[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Performance of intertidal topography video monitoring of a meso-tidal reflective beach in South Portugal

  • Published:
Ocean Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study discusses site-specific system optimization efforts related to the capability of a coastal video station to monitor intertidal topography. The system consists of two video cameras connected to a PC, and is operating at the meso-tidal, reflective Faro Beach (Algarve coast, S. Portugal). Measurements from the period February 4, 2009 to May 30, 2010 are discussed in this study. Shoreline detection was based on the processing of variance images, considering pixel intensity thresholds for feature extraction, provided by a specially trained artificial neural network (ANN). The obtained shoreline data return rate was 83%, with an average horizontal cross-shore root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.06 m. Several empirical parameterizations and ANN models were tested to estimate the elevations of shoreline contours, using wave and tidal data. Using a manually validated shoreline set, the lowest RMSE (0.18 m) for the vertical elevation was obtained using an ANN while empirical parameterizations based on the tidal elevation and wave run-up height resulted in an RMSE of 0.26 m. These errors were reduced to 0.22 m after applying 3-D data filtering and interpolation of the topographic information generated for each tidal cycle. Average beach-face slope tan(β) RMSE were around 0.02. Tests for a 5-month period of fully automated operation applying the ANN model resulted in an optimal, average, vertical elevation RMSE of 0.22 m, obtained using a one tidal cycle time window and a time-varying beach-face slope. The findings indicate that the use of an ANN in such systems has considerable potential, especially for sites where long-term field data allow efficient training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aarninkhof SGJ, Holman RA (1999) Monitoring the nearshore with video. Backscatter 10:8–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Aarninkhof SGJ, Ruessink BG (2004) Video observations and model predictions of depth-induced wave dissipation. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote 42(11):2612–2622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aarninkhof SGJ, Turner IL, Dronkers TDT, Caljouw M, Nipiusc L (2003) A video-based technique for mapping intertidal beach bathymetry. Coast Eng 49:275–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida LP, Ferreira Ó, Vousdoukas M, Dodet G (2011a) Historical variation and trends in storminess along the Portuguese South Coast. Nat Hazard Earth Sys Sci. (manuscript accepted)

  • Almeida LP, Vousdoukas MI, Ferreira ÓM, Rodrigues BA, Matias A (2011b) Thresholds for storm impacts on an exposed sandy coastal area in southern Portugal. Geomorphology. (manuscript accepted)

  • Battjes JA (1974) Surf similarity. In: 14th Conference on Coastal Engineering. ASCE. pp 466–480

  • Bay H, Ess A, Tuytelaars T, Gool LV (2008) SURF: speeded up robust features. Comput Vis Image Underst CVIU 110(3):346–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouguet J-Y (2007) Camera Calibration Toolbox for Matlab. Available at: http://www.vision.caltech.edu/bouguetj/calib_doc/. Accessed Dec 2009

  • Catálan PA, Haller MC (2008) Remote sensing of breaking wave phase speeds with application to non-linear depth inversions. Coast Eng 55(1):93–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chickadel CC, Holman RA, Freilich MH (2003) An optical technique for the measurement of longshore currents. J Geophys Res 108:33–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciavola P, Taborda R, Ferreira O, Dias JA (1997) Field Measurements of Longshore Sand transport and control processes on a steep meso-tidal beach in Portugal. J Coast Res 13(4):1119–1129

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa M, Silva R, Vitorino J (2001) Contribuição para o estudo do clima de agitação marítima na costa portuguesa. In: 2as Jornadas Portuguesas Engenharia Costeira e Portuária, Sines, Portugal. International Navigation Association PIANC

  • Dodet G, Bertin X, Taborda R (2010) Wave climate variability in the North-East Atlantic Ocean over the last six decades. Ocean Model 31(3–4):120–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas SL (1992) Estimating extreme values of run-up on beaches. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 118(2):220–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira PM, Ruano AE (2000) Exploiting the separability of linear and non-linear parameters in radial basis function neural networks. In: IEEE Symposium 2000: Adaptive systems for signal processing, communications and control, Alberta, Canada. pp 321–326

  • Ferreira PM, Faria EA, Ruano AE (2002) Neural network models in Greenhouse air temperature prediction. Neurocomputing 43(1–4):51–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira Ó, Garcia T, Matias A, Taborda R, Dias JA (2006) An integrated method for the determination of set-back lines for coastal erosion hazards on sandy shores. Cont Shelf Res 26(9):1030–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira O, Vousdoukas MV, Ciavola P (2009) MICORE Review of Climate Change Impacts on Storm Occurrence. (Open access, Deliverable WP1.4). Available at: https://micore.eu/area.php?idarea=28. Accessed Dec 2009

  • Fischler M, Bolles R (1981) RANdom SAmpling Consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with application to image analysis and automated cartography. Commun Assoc Comput Machinery 24:381–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folk RL (1980) Petrology of the sedimentary rocks. Hemphill Publishing Company, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley MD, Turner IL, Short AD, Ranasinghe R (2006) Assessing the accuracy and applicability of a multi-decadal beach survey dataset. Paper presented at the 30st International Conference on Coastal Engineering, San Diego, USA

  • Hartley R, Zisserman A (2006) Multiple view geometry in computer vision. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Heikkilä J, Silvén O (1997) A four-step camera calibration procedure with implicit image correction. In: IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, San Juan, Puerto Rico. pp 1106–1112

  • Holland KT, Raubenheimer B, Guza RT, Holman RA (1995) Run-up kinematics on a natural beach. J Geophys Res 100(C3):4985–4993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holman RA (1986) Extreme value statistics for wave run-up on a natural beach. Coast Eng 9:527–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holman RA, Sallenger JAH (1985) Setup and swash on a natural beach. J Geophys Res 90(C1):945–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holman RA, Stanley J (2007) The history and technical capabilities of Argus. Coast Eng 54(6–7):477–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber PJ (1981) Robust Statistics. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt IA (1959) Design of seawalls and breakwaters. J Waterw Har Div ASCE 85(WW3):123–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalnay E, Kanamitsu M, Kistler R, Collins W, Deaven D, Gandin L, Iredell M, Saha S, White G, Woollen J, Zhu Y, Chelliah M, Ebisuzaki W, Higgins W, Janowiak J, Mo KC, Ropelewski C, Wang J, Leetmaa A, Reynolds R, Roy Jenne R, Joseph D (1996) The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77:437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingston KS (2003) Applications of complex adaptive systems, approaches to coastal systems. Ph.D. thesis, University of Plymouth, Plymouth

  • Lagarias JC, Reeds JA, Wright MH, Wright PE (1998) Convergence properties of the Nelder–Mead simplex method in low dimensions. SIAM J Optim 9(1):112–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippmann TC, Holman RA (1989) Quantification of sand bar morphology: a video technique based on wave dissipation. J Geophys Res 94(C1):995–1011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen AJ, Plant NG (2001) Intertidal beach slope predictions compared to field data. Mar Geol 173(1–4):121–139. doi:10.1016/s0025-3227(00)00168-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt DW (1963) An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. J Soc Ind Appl Math 11(2):431–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moody J, Darken CJ (1989) Fast learning in networks of locally-tuned processing units. Neural Comput 1(2):281–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearre NS, Puleo JA (2009) Quantifying seasonal shoreline variability at Rehoboth Beach, Delaware, using automated imaging techniques. J Coast Res 25(4):900–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plant NG, Holman RA (1997) Intertidal beach profile estimation using video images. Mar Geol 140(1–2):1–24. doi:10.1016/s0025-3227(97)00019-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plant NG, Holland KT, Puleo JA (2002) Analysis of the scale of errors in nearshore bathymetric data. Mar Geol 191(1–2):71–86. doi:10.1016/s0025-3227(02)00497-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plant NG, Aarninkhof SGJ, Turner IL, Kingston KS (2007) The performance of shoreline detection models applied to video imagery. J Coast Res 23(3):658–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruano AE, Ferreira PM, Cabrita C, Matos S (2002) Training neural networks and neuro-fuzzy systems: a unified view. In: 15th IFAC world congress, Barcelona, Spain

  • Ruessink BG, van Enckevort IMJ, Kingston KS, Davidson MA (2000) Analysis of observed two- and three-dimensional nearshore bar behaviour. Mar Geol 169(1–2):161–183. doi:10.1016/s0025-3227(00)00060-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegle E, Huntley DA, Davidson MA (2007) Coupling video imaging and numerical modelling for the study of inlet morphodynamics. Mar Geol 236(3–4):143–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg J, Ljung L (1994) Overtraining, regularization, and searching for minimum with application to neural networks. Paper presented at the IFAC Symposium on Adaptive Systems in Control and Signal Processing

  • Smith KR, Bryan KR (2007) Monitoring beach volume using a combination of intermittent profiling and video imagery. J Coast Res 23(4):892–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockdon HF, Holman RA, Howd PA, Sallenger JAH (2006) Empirical parameterization of setup, swash, and runup. Coast Eng 53(7):573–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunamura T (1984) Quantitative predictions of beach-face slopes. Geol Soc Amer Bull 95:242–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolman HL (2002) User manual and system documentation of WAVEWATCH-III version 2.22. NOAA/NWS/NCEP/MMAB

  • Tucker MJ, Pitt EG (2001) Waves in Ocean Engineering, vol 5 (Elsevier Ocean Engineering Book Series). Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • US Army Corps of Engineers (2002) Coastal Engineering Manual. Engineer Manual 1110-2-1100 (in 6 volumes). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Uunk L, Wijnberg KM, Morelissen R (2010) Automated mapping of the intertidal beach bathymetry from video images. Coast Eng 57:461–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dongeren A, Plant N, Cohen A, Roelvink D, Haller MC, Catalán P (2008) Beach Wizard: nearshore bathymetry estimation through assimilation of model computations and remote observations. Coast Eng 55(12):1016–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Enckevort IMJ, Ruessink BG (2003a) Video observations of nearshore bar behaviour. Part 1: alongshore uniform variability. Cont Shelf Res 23(5):501–512. doi:10.1016/s0278-4343(02)00234-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Enckevort IMJ, Ruessink BG (2003b) Video observations of nearshore bar behaviour. Part 2: alongshore non-uniform variability. Cont Shelf Res 23(5):513–532. doi:10.1016/s0278-4343(02)00235-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vousdoukas MI, Velegrakis AF, Karambas T, Valais G, Zarkoyiannis S (2005) Morphodynamics of beachrock infected beaches: Vatera Beach, NE Mediterranean. In: Sanchez-Arcilla A (ed) In: 5th International Conference on Coastal Dynamics, Barcelona, Spain

  • Vousdoukas MI, Velegrakis AF, Dimou K, Zervakis V, Conley DC (2009) Wave run-up observations in microtidal, sediment-starved pocket beaches of the Eastern Mediterranean. J Mar Syst 78:37–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vousdoukas MI, Pennucci G, Holman RA, Conley DC (2011) A semi automatic technique for Rapid Environmental Assessment in the coastal zone using Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (SUAV). J Coastal Res SI64

  • Wolf PR (1974) Elements of photogrammetry (with air photo interpretation and remote sensing). McGraw-Hill, St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright LD, Short AD (1984) Morphodynamic variability of surf zones and beaches: a synthesis. Mar Geol 56(1–4):93–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the European Community Seventh Framework Programme funding under the research project MICORE (grant agreement no. 202798). We are indebted to the Restaurant ‘Paquete’ for allowing us to deploy the cameras on their rooftop and for supplying electric power and space for our equipment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculdade de Ciências do Mar e do Ambiente, Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139, Faro, Portugal

    Michalis Ioannis Vousdoukas, Luis Pedro Almeida & Óscar Manuel Ferreira

  2. Forschungszentrum Küste, Merkurstraße 11, 30419, Hannover, Germany

    Michalis Ioannis Vousdoukas

  3. Centre of Intelligent Systems, Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139, Faro, Portugal

    Pedro Manuel Ferreira & Antonio Ruano

  4. Faculty of Science, LATTEX, IDL, University of Lisbon, Bloc C-6, 2 Floor, Campo Grande, 1749-016, Lisbon, Portugal

    Guillaume Dodet, Rui Taborda & Ana Nobre Silva

  5. Department of Marine Science, University of the Aegean, University Hill, 81100, Mytilene, Greece

    Fotis Psaros

  6. Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Facoltà di Ingegneria, Università di Ferrara, Via Saragat, 1, 44100, Ferrara, Italy

    Umberto Andriolo

  7. LNEC Estuaries and Coastal Zones Division, National Laboratory of Civil Engineering, Avenida do Brasil 101, 1700-066, Lisbon, Portugal

    Guillaume Dodet

Authors
  1. Michalis Ioannis Vousdoukas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pedro Manuel Ferreira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Luis Pedro Almeida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Guillaume Dodet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Fotis Psaros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Umberto Andriolo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Rui Taborda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ana Nobre Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Antonio Ruano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Óscar Manuel Ferreira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michalis Ioannis Vousdoukas.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Pierre-Marie Poulain

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Multiparametric observation and analysis of the Sea

Appendix—iterative intertidal topography update

Appendix—iterative intertidal topography update

Surface grids were generated from the 3D scattered points resulting from the several ‘contour lines’ acquired during the measuring window. An iterative procedure was applied to identify and extract outliers, so as to estimate the latest intertidal beach topography and to update a digital elevation model (DEM) of the study area. The procedure consisted of the following steps:

  1. 1.

    For each DEM update step, all contour lines were accumulated according to the given time window.

  2. 2.

    The elevations of the points cloud were compared with those of the existing (previously updated) DEM corresponding locations (provided after interpolation), and points with an absolute elevation difference greater than a dz thres,1 threshold value of 2 m were excluded.

  3. 3.

    The perimeter of the points cloud was defined considering a maximum 2 m separation distance.

  4. 4.

    The DEM sections found beyond and landward of those limits were sub-sampled with cross- and longshore resolutions of 5 and 10 m, respectively, and were added to the points cloud.

  5. 5.

    A grid was generated from all the available points and was smoothed with a 4 × 4 m, 2D convolution function.

  6. 6.

    The elevations of the original points were compared with those of the corresponding survey grid locations (provided after interpolation) and points with an absolute elevation difference greater than a dz thres,2 threshold value of 0.5 m were excluded.

  7. 7.

    The data gridding and filtering steps 5–6 were repeated until the number of points was constant (zero outliers detected), or until a pre-defined maximum number of iterations had taken place (set to 100 for the present case).

  8. 8.

    The final grid was generated applying a quadratic loess interpolation method, with a 4 m length-scale smoothing (e.g. Plant et al. 2002).

  9. 9.

    The Faro Beach DEM was updated according to the generated grid, excluding non-moving areas (e.g. buildings, walls).

Please note that the several thresholds used (dz thres,1 and dz thres,2) were empirical and were based on our observations at the study area. When the time window was no longer than one tidal cycle, the procedure followed the steps below: (1) a DEM was generated considering a 2-day time window according to steps 1–9; (2) steps 1–4 were applied for the actual time window; (3) the outlier extraction described in steps 6–7 took place based on the DEM generated during (1); (4) The DEM was updated following steps 8 and 9. In that case, shoreline contours obtained only during the retreating phase of the tide were considered in step 1, unless fewer than four were available. In such a case, the data during the rising phase of the following tide were also considered.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vousdoukas, M.I., Ferreira, P.M., Almeida, L.P. et al. Performance of intertidal topography video monitoring of a meso-tidal reflective beach in South Portugal. Ocean Dynamics 61, 1521–1540 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-011-0440-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-011-0440-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation