Changing Classroom Practice: Elementary Teacher Experiences of a Professional Development Program

• Author. (2011). Standards for professional learning. Oxford, OH: Learning Forward. https://learningforward.org/standards-for-professional-learning.

  Google Scholar 

• Bruce, C. D., & Ross, J. A. (2008). A model for increasing reform implementation and teacher efficacy: Teacher peer coaching in grades 3 and 6 mathematics. Canadian Journal of Education,31(2), 346–370.

  Google Scholar 

• Bryk, A., Kruse, S., & Louis, K. (1995). Building professional learning in schools. Madison: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools.

  Google Scholar 

• Capps, D. K., Crawford, B. A., & Constas, M. A. (2012). A review of empirical literature on inquiry professional development: Alignment with best practices and a critique of the findings. Journal of Science Teacher Education,23, 291–318.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

  Google Scholar 

• Danielson, C. (2007). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching (2nd ed.). Alexandria: ASCD.

  Google Scholar 

• Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (2011). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Kappan,92(6), 81–92.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Desimone, L. (2011). A primer on effective professional development. Kappan,92(6), 68–71.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Drago-Severson, E. (2009). Leading adult learning. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.

  Google Scholar 

• Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Gallucci, C. (2008). Districtwide instructional reform: Using sociocultural theory to link professional learning to organizational support. American Journal of Education,114, 541–581.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gaytan, J. A., & McEwen, B. C. (2010). Instructional technology professional development evaluation: Developing a high quality model. The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal,52(2), 77–94.

  Google Scholar 

• Heck, R., Brandon, P., & Wang, J. (2001). Implementing site-managed educational changes: Examining levels of implementation and effect. Educational Policy,15(2), 302–322.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hirsch, S. (2005). Professional development and closingthe achievement gap. Theory Into Practice, 44(1), 38–44.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hochberg, E., & Desimone, L. (2010). Professional development in the accountability context: Building capacity to achieve standards. Educational Psychologist,45(2), 89–106.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Huston, T., & Weaver, C. L. (2008). Peer coaching: Professional development for experienced faculty. Innovative Higher Education,33(5), 5–20.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hutchins, K., Arbaugh, F., Abell, S., Marra, R., & Lee, M. (2008). A consumer guide to professional development. Science Scope,31, 16–19.

  Google Scholar 

• Ingvarson, L., Meiers, M., & Beavis, A. (2005). Factors affecting the impact of professional development programs on teachers’ knowledge, practice, student outcomes, & efficacy. Education Policy Analysis Archives,13(10), 1–28.

  Google Scholar 

• Kent, A. (2004). Improving teacher quality through professional development. Education,124(3), 427–435.

  Google Scholar 

• Ko, B., Wallhead, T., & Ward, P. (2006). Chapter 4: Professional development workshops-What do teachers learn and use? Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, (25), 397–412. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.25.4.397.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lu, R., & Overbaugh, R. C. (2009). School environment and technology implementation in K-12 classrooms. Computers in the Schools,26, 89–106.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  Google Scholar 

• Morewood, A. L., Ankrum, J. W., & Bean, R. M. (2010). Teachers’ perceptions of the influence of professional development on their knowledge of content, pedagogy, and curriculum. In Mentoring literacy professionals: continuing the spirit of CRA/ALER after 50 years. The thirty-first yearbook: A doubled peer reviewed publication of the college reading association (Vol. 31, pp. 201–219). Florida: Association of Literacy Educators and Researchers.

• Mouza, C. (2009). Does research-based professional development make a difference? A longitudinal investigation of teacher learning in technology integration. Teachers College Record,111(5), 1195–1241.

  Google Scholar 

• National Governors Association for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers.

• No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001., § No. 107-110, 155, stat. 1425 (2002).

• Papastamatis, A., Panitsidou, E., Giavrimis, P., & Papanis, E. (2009). Facilitating teachers’ & educators effective professional development. Review of European Studies,1(2), 83–90.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pennsylvania Department of Education. (2013, January). Pennsylvania common core standards. Pennsylvania Department of Education. Retrieved from http://static.pdesas.org/content/documents/PACCSS%20Mathematics%20PreK%20HS%20January%202013.pdf.

• Prensky, M. (2011, January). The reformers are leaving our schools in the 20th century: Why most U.S. school reformers are on the wrong track, and how to get our kids’ education right for the future. SNS Newsletter. Retrieved from http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/+Prensky-The_Reformers_Are_Leaving_Our_Schools_in_the_20th_Century-please_distribute_freely.pdf.

• Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

  Google Scholar 

• Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation,27(2), 237–246.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tohill, A. (2009). Developing effective professional development. The International Journal of Learning,16(7), 593–605.

  Google Scholar 

• U.S. Department of Education. (2009). Race to the top program executive summary. United States Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop/executive-summary.pdf

• Waddell, D. L., & Dunn, N. (2005). Peer coaching: The next step in staff development. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing,36(2), 84–89.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wei, R. C., Darling-Hammond, L., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. Dallas: National Staff Development Council.

  Google Scholar 

• Wilhelm, R. (2013, February 13). Igniting the hope of knowing. Keynote Speaker presented at the Pennsylvania Educational Technology Exposition and Conference, Hershey, Pennsylvania.

• Wlodkowski, R. (2003). Fostering motivation in professional development programs. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education,98, 39–47.

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references