[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Participatory Impact Assessment of Soil and Water Conservation Scenarios in Oum Zessar Watershed, Tunisia

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Environmental threats and progressive degradation of natural resources are considered critical impediments to sustainable development. This paper reports on a participatory impact assessment of alternative soil and water conservation (SWC) scenarios in the Oum Zessar watershed, Tunisia. The first objective was to assess the impact of three SWC scenarios on key social, economic and environmental land use functions. The second objective was to test and evaluate the applicability of the ‘Framework for Participatory Impact Assessment (FoPIA)’ for assessing scenario impacts in the context of a developing country, in this case Tunisia. The assessed scenarios included: the originally planned SWC policy implementation at 85 % coverage of arable land of the watershed, the current implementation (70 %), and a hypothetical expansion of SWC measures to the entire watershed (100 %). Our results suggest that implementation of the SWC policy at 100 % coverage of arable land achieves the maximum socioeconomic benefit. However, if stakeholders’ preferences regarding land use functions are taken into account, and considering the fact that the implementation of SWC measures also implies some negative changes to traditional landscapes and the natural system, SWC implementation at 85 % coverage of arable land might be preferable. The FoPIA approved to be a useful tool for conducting a holistic sustainability impact assessment of SWC scenarios and for studying the most intriguing sustainability problems while providing possible recommendations towards sustainable development. We conclude that participatory impact assessment contributes to an enhanced regional understanding of key linkages between policy effects and sustainable development, which provides the foundation for improved policy decision making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. National Institute of Statistics, Tunisia.

References

  • Amsalu A, de Graaff J (2007) Determinants of adoption and continued use of stone terraces for soil and water conservation in an Ethiopian highland watershed. Ecological Economics 61:294–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacic ILZ, Bregt AK, Rossiter DG (2006) A participatory approach for integrating risk assessment into rural decision-making: a case study in Santa Catarina, Brazil. Agricultural Systems 87:229–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baur H, Poulter G, Puccioni M, Castro P, Lutzeyer HJ, Krall S (2003) Impact assessment and evaluation in agricultural research for development. Agricultural Systems 78:329–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett EM, Peterson GD, Gordon LJ (2009) Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters 12:1394–1404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binder CR, Feola G, Steinberger JK (2010) Considering the normative, systemic and procedural dimensions in indicator-based sustainability assessments in agriculture. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 30:71–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulanger PM, Brechet T (2005) Models for policy-making in sustainable development: the state of the art and perspectives for research. Ecological Economics 55:337–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brismar A (2002) River systems as providers of goods and services: a basis for comparing desired and undesired effects of large dam projects. Environmental Management 29:598–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (2005) Impact assessment guidelines

  • European Commission SEC (2005) 791, European Commission. 10-5-2007. http://www.mfcr.cz/cps/rde/xbcr/mfcr/SEC2005791ImpactAssessmentGuidelines2006update.pdf

  • De Ridder W, Turnpenny J, Nilsson M, Von Raggamby A (2007) A framework for tool selection and use in integrated assessment for sustainable development. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 9:423–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Smedt P (2010) The use of impact assessment tools to support sustainable policy objectives in Europe. Ecology and Society 15:Art.30

  • Dhehibi B, Lachaal L (2006) Empirical evidence of productivity growth in Tunisian agriculture: 1961-2000. African Development Review-Revue Africaine de Developpement 18:248–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Balteiro L, Romero C (2004) In search of a natural systems sustainability index. Ecological Economics 49:401–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleskens L, Stroosnijder L, Ouessar M, De Graaff J (2005) Evaluation of the on-site impact of water harvesting in southern Tunisia. Journal of Arid Environments 62:613–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman ER (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • George C, Kirkpatrick C (2006) Assessing national sustainable development strategies: strengthening the links to operational policy. Natural Resources Forum 30:146–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacking T, Guthrie P (2002) A framework for clarifying the meaning of triple bottom-line, integrated, and sustainability assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 28:73–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halvorson WL, Castellanos AE, Murrieta-Saldivar J (2003) Sustainable land use requires attention to ecological signals. Environmental Management 32:551–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helming K, Diehl K, Bach H, Dilly O, König B, Kuhlman T, Perez-Soba M, Sieber S, Tabbush P, Tscherning K, Wascher D, Wiggering H (2011) Ex ante impact assessment of policies affecting land use, part A: analytical framework. Ecology and Society 16:Art. 27

  • Hill J, Woodland W (2003) Contrasting water management techniques in Tunisia: towards sustainable agricultural use. The Geographical Journal 169:342–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill MJ, Lesslie R, Donohue R, Houlder P, Holloway J, Smith J, Ritman K (2006) Multi-criteria assessment of tensions in resource use at continental scale: a proof of concept with Australian rangelands. Environmental Management 37:712–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holman IP, Rounsevell MDA, Cojacaru G, Shackley S, McLachlan C, Audsley E, Berry PM, Fontaine C, Harrison PA, Henriques C, Mokrech M, Nicholls RJ, Pearn KR, Richards JA (2008) The concepts and development of a participatory regional integrated assessment tool. Climatic Change 90:5–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeddi K, Chaieb M (2010) Changes in soil properties and vegetation following livestock grazing exclusion in degraded arid environments of South Tunisia. Flora—Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants 205:184–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kates RW, Clark WC, Corell R, Hall JM, Jaeger CC, Lowe I, McCarthy JJ, Schellnhuber HJ, Bolin B, Dickson NM, Faucheux S, Gallopin GC, Grubler A, Huntley B, Jager J, Jodha NS, Kasperson RE, Mabogunje A, Matson P, Mooney H, Moore B, O’Riordan T, Svedin U (2001) Environment and development—Sustainability science. Science 292:641–642

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick C, Parker D (2004) Regulatory impact assessment and regulatory governance in developing countries. Public Administration and Development 24:333–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • König HJ, Schuler J, Suarma U, McNeill D, Imbernon J, Damayanti F, Dalimunthe SA, Uthes S, Sartohadi J, Helming K, Morris J (2010) Assessing the impact of land use policy on urban-rural sustainability using the FoPIA Approach in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Sustainability 2:1991–2009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • König HJ, Zhen L, Helming K, Uthes S, Yang L, Xiaochang C, Wiggering H (in press) Assessing the impact of the SLCP land conversion program on rural sustainability in Guyuan, Western China. Land Degradation & Development.

  • Lambin EF, Turner BL, Geist HJ, Agbola SB, Angelsen A, Bruce JW, Coomes OT, Dirzo R, Fischer G, Folke C, George PS, Homewood K, Imbernon J, Leemans R, Li XB, Moran EF, Mortimore M, Ramakrishnan PS, Richards JF, Skanes H, Steffen W, Stone GD, Svedin U, Veldkamp TA, Vogel C, Xu JC (2001) The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions 11:261–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linkov I, Satterstrom FK, Kiker G, Batchelor C, Bridges T, Ferguson E (2006) From comparative risk assessment to multi-criteria decision analysis and adaptive management: recent developments and applications. Environment International 32:1072–1093

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Dietz T, Carpenter SR, Alberti M, Folke C, Moran E, Pell AN, Deadman P, Kratz T, Lubchenco J, Ostrom E, Ouyang Z, Provencher W, Redman CL, Schneider SH, Taylor WW (2007) Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 317:1513–1516

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morris J, Tassone V, De Groot R, Camilleri M, Moncada S (2011) A Framework for Participatory Impact Assessment’ (FoPIA): involving stakeholders in European policy-making, a case study of land use change in Malta. Ecology and Society 16:Art. 12

  • O’Farrell PJ, Anderson PM (2010) Sustainable multifunctional landscapes: a review to implementation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2:59–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouessar M, Sghaier M, Mahdhi N, Abdelli F, De Graaff J, Chaieb H, Yahyaoui H, Gabriels D (2004) An integrated approach for impact assessment of water harvesting techniques in dry areas: the case of oued oum zessar watershed (Tunisia). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 99:127–140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ouessar M, Bruggeman A, Mohtar R, Ouerchefani D, Abdelli F, Boufelgha M (2009) An Overview of Evaluation and Impact Assessment Tools for Water Harvesting. In: Lee C, Schaaf T (eds) The future of drylands. Springer, Netherlands, pp 255–267

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Paracchini ML, Pacini C, Jones MLM, Perez-Soba M (2011) An aggregation framework to link indicators associated with multifunctional land use to the stakeholder evaluation of policy options. Ecological Indicators 11:71–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Soba M, Petit S, Jones L, Bertrand N, Briquel V, Omodei-Zorini L, Contini C, Helming K, Farrington JH, Mossello MT, Wascher D, Kienast F, Groot R (2008) Land use functions—a multifunctionality approach to assess the impact of land use changes on land use sustainability. In: Helming K, Pérez-Soba M, Tabbush P (eds) Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes. Springer, Berlin, pp 375–404

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pope J, Grace W (2006) Sustainability assessment in context: issues of process, policy and governance. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 8:373–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed MS (2008) Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biological Conservation 141:2417–2431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reidsma P, König H, Feng S, Bezlepkina I, Nesheim I, Bonin M, Sghaier M, Purushothaman S, Sieber S, van Ittersum MK, Brouwer F (2011) Methods and tools for integrated assessment of land use policies on sustainable development in developing countries. Land Use Policy 28:604–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotmans J (1998) Methods for IA: the challenges and opportunities ahead. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 3:155–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiettecatte W, Ouessar M, Gabriels D, Tanghe S, Heirman S, Abdelli F (2005) Impact of water harvesting techniques on soil and water conservation: a case study on a micro catchment in southeastern Tunisia. Journal of Arid Environments 61:297–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schößer B, Helming K, Wiggering H (2010) Assessing land use change impacts—a comparison of the SENSOR land use function approach with other frameworks. Journal of Land Use Science 5:159–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scrieciu SS (2007) The inherent dangers of using computable general equilibrium models as a single integrated modelling framework for sustainability impact assessment. A critical note on Bohringer and Löschel (2006). Ecological Economics 60:678–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sghaier M, Ounalli N, Djeder H, Bouzaida MA (2009) D 3.1—overview and analysis of land use policies in Tunisia. LUPIS, E. 6. F. P. w. l. e

  • Sheate WR, do Partidario MR, Byron H, Bina O, Dagg S (2008) Sustainability assessment of future scenarios: methodology and application to mountain areas of Europe. Environmental Management 41:282–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sieber S, Müller K, Verweij P, Haraldsson H, Fricke K, Pacini C, Tscherning K, Helming K, Jansson T (2008) Transfer into decision support: the sustainability impact assessment tool. Springer, New York, pp 107–128

  • Singh RK, Murty HR, Gupta SK, Dikshit AK (2009) An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological Indicators 9:189–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slee B (2007) Social indicators of multifunctional rural land use: the case of forestry in the UK. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 120:31–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smeets E, Weterings R (1999) Environmental indicators: typology and overview. European Environmental Agency (EAA), Copenhagen

  • Steinfeld H, Mooney HA, Schmeider F, Neville LE (2010) Livestock in a changing landscape, vol 1. Drivers, consequences and responses. Island Press, Washington DC

  • Thabrew L, Wiek A, Ries R (2009) Environmental decision making in multi-stakeholder contexts: applicability of life cycle thinking in development planning and implementation. Journal of Cleaner Production 17:67–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tscherning K, König H, Schößer B, Helming K, Sieber S (2008) Ex-ante Impact Assessments (IA) in the European Commission—an overview. In: Helming K, Pérez-Soba M, Tabbush P (eds) Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes. Springer, Berlin, pp 17–33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Uthes S, Fricke K, König H, Zander P, van Ittersum M, Sieber S, Helming K, Piorr A, Müller K (2010) Policy relevance of three integrated assessment tools—A comparison with specific reference to agricultural policies. Ecological Modelling 221:2136–2152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Ittersum MK, Ewert F, Heckelei T, Wery J, Olsson JA, Andersen E, Bezlepkina I, Brouwer F, Donatelli M, Flichman G, Olsson L, Rizzoli AE, van der Wal T, Wien JE, Wolf J (2008) Integrated assessment of agricultural systems—A component-based framework for the European Union (SEAMLESS). Agricultural Systems 96:150–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walmsley JJ (2002) Framework for measuring sustainable development in catchment systems. Environmental Management 29:195–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter C, Stutzel H (2009) A new method for assessing the sustainability of land-use systems (II): evaluating impact indicators. Ecological Economics 68:1288–1300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walz R (2000) Development of environmental indicator systems: experiences from Germany. Environmental Management 25:613–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggering H, Dalchow C, Glemnitz M, Helming K, Müller K, Schultz A, Stachow U, Zander P (2006) Indicators for multifunctional land use—Linking socio-economic requirements with landscape potentials. Ecological Indicators 6:238–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhen L, Cao S, Wei Y, Dilly O, Liu X, Li F, Koenig H, Tscherning K, Helming K (2009) Comparison of sustainability issues in two sensitive areas of China. Environmental Science & Policy 12:1153–1167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu X, Dale AP (2000) Identifying opportunities for decision support systems in support of regional resource use planning: an approach through soft systems methodology. Environmental Management 26:371–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work in this publication was supported by the LUPIS project under the EU 6th Framework Sustainable Development, Global Change and Ecosystems programme. The authors wish to acknowledge first the numerous stakeholders who contributed their knowledge to this study. We thank all the anonymous reviewers for their thorough evaluation and constructive recommendations for improving this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hannes Jochen König.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

König, H.J., Sghaier, M., Schuler, J. et al. Participatory Impact Assessment of Soil and Water Conservation Scenarios in Oum Zessar Watershed, Tunisia. Environmental Management 50, 153–165 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9865-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9865-y

Keywords

Navigation