Comprehensive Exploration of Digital Literacy: Embedded with Self-Regulation and Epistemological Beliefs

• Akyol, G., Sungur, S., & Tekkaya, C. (2010). The contribution of cognitive and metacognitive strategy use to students’ science achievement. Educational Research and Evaluation, 16(1), 1–21.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Atoy Jr, M. B., Garcia, F. R. O., Cadungog, R. R., Cua, J. D. O., Mangunay, S. C., & de Guzman, A. B. (2020). Linking digital literacy and online information searching strategies of Philippine university students: The moderating role of mindfulness. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 52(4) 1015-1027.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Güneş, E., & Bahçivan, E. (2018). A mixed research-based model for pre-service science teachers' digital literacy: Responses to “which beliefs” and “how and why they interact” questions. Computers & Education, 118, 96-106.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bahcivan, E. (2014). Examining relationships among Turkish pre-service science teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning, scientific epistemological beliefs and science teaching efficacy beliefs. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(6), 870-882.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Barzilai, S., & Zohar, A. (2012). Epistemic thinking in action: Evaluating and integrating online sources. Cognition and Instruction, 30(1), 39–85.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Baxter Magolda, M. (1992). Knowing and reasoning in college: Gender-related patterns in students’ intellectual development. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

  Google Scholar 

• Blau, I., Shamir-Inbal, T., & Avdiel, O. (2020). How does the pedagogical design of a technology-enhanced collaborative academic course promote digital literacies, self-regulation, and perceived learning of students? The Internet and Higher Education, 45, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100722

• Buehl, M. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2006). Examining the dual nature of epistemological beliefs. International Journal of Educational Research, 45(1–2), 28–42.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Conley, A. M., Pintrich, P. R., Vekiri, I., & Harrison, D. (2004). Changes in epistemological beliefs in elementary science students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(2), 186–204.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  Google Scholar 

• Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. New Jersey: Pearson.

  Google Scholar 

• Duncan, T. G., & McKeachie, W. J. (2005). The making of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 117–128.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Elby, A., & Hammer, D. (2001). On the substance of a sophisticated epistemology. Science Education, 85(5), 554–567.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Eshet Alkalai, Y. (2012). Thinking in the digital era: A revised model for digital literacy. Issues in Informing Science & Information Technology, 9, 267–276. Retrieved from http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/91273710/thinking-digital-era-revised-model-digital-literacy

• Ferguson, L. E., Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2012). Epistemic cognition when students read multiple documents containing conflicting scientific evidence: A think-aloud study. Learning and Instruction, 22, 103–120.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13(1), 1–17.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

  Google Scholar 

• Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2009). A macro-level analysis of SRL processes and their relations to the acquisition of a sophisticated mental model of a complex system. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(1), 18–29.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Greene, J. A., Muis, K. R., & Pieschl, S. (2010). The role of epistemic beliefs in students’ self-regulated learning with computer-based learning environments: Conceptual and methodological issues. Educational Psychologist, 45(4), 245–257.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Greene, J. A., Yu, S., & Copeland, D. Z. (2014). Measuring critical components of digital literacy and their relationships with learning. Computers & Education, 76, 55–69.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hammer, D., & Elby, A. (2002). On the form of personal epistemology. In B. K. Hofer, & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.). Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 169–190). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  Google Scholar 

• Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88–140.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan.

• King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series and Jossey-Bass Social and Behavioral Science Series. Jossey-Bass, 350 Sansome Street, San Francisco, CA 94104–1310.

• Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  Google Scholar 

• Lin, T. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2017). Developing instruments concerning scientific epistemic beliefs and goal orientations in learning science: A validation study. International Journal of Science Education, 39(17), 2382–2401.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry London. England: Sage Publications.

  Google Scholar 

• List, A. (2019). Defining digital literacy development: An examination of pre-service teachers’ beliefs. Computers & Education, 138, 146–158.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Martin, A. (2008). Digital Literacy and the “Digital Society”. In C. Lankshear, & M. Knobel (Eds.). Digital Literacies: Concepts, Policies, and Practices (pp. 151-176). New York: Peter Lang.

  Google Scholar 

• Mason, L., Boldrin, A., & Ariasi, N. (2010). Epistemic metacognition in context: Evaluating and learning online information. Metacognition and Learning, 5(1), 67–90.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mason, L., Ariasi, N., & Boldrin, A. (2011). Epistemic beliefs in action: Spontaneous reflections about knowledge and knowing during online information searching and their influences on learning. Learning and Instruction, 21, 137–151.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mason, L., Scrimin, S., Tornatora, M. C., Suitner, C., & Moè, A. (2018). Internet source evaluation: The role of implicit associations and psychophysiological self-regulation. Computers & Education, 119, 59–75.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Muis, K. R. (2007). The role of epistemic beliefs in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 42, 173–190.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Muis, K. R. (2008). Epistemic profiles and self-regulated learning: Examining relations in the context of mathematics problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(2), 177–208.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Muis, K. R., & Franco, G. M. (2009). Epistemic beliefs: Setting the standards for self-regulated learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(4), 306–318.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Muis, K. R., Pekrun, R., Sinatra, G. M., Azevedo, R., Trevors, G., Meier, E., & Heddy, B. C. (2015). The curious case of climate change: Testing a theoretical model of epistemic beliefs, epistemic emotions, and complex learning. Learning and Instruction, 39, 168–183.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065–1078.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Nussbaum, E. M., & Bendixen, L. D. (2003). Approaching and avoiding arguments: The role of epistemological beliefs, need for cognition, and extraverted personality traits. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(4), 573–595.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Palmer, B., & Marra, R. M. (2008). Individual Domain-Specific Epistemologies: Implications for Educational Practice. In M. S. Khine (Ed.). Knowing, Knowledge and Beliefs: Epistemological Studies across Diverse Cultures (pp. 325-350). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6596-5_16

• Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

  Google Scholar 

• Pieschl, S., Stahl, E., & Bromme, R. (2008). Epistemological beliefs and self-regulated learning with hypertext. Metacognition and Learning, 3(1), 17–37.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., García, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801–813.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 498.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Shevlin, M., & Miles, J. N. (1998). Effects of sample size, model specification and factor loadings on the GFI in confirmatory factor analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(1), 85–90.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Stathopoulou, C., & Vosniadou, S. (2007). Conceptual change in physics and physics-related epistemological beliefs: A relationship under scrutiny. In S. Vosniadou, A. Baltas, & X. Vamvakoussi (Eds.), Reframing the conceptual change approach in learning and instruction (pp. 145–163). New York: Elsevier.

  Google Scholar 

• ​Strømsø, H. I., & Bråten, I. (2010). The role of personal epistemology in the self-regulation of internet-based learning. Metacognition and Learning, 5(1), 91–111.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics, Ed. 6th Pearson Education. Inc, Boston.

• Tsai, P. S., Tsai, C. C., & Hwang, G. J. (2011). The correlates of Taiwan teachers’ epistemological beliefs concerning internet environments, online search strategies, and search outcomes. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(1), 54–63.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Walraven, A., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Boshuizen, H. P. (2009). How students evaluate information and sources when searching the World Wide Web for information. Computers & Education, 52(1), 234–246.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Yerdelen, S., & Sungur, S. (2019). Multilevel investigation of students’ self-regulation processes in learning science: Classroom learning environment and teacher effectiveness. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(1), 89–110.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Yilmaz-Tuzun, O., & Topcu, M. S. (2008). Relationships among preservice science teachers’ epistemological beliefs, epistemological world views, and self-efficacy beliefs. International Journal of Science Education, 30(1), 65–85.

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references