A survey of multidisciplinary design optimization methods in launch vehicle design

• Agte J (2005) A tool for application of bi-level integrated system synthesis to multidisciplinary design optimization problems. In: DGLR-2005-241, German air and space congress, Friedrichshafen, Germany

• Agte J, de Weck O, Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J, Arendsen P, Morris A, Spieck M (2009) MDO: assessment and direction for advancement—an opinion of one international group. Struct Multidisc Optim. doi:10.1007/s00158-009-0381-5

  Google Scholar 

• Akhtar S, Linshu H (2005) Simulation-based optimization strategy for liquid fueled multi-stage space launch vehicle. In: 6th international conference on parallel and distributed computing, applications and technologies (PDCAT’05). Dalian, China

• Akhtar S, Linshu H (2006) Support vector regression-driven multidisciplinary design optimization for multi-stage launch vehicle considering throttling effect. In: 44th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit. Reno, Nevada, USA

• Alaya I, Solnon C, Ghedira K (2007) Ant colony optimization for multi-objective optimization problems. In: 19th IEEE international conference on tools with artificial intelligence. Patras, Greece

• Alexandrov N, Hussaini M (1995) Multidisciplinary design optimization: state of the art. In: Proceedings of the ICASE/NASA Langley workshop on multidisciplinary design optimization, SIAM proceedings series

• Alexandrov N, Lewis R (2000) Algorithmic perspectives on problem formulations in MDO. In: 8th AIAA/UASAF/NASA/ISSMO symposium on multidisciplinary analysis & optimization. Long Beach, CA, USA

• Allison J (2004) Complex system optimization: a comparison of analytical target cascading, collaborative optimization and other formulations. Ph.D. thesis, University of Michigan, USA

• Allison J, Kokkolaras M, Zawislak M, Papalambros P (2005) On the use of analytical target cascading and collaborative optimization for complex system design. In: 6th world congress on structural and multidisciplinary optimization, 30 May–3 June, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

• Altus T (2002) A response surface methodology for Bi-Level Integrated System Synthesis (BLISS). NASA Technical Report n° NASA/CR-2002-211652. NASA Langley Research Center, USA

• Auroux D, Clément J, Hermetz J, Masmoudi M, Parte Y (2009) Etat de l’art et nouvelles tendances en conception collaborative. Optimisation multidisciplinaire en mécanique. Hermes Science, ISTE Wiley, London

• Bäck T (1996) Evolutionary algorithms in theory and practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Balesdent M, Bérend N, Dépincé P (2010a) Optimal design of expendable lauch vehicles using stage-wise MDO formulation. In: 13th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference. Fort Worth, Texas, USA. AIAA-2010-9324

• Balesdent M, Bérend N, Dépincé P, Chriette A (2010b) Multidisciplinary design optimization of a multi-stage launch vehicle using flight phases decomposition. In: 3rd international conference on multidisciplinary design optimization and applications. Paris, France

• Balling R, Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J (1994) Optimization of coupled systems: a critical overview of approaches. NASA/ICASE Report n° 94-100

• Balling R, Wilkinson C (1997) Execution of multidisciplinary design optimization approaches on common test problems. AIAA J 35(1):178–186

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Bayley D, Hartfield R (2007) Design optimization of space launch vehicles for minimum cost using a genetic algorithm. In: 43rd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference and exhibit. Cincinnati, OH, USA. AIAA-2007-5852

• Bayley D, Hartfield R, Burkhalter J, Jenkins R (2008) Design optimization of a space launch vehicle using a genetic algorithm. J Spacecr Rockets 45(4):733–740

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Betts J (1998) Survey of numerical methods for trajectory optimization. J Guid Control Dyn 21(2):193–207

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Boman E (1999). Infeasibility and negative curvature in optimization. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, USA

• Braun R (1996) Collaborative optimization: an architecture for large-scale distributed design. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, USA

• Braun R, Kroo I (1995) Development and application of the collaborative optimization architecture in a multidisciplinary design environment. In: Multidisciplinary design optimization: state of the art. SIAM, Philadelphia, pp 98–116

  Google Scholar 

• Braun R, Kroo I, Gage P (1993) Post-optimality analysis in aerospace vehicle design. In: AIAA aircraft design, systems and operations meeting. Monterey, CA, USA

• Braun R, Kroo I, Lepsch R, Powell R, Stanley D (1995) Comparison of two multidisciplinary optimization strategies for launch vehicle design. J Spacecr Rockets 32(3):404–410

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Braun R, Moore A, Kroo I (1996) Use of the collaborative optimization architecture for launch vehicle design. In: 6th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization. Bellevue, WA, USA

• Briggs G, Ray T, Milthorpe J (2007a). Evolutionary algorithm use in optimisation of a launch vehicle stack model. In: 45th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit. Reno, Nevada, USA. AIAA-2007-364

• Briggs G, Ray T, Milthorpe J (2007b) Optimal design of an Australian medium launch vehicle. Innov Syst Softw Eng 2(3):105–116

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Brown N, Olds J (2005) Evaluation of Multidisciplinary Optimization (MDO) techniques applied to a reusable launch vehicle. In: 43rd AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit. Reno, Nevada, USA

• Brown N, Olds R (2006) Evaluation of multidisciplinary optimization techniques applied to a reusable launch vehicle. J Spacecr Rockets 43:1289–1300

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bryson A (1999) Dynamic optimization. Addison-Wesley, Menlo-Park

  Google Scholar 

• Bryson A, Ho Y-C (1975) Applied optimal control: optimization, estimation and control, revised printing. Taylor & Francis, Levittown

  Google Scholar 

• Castellini F, Lavagna M, Erf S (2008) Concurrent optimization of launcher architectures and ascent trajectories with global optimization algorithms. In: 59th international astronautical congress (IAC). Glasgow, Scotland

  Google Scholar 

• Clément J (2009) Optimisation multi-disciplinaire: étude théorique et application à la conception des avions en phase d’avant projet. Ph.D. thesis, Institut Supérieur de l’Aéronautique et de l’Espace. Toulouse, France

• Coello C (1998) An updated survey of GA-based multi-objective optimization techniques. Technical Report RD-98-08. Laboratorio Nacional de Informatica Avanzada (LNIA). Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico

• Coello C (1999) A comprehensive survey of evolutionary-based multi-objective optimization. Knowl Inf Syst 1(3):129–137

  Google Scholar 

• Cormier T, Scott A, Ledsinger L, McCormick D, Way D, Olds R (2000) Comparison of collaborative optimization to conventional design techniques for a conceptual RLV. In: 8th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization. Long Beach, CA, USA

• Cramer E, Dennis J, Frank P, Lewis R, Shubin G (1994) Problem formulation for multidisciplinary optimization. SIAM J Optim 4:754–776

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Delattre N, Mongrard O (2007) The use of multidisciplinary optimization for the design of expendable launchers. In: 2nd European conference for aerospace sciences (EUCASS). Brussels, Belgium

• DeMiguel A (2001) Two decomposition algorithms for nonconvex optimization problems with global variables. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, USA

• DeMiguel A, Murray W (2000) An analysis of collaborative optimization methods. In: 8th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization. Long Beach, CA, USA

• Doerner K, Gutjahr W, Hartl W, Strauss R, Stummer C (2001) Ant colony optimization in multiobjective porfolio selection. In: 4th metaheuristics international conference. Porto, Portugal

• Dorigo M, Süzle T (2004) Ant colony optimization. MIT Press, Cambridge

  Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Du X, Chen W (2002) Efficient uncertainty analysis methods for multidisciplinary robust design. AIAA J 40(3):545–552

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Duranté N, Dufour A, Pain V (2004) Multidisciplinary analysis and optimisation approach for the design of expendable launchers. In: 10th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference. Albany, New-York, USA

  Google Scholar 

• Filatyev A, Golikov A (2008) The complex approach to optimization of STS parameters on the maximum principle basis. In: 59th international astronautical congress (IAC). Glasgow, Scotland

  Google Scholar 

• Filatyev A, Golikov A, Shanygin A, Voityshen V (2009) The local distributed criteria method for multidisciplinary optimization of launchers parameters. Acta Astron 65:584–590

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fletcher R (1987) Practical methods of optimization, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Fonseca C, Fleming P (1993) Genetic algorithms for multi-objective optimization: formulation, discussion and generalization. In: Forrest S (ed) 5th international conference on genetic algorithms. San Mateo, CA, USA

• Gang C, Min X, Zi-ming W, Si-Lu C (2005) Multidisciplinary design optimization of RLV reentry trajectory. In: 13th AIAA/CIRA international space planes and hypersonices systems and technologies. Capua, Italy

• Geethaikrishnan C, Mujumbar P, Sudhakar K, Adimurthy VV (2008) Genetic algorithm guided gradient search for launch vehicle trajectory optimization. In: International conference on aerospace science and technology. Bangalore, India

• Gill P, Murray W, Wright M (1981) Practical optimization. Academic, New York

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Gill P, Murray W, Sainders M, Wright M (1986) Users guide for NPSOL (version 4.0): a Fortran package for nonlinear programming. Technical Report SOL 86-2. Stanford University, USA

• Han J, Papalambros P (2010) A note on the convergence of analytical target cascading with infinite norms. J Mech Des 132:034502

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hargraves C, Paris S (1987) Direct trajectory optimization using nonlinear programming and collocation. J Guid Control Dyn 10(4):338–342

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Holland J (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

  Google Scholar 

• Huang C, Bloebaum C (2004) Multi-objective Pareto concurrent subspace optimization for multidisciplinary design. In: 42nd AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit. Reno, Nevada, USA

• Jodei J, Ebrahimi M, Roshanian J (2006) An automated approach to multidisciplinary system design optimization of small solid propellant launch vehicles. In: 1st ISSCAA international symposium on systems and control in aerospace and astronautics. Harbin, China

• Jodei J, Ebrahimi M, Roshanian J (2009) Multidisciplinary design optimization of a small solid propellant launch vehicle using system sensitivity analysis. Struct Multidisc Optim 38:93–100

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kalden O (2007) Multidisciplinary design and trajectory optimization of the reusable launch vehicle concept Hopper. In: 3rd international conference on recent advances in space technologies. Istanbul, Turkey

• Keane A, Nair P (2005) Computational approaches for aerospace design: the pursuit of excellence. Wiley, New York

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Kim H (2001) Target cascading in optimal system design. Ph.D. thesis, University of Michigan

• Kim H, Chen W, Wiecek M (2006) Lagrangian coordination for enhancing the convergence of analytical target cascading. AIAA J 44(10):2197–2207

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt C, Vecchi J (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science, New Series 220(4598):671–680

  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Kodiyalam S (1998) Evaluation of methods for Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO), phase 1. NASA/CR-1998-20716

• Kodiyalam S (2000) Evaluation of methods for Multidisciplinary Design optimization (MDO), phase 2. NASA/CR-2000-210313

• Kroo I (2004) Distributed multidisciplinary design and collaborative optimization. In: VKI lecture series on optimization methods and tools for multicriteria/multidisciplinary design

• Kudryavtsev L (2001) Implicit function. In: Hazewinkel M ed. Encyclopaedia of mathematics. Springer, New York

  Google Scholar 

• Kuratani N, Suzuki H, Goeklich RA (2005) Multidisciplinary optimization of space transportation systems. In: 56th international astronautical congress of the international astronautical federation. Fukuoka, Japan

• Laurent-Varin J, Bolanowski O, Cristiani E, Zidani H (2009) Trajectory optimization of launcher with Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman approach. In: 3rd European conference for aerospace sciences. Versailles, France

• Ledsinger L, Olds J (2002) Optimized solutions for Kistler K-1 Branching Trajectories using Multidisciplinary Design Optimization techniques. J Spacecr Rockets 39(3):420–429

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lee J-W, Choi Y-C, Byun Y-H (2005a). Optimal supersonic air-launching rocket design using multi-disciplinary system optimization approach. J Korean Soc Aeronaut Space Sci 33:12

  Google Scholar 

• Lee J-W, Jeon K-S, Byun Y-H, Kim S-J (2005b) Optimal space launcher design using a refined response surface method. In: Lecture notes in computer science, vol 3613/2005. Springer, Berlin

  Google Scholar 

• Liu X, Xiang A, Gang T (1997) A new efficient method of multi-stage solid rocket optimization. In: 33rd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference and exhibit. Seattle, WA, USA

• Luo Y, Liang Y, Zhou L (2004) Multi-level, multi-objective and multidisciplinary optimization design of a series of launch vehicles. In: 55th international astronautical congress. Vancouver, Canada

• Martins J, Marriage C (2007) An object-oriented framework for Multidisciplinary Design Optimization. In: 3rd AIAA multidisciplinary design optimization specialist conference. Waikiki, Hawaii, USA

• Masmoudi M, Parte Y (2006) Discipline Interaction Variable Elimination (DIVE) approach for MDO. In: European conference on computational fluid dynamics (ECCOMAS CFD). Egmond aan Zee, The Netherlands

• Masmoudi M, Parte Y, Hermetz J, Clement J (2008) DIVE: a new approach for multidisciplinary optimization. In: 5th European congress on computational methods in applied sciences (ECCOMAS). Venice, Italy

• Metropolis N, Rosenbluth A, Rosenbluth M, Teller A, Teller E (1953) Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines. J Chem Phys 21:1087–1092

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Michelena N, Kim H, Papalambros P (1999) A system partitioning and optimization approach to target cascading. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on engineering design. Munich, Germany

• Michelena N, Park H, Papalambros P (2003) Convergence properties of analytical target cascading. AIAA J 41(5):897–905

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Moore A, Braun R, Powell R (1995) Optimal technology investment strategies for a reusable launch vehicle. In: AIAA space programs and technologies conference. Huntsville, AL, USA

• Nocedal J, Wright S (2006) Numerical optimization, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Olds J (1992) The suitability of selected multidisciplinary design and optimization techniques to conceptual aerospace vehicle design. In: 4th AIAA/USAF/NASA/OAI symposium on multidisiciplinary analysis and optimization. Cleveland, OH, USA

• Olds J (1994) System sensitivity analysis applied to the conceptual design of a dual-fuel rocket SSTO. In: 5th AIAA/NASA/USAF/ISSMO symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization. Panama City Beach, FL, USA

• Olds J, Walberg G (1993) Multidisciplinary design of a rocket-based combined cycle SSTO launch vehicle using Taguchi methods. In: AIAA/AHS/ASEE aerospace design conference. Irvine, CA, USA

• Pareto V (1971) Manual of political economy. A.M. Kelley, New York

  Google Scholar 

• Perez V, Renaud J, Watson L (2002) Adaptive experimental design for construction of response surface approximations. AIAA J 40(12):2495–2503

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Perrot L (2003) Optimisation of reusable launchers by decomposition and coordination of trajectory optimisation problems. In: 5th international conference on launcher technology, space launchers: missions, control and avionics. Madrid , Spain

• Pontryagin L, Boltyansky V, Gamkrelidze R, Mischenko E (1962) The mathematical theory of optimal processes. Interscience, New York

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Qu M, Gage P, Sohn J, Bradford J, Starr B (2004) Generalized vehicle performance closure model for two-stage-to-orbit launch vehicles. In: 42nd AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit. Reno, Nevada, USA

• Rafique A, LinShu H, Zeeshan Q, Nisar K, Xiaowei W (2009a) Hybrid optimization method for multidisciplinary design of air launched satellite launch vehicle. In: 45th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit. Denver, Colorado, USA

• Rafique A, LinShu H, Zeeshan Q, Nisar K, Xiaowei W (2009b) Integrated system design of air launched small space launch vehicle using genetic algorithm. In: 45th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit. Denver, Colorado, USA

• Rahn M, Schöttle U (1994) Decomposition algorithm for flight performance and system optimization of an airbreathing launch vehicle. In: 45th congress of International Astronautical Federation. Jerusalem, Israel. IAF-94.A.2.018

• Renaud J, Gabriele G (1993) Improved coordination in nonhierarchic system optimization. AIAA J 31(12):2367–2373

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Renaud J, Gabriele G (1994) Approximation in nonhierarchic system optimization. AIAA J 32(1):198–205

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Rodriguez J, Renaud J, Watson L (1998) Trust region augmented Lagrangian methods for sequential response surface approximation and optimization. J Mech Des 120:58–66

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rodriguez J, Perez V, Padmanabhan D, Renaud J (2001) Sequential approximate optimization using variable fidelity response surface approximations. Struct Multidisc Optim 22(1):24–34

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sellar R, Batill S (1996) Concurrent subspace optimization using gradient-enhanced neural network approximations. In: 6th AIAA/NASA/USAF multidisciplinary analysis and optimization symposium. Bellevue, WA, USA

• Sellar R, Batill S, Renaud J (1996) Response surface based, concurrent subspace optimization for multidisciplinary system design. In: 34th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit. Reno, Nevada, USA

• Serafini P (1992) Simulated annealing for multiple objective optimization problems. In: 10th international conference on multiple criteria decision making. Taipei, Taiwan

• Sobieski I (1993) Multidisciplinary design optimization: attempt at definition. In: Industry university workshop on multidisciplinary aircraft design, pp 23–48

• Sobieski I, Kroo I (2000) Collaborative optimization using response surface estimation. AIAA J 38(10):1931–1938

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J (1988) Optimization by decomposition: a step from hierarchic to non-hierarchic systems. NASA Technical Report CP-3031

• Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J (1990) Sensitivity of complex internally coupled systems. AIAA J 28(1):153–160

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J, Haftka R (1997) Multidisciplinary aerospace design optimization: survey of recent developments. Struct Optim (14):1–23

• Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J, Agte J, Sandusky R (1998) Bi-Level Integrated System Synthesis (BLISS). NASA/TM-1998-208715

• Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J, Emiley M, Agte J, Sandusky R (2000) Advancement of Bi-Level Integrated System Synthesis (BLISS). NASA/TM-2000-210305

• Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J, Altus T, Phillips M, Sandusky R (2003) Bi-level Integrated System Synthesis for concurrent and distributed processing. AIAA J 41(10):1996–2003

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tava M, Suzuki S (2002) Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of the shape and trajectory of a reentry vehicle. Trans Jpn Soc Aeronaut Space Sci 45(147):10–19

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tava M, Suzuki S (2003) Integrated multidisciplinary and multicriteria optimization of a space transportation system and its trajectory. In: 54th international astronautical congress of the International Astronautical Federation. Bremen, Germany

• Tedford N, Martins J (2010) Benchmarking multidisciplinary design optimization algorithms. Optim Eng 11:159–183

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Tosserams S, Etman L, Rooda J (2009) A classification of methods for distributed system optimization based on formulation structure. Struct Multidisc Optim

• Tosserams S, Kokkolaras M, Etman L, Rooda J (2010) A nonhierarchical formulation of analytical target cascading. J Mech Des 23:051002

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tsuchiya T, Mori T (2002) Multidisciplinary Design Optimization to future space transportation vehicles. In: AIAA-2002-5171

• Tsuchiya T, Mori T (2004) Optimal conceptual design of two-stage reusable rocket vehicles including trajectory optimization. J Spacecr Rockets 41(5):770–778

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ulungu E, Teghem J, Fortemps P, Tuyttens D (1999) MOSA method: a tool for solving multi-objective combinatorial optimization problems. J Multi-Crit Decis Anal 8:221–2396

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Vanderplaats G (1999) Numerical optimization techniques for engineering and design, 3rd edn. Vanderplaats Research & Development, Inc., Colorado Springs

• Villeneuve F, Mavris D (2005) A new method of architecture selection for launch vehicles. In: 13th AIAA/CIRA international space planes and hypersonics systems and technologies. Capua, Italy

• Wujek B, Renaud J, Batill S (1997) A concurrent engineering approach for multidisciplinary design in a distributed computing environment. In: Alexandrov N, Hussaini MY (eds) Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: state-of-the-art. SIAM series: Proceedings in applied mathematics, vol 80, pp 189–208

• Wujek B, Renaud J, Batill S, Brockman J (1996) Concurrent subspace optimization using design variable sharing in a distributed computing environment. Concurr Eng 4(4):361–377

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Yokoyama N, Suzuki S, Tsuchiya T, Taguchi H, Kanda T (2005) Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of SSTO space plane considering rigid body characteristics. In: 42nd AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit. Reno, Nevada, USA

• Yokoyama N, Suzuki S, Tsuchiya T, Taguchi H, Kanda T (2007) Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of SSTO space plane considering rigid body characteristics. J Spacecr Rockets 44(1):121–131

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zitzler E (1999) Evolutionary algorithms for multi-objective optimization: methods and applications. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Science, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich

Download references