Using patterns for the refinement and translationof UML models: A controlled experiment

• Arisholm E, Sjøberg, DIK (2004) Evaluating the effect of a delegated versus centralized control style on the maintainability of object-oriented software. IEEE Trans on Softw Eng 30(8):521–534

  Google Scholar 

• Astels D (2002) Refactoring with UML. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference eXtreme Programming and Flexible Processes in Software Engineering, pp 67–70

• Atkinson C, Izygon M (1995) ION a notation for the graphical depiction of object-oriented programs. Technical report, University of Houston-Clear Lake

• Atkinson C, Bayer J, Bunse C, et al. (2001) Component-based product line engineering with UML, Addison Wesley.

• Bell AE, Schmidt RW (1999) UMLoquent expression of AWACS software design. Commun ACM 42(10):55–61

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Booch G (1994) Object oriented analysis and design with applications (2nd edition). Benjamin/ Cummings, Redwood City, CA

  Google Scholar 

• Bortz J (1993) Statistik für Sozialwissenschaftler (4th edition). Springer–Verlag, (in German)

• Briand LC, Daly JW, Wüst J (1997a) A unified framework for cohesion measurement. Proceedings of the Fourth International IEEE Symposium on Software Metrics, Metrics'97

• Briand LC, Bunse C, Daly JW (1997b) An experimental evaluation of quality guidelines on the maintainability of object-oriented design documents. In: Wiedenbeck S, Scholtz J (eds), Proceedings of the Empirical Studies of Programmers: Seventh Workshop ESP7,ACMPress, pp 1–19

• Briand LC, Bunse C, Daly JW, Differding C (1997c) An experimental comparison of the maintainability of object-oriented and structured design documents. Journal of Empirical Software Engineering 2(3):291–312

  Google Scholar 

• Briand LC, Daly JW, Wüst J (1999) A unified framework for coupling measurement in object-oriented systems. IEEE Trans on Softw Eng 25(1):91–121

  Google Scholar 

• 121Briand LC, Bunse C, Daly JW (2001) A controlled experiment for evaluating quality guidelines on the maintainability of object-oriented designs. IEEE Trans on Softw Eng 27(6):513–530

  Google Scholar 

• Bruegge B, Dutoit AH (2003) Object-oriented software engineering: using UML, patterns, and java. Prentice Hall

• Bunse C, Atkinson C (1999a) Improving quality in object-oriented software: systematic refinement and translation of models to code. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Software & Systems Engineering and their Applications (ICSSEA’99), Paris, France

• Bunse C, Atkinson C (1999b) The normal object form: bridging the gap from models to code. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on the Unified Modeling Language (UML'99), Fort Collins, USA

• Bunse C (2001) Pattern-based refinement and translation of object-oriented models to code, Fraunhofer IRB, ISBN 3-8167-5613-1

• Cheesman J, Daniels J (2000) UML components: a simple process for specifying component-based software. Addison-Wesley

• Chidamber SR, Kemerer CF (1994) A metrics suite for object-oriented design. IEEE Trans on Softw Eng 20(6):476– 493

  Google Scholar 

• Coleman D, Arnold P, Bodoff S, Dollin C, Gilchrist H, Hayes F, Jeremaes P (1993) Object-oriented development: the fusion method. Prentice Hall

• Coplien JO, Schmidt DC (1995) Pattern languages of program design. Addison-Wesley (Software Patterns Series)

• Curtis C (1980) Measurement and experimentation in software engineering. Proc IEEE 68(9):1144–1157

  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Daly J, Brooks A, Miller J, Roper M, Wood M (1996) Evaluating inheritance depth on the maintainability of object-oriented software. Empirical Software Engineering, An International Journal 1(2):109–132

  Google Scholar 

• US Department of Defense (DoD) (1983) Reference manual for the Ada Programming Language

• D'Souza DF, Wills AC (1998) Objects, components and frameworks with UML: the catalysis approach. Addison-Wesley

• Gamma E, Helm R, Johnson R, Vlissides J (1995) Design patterns–elements of reusable objectoriented software. Addison-Wesley

• Grady RB (1992) Practical software metrics for project management and process improvement. Prentice Hall, NJ

  Google Scholar 

• Green S, Kouchakdjian A, Basili V, Weidow D (1990) The cleanroom case study in the SEL: project description and early analysis. Technical Report SEL-90-002, NASA–SEL

• Herrington J (2003) Code generation in action. Manning Publications Company

• Hofstadter DR (1996) Metamagical themas: questing for the essence of mind and pattern. Basic Books

• Holub A (2002) When it comes to good OO Design, keep it simple—feature-rich OO Design Tools fail where simple solutions succeed. Java World, a copy of the article can be obtained at http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw_01_2002/jw_0111_ootools_p.html

• Jeckle M (2005) Overview on UML CASE Tools, pages on the WWW which can be obtained at http://www.jeckle.de, last visited Spring 2005

• Kaplan B, Duchon D (1988) Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in information systems research: a case study. MIS Quarterly, pp 571–586

• Kruchten P (1998) The rational unified process: an introduction. Addison-Wesley

• Lee RC, Tepfenhart WM (1997) UML and C++. A practical guide to object-oriented development. Prentice Hall

• Leite J (2000) Lecture notes—software engineering 1 (SE-1). University of Kaiserslautern, Germany, Fall-Semester 1999–2000

• Meyer B (1992) EIFFEL—the language. Prentice Hall

• Object Management Group (OMG) (2001) OMG unified modeling language specification, version 1.5. Technical report

• Object Management Group (OMG). (2005) OMG UML 2.0 superstructure specification. Technical Report, OMG

• Martin RC, Riehle D, Buschmann F (1997) Pattern languages of program design 3. Addison-Wesley (Software Patterns Series)

• Medvidovic N, Egyed A, Rosenblum DS (1999) Round-trip software engineering using UML: from architecture to design and back, 1999. Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Object-Oriented Reengineering (WOOR), Toulouse, France, pp 1–8

• Reed PR Jr (2001) Developing applications with Java and UML. Addison-Wesley

• Rumbaugh J, Blaha M, Premerlani W, Eddy F, Lorensen W (1991) Object-oriented modeling and design. Prentice Hall

• Satpathy M, Harrison R, Snook C, Butler M (2000) A generic model for assessing process quality, proceedings. of the 10th international workshop on software measurement (IWSM 2000), lecture notes in computer science, Volume 2006, Springer, pp 94–110

• Sendall S, Küster J (2004) Taming model round-trip engineering. OOPSLA/GPCE: Best Practices for Model-Driven Software Development

• Singer B, Lovie AD, Lovie P (1986) Sample size and power. In: Lovie AD (ed), New Developments in Statistics for Psychology and the Social Sciences. The British Psychological Society and Methuen, London, pp 129–142

  Google Scholar 

• Stroustrup B (1993) The C++ programming language (2nd edition). Addison-Wesley

• Webster BF (1995) Pitfalls of object-oriented development. M&T Books

• Trochim W (2002) Threats to conclusion validity, pages on the WWW available at: http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/concthre.htm, Last visited in March 2005

• Watt JH, van den Berg S (1995) Research methods for communication science. Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, MA

  Google Scholar 

• Welkowitz J, Ewen R, Cohen J (1976) Introductory statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd edition). Academic Press

• Wohlin C, Runeson P, Höst M, Ohlsson M, Regnell B, Wesslén A (2000) Experimentation in software engineering—an introduction. Kluwer Academic Publishers

• Wood M, Daly J, Miller J, Roper M (1999) Multi-method research: an empirical investigation of object-oriented technology. Journal of Systems and Software 48(1):13–26

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references