The impact of goal orientation, self-reflection and personal characteristics on the acquisition of oral presentation skills

• Adams, K. (2004). Modelling success: Enhancing international postgraduate research students’ self-efficacy for research seminar presentations.Higher Education Research and Development, 23(2), 115–130.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal ofEducational Psychology, 84 (3), 261–271.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Andeweg, B., & de Jong, J. (1998). “May I have your attention”. Exordial techniques in informative oral presentations.Technical Communication Quarterly, 7(3), 271–284.

  Google Scholar 

• Bakx, A., Vermetten, Y., & Van der Sanden, J. (2003). Self-perceived competence, learning conceptions and preferred learning situations in the domain of communication. BritishJournal of Educational Psychology, 73, 223–245.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bakx, A., Van der Sanden J., Sijtsma, K., Croon, M., & Vermetten, Y. (2006). The role of students’ personality characteristics self-perceived competence and learning conceptions in the acquisition and development of social communicative competence: A longitudinal study.Higher Education, 51, 71–104.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bandura, A. (1997).Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

  Google Scholar 

• Bandura, A. (1998). Self-efficacy. In. H. Friedman (Ed.),Encyclopaedia of mental health. San Diego: Academic Press. Retrieved June 6 2003 from www.emory.edu/EDUCATION/mfp/BanEncy.html

  Google Scholar 

• Bayless, M. (2004). Change the placement, the pace, and the preparation for the oral presentation.Business Communication Quarterly, June, 222–225.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Behling, O., & Law, K. (2000).Translating questionnaires and other research instruments: Problems and solutions Thousand Oaks: Sage.

  Google Scholar 

• Behnke R., & Sawyer, C. (2000). Anticipatory anxiety patterns for male and female public speakers.Communication Education, 49(2), 187–195.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. & Zeidner, M. (Eds.), (2000).Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego: Academic press.

  Google Scholar 

• Bourhis, J., & Allen, M. (1998). The role of videotaped feedback in the instruction of public speaking: A quantitative synthesis of published empirical research.Communication Research Reports, 15(3), 256–261.

  Google Scholar 

• Bruinsma, M. (2004). Motivation, cognitive processing and achievement in higher education.Learning and Instruction, 14, 549–568.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Calcich, S., & Weilbaker, D. (1992). Selecting the optimum number of in-class sales presentations.Marketing Education Review 2, 31–33.

  Google Scholar 

• Campbell, K., Mothersbaugh, D., Brammer, C., & Taylor, T. (2001). Peerversus self assessment of oral business presentation performance.Business Communication Quarterly, 64(3), 23–42.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Carlson, R., & Smith-Howell, D. (1995). Classroom public speaking assessment: Reliability and validity of selected evaluation instruments.Communication Education, 44, 87–97.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (2005). Peer assessment of language proficiency.Language Testing, 22(1) 93–121.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Conor, C. (2006). Enhancing reflective learning through role-plays: The use of an effective sales presentation evaluation form in student role-plays.Marketing Education Review, 16(1), 9–13.

  Google Scholar 

• Daly, J., Vangelisti, A., & Weber, D. (1995). Speech anxiety affects how people prepare speeches — A protocol analysis of the preparation processes of speakers.Communication Monographs, 62(4), 383–397.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Day, E., Radosevich, D., & Chasteen, C. (2003). Construct-and criterion-related validity of four commonly used goal orientation instruments.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(4), 434–464.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Diseth, A., & Martinsen, O. (2003). Approaches to learning, cognitive style and motives as predictors of academic achievement.Educational Psychology, 23(2), 195–207.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Eccles, J., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals.Annual REview of Psychology, 53, 109–132.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Edens, F., Rink, F., & Smilde, M. (2000). De studentenrechtbank: Een evaluatieonderzoek naar beoordelingslijsten voor presentatievaardigheden [Student court of justice: An evaluation of assessment instruments for presentation skills].Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch [Journal for Educational Research], 24(3–4), 265–274.

  Google Scholar 

• Eklund, G. (1998). Students’ conceptions of learning in different educational contexts.Higher Education, 35, 299–316.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Elen, J., & Lowyck, J. (1998). Students’ views on the efficiency of instruction: An exploratory survey of the instructional metacognitive knowledge of university freshmen,Higher Education, 36(2), 231–252.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hafner, J., & Hafner, P. (2003). Quantitative analysis of the rubric as an assessment tool: An emprical study of peer-group rating.International Journal of Science Education, 25(12), 1509–1528.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Holladay, C., & Quiñones, M. (2003). Research reports: Practice variability and transfer of training: The role of self-efficacy generality.Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(6), 1094–1103.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jensen, K., & Harris, V. (1999). The public speaking portfolio.Communication Education, 48, 211–227.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Könings, K., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Van Merriënboer, J. (2005). Towards more powerful learning environments through combining the perspectives of designers, teachers, and students.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 645–660.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Langan, A., Wheater, C., Shaw, E., Haines, B., Cullen, W., Boyle, J., et al. (2005). Peer assessment of oral presentations: Effects of student gender, university affiliation and participation in the development of assessment criteria.Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(1), 21–34.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Linnenbrink, E., & Pintrich, P. (2002). Motivation as an enabler for academic success.School Psychology Review, 31(3), 313–327.

  Google Scholar 

• Locke, E., & Latham G. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation —A 35 year odyssey.American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Magin, D., & Helmore, P. (2001). Peer and teacher assessments of oral presentation skills: How reliable are they?Studies in Higher Education, 26(3), 287–298.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Marzano, R., Pickering, D., & Pollock, J. (2001).Classroom instruction that works. Research based strategies for increasing student achievement. Alexandria, Virginia, USA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

  Google Scholar 

• Masui, C., & De Corte, E. (2005). Learning to reflect and to attribute constructively as basic components of self-regulated learning.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 351–372.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Meijer, P., Zanting, A., & Verloop, N. (2002). How can student teachers elicit experienced teachers’ practical knowledge?.Journal of Teacher education, 53(5), 406–419.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., Middleton, M., Maehr, M., Urdan, T., Anderman, L. et al. (1998). The development and validation of scales assessing students’ achievement goal orientations.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23(2), 113–131.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Midgley et al. (2000).Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning, Scales (PALS), retrieved May 17, 2006 from http://www.umich.edu/~pals/

• Pajares, F. (2002).Self-efficacy beliefs in academic contexts: An outline. Retrieved June 2, 2003 from http://www.emory.edu/EDUCATION/mfp/efftalk.html.

• Patri, M. (2002). The influence of peer feedback on self and peer assessment of oral skills.Language Testing, 19 (2), 109–131.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pintrich, P. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts.Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667–686.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pintrich, P., & De Groot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning, components of classroom academic performance.Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pintrich, P., & Schunk, D. (2002).Motivation in education. Theory, research and applications (2nd ed.), New-Jersey: Pearson education.

  Google Scholar 

• Ross, M., Shannon, D., Salisbury-Glennon, J., & Guarino, A. (2002). The patterns of adaptive learning survey: A comparison across grade levels.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62(3), 483–497.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schunk, D. (2001a). Social cognitive theory and self-regulated learning. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.),Self-regulated learning and academic achievement. Theoretical perspectives (pp. 125–151). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Schunk, D. (2001b).Self-regulation through goal setting, ERIC:CASS Digest, 1–4.

• Schunk, D., & Ertmer, P. (2000). Self-regulation and academic learning. Self-efficacy enhancing interventions. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.),Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 631–649). San Diego: Academic Press.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Smith, M., Duda, J., Allen, J., & Hall, H. (2002). Contemporary measures of approach and avoidance goals orientations: Similarities and differences.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 155–190.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tucker, M., & McCarthy, A. (2001). Presentation self-efficacy: Increasing communication skills through service-learning.Journal of Managerial Issues, 13(2), 227–244.

  Google Scholar 

• Urdan, T., & Schoenfelder, E. (2006). Classroom effects on student motivation: Goal structures, social relationships, and competence beliefs.Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 331–349.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Vancouver, J., Thompson, C., Tischner, E., & Putka, D. (2002). Two studies examining the negative effect of self-efficacy on performance.Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 506–516.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Vermetten, Y., Lodewijks, H., & Vermunt, J. (2002). Powerful learning environments? How university students differ in their response to instructional measures.Learning and Instruction, 12(3), 263–284.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Vermunt, J., & Vermetten, J. (2004). Patterns in student learning: Relationships between strategies, conceptions of learning, and learning orientations.Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 359–384.

  Google Scholar 

• Wiertzema, K., & Jansen, P. (2004).Spreken in het openbaar [Speaking in public]. Pearson education Benelux.

• Zimmerman, B. (1998). Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation: An analysis of exemplary instructional models. In D. Schunk & B. Zimmerman (Eds.),Self-regulated learning. From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 1–19). New York: The Guildford Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Zimmerman, B. (2000). Attaining self-regulation. A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.),Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego: Academic Press.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references