[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

The measurement of international scientific collaboration

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A growing science policy interest in international scientific collaboration has brought about a multitude of studies which attempt to measure the extent of international scientific collaboration between countries and to explore intercountry collaborative networks. This paper attempts to clarify the methodology that is being used or can be used for this purpose and discusses the adequacy of the methods. The paper concludes that, in an analysis of collaborative links, it is essential to use both absolute and relative measures. The latter normalize differences in country size. Each yields a different type of information. Absolute measures yield an answer to questions such as which countries are central in the international network of science, whether collaborative links reveal a centre — periphery relationship, and which countries are the most important collaborative partners of another country. Relative measures provide answers to questions of the intensity of collaborative links.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes and references

  1. D. deB. Beaver, R. Rosen, Studies in scientific collaboration. Part I. The professional origins of scientific co-authorship,Scientometrics, 1 (1978) 65–84.

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. Luukkonen, O. Persson, G. Sivertsen, Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration,Science, Technology, & Human Values, 17 (1992) 101–126.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. deB. Beaver, R. Rosen, Studies in scientific collaboration. Part II. Scientific co-authorship, research productivity and visibility in the French scientific elite, 1799–1830,Scientometrics, 1 (1979) 133–149.

    Google Scholar 

  4. E.g.G. Lewison, P. Cunningham, Bibliometric studies for the evaluation of transnational research,Scientometrics, 21 (1991) 223–244; The EC SCIENCE/Stimulation Programme.Scientometrics, 21 (1991) 325–342.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J.-F. Miquel, Y. Okubo, Indicators to measure internationalization of science. A paper presented at a conference organised by the OECD, ”Consequences of the Technology Economy Programme for the Development of Indicators”, Paris, 2nd–5th July 1990.

  6. R. de Bruin, R. R. Braam, H. F. Moed, Bibliometric lines in the sand,Nature, 349 (1991) 559–562.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. J. W. Tijssen, H. F. Moed, Literature-based statistical analyses of international scientific cooperation. An exploratory case study of the Netherlands. In:A. F. J. van Raan, A. J. Nederhof, H. F. Moed (Eds),Science and Technology Indicators. Their Use in Science Policy and Their Role in Science Studies, Leiden, DSWO Press, 1989, p. 129–145.

    Google Scholar 

  8. F. Narin, E. S. Whitlow, Measurement of scientific cooperation and coauthorship in CEC-related areas of science. Vol 1. Commission of the European Communities (EUR 12900 EN), 1990.

  9. A. Schubert, T. Braun, International collaboration in the sciences, 1981–1985,Scientometrics, 19 (1990) 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.-F. Miquel, Y. Okubo,op. cit. note 5 Indicators to measure internationalization of science. A paper presented at a conference organised by the OECD, “Consequences of the Technology Economy Programme for the Development of Indicators”, Paris, 2nd–5th July 1990.

  11. G. Lewison, P. Cunningham, Bibliometric studies for the evaluation of trans-national research,Scientometrics, 21 (1991) 223–244.

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. F. Moed, R. E. de Bruin, A. J. Nederhof, R. J. W. Tijssen International scientific co-operation and awareness within the European Community: Problems and perspectives,Scientometrics, 21 (1991) 291–311.

    Google Scholar 

  13. F. Narin, K. Stevens, E. S. Whitlow Scientific co-operation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers,Scientometrics, 21 (1991) 313–323.

    Google Scholar 

  14. T. Luukkonen, O. Persson, G. Sivertsen,op. cit., note 2.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J.-F. Miquel, Y. Okubo,op. cit., note 5 Indicators to measure internationalization of science. A paper presented at a conference organised by the OECD, “Consequences of the Technology Economy Programme for the Development of Indicators”, Paris, 2nd–5th July 1990.

  16. A. Schubert, T. Braun,op. cit., note 9.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. J. W. Tijssen, H. F. Moed,op. cit., note 7.

    Google Scholar 

  18. T. Luukkonen, O. Persson, G. Sivertsen,op. cit., note 2.

    Google Scholar 

  19. F. Narin, E. S. Whitlow,op. cit., note 8 Measurement of scientific cooperation and coauthorship in CEC-related areas of science. Vol 1. Commission of the European Communities (EUR 12900 EN), 1990.

  20. Earth and space science, mathematics, physics, biomedicine, biology, chemistry, engineering and technology, clinical medicine.

  21. Science and Technology Policy — Review and Outlook 1991. OECD: Paris 1992.

  22. J.-F. Miquel, Y. Okubo,op. cit., note 5 Indicators to measure internationalization of science. A paper presented at a conference organised by the OECD, “Consequences of the Technology Economy Programme for the Development of Indicators”, Paris, 2nd–5th July 1990.

  23. T. Luukkonen, O. Persson, G. Sivertsen,op. cit. note 2.

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. Anderson, P. M. D. Collins, J. Irvine, P. A. Isard, B. R. Martin, F. Narin, K. Stevens, Online approaches to measuring national scientific output: A cautionary tale,Science and Public Policy, 15 (1988) 153–161.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Our choice of the measures presented here has been guided by the following methodological and practical considerations: appropriateness, accessibility, and illustrative power.

  26. G. Salton, D. Bergmark, A citation study of computer science literature,IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication PC-22, 3 (1979) 393–440.

    Google Scholar 

  27. P. H. A. Sneath, R. R. Sokal,Numerical Taxonomy, Freeman, San Francisco, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  28. E.g.T. Luukkonen, O. Persson, G. Sivertsen,op. cit., note 2.

    Google Scholar 

  29. L. A. Goodman, The analysis of cross-classified data: independence, quasi-independence, and interactions in contingency tables with or without missing entries,Journal of American Statistical Association, 63 (1968) 1091–1131.

    Google Scholar 

  30. E.g.A. Schubert, T. Braun,op. cit., note 9.R. de Bruin, R. R. Braam, H. F. Moed,op. cit., note 6. Bibliometric lines in the sand,Nature, 349 (1991) 559–562.

    Google Scholar 

  31. R. J. W. Tijssen,Cartography of science: scientometric mapping with multidimensional scaling methods, Leiden, DSWO Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  32. I. Gómez, A. Méndez, Are peripheral countries profiting from scientific cooperation networks? In:P. Weingart, R. Sehringer, M. Winterhager (Eds),Representations of Science and Technology, Leiden, DWSO Press, 1992, 112–123.

    Google Scholar 

  33. R. J. W. Tijssen, J. De Leeuw, A. F. J. van Raan, Quasi-correspondence analysis on scientometric transaction matrices,Scientometrics, 11 (1987) 351–366, describes an alternative method for doing a quasi-correspondence analysis through the application of a standard correspondence analysis to a pre-processed data matrix.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Luukkonen, T., Tijssen, R.J.W., Persson, O. et al. The measurement of international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics 28, 15–36 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016282

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016282

Keywords

Navigation