Abstract
Noninhibitory levels of glucose-C [≤ 72 µg carbon (C)/g soil] increased the inhibitory activity ofp-coumaric acid on morning-glory seedling biomass accumulation in Cecil Bt-horizon soil. The amount ofp-coumaric acid required for a given level of inhibition of shoot and seedling biomass accumulation decreased as the concentration of glucose increased. Soil extractions with neutral EDTA (0.25 M, pH 7) after addition of combinations ofp-coumaric acid and glucose (concentrations ranging from 0 to 1.25 µmol/g soil) to the soil showed that utilization ofp-coumaric acid by microbes decreased linearly as the concentration of glucose increased. The increased inhibitory activity of a given concentration ofp-coumaric acid in the presence of glucose was not due to a reduction in soil sorption ofp-coumaric acid or effects of nitrogen-limited microbial growth. Noninhibitory levels of phenylalanine andp-hydroxybenzoic acid slowed the utilization ofp-coumaric acid by microbes in a similar manner as glucose. The presence of methionine, however, did not affect the rate ofp-coumaric acid utilization by microbes. These observations suggest that differential utilization of individual molecules in organic mixtures by soil microbes can modify, and in this case increase, the effectiveness of a given concentration of an inhibitor such asp-coumaric acid on the inhibition of seedling growth such as morning-glory.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bachmann, A., De Bruin, W., Jumelet, J.C., Rijnaarts, H.H.N., andZehnder, A.J.B. 1988. Aerobic biomineralization of alpha-hexachlorocyclohexane in contaminated soil.Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 54:548–554.
Blum, U., Gerig, T.M., Worsham, A.D., andKing, L.D. 1993. Modification of the allelopathic effects ofp-coumaric acid on morning-glory seedling biomass by glucose, methionine, and nitrate.J. Chem. Ecol. 19:2791–2811.
Blum, U., Worsham, A.D., King, L.D., andGerig, T.M. 1994. Use of water and EDTA extractions to estimate available (free and reversibly bound) phenolic acids in Cecil soils.J. Chem. Ecol. 20:341–359.
Dalton, B.R., Weed, S.B., andBlum, U. 1987. Plant phenolic acids in soils: A comparison of extraction procedures.Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 51:1515–1521.
Dische, Z. 1962. Color reactions of hexoses, pp. 488–494,in R.L. Whistler and M.L. Wolfrom (eds.). Methods in Carbohydrate Chemistry. Academic Press, New York.
Gerig, T.M., andBlum, U. 1993. Modification of an inhibition curve to account for the effects of a second compound.J. Chem. Ecol. 19:2783–2790.
Harder, W., andDijkhuizen, L. 1982. Strategies of mixed substrate utilization in microorganisms.Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London 297:459–480.
Hoagland, D.R., andArnon, D.J. 1950. The water-culture method of growing plants without soil. California Agricultural Experiment Station Circular 347.
Kuiters, A.T. 1990. Role of phenolic substances from decomposing forest litter in plant-soil interactions.Acta Bot. Neerl. 39:329–348.
Papanastasiou, A.C. 1982. Kinetics of biodegradation of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyaceteate in the presence of glucose.Biotechnol. Bioeng. 24:2001–2011.
Rice, E.L. 1984. Allelopathy. Academic Press. New York.
SAS Institute, Inc. 1988. SAS/STAT User's Guide Release 6.03 Edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.
Siqueira, J.O., Nair, M.G., Hammerschimdt, R., andSafir, G.R. 1991. Significance of phenolic compounds in plant-soil-microbial systems.Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 10:63–121.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The use of trade names in this publication does not imply endorsement by the United States government or the North Carolina Agricultural Research Service of products named, nor criticism of similar ones not mentioned.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pue, K.J., Blum, U., Gerig, T.M. et al. Mechanism by which noninhibitory concentrations of glucose increase inhibitory activity ofp-coumaric acid on morning-glory seedling biomass accumulation. J Chem Ecol 21, 833–847 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02033464
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02033464