Eye tracking as an MT evaluation technique

• Ball Linden J, Eger N, Stevens R, Dodd J (2006) Applying the post-experience eye-tracked protocol (PEEP) method in usability testing. Interfaces 67: 15–19

  Google Scholar 

• Caffrey C (2008) Using pupillometric, fixation-based and subjective measures to measure the processing effort experienced when viewing subtitled TV anime with pop-up gloss. In: Göpferich S, Jakobsen A, Mees I (eds) Looking at eyes—eye tracking studies of reading and translation processing. Copenhagen Studies in Language 36. Samfundslitteratur, Copenhagen, pp 125–144

  Google Scholar 

• Daneman M, Carpenter P (1980) Individual differences in working memory and reading. J Verbal Learn Verbal Behav 19(4): 450–466

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Duchowski A (2003) Eye-tracking methodology—theory and practice. Springer-Verlag, London

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Göpferich, S, Jakobsen, A, Mees, I (eds) (2009) Looking at eyes—eye tracking studies of reading and translation processing. Copenhagen Studies in Language 36. Samfundslitteratur, Copenhagen, pp 125–144

  Google Scholar 

• Hess E, Polt J (1964) Pupil size in relation to mental activity in simple problem solving. Science 143: 1190–1192

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hyönä J, Nurminen AM (2006) Do adult readers know how they read? Evidence from eye movement patterns and verbal reports. Br J Psychol 97: 31–50

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Iqbal S, Adamzyck P, Zheng X, Bailey P (2005) Towards an index of opportunity: understanding changes in mental workload during task execution. In: Human factors in computing systems: proceedings of CHI’05. ACM Press, New York, pp 311–320

• Jakobsen AL, Jensen K (2009) Eye movement behaviour across four different types of reading task. In: Göpferich S, Jakobsen A, Mees I (eds) Looking at eyes—eye tracking studies of reading and translation processing. Copenhagen Studies in Language 36. Samfundslitteratur, Copenhagen, pp 103–124

  Google Scholar 

• Jakobsen AL (1999) Logging target text production with Translog. In: Hansen G (eds) Probing the process in translation: methods and results. Copenhagen Studies in Language 24. Samfundslitteratur, Copenhagen, pp 9–20

  Google Scholar 

• Kaakinen JK, Hyönä J (2005) Perspective effects on expository text comprehension: evidence from think-aloud protocols, eyetracking, and recalls. Discourse Process 40: 239–257

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kaakinen JK, Hyönä J, Keenan J (2003) How prior knowledge, WMC, and relevance of information affect eye fixations in expository text. J Exp Psychol 29(3): 447–457

  Google Scholar 

• Kintsch W (1998) Comprehension: a paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England

  Google Scholar 

• Nakayama M, Koji T, Yasutaka S (2002) The act of task difficulty and eye-movement frequency for the oculo-motor indices. In: Proceedings of the symposium on eye tracking research and application, New Orleans, Louisiana, pp 37–42

• O’Brien S (forthcoming) Controlled language and readability. In: Shreve G, Angelone E (eds) Translation and cognition. American Translators Association Scholarly Monograph Series. John Benjamins, Amsterdam

• O’Brien S (2008) Processing fuzzy matches in translation memory tools—an eye-tracking analysis. In: Göpferich S, Jakobsen A, Mees I (eds) Looking at eyes—eye tracking studies of reading and translation processing. Copenhagen Studies in Language 36. Samfundslitteratur, Copenhagen, pp 79–102

  Google Scholar 

• O’Brien S (2006) Eye-tracking and translation memory matches. Perspectives 14(3): 185–205

  Google Scholar 

• Rayner K (1998) Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychol Bull 124: 372–422

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Roturier J (2006) An investigation into the impact of controlled English rules on the comprehensibility, usefulness, and acceptability of machine-translated technical documentation for French and German users. PhD Dissertation, Dublin City University

• Roturier J (2009) Deploying novel MT technology to raise the bar for quality: a review of key advantages and challenges. MT Summit XII: proceedings of the twelfth Machine Translation Summit, August 26–30, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

• Schultheis H, Jameson A (2004) Assessing cognitive load in adaptive hypermedia systems: Physiological and behavioural methods. In: Neijdlw W, Bra P (eds) Adaptive hypermedia and adaptive web-based systems. Springer Verlag, Eindhoven, pp 18–24

  Google Scholar 

• Stanford Poynter Project: http://www.poynterextra.org/et/i.htm [Last accessed: 29/04/2009]

• Van Gog T, Kester L, Nievelstein F, Giesbers B, Paas F (2009) Uncovering cognitive processes: different techniques that can contribute to cognitive load research and instruction. Comput Hum Behav 25: 325–331

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references