Some history of the hierarchical Bayesian methodology

• Bishop, Y.M.M., Fienberg, S.E., andHolland, P.W. (1975).Discrete Multivariate Analysis Harvard, Mass: M.I.T. Press.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Crook, J.F. andGood, I.J. (1980). On the application of symmetric Dirichlet distributions and their mixtures to contingency tables, II.Ann. Statist. (to be published).

• David, F.N. (1949).Probability Theory for Statistical Methods. Cambridge: University Press.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Dempster, A.P., Laird, N.M., andRubin, D.B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm.J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 39, 1–38 (with discussion).

  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Good, I.J. (1950).Probability and the Weighing of Evidence. London: Griffin.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• — (1952). Rational decisions.J. Roy Statist. Soc. B 14, 107–114

  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• — (1953). On the population frequencies of species and the estimation of population parameters.Biometrika 40, 237–264.

  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• — (1955). Contribution to the discussion on the Symposium on Linear Programming.J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B. 17, 194–196.

  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• — (1956). On the estimation of small frequencies in contingency tables.J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B.,18, 113–124.

  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• — (1957). Saddle-point methods for the multinomial distribution.Ann. Math. Statist. 28, 861–881.

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• — (1959). Kinds of probability.Science 127, 443–447.

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Good, I.J., (1962). Subjective probability as the measure of a non-measurable set. InLogic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science (Nagel, E., Suppes, P., and Tarski, A. eds), 319–329.

• — (1963). Maximum entropy for hypothesis formulation, especially for multidimensional contingency tables.Ann. Math. Statist,34, 911–934.

  Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• — (1964). Contribution to the discussion of A.R. Thatcher Relationships between Bayesian and confidence limits for predictions.J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B,26, 204–205.

  Google Scholar 

• — (1965).The Estimation of Probabilities: An Essay on Modern Bayesian Methods. Harvard, Mass: M.I.T. Press.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• — (1966). How to estimate probabilities.J. Inst. Math. Applics. 2, 364–383.

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• — (1967). A Bayesian significance test for multinomial distributions.J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 29, 399–431.

  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• — (1969). A subjective analysis of Bode’s law and an ‘objective’ test for approximate numerical rationality.J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 64, 23–66 (with discussion).

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Good, I.J., (1971a). Contribution to the discussion of Orear and Cassel (1971), 284–286.

• — (1971b). Nonparametric roughness penalty for probability densities.Nature Physical Science 229, 29–30.

  Google Scholar 

• — (1971c). Twenty-seven principles of rationality. InFoundations of Statistical Inference (V.P. Godambe and D.A. Sprott. ed.) 123–127, Toronto: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

  Google Scholar 

• — (1975). The Bayes factor against equiprobability of a multinomial population assuming a symmetric Dirichlet prior.Ann. Statist. 3, 246–250.

  Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• — (1976a). On the application of symmetric Dirichlet distributions and their mixtures to contingency tables.Ann. Statist. 4, 1159–1189.

  Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• — (1976b). The Bayesian influence or how to sweep subjectivism under the carpet. InFoundations of Probability Theory, Statistical Inference, and Statistical Theories of Science 2 (C.A. Hooker and W. Harper, eds.) 125–174, Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel.

  Google Scholar 

• Good, I.J., (1979a). A comparison of some statistical estimates for the numbers of contingency tables, item C26 in “Comments, Conjectures, and Conclusions”. InJ. Statist. Comput. Simul. 8, 312–314.

  Google Scholar 

• — (1979b). The contributions of Jeffreys to Bayesian statistics. InStudies in Bayesian Econometrics and Statistics in Honor of Harold Jeffreys. (A. Zellner, ed.), 21–34. Amsterdam: North Holland.

  Google Scholar 

• — (1979c). Predictive sample reuse and the estimation of probabilities.J. Statist. Comput. Simul. 9, 238–239.

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Good, I.J. andCrook, J.F. (1974). The Bayes/non-Bayes compromise and the multinomial distribution.J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 69, 711–720.

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• — (1977). The enumeration of arrays and a generalization related to contingency tables.Discrete Mathematics 19, 23–45.

  Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Good, I.J. andGaskins, R.A. (1971). Non-parametric roughness penalties for probability densities.Biometrika 58, 255–277.

  Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• — (1972). Global nonparametric estimation of probability densities.Virginia J. of Science 23, 171–193.

  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• — (1979). Density estimation and bump-hunting by the penalized likelihood method exemplified by scattering and meteorite data.J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 75, 42–73 (with discussion).

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Hardy, G.F. (1889). In correspondence in Insurance Record. Reprinted inTrans.Fac. Actuaries 8 (1920), 174–182.

  Google Scholar 

• Hurwicz, L. (1951). Some specification problems and applications to econometric models,Econometrics 19, 343–344 (abstract).

  Google Scholar 

• Jaynes, E.T. (1957). Information theory and statistical mechanics.Phys. Rev. 106, 620–630.

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Jeffreys, H. (1946). An invariant form for the prior probability in estimation problems.Proc. Roy. Soc. (London), A. 186, 453–461.

  Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Johnson, W.E. (1932). Appendix (ed. R.B. Braithwaite) to Probability: deductive and inductive problems.Mind 41, 421–423.

  Google Scholar 

• Kemble, E.C. (1941). The probability concept.Philosophy of Science 8, 204–232.

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Keynes, J.M. (1921).A Treatise on Probability. London: Macmillan.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Koopmanm, B.O. (1940a). The basis of probability.Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 46, 763–764.

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• — (1940a). The axioms and algebra of intuitive probability.Ann. Math.,41, 269–292.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Leonard, T. (1978). Density estimation, stochastic processes and prior information.J. Roy. Statist. Soc, B,40, 113–146 (with discussion).

  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Levi, I. (1973). Inductive logic and the improvement of knowledge.Tech. Rep, Columbia University.

• Levin, B. andReeds, J. (1977). Compound multinomial likelihood functions: proof of a conjecture of I.J. Good.,Ann. Statist. 5, 79–87.

  Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Lidstone, G.J. (1920). Note on the general case of the Bayes-Laplace formula for inductive or a posteriori probabilities.Trans. Fac. Actuar. 8, 182–192.

  Google Scholar 

• Lindley, D.V. (1971). The estimation of many parameters. InFoundations of Statistical Inference (V.P. Godambe and D.A. Sprott, eds.) 435–455, (with discussion). Toronto: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

  Google Scholar 

• Lindley, D.V. andSmith, A.F.M. (1972). Bayes estimates for the linear model.J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B. 34, 1–41 (with discussion).

  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• De Morgan, A. (1847). Theory of probabilities.Encyclopaedia Metropolitana 2, 393–490.

  Google Scholar 

• Orear, J. andCassel, D. (1971). Applications of statistical inference to physics. InFoundations of Statistical Inference (V.P. Godambe and D.A. Sprott. eds.) 280–288 (with discussion). Toronto: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

  Google Scholar 

• Pelz, W. (1977).Topics on the estimation of small probabilities. Ph D thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

• Perks, W. (1947). Some observations on inverse probability including a new indifference rule.J. Inst. Actuar 73, 285–312.

  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Reichenbach, H. (1949).The Theory of Probability. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Ribbins, H. (1951). Asymptotically subminimax solutions of compound statistical decision problems.Proc. 2nd Berkeley Symp. 131–148. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  Google Scholar 

• — (1956). An empirical Bayes approach to statistics.Proc. 3rd Berkeley Symp.1, 157–163. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Rogers, J.M. (1974).Some examples of compromises between Bayesian and non-Bayesian statistical methods. Ph. D. Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

• Savage, L.J. (1954).The Foundations of Statistics. New York: Wiley.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Smith, C.A.B. (1961). Consistency in statistical inference and decision.J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B. 23, 1–37 (with discussion).

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• von Mises, R. (1942). On the correct use of Bayes’s formula.Ann. Math. Statist. 13, 156–165.

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

References in the Discussion

• Dawes, R.M. (1971). A case study of graduate admissions: Application of three principles of human decision making.Amer. Psychol. 25, 180–188.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Garthwaithe, P. (1977).Psychological aspects of subjective probability elicitation. M.Sc. Thesis. Department of Statistics, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth.

  Google Scholar 

• Geisser, S. (1975a). The predictive sample reuse method with applications.J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 70, 320–328.

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• — (1975b). A new approach to the fundamental problem of applied statistics.Sankhya B 37, 385–397.

  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Goel, P.K. andDeGroot, M.H. (1979). Information about hyperparameters in hierarchical models.Tech. Rep. 160. Department of Statistics, Carnegie-Mellon University.

• Gokhale andPress, S.J. (1979). The assessment of a prior distribution for the correlation coefficient in a bivariate normal distribution.Tech. Rep. 58, University of California, Riverside.

• Good, I.J. (1962). A compromise between credibility and subjective probability.International Congress of Mathematicians, Abstracts of Short Communication. Stockholm, 160.

• — (1965b). Speculations concerning the first ultraintelligent machine.Advances in Computer 6, 31–38.

  Google Scholar 

• Good, I.J. (1971d). Unpublished lecture notes entitled “The Bayesian Influence” 122. Statistics Department, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

• — (1972). Food for thought. InInterdisciplinary Investigation of the Brain (J.P. Nicholson, ed.) 1972, 213–228. New York: Plenum Press.

  Google Scholar 

• — (1975b). Explicativity, corroboration and the relative odds of hypotheses.Synthese 30, 39–73.

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• — (1980a). The logic of hypothesis testing. InPhilosophical Foundations of Economics (J.C. Pitt, ed.) Dordrecht: Reidel.

  Google Scholar 

• Good, I.J. (1980b). An approximation of value in the Bayesian analysis of contingency tables.J. Statist. Comput. Simulation (in press).

• Kadane, J.B., Dickey, J.M., Winkler, R.L., Smith, W.S. andPeters, S.C. (1980). Interactive elicitation of opinion for a normal linear model.J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 75 (to appear).

• Leonard, T. (1973). A Bayesian method for histograms.Biometrika 60, 297–308.

  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• — (1973). Bayesian estimation methods for two-way contingency tables.J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 37, 23–37.

  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• — (1977). A Bayesian approach to some multinomial estimation and pretesting problems.J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 72, 869–874.

  Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Lindqvist, B. (1977). How fast does a Markov chain forget the initial state? A decision theoretical approach.Scand. J. Statist. 4, 145–152.

  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• — (1978). On the loss of information incurred by lumping states of a Markov chain.Scand. J. Statist. 5, 92–98.

  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• O’Hagan, A. andLeonard, T. (1976). Bayes estimation subject to uncertainty about parameter constraints.Biometrika 63, 201–203.

  Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Scott, D., Tapia, R.A. andThompson, J.R. (1978). Multivariate density estimation by discrete maximum penalized likelihood methods. InGraphical Representation of Multivariate Data. 169–182. New York: Academic Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Slovic, P. andLichtenstein, S.C. (1971) Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgement.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 6, 649–744.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Stone, M. (1974). Cross-validation and multinomial prediction.Biometrika 61, 509–515.

  Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Tversky, A. (1974). Assessing uncertainty.J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 36, 148–159.

  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references