Self-reported use of retrieval practice varies across age and domain

• Agarwal, P. K., Karpicke, J. D., Kang, S. H. K., Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (2008). Examining the tested effect with open- and closed-book tests. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 861–876.

  Google Scholar 

• Ames, C. (1992). Achievement goals and the classroom motivational climate. In D. Schunk & J. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 327–349). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Anderson, M. C., Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1063–1087. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.5.1063.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bielaczyc, K., Pirolli, P. L., & Brown, A. L. (1995). Training in self explanation and self- regulation strategies: Investigating the effects of knowledge acquisition activities on problem solving. Cognition and Instruction, 13, 221–252.

  Google Scholar 

• Biggs, J. B. (1979). Individual differences in study processes and the quality of learning outcomes. Higher Education, 8, 381–394.

  Google Scholar 

• Bjorklund, D. F., & Zeman, B. R. (1983). The development of organizational strategies in children’s recall of familiar information: Using social organization to recall the names of classmates. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 6, 341–353.

  Google Scholar 

• Blasiman, R., Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. A. (2017). The what, how much, and when of study strategies: Comparing intended versus actual study behaviour. Memory, 25(6), 784–792. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2016.1221974.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bong, M. (2001). Between- and within-domain relations of academic motivation among middle and high-school students: Self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 23–34.

  Google Scholar 

• Bong, M. (2004). Academic motivation in self-efficacy, task value, achievement goal orientations, and attributional beliefs. Journal of Educational Research, 97, 287–297.

  Google Scholar 

• Bråten, I., & Samuelstuen, M. S. (2004). Does the influence of reading purpose on reports of strategic text processing depend on students’ topic knowledge? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 324–336.

  Google Scholar 

• Broekkamp, H., & Van Hout-Wolters, B. (2007). The gap between educational research and practice: A literature review, symposium, and questionnaire. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13, 203–220.

  Google Scholar 

• Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. S. (1989). Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 393–451). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc..

  Google Scholar 

• Brown, A. L., Bransford, J. D., Ferrara, R. A., & Campione, J. C. (1983). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In J. H. Flavell & E. M. Markman (Eds.), handbook of child psychology (4th ed.): Cognitive development (Vol. 3, pp. 77–166). New York: Wiley.

  Google Scholar 

• Bui, D. C., Maddox, G. B., & Balota, D. A. (2013). The roles of working memory and intervening task difficulty in determining the benefits of repetition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 341–347. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0352-5.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L. (2007). Testing improves long-term retention in a simulated classroom setting. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 514–527.

  Google Scholar 

• Carpenter, S. K. (2012). Testing enhances the transfer of learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 279–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412452728.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Carpenter, S. K., & DeLosh, E. L. (2005). Application of the testing and spacing effects to name learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 619–636.

  Google Scholar 

• Carpenter, S. K., Lund, T. J., Coffman, C. R., Armstrong, P. I., Lamm, M. H., & Reason, R. D. (2016). A classroom study on the relationship between student achievement and retrieval- enhanced learning. Educational Psychology Review, 1–23.

• Clark, D. A., & Svinicki, M. (2015). The effect of retrieval on post-task enjoyment of studying. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 51–67.

• Cleary, T. J., & Chen, P. P. (2009). Self-regulation, motivation, and math achievement in middle school: Variations across grade level and math context. Journal of School Psychology, 47, 291–314.

  Google Scholar 

• Crede, M., & Phillips, L. A. (2011). A meta-analytic review of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 337–346.

  Google Scholar 

• Cromley, J. G., & Azevedo, R. (2007). Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 311–325.

  Google Scholar 

• Cull, W. L. (2000). Untangling the benefits of multiple study opportunities and repeated testing for cued recall. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 215–235.

  Google Scholar 

• Dignath, G., Buettner, G., & Langfeldt, H. P. (2008). How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively? A meta-analysis on self-regulation training programmes. Educational Research Review, 3, 101–129.

  Google Scholar 

• Duncan, T. G., & McKeachie, W. C. (2005). The making of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational Psychologist, 40, 117–128.

  Google Scholar 

• Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215–251.

  Google Scholar 

• Finley, J. R., & Benjamin, A. S. (2018). Metacognitive control of transfer-appropriate processing. Manuscript in preparation.

• Glover, J. A. (1989). The “testing” phenomenon: Not gone but nearly forgotten. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 392–399.

  Google Scholar 

• Gottfried, A. E. (1985). Academic intrinsic motivation in elementary and junior high school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 631–645.

  Google Scholar 

• Grossman, P., & Stodolsky, S. (1994). Considerations of content and the circumstances of secondary school teaching. In L. Darling-Hammond, ed. Review of Research in Education (Vol. 20, pp. 179–221). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

• Grossman, P. L., & Stodolsky, S. S. (1995). Content as context: The role of school subjects in secondary school teaching. Educational Researcher, 24(8), 5–11 23.

  Google Scholar 

• Hadwin, A. F. (2000). Building a case for self-regulating as a socially constructed phenomenon. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.

• Hadwin, A. F., Winne, P. H., Stockley, D. B., Nesbit, J. C., & Woszczyna, C. (2001). Context moderates students’ self-reports about how they study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 477–487.

  Google Scholar 

• Hartwig, M. K., & Dunlosky, J. (2012). Study strategies of college students: Are self-testing and scheduling related to achievement? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(1), 126–134.

  Google Scholar 

• Jamieson-Noel, D., & Winne, P. H. (2003). Comparing self-reports to traces of studying behavior as representations of students’ studying and achievement. German Journal of Educational Psychology, 17, 159–171.

  Google Scholar 

• Janes, J. L., Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. A. (2018). How do students use self-testings across multiple study sessions when preparing for a high-stakes exam? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 7(2), 230–240.

  Google Scholar 

• Karpicke, J. D. (2009). Metacognitive control and strategy selection: Deciding to practice retrieval during learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 469–486.

  Google Scholar 

• Karpicke, J. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2011). Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science, 331, 772–775.

  Google Scholar 

• Karpicke, J. D., Butler, A. C., & Roediger III, H. L. (2009). Metacognitive strategies in student learning: Do students practice retrieval when they study on their own? Memory, 17(4), 471–479.

  Google Scholar 

• King, A. (1992). Comparison of self-questioning, summarizing, and notetaking-review as strategies for learning from lectures. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 303–323.

  Google Scholar 

• Kirk-Johnson, A., Gallo, B. M., & Fraundorf, S. H. (2019). Perceiving effort as poor learning: the misinterpreted-effort hypothesis of how experienced effort and perceived learning relate to study strategy choice. Cognitive Psychology, 115.

• Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 349–370.

  Google Scholar 

• Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2007). The promise and perils of self-regulated study. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(2), 219–224.

  Google Scholar 

• Kornell, N., & Son, L. K. (2009). Learners’ choices and beliefs about self-testing. Memory, 17, 493–501.

  Google Scholar 

• Kornell, N., Bjork, R. A., & Garcia, M. A. (2011). Why tests appear to prevent forgetting: A distribution-based bifurcation model. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 85–97.

  Google Scholar 

• Kuhbandner, C., & Emmerdinger, K. J. (2018). Do students really prefer repeated rereading over testing when studying textbooks? A reexamination. Memory, 27(7), 952–961. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2019.1610177.

• Kuhn, D. (2000). Theory of mind, metacognition, and reasoning: A life-span perspective. In P. Mitchell & K. J. Riggs (Eds.), Children’s reasoning and the mind (pp. 301–326). Hove, England: Psychology Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Leeming, F. C. (2002). The exam-a-day procedure improves performance in psychology classes. Teaching of Psychology, 29, 210–212.

  Google Scholar 

• Lonka, K., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (1996). Epistemologies, conceptions of learning, and study practices in medicine and psychology. Higher Education, 31, 5–24.

  Google Scholar 

• Maddox, G. B., & Balota, D. A. (2012). Self control of when and how much to test face-name pairs in a novel spaced retrieval paradigm: An examination of age-related differences. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 19, 620–643. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2011.640658.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Maddox, G. B., & Balota, D. A. (2015). Retrieval practice and spacing effects in young and older adults: An examination of the benefits of desirable difficulty. Memory and Cognition, 43, 770–774. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421/s13421-014-0499-6.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning II: Outcome as a function of the learner’s conception of the task. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 115–127.

  Google Scholar 

• McAndrew, M., Morrow, C. S., Atiyeh, L., & Pierre, G. C. (2016). Dental student study strategies: Are self-testing and scheduling related to academic performance? Journal of Dental Education, 80(5), 542–552.

  Google Scholar 

• McDaniel, M. A., Agarwal, P. K., Huelser, B. J., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger III, H. L. (2011). Test-enhanced learning in a middle school science classroom: The effects of quiz frequency and placement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(2), 399.

  Google Scholar 

• McDermott, K. B., Agarwal, P. K., D’Antonio, L., Roediger, H. L., & McDaniel, M. A. (2014). Both multiple-choice and short-answer quizzes enhance later exam performance in middle and high school classes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 20, 3–21.

  Google Scholar 

• Miyatsu, T., Nguyen, K., & McDaniel, M. A. (2018). Five popular study strategies: Their optimal implementation and pitfalls. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(3), 390–407.

  Google Scholar 

• Mulligan, N. W., & Peterson, D. J. (2015). Negative and positive testing effects in terms of item- specific and relational information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(3), 859–871. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000056.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pashler, H., Bain, P. M., Bottge, B. A., Graesser, A., Koedinger, K., McDaniel, M., et al. (2007).Organizing instruction and study to improve student learning (NCER 2007–2004). Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education, National Center forEducation Research, Institute of Education Sciences.

• Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544–555.

  Google Scholar 

• Pintrich, P. R., & DeGroot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.

  Google Scholar 

• Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801–813.

  Google Scholar 

• Pintrich, P. R., Brown, D. R., & Weinstein, C.-E. (1994). Student motivation, cognition and learning. Hillsdale: Lawrence-Erlbaurn.

  Google Scholar 

• Putnam, A. L., & Roediger, H. L. (2013). Does response mode affect amount recalled or the magnitude of the testing effect? Memory & Cognition, 41, 36–48.

  Google Scholar 

• Rabinowitz, J. C., Ackerman, B. P., Craik, F. I. M., & Hinchley, J. L. (1982). Aging and metamemory: The roles of relatedness and imagery. Journal of Gerontology, 37, 688–660.

  Google Scholar 

• Ramsden, P., & Entwistle, N. J. (1981). Effects of academic departments on students approaches to studying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 368–383.

  Google Scholar 

• Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J. (2016). How effective is example generation for learning declarative concepts? Educational Psychology Review, 28, 649–672.

  Google Scholar 

• Rea, C. P., & Modigliani, V. (1985). The effect of expanded versus massed practice on the retention of multiplication facts and spelling lists. Human Learning: Journal of Practical Research & Applications, 4(1), 11–18.

  Google Scholar 

• Reynolds, R. E. (1992). Selective attention and prose learning: Theoretical and empirical research. Educational Psychology Review, 4, 345–391.

  Google Scholar 

• Rodriguez, F., Rivas, M. J., Matsumura, L. H., Warschauer, M., & Sato, B. K. (2018). How do students study in STEM courses? Findings from a light-touch intervention and its relevance for underrepresented students. PLoS One, 13(7), 1–20.

  Google Scholar 

• Roediger III, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17, 249–255.

  Google Scholar 

• Roediger III, H. L., Agarwal, P. K., McDaniel, M. A., & McDermott, K. B. (2011). Test enhanced learning in the classroom: Long-term improvements from quizzing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17(4), 382–395.

  Google Scholar 

• Rohrer, D., Dedrick, R. F., & Burgess, K. (2014). The benefit of interleaved mathematics practice is not limited to superficially similar kinds of problems. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 1323–1330.

  Google Scholar 

• Rotgans, J., & Schmidt, H. (2009). Examination of the context-specific nature of self-regulated learning. Educational Studies, 35, 239–253.

  Google Scholar 

• Rowland, C. A. (2014). The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: A meta-analytic review of the testing effect. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1432–1436.

  Google Scholar 

• Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 299–324.

  Google Scholar 

• Schneider, W. (1998). The development of procedural metamemory in childhood and adolescence. In G. Mazzoni & T. O. Nelson (Eds), Monitoring and control processes in metacognition and cognitive neuropsychology (pp. 1–21). Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.

• Schneider, W. (2008). The development of metacognitive knowledge in children and adolescents: Major trends and implications for education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 2, 114–121.

  Google Scholar 

• Schneider, W., & Pressley, M. (1989). Memory development between 2 and 20. New York: Springer-Verlag.

  Google Scholar 

• Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 207–231.

  Google Scholar 

• Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.). (1998). Selfregulated learning: From teaching to self- reflective practice. New York: Guilford Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Scouller, K. (1998). The influence of assessment method on students’ learning approaches: Multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay. Higher Education, 35, 453–472.

  Google Scholar 

• Scouller, K. M., & Prosser, M. (1994). Students’ experiences in studying for multiple choice question examinations. Studies in Higher Education, 19, 267–279.

  Google Scholar 

• Shaw, R. J., & Craik, E. I. M. (1989). Age differences in predictions and performance on a cued recall task. Psychology and Aging, 4, 131–135.

  Google Scholar 

• Siegler, R. S. (1988). Strategy choice procedures and the development of multiplication skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 3, 258–275.

  Google Scholar 

• Son, L. K. (2005). Metacognitive control: Children’s short-term versus long-term study strategies. Journal of General Psychology, 132, 347–363.

  Google Scholar 

• Spitzer, H. F. (1939). Studies in retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 30(9), 641–656.

  Google Scholar 

• Sternberg, R. J. (1988). The triarchic mind: A new theory of human intelligence. New York: Viking.

  Google Scholar 

• Stodolsky, S. (1988). The subject matters: classroom activity in math and social studies. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Thomas, P. R., & Bain, J. D. (1982). Consistency in learning strategies. Higher Education, 11, 249–259.

  Google Scholar 

• Thomas, J. W., & Rowher, W. D. (1987). Grade-level and course-specific differences in academic studying: Summary. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 12, 381–385.

  Google Scholar 

• Thomas, J. W., Bol, L., Warkentin, R. W., Wilson, M., Strage, A., & Rowher, W. D. (1993). Interrelationships among students study activities, self-concept of academic ability, and achievement as a function of characteristics of high-school biology courses. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 7, 499–532.

  Google Scholar 

• Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1991). Improving the quality of student learning: The influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes. Higher Education, 22, 251–266.

  Google Scholar 

• Tullis, J. G., & Benjamin, A. S. (2011). On the effectiveness of self-paced learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 109–118.

  Google Scholar 

• Tullis, J. G., & Benjamin, A. S. (2012). Consequences of restudy choices in younger and older learners. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 743–749.

  Google Scholar 

• Tullis, J. G., Finley, J. R., & Benjamin, A. S. (2013). Metacognition of the testing effect: Guiding learners to predict the benefits of retrieval. Memory & Cognition, 41, 429–442.

  Google Scholar 

• Tullis, J. G., Fiechter, J. L., & Benjamin, A. S. (2018). The efficacy of learners' testing choices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44, 540–552.

  Google Scholar 

• Van Hout-Wolters, B. (2000). Assessing active self-directed learning. In R. Simons, J. van der Linden, & T. Duffy (Eds.), New learning (pp. 83–101). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  Google Scholar 

• VanderStoep, S. W., Pintrich, P. R., & Fagerlin, A. (1996). Disciplinary differences in self- regulated learning in college students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 345–362.

  Google Scholar 

• Veenman, M. V. J. (2005). The assessment of metacognitive skills: What can be learned from multi-method designs? In C. Artelt & B. Moschner (Eds.), Lernstrategien und Metakognition: Implikationen für Forschung und Praxis (pp. 77–99). Münster: Waxmann.

  Google Scholar 

• Vermeeten, J., Lodewijks, H., & Vermunt, J. (1997). Change and stability in learning strategies during the first two years at the university. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, march 24–28.

• Wade, W., Trathen, W., & Schraw, G. (1990). An analysis of spontaneous study strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 147–166.

  Google Scholar 

• Warr, P., & Downing, J. (2000). Learning strategies, learning anxiety, and knowledge acquisition. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 311–333.

  Google Scholar 

• Weinstein, C. E. (1978). Teaching cognitive elaboration learning strategies. In H. F. O'Neal (Ed.), Learning strategies. New York: Academic Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 315–327). New York: MacMillan.

  Google Scholar 

• Weinstein, C. E., Zimmerman, S. A., & Palmer, D. R. (1988). Assessing learning strategies: The design and development of the LASSI. In C. E. Weinstein, E. T. Goetz, & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Learning and study strategies: Issues in assessment, instruction, and evaluation (pp. 25–40). New York: Academic.

  Google Scholar 

• Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 279–306). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Winne, P., & Perry, N. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531–566). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Winne, P., Jamieson-Noel, D., & Muis, K. (2001). Methodological issues and advances in researching tactics, strategies, and self-regulated learning. In P. R. Pintrich & M. L. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement, New directions in measures and methods (Vol. 12, pp. 121–155). Amsterdam: JAI Press Elsevier Science.

  Google Scholar 

• Wissman, K. T., Rawson, K. A., & Pyc, M. A. (2012). How and when do students use flashcards? Memory, 20(6), 568–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2012.687052.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wolters, C., & Pintrich, P. R. (1998). Contextual differences in student motivation and self regulated learning in mathematics, English, and social studies classrooms. Instructional Science, 26, 27–47.

  Google Scholar 

• Wong, B. Y. L., Wong, R., & Lemare, L. (1982). The effects of knowledge of criterion task on comprehension and recall in normally achieving and learning disabled children. The Journal of Educational Research, 76(2), 119–126.

  Google Scholar 

• Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social–cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329–339.

  Google Scholar 

• Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25, 3–17.

  Google Scholar 

• Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82–91.

  Google Scholar 

• Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614–628.

  Google Scholar 

• Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51–59.

  Google Scholar 

• Zimmerman, B. J., & Moylan, A. R. (2009). Self-regulation: where metacognition and motivation intersect. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of Metacognition in Education (pp. 299–315). New York, NY: Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

Download references