[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Weakly-Supervised Cross-Domain Dictionary Learning for Visual Recognition

  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Vision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We address the visual categorization problem and present a method that utilizes weakly labeled data from other visual domains as the auxiliary source data for enhancing the original learning system. The proposed method aims to expand the intra-class diversity of original training data through the collaboration with the source data. In order to bring the original target domain data and the auxiliary source domain data into the same feature space, we introduce a weakly-supervised cross-domain dictionary learning method, which learns a reconstructive, discriminative and domain-adaptive dictionary pair and the corresponding classifier parameters without using any prior information. Such a method operates at a high level, and it can be applied to different cross-domain applications. To build up the auxiliary domain data, we manually collect images from Web pages, and select human actions of specific categories from a different dataset. The proposed method is evaluated for human action recognition, image classification and event recognition tasks on the UCF YouTube dataset, the Caltech101/256 datasets and the Kodak dataset, respectively, achieving outstanding results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. http://www.flickr.com/

  2. http://www.youtube.com/

  3. http://research.microsoft.com/~zliu/ActionRecoRsrc

References

  • Aharon, M., Elad, M., & Bruckstein, A. (2006). K-SVD: An algorithm for designing overcomplete dictionaries for sparse representation. IEEE Transaction on Signal Processing, 54(11), 4311–4322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgwardt, K. M., Gretton, A., Rasch, M. J., Kriegel, H. P., Schölkopf, B., & Smola, A. J. (2006). Integrating structured biological data by kernel maximum mean discrepancy. Bioinformatices, 22, e49– e57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boureau, Y., Bach, F., LeCun, Y., & Ponce, J. (2010). Learning mid-level features for recognition. CVPR.

  • Cao, L., Liu, Z., & Huang, T. S. (2010). Cross-dataset action detection. CVPR.

  • Cao, X., Wang, Z., Yan, P., & Li, X. (2013). Transfer learning for pedestrian detection. Neurocomputing, 100, 51–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S. S., Donoho, L. D., & Saunders, A. M. (1993). Atomic decomposition by basis pursuit. IEEE Transaction on Signal Processing, 41(12), 3397–3415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalal, N., & Triggs, B. (2005). Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. CVPR.

  • Dalal, N., Triggs, B., & Schmid, C. (2006). Human detection using oriented histograms of flow and appearance. ECCV.

  • Daumé III, Hal, Frustratingly easy domain adaptation, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 256–263 (2007).

  • Dikmen, M., Ning, H., Lin, D. J., Cao, L., Le, V., Tsai, S. F., et al. (2008). Surveillance event detection. TRECVID Video Evaluation Workshop.

  • Dollár, P., Rabaud, V., Cottrell, G., & Belongie, S. (2005). Behavior recognition via sparse spatio-temporal features, IEEE International Workshop on Visual Surveillance and Performance Evaluation of Tracking and Surveillance, pp. 65–72 .

  • Duan, L., Tsang, I. W., & Xu, D. (2012). Domain transfer multiple kernel learning. IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 34, 465–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan, L., Tsang, I. W., Xu, D., & Maybank, J. S. (2009). Domain transfer svm for video concept detection. CVPR.

  • Duan, L., Xu, D., Tsang, I. W., & Luo, J. (2012). Visual event recognition in videos by learning from web data. IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 34, 1667–1680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duchenne, O., Laptev, I., Sivic, J., Bach, F., & Ponce, J. (2009). Automatic annotation of human actions in video. ICCV.

  • Fei-Fei, L. (2006). Knowledge transfer in learning to recognize visual objects classes. ICDL.

  • Fei-Fei, L., Fergus, R., & Perona, P. (2007). Learning generative visual models from few training examples. An incremental bayesian approach tested on 101 object categories. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 106, 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, X., Wang, X., Li, X., & Tao, D. (2011). Transfer latent variable model based on divergence analysis. Pattern Recognition, 44, 2358–2366.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, A., Illingworth, J., & Bowden, R. (2011). Action recognition using mined hierarchical compound features. IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 33, 883–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golub, G., Hansen, P., & O’Leary, D. (1999). Tikhonov regularization and total least squares. Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, 21(1), 185–194.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gregor, K., & LeCun, Y. (2010). ICML: Learning fast approximations of sparse coding. New York: Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, G., Holub, A., & Perona, P. (2007). Caltech-256 object category dataset, CIT Technical Report 1694.

  • Ikizler-Cinbis, N., Sclaroff, S. (2010). Object, scene and actions: Combining multiple features for human action recognition. ECCV.

  • Jégou, H., Douze, M., & Schmid, C. (2010). Improving bag-of-features for large scale image search. International Journal of Computer Vision, 87, 316–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji, S., Xu, W., Yang, M., & Yu, K. (2013). 3D convolutional neural networks for human action recognition. IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 35, 221–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Z., Lin, Z., & Davis, L. S. (2011) Learning a discriminative dictionary for sparse coding via label consistent K-SVD. CVPR.

  • Junejo, I. N., Dexter, E., Laptev, I., & Pérez, P. (2011). View-independent action recognition from temporal self-similarities. IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 33, 172–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuehne, H., Jhuang, H., Garrote, E., Poggio, & T., Serre, T. (2011). HMDB: A large video database for human motion recognition. ICCV.

  • Kullback, S. (1987). The kullback-leibler distance. The American Statistician, 41, 340–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laptev, I., Marszalek, M., Schmid, C., & Rozenfeld, B. (2008). Learning realistic human actions from movies. CVPR.

  • Laptev, I. (2005). On space-time interest points. Internation Journal of Computer Vision, 64, 107–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazebnik, S., Schmid, C., & Ponce, J. (2006) Beyond bags of features: Spatial pyramid matching for recognizing natural scene categories. CVPR.

  • Lee, H., Battle, A., Raina, R., & Andrew, Ng. (2007). Efficient sparse coding algorithms. NIPS.

  • Lee, H., Battle, A., Raina, R., & Ng, A. (2006). Efficient sparse coding algorithms. NIPS.

  • Li, R., & Zickler, T. (2012). Discriminative virtual views for cross-view action recognition. CVPR.

  • Liu, J., Luo, J., & Shah, M. (2009). Recognizing realistic actions from videos “in the wild”. CVPR.

  • Liu, J., Shah, M., Kuipers, B., & Savarese, S. (2011). Cross-view action recognition via view knowledge transfer. CVPR.

  • Liu, L., Shao, L., & Rockett, P. (2012). Boosted key-frame selection and correlated pyramidal motion-feature representation for human action recognition. Pattern Recognition. doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2012.10.004.

  • Liwicki, S., Zafeiriou, S., Tzimiropoulos, G., & Pantic, M. (2012). Efficient online subspace learning with an indefinite kernel for visual tracking and recognition. IEEE Transaction on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 23, 1624–1636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loui, A., Luo, J., Chang, S., Ellis, D., Jiang, W., Kennedy, l., Lee, K., & Yanagawa, K. (2007). Kodak’s consumer video benchmark data set: concept definition and annotation. IWMIR.

  • Lowe, D. (2004). Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision, 60, 91–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, D. G., Luo, J., Chang, S. F., Ellis, D., Jiang, W., Kennedy, L., et al. (2004). Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision, 60(2), 91–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mairal, J., Bach, F., Ponce, J., Sapiro, G,. & Zisserman, A. (2008). Discriminative learned dictionaries for local image analysis. CVPR.

  • Mairal, J., Bach, F., Ponce, J., Sapiro, G., & Zisserman, A. (2009). Supervised dictionary learning. NIPS.

  • Mairal, J., Leordeanu, M., Bach, F., Hebert, M., & Ponce, J. (2008) Discriminative sparse image models for class-specific edge detection and image interpretation. ECCV.

  • Maji, S., Berg, A., & Malik, J. (2013). Efficient classification for additive Kernel SVMs. IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 35, 66–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallat, S. G., & Zhang, Z. (1993). Matching pursuits with time-frequency dictionaries. IEEE Transaction on Signal Processing, 41(12), 3397–3415.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Marszalek, M., Laptev, I., & Schmid, C. (2009). Actions in context. CVPR.

  • Orrite, C., Rodríguez, M., & Montañés, M. (2011). One-sequence learning of human actions. Human Behavior Unterstanding, 7065, 40–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, S. J., & Yang, Q. (2010). A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Transaction on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 22, 1345–1359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pati, Y., & Ramin, R. (1993). Orthogonal matching pursuit: Recursive function approximation with applications to wavelet decomposition. Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 4, 40–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, Q., Patel, V. M., Turaga, P., & Chellappa, R. (2012). Domain adaptive dictionary learning. ECCV.

  • Raina, R., Battle, A., Lee, H., Packer, B., & Ng, A. Y. (2007). Self-taught learning: Transfer learning from unlabeled data. ICML.

  • Schuldt, C., Laptev, I., & Caputo, B. (2004). Recognizing human actions: A local svm approach. ICPR.

  • Sidenblada, H., & Black, M. J. (2003). Learning the statistics of people in images and video. International Journal of Computer Vision, 54, 183–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohn, K., Jung, D., Lee, H., & Hero, A. (2011) Efficient learning of sparse, distributed, convolutional feature representations for object recognition. ICCV.

  • Su, Y., & Jurie, F. (2012). Improving image classification using semantic attributes. International Journal of Computer Vision, 100, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uemura, H., Ishikawa, S., Mikolajczyk, K. (2008). Feature tracking and motion compensation for action recognition. BMVC.

  • Wang, H., Klaser, A., Schmid, C., Liu, C. (2011). Action recognition by dense trajectories. CVPR.

  • Wang, H., Ullah, M., Klaser, A., Laptev, I., Schmid, C. (2009). Evaluation of local spatio-temporal features for action recognition. BMVC.

  • Wang, J., Yang, J., Yu, K., Lv, F., huang, T., Gong, Y. (2010). Locality-constrained linear coding for image classification. CVPR.

  • Wang, Y., & Mori, G. (2009). Max-margin hidden conditional random fields for human action recognition. CVPR.

  • Wang, Y., & Mori, G. (2011). Hidden part models for human action recognition: Probabilistic versus max margin. IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 33, 1310–1323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J., Yang, Y. A., Ganesh, A., Sastry, S. S., & Ma, Y. (2009). IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 31, 210–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiang, S., Nie, F., Meng, G., Pan, C., & Zhang, C. (2012). Discriminative least squares regression for multiclass classification and feature selection. IEEE Transaction on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 23, 1738–1754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, L., Jin, R., Sukthankar, R., & Jurie, F. (2008). Unifying discriminative visual codebook generation with classifier training for object category recognition. CVPR.

  • Yang, J., Yan, R., & Hauptmann, A. G. (2007). Cross-domain video concept detection using adaptive SVMs. ACM MM.

  • Yang, J., Yu, K., Gong, Y., Huang, T. (2009). Linear spatial pyramid matching using sparse coding for image classification. CVPR.

  • Yang, J., Yu, K., & Huang, T. (2010). Supervised translation-invariant sparse coding. CVPR.

  • Yao, A., Gall, J., & Van, L. G. (2012). Coupled action recognition and pose estimation from multiple views. International Journal of Computer Vision, 100, 16–37.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zafeiriou, S., Tzimiropoulos, G., Petrou, M., & Stathaki, T. (2012) Regularized kernel discriminant analysis with a robust kernel for face recognition and verification. NIPS.

  • Zhang, H., Berg, C. A., Maire, M., & Malik, J. (2006) SVM-KNN: Discriminative nearest neighbor classification for visual category recognition. CVPR.

  • Zhang, Q., & Li, B. (2010). Discriminative K-SVD for dictionary learning in face recognition. CVPR.

  • Zhang, W., Surve, A., Fern, X., & Dietterich, T. (2009). Learning non-redundant codebooks for classifying complex objects. ICML.

  • Zheng, J., Jinag, Z., Phillips,P. J., & Chellappa, R. (2012) Cross-view action recognition via a transferable dictionary pair. BMVC.

  • Zhou, D., Bousquet, O., Lal, T., Weston, J., Gretton, A., & Schölkopf, B. (2004). Learning with local and global consistency. NIPS.

  • Zhou, M., Chen, H., Paisley, J., Ren, L., Sapiro, G., & Carin, L. (2009). Non-parametric bayesian dictionary learning for sparse image representations. NIPS.

  • Zhou, D., Weston, J., Gretton, A., Bousquet, O., & Schölkopf, B. (2004). Ranking on data manifolds. NIPS.

  • Zhu, F., & Shao, L. (2013). Enhancing action recognition by cross-domain dictionary learning. BMVC.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Electronic and Information Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing , 210044, China

    Fan Zhu & Ling Shao

  2. Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield , S1 3JD, UK

    Fan Zhu & Ling Shao

Authors
  1. Fan Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ling Shao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ling Shao.

Additional information

Communicated by Dr. Trevor Darrell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhu, F., Shao, L. Weakly-Supervised Cross-Domain Dictionary Learning for Visual Recognition. Int J Comput Vis 109, 42–59 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-014-0703-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-014-0703-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation