Small business activity does not measure entrepreneurship. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(5), 1760–1765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskisson, R. E., Yiu, D., & Kim, H. (2004). Corporate governance systems: Effects of capital and labor market congruency on corporate innovation and global competitiveness. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 15(2), 293–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang-Saad, A., Fay, J., & Sheridan, L. (2016). Closing the divide: accelerating technology commercialization by catalyzing the university entrepreneurial ecosystem with I-Corps™. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1–21.

  • Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). Strategy as ecology. Harvard Business Review, 82(3), 68–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isenberg, D. J. (2010). How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Business Review, 88(6), 40–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isenberg, D. (2011). The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: Principles for cultivating entrepreneurship. Presentation at the Institute of International and European Affairs.

  • Isenberg, D., & Onyemah, V. (2016). Fostering Scaleup Ecosystems for Regional Economic Growth (Innovations Case Narrative: Manizales-Mas and Scale Up Milwaukee). Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 11(1-2), 60–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johannisson, B. (2011). Towards a practice theory of entrepreneuring. Small Business Economics, 36(2), 135–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, K., Eun, J. H., & Lee, S. H. (2017). Exploring competing perspectives on government-driven entrepreneurial ecosystems: lessons from Centres for Creative Economy and Innovation (CCEI) of South Korea. European Planning Studies, 25(5), 827–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazanjian, R. K. (1988). Relation of dominant problems to stages of growth in technology-based new ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 31(2), 257–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, M., & Patton, D. (2005). Entrepreneurial geographies: Support networks in three high-technology industries. Economic Geography, 81(2), 201–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, C., Hao, H., Alderman, D., Kleckley, J. W., & Gray, S. (2014). A spatial analysis of tourism, entrepreneurship and the entrepreneurial ecosystem in North Carolina, USA. Tourism Planning & Development, 11(3), 305–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, N. F., Reilly, M. D., & Carsrud, A. L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5), 411–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kshetri, N. (2014). Developing successful entrepreneurial ecosystems: Lessons from a comparison of an Asian tiger and a Baltic tiger. Baltic Journal of Management, 9(3), 330–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko, D. F., Fisher, G., Bloodgood, J. M., & Hornsby, J. S. (2017). The paradox of new venture legitimation within an entrepreneurial ecosystem. Small Business Economics, 1–22.

  • Letaifa, S. B., & Rabeau, Y. (2013). Too close to collaborate? How geographic proximity could impede entrepreneurship and innovation. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 2071–2078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mack, E. A., & Mayer, H. (2016). The evolutionary dynamics of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Urban Studies, 53(10), 2118–2133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mack, E. A., & Qian, H. (2016). Geographies of Entrepreneurship. Routledge.

  • Malecki, E. J. (1997). Entrepreneurs, networks, and economic development: A review of recent research. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, 3, 57–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malecki, E. J. (2011). Connecting local entrepreneurial ecosystems to global innovation networks: open innovation, double networks and knowledge integration. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 14(1), 36–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maritz, A., Jones, C., & Shwetzer, C. (2015). The status of entrepreneurship education in Australian universities. Education+ Training, 57(8/9), 1020–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markley, D. M., Lyons, T. S., & Macke, D. W. (2015). Creating entrepreneurial communities: building community capacity for ecosystem development. Community Development, 46(5), 580–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, A. (1999). Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence, policy distance: the case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies. Regional Studies, 33(9), 869–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mars, M. M., Bronstein, J. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2012). The value of a metaphor: Organizations and ecosystems. Organizational Dynamics, 41(4), 271–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. (1920). Industry and trade: a study of industrial technique and business organization; and of their influences on the conditions of various classes and nations. Macmillan.

  • Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2003). Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea? Journal of Economic Geography, 3(1), 5–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, C., & Brown, R. (2013). Creating good public policy to support high-growth firms. Small Business Economics, 40(2), 211–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, C., & Brown, R. (2014). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship. Final Report to OECD, Paris, 30(1), 77–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, K., Zappe, S., Brannon, M. L., & Zhao, Y. (2016). An Educational and Entrepreneurial Ecosystem to Actualize Technology-Based Social Ventures. Advances in Engineering Education, 5(1), n1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. J., & Acs, Z. J. (2017). The campus as entrepreneurial ecosystem: the University of Chicago. Small Business Economics, 1–21.

  • Molles, M. C. M. C. (2002). Ecology: concepts and applications (No. Sirsi) i9780070294165).

  • Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motoyama, Y., & Knowlton, K. (2017). Examining the connections within the startup ecosystem: A Case Study of St. Louis. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 7(1).

  • Nambisan, S., & Baron, R. A. (2013). Entrepreneurship in innovation ecosystems: entrepreneurs' selfregulatory processes and their implications for new venture success. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(5), 1071–1097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Napier, G., & Hansen, C. (2011). Ecosystems for young scalable firms. FORA Group.

  • Neck, H. M., Meyer, G. D., Cohen, B., & Corbett, A. C. (2004). An entrepreneurial system view of new venture creation. Journal of Small Business Management, 42(2), 190–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson Richard, R., & Winter Sidney, G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumeyer, X., He, S., & Santos, S. C. (2017, June). The social organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. In Technology & Engineering Management Conference (TEMSCON), 2017 IEEE (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

  • Nylund, P. A., & Cohen, B. (2017). Collision density: driving growth in urban entrepreneurial ecosystems. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(3), 757–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obschonka, M., Silbereisen, R. K., & Schmitt-Rodermund, E. (2010). Entrepreneurial intention as developmental outcome. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(1), 63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pena, I. (2004). Business incubation centers and new firm growth in the Basque country. Small Business Economics, 22(3–4), 223–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennings, J. M. (1982). The urban quality of life and entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Journal, 25(1), 63–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitelis, C. (2012). Clusters, entrepreneurial ecosystem co-creation, and appropriability: a conceptual framework. Industrial and Corporate Change, 21(6), 1359–1388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77–90. Boston.

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2003). The new frontier of experience innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(4), 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruyt, E. (2013). Small system dynamics models for big issues: Triple jump towards real-world complexity.

  • Pyke, F., Becattini, G., & Sengenberger, W. (Eds.). (1990). Industrial districts and inter-firm co-operation in Italy. International Institute for Labour Studies.

  • Qian, H., Acs, Z. J., & Stough, R. R. (2012). Regional systems of entrepreneurship: the nexus of human capital, knowledge and new firm formation. Journal of Economic Geography, 13(4), 559–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. B. (1979). Technological innovation, entrepreneurship, and strategy. Sloan Management Review (pre-1986), 20(3), 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, M. P., Fetters, M. L., & Greene, P. G. (2014). University-based entrepreneurship ecosystems: a global study of six educational institutions. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 18(5–6), 481–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritsilä, J. J. (1999). Regional differences in environments for enterprises. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 11(3), 187–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, E. B., & Eesley, C. E. (2011). Entrepreneurial impact: The role of MIT. Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, 7(1–2), 1–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roundy, P. T., Brockman, B. K., & Bradshaw, M. (2017). The resilience of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 8, 99–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional networks: industrial adaptation in Silicon Valley and route 128.

  • Schramm, C.J. (2004). Building entrepreneurial economies. Foreign Affairs, 104-115.

  • Schulze, E. D., Beck, E., & Müller Hohenstein, K. (2005). Plant ecology (No. 581.7 S386).

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1911). Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, Leipzig 1911: Duncker & Humblot; revised English edition: The Theory of Economic Development.

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The schumpttr: theory economic development. Harvard University Press.

  • Shane, S. A. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship: The individual-opportunity nexus. Edward Elgar Publishing.

  • Shane, S. A. (2009). Technology strategy for managers and entrepreneurs. Prentice Hall.

  • Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simatupang, T. M., Schwab, A., & Lantu, D. C. (2015). Building sustainable entrepreneurship ecosystems.

  • Smith, T. M., Smith, R. L., & Waters, I. (2012). Elements of ecology. San Francisco: Benjamin Cummings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson, O., & Audia, P. G. (2000). The social structure of entrepreneurial activity: Geographic concentration of footwear production in the United States, 1940–1989. American Journal of Sociology, 106(2), 424–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spigel, B. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spilling, O. R. (1996). The entrepreneurial system: On entrepreneurship in the context of a mega-event. Journal of Business Research, 36(1), 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: a sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759–1769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stam, W., & Elfring, T. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation and new venture performance: The moderating role of intra-and extraindustry social capital. Academy of Management Journal, 51(1), 97–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stam, F. C., & Spigel, B. (2016). Entrepreneurial ecosystems. USE Discussion paper series, 16(13).

  • Stam, E., Bosma, N., Van Witteloostuijn, A., De Jong, J., Bogaert, S., Edwards, N., & Jaspers, F. (2012). Ambitious entrepreneurship. A review of the academic literature and new directions for public policy, AWT report, 41.

  • Sterman, J. D. J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world (No. HD30. 2 S7835 2000).

  • Sterman, J. D. (2001). System Dynamics Modeling. California Management Review, 43(4), 8.

  • Steyaert, C., & Katz, J. (2004). Reclaiming the space of entrepreneurship in society: geographical, discursive and social dimensions. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 16(3), 179–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sussan, F., & Acs, Z. J. (2017). The digital entrepreneurial ecosystem. Small Business Economics, 1–19.

  • Szerb, L., Aidis, R., & Acs, Z. J. (2013). The comparison of the global entrepreneurship monitor and the global entrepreneurship and development index methodologies. Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, 9(1), 1–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tansley, A. G. (1935). The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology, 16(3), 284–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theodoraki, C., & Messeghem, K. (2017). Exploring the entrepreneurial ecosystem in the field of entrepreneurial support: a multi-level approach. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 31(1), 47–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, B. (1991). Alfred Marshall on economic biology. Review of Political Economy, 3(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsvetkova, A. (2015). Innovation, entrepreneurship, and metropolitan economic performance: empirical test of recent theoretical propositions. Economic Development Quarterly, 29(4), 299–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urbinati, A., Chiaroni, D., Chiesa, V., & Frattini, F. (2018). The role of digital technologies in open innovation processes: an exploratory multiple case study analysis. R&D Management, forthcoming.

  • Van de Ven, H. (1993). The development of an infrastructure for entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(3), 211–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, W., Ponthieu, L., & Doster, J. (1995). Business owner-managers' descriptions of entrepreneurship: A content analysis. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 8(1), 33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WEF. (2013). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems Around the Globe and Company Growth Dynamics. World Economic Forum: Davos.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, J., & Bogers, M. (2013). Leveraging external sources of innovation: A review of research on open innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management.

  • Williamson, P. J., & De Meyer, A. (2012). Ecosystem advantage. California Management Review, 55(1), 24–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, P. K., Ho, Y. P., & Autio, E. (2005). Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth: Evidence from GEM data. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 335–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yearworth, M. (2010, July). Inductive modelling of an entrepreneurial system. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Seoul, Korea (pp. 25-29).

  • Yun, J. J., Won, D., Park, K., Yang, J., & Zhao, X. (2017). Growth of a platform business model as an entrepreneurial ecosystem and its effects on regional development. European Planning Studies, 25(5), 805–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A. (2007). Contextualizing theory building in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(3), 443–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., & Nambisan, S. (2011). Entrepreneurship in global innovation ecosystems. AMS review, 1(1), 4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., & Wright, M. (2011). Entrepreneurship's next act. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(4), 67–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., Wright, M., & Abdelgawad, S. G. (2014). Contextualization and the advancement of entrepreneurship research. International Small Business Journal, 32(5), 479–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011). The business model: recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1019–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Editor in Chief and the anonymous Reviewers, who helped significantly enhancing the study’s contributions. We are also immensely grateful to Per Davidsson, Dean A. Shepherd, Jasmina Berbegal-Mirabent and Stephen Cox for sharing their knowledge and experience with us during the course of this research. Any errors remain our own.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Politecnico di Milano, Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Via Lambruschini, 4/B, 20156, Milan, Italy

    Angelo Cavallo, Antonio Ghezzi & Raffaello Balocco

Authors
  1. Angelo Cavallo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Antonio Ghezzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Raffaello Balocco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angelo Cavallo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cavallo, A., Ghezzi, A. & Balocco, R. Entrepreneurial ecosystem research: present debates and future directions. Int Entrep Manag J 15, 1291–1321 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-018-0526-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-018-0526-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation