[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

A regularized decomposition method for minimizing a sum of polyhedral functions

  • Published:
Mathematical Programming Submit manuscript

Abstract

A problem of minimizing a sum of many convex piecewise-linear functions is considered. In view of applications to two-stage linear programming, where objectives are marginal values of lower level problems, it is assumed that domains of objectives may be proper polyhedral subsets of the space of decision variables and are defined by piecewise-linear induced feasibility constraints. We propose a new decomposition method that may start from an arbitrary point and simultaneously processes objective and feasibility cuts for each component. The master program is augmented with a quadratic regularizing term and comprises an a priori bounded number of cuts. The method goes through nonbasic points, in general, and is finitely convergent without any nondegeneracy assumptions. Next, we present a special technique for solving the regularized master problem that uses an active set strategy and QR factorization and exploits the structure of the master. Finally, some numerical evidence is given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Birge and R.J.-B. Wets, “Designing approximation schemes for stochastic optimization problems, in particular for stochastic programs with recourse,” WP-83-111, IIASA, Laxenburg, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M.J. Best, “Equivalence of some quadratic programming algorithms,”Mathematical Programming 30 (1984) 71–87.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Bisschop and A. Meeraus, “Matrix augmentation and partitioning in the updating of the basis inverse,”Mathematical Programming 13 (1977) 241–254.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.W. Daniel, W.P. Gragg, L.C. Kaufman and G.W. Stewart, “Reorthogonalization and stable algorithm for updating the Gram-Schmidt QR factorization,”Mathematics of Computation 30 (1976) 772–795.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Dantzig and A. Madansky, “On the solution of two-stage linear programs under uncertainty,” in:Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, vol. I, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1961, pp. 165–176.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Dantzig and R. Van Slyke, “Generalized upper bounding techniques,”Journal of Computer System Science 1 (1967) 213–226.

    Google Scholar 

  7. P.E. Gill, N.I.M. Gould, W. Murray, M.A. Saunders and M. Wright, “A weighted Gram-Schmidt method for convex quadratic programming,”Mathematical Programming 30 (1984) 176–195.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P.E. Gill and W. Murray, “Numerically stable methods for quadratic programming,”Mathematical Programming 14 (1978) 349–372.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. Kall, K. Frauendorfer and A. Ruszczyński, “Approximation techniques in stochastic programming,” Technical Report, Institut für Operations Research, Universität Zürich, Zürich, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. Kall and D. Stoyan, “Solving stochastic programming problems with recourse including error bounds,”Mathematische Operationsforschung und Statistik, Ser. Optimization 13 (1982) 431–447.

    Google Scholar 

  11. K.C. Kiwiel, “An aggregate subgradient method for nonsmooth convex minimization,”Mathematical Programming 27 (1983) 320–341.

    Google Scholar 

  12. K.C. Kiwiel, “A decomposition method of descent for minimizing a sum of convex nonsmooth functions,” Technical Report, Systems Research Institute, Warsaw, 1984 (to appear inJournal of Optimization Theory and Applications).

    Google Scholar 

  13. K.C. Kiwiel, “A method for solving certain quadratic programming problems arising in nonsmooth optimization,” Technical Report, Systems Research Institute, Warsaw, 1984 (to appear inIMA Journal of Numerical Analysis).

    Google Scholar 

  14. L.S. Lasdon,Optimization Theory for Large Systems (Macmillan, New York, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  15. C. Lemaréchal, J.J. Strodiot and A. Bihain, “On a bundle algorithm for nonsmooth optimization,” in: O.L. Mangasarian, R.R. Meyer and S.M. Robinson, eds.,Nonlinear Programming 4 (Academic Press, New York, 1981) pp. 245–282.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R.E. Marsten, W.W. Hogan and J.W. Blankenship, “The boxstep method for large scale optimization,”Operations Research 23 (1975) 389–405.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Mifflin, “A stable method for solving certain constrained least squares problems,”Mathematical Programming 16 (1979) 141–158.

    Google Scholar 

  18. B.A. Murtagh and M.A. Saunders, “Large-scale linearly constrained optimization,”Mathematical Programming 14 (1978) 41–72.

    Google Scholar 

  19. R.T. Rockafellar,Convex Analysis (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  20. R.T. Rockafellar, “Monotone operators and the proximal point algorithm,”SIAM Journal of Control and Optimization 14 (1976) 877–898.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J.B. Rosen, “Primal partition programming for block diagonal matrices,”Numerische Mathematik 6 (1964) 250–260.

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. Ruszczyński, “QDECOM: The regularized decomposition method. User manual,” Technical Report, Institut für Operations Research, Universität Zürich, Zürich, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  23. N.Z. Shor,Minimization Methods for Non-Differentiable Functions (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  24. D.M. Topkis, “A cutting-plane algorithm with linear and geometric rates of convergence,”Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 36 (1982) 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. Van Slyke and R.J.-B. Wets, “L-shaped linear programs with applications to optimal control and stochastic programming,”SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 17 (1969) 638–663.

    Google Scholar 

  26. R.J.-B. Wets, “Stochastic programming: solution techniques and approximation schemes,” in: A. Bachem, M. Grötschel and B. Korte, eds.,Mathematical Programming: The State of the Art (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1983) pp. 507–603.

    Google Scholar 

  27. R.J.-B. Wets, “Large scale linear programming techniques in stochastic programming,” WP-84-90, IIASA, Laxenburg, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  28. P. Wolfe, “A method of conjugate subgradients for minimizing nondifferentiable functions,”Mathematical Programming Study 3 (1975) 145–173.

    Google Scholar 

  29. P. Wolfe, “Finding the nearest point in a polytope,”Mathematical Programming 11 (1976) 128–149.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

On leave from Instytut Automatyki, Politechnika Warszawska, Poland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ruszczyński, A. A regularized decomposition method for minimizing a sum of polyhedral functions. Mathematical Programming 35, 309–333 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580883

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580883

Key words

Navigation