[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Multiple-response optimisation of electrochemical grinding characteristics through response surface methodology

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper comprehensively evaluates the influence of voltage and cutting speed on electrochemical grinding of composite carbide inserts. A complete 42 factorial experiment was planned and carried out where each treatment combination has been replicated twice to achieve an acceptable degree of precision. Mathematical models have been developed for the major performance indices like current density, material removal rate (MRR) and surface finish of the job by multiple linear regression analysis. Then multiple-response optimisation has been carried out to find the optimum parameter settings to get a desired yield both by desirability functions as well as by contour overlapping method. It has been found that passivation occurs increasingly at higher voltages and it is removed almost instantaneously at higher speed leading to higher current density and MRR. The surface finish is not very much dependent on grinding speed. The optimum surface finish is obtainable at 12 to 13 V (app.) in electrochemical grinding of composite carbides.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nandiv S, Lenze E, Geva M (1976) Peripheral electrochemical grinding of cintered carbides—effect on surface finish. Wear 38:325–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Maksoud TMA, Brooks AJ (1995) Electrochemical grinding of ceramic form tooling. J Mater Process Technol 55:70–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lyubimov VV, Yerokhin AL, Tchmir MYa (1998) Mechanisms of synthetic diamond wear in tools for electrochemical grinding. Diamond Relat Mater 7:1267–1271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Noble CF (1983) Electromechanical action in peripheral electrochemical grinding. Ann CIRP 32/1:123–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Roy S, Bhattacharyya A, Banerjee S (2007) Analysis of effect of voltage on surface texture in electrochemical grinding by autocorrelation function. Tribol Int 40:1387–1393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Aggarwala A, Singh H, Kumar P, Singh M (2008) Optimization of multiple quality characteristics for CNC turning under cryogenic cutting environment using desirability function. J Mater Process Technol 205:42–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Benedict GF (1987) Nontraditional manufacturing processes. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Puri AB, Bhattacharya B (2005) Modelling and analysis of white layer depth in wire-cut EDM process through response surface methodology. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 25:301–307, Number 3–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Montgomery DC (2000) Design and analysis of experiments, 5th edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Asit Baran Puri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Puri, A.B., Banerjee, S. Multiple-response optimisation of electrochemical grinding characteristics through response surface methodology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 64, 715–725 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4065-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4065-8

Keywords