A dempster-shafer approach to modeling agent preferences for plan recognition

• AAAI: 1986,Proceedings of the 5th National Conference of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Philadelphia, PA.

• Bauer, M. and G. Paul: 1993, ‘Logic-Based Plan Recognition for Intelligent Help Systems’. In C. Bäckström and E. Sandewall (eds.),Current Trends in AI Planning: Proceedings of the Second European Workshop on Planning, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, Vadstena, Sweden. IOS Press, pp. 60–73.

  Google Scholar 

• Bauer, M., S. Biundo, D. Dengler, J. Koehler and G. Paul: 1993, ‘PHI — A Logic-Based Tool for Intelligent Help Systems’. In R. Bajcsy (ed.),Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Chambéry, France. Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 460–466.

  Google Scholar 

• Bauer, M.: 1994a, ‘Integrating Probabilistic Reasoning into Plan Recognition’. InProceedings of the 10th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Wiley, pp. 620–624.

  Google Scholar 

• Bauer, M.: 1994b, ‘Quantitative Modeling of User Preferences for Plan Recognition’. In Goodman et al. (1994), pp. 73–78.

• Calistri-Yeh, R. J.: 1991, ‘Utilizing User Models to Handle Ambiguity and Misconceptions in Robust Plan Recognition’.User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 2(1–2).

• Calistri, R. J.: 1990, ‘Classifying and Detecting Plan-Based Misconceptions for Robust Plan Recognition’. Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. of Computer Science, Brown University, RI.

  Google Scholar 

• Carberry, S.: 1990a, ‘Incorporating Default Inferences into Plan Recognition’. InProceedings of the 8th National Conference of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Boston, MA. MIT Press, pp. 471–478.

  Google Scholar 

• Carberry, S.: 1990b, ‘A Model of Plan Recognition that Facilitates Default Inferences’. InProceedings of the Second International Workshop on User Modeling (UM90), Honolulu, Hawaii.

• Charniak, E. and R. Goldman: 1991, ‘A Probabilistic Model of Plan Recognition’. InProceedings of the 9th National Conference of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Anaheim, CA. MIT Press, pp. 160–165.

  Google Scholar 

• Charniak, E. and R. P. Goldman: 1993, ‘A Bayesian Model of Plan Recognition’.Artificial Intelligence 64(1), 53–79.

  Google Scholar 

• Dempster, A. P.: 1967, ‘Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multivalued Mapping’.Annals of Mathematical Statistics 38, 325–339.

  Google Scholar 

• Dubois, D. and H. Prade: 1985, ‘A Note on Measures of Specificity for Fuzzy Sets’.Int. J. Gen. Syst. 10, 279–283.

  Google Scholar 

• Elzer, S., J. Chu-Carroll and S. Carberry: 1994, ‘Recognizing and Utilizing UserPreferences in Collaborative Consultation Dialogues’. In Goodman et al. (1994), pp. 19–24.

• Goldman, R. and E. Charniak: 1988, ‘A Probabilistic ATMS for Plan Recognition’. In D. McDermott, L. Birnbaum, J. Maier, R. Wilensky, S. Williams and D. Chubb (eds.),Proceedings of theAAAI-88 Workshop on Plan Recognition, St. Paul, MI.

• Goodman, B. A. and D. J. Litman: 1992, ‘On the Interaction between Plan Recognition and Intelligent Interfaces’.User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 2(1–2), 83–116.

  Google Scholar 

• Goodman, B., A. Kobsa and D. Litman (eds.): 1994,Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on User Modeling (UM94), Hyannis, MA, USA. MITRE Corporation.

  Google Scholar 

• Guan, J. and D. Bell: 1991,Evidence Theory and Its Applications, Volume 1. Elsevier.

• Kautz, H. and J. Alten: 1986, ‘Generalized Plan Recognition’. In AAAI (1986), pp. 32–37.

• Kruse, R., E. Schwecke and J. Heinsohn: 1991,Uncertainty and Vagueness in Knowledge-Based Systems. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag.

  Google Scholar 

• Maes, P.: 1994, ‘Agents That Reduce Work and Information Overload’.Communications of the ACM 37(7), 31–40.

  Google Scholar 

• Orponen, P.: 1990, ‘Dempster's Rule of Combination is # P-complete’.Artificial Intelligence 44, 245–253.

  Google Scholar 

• Raskutti, B. and I. Zukerman: 1991a, ‘Generation and Selection of Likely Interpretations during Plan Recognition in Task-Oriented Consultation Systems’.User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 1, 323–353.

  Google Scholar 

• Raskutti, B. and I. Zukerman: 1991b, ‘Handling Uncertainty during Plan Recognition in TaskOriented Consultation Systems’. In B. D'Ambrosio, P. Smets and P. Bonissone (eds.),Proceedings of the Seventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, University of Los Angeles, CA, pp. 308–315.

  Google Scholar 

• Ruspini, E. H., J. D. Lowrance and T. M. Strat: 1992, ‘Understanding Evidential Reasoning’.International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 6, 401–424.

  Google Scholar 

• Ruspini, E. H.: 1986, ‘The Logical Foundations of Evidential Reasoning’. Technical Note 408, SRI International.

• Shafer, G.: 1976,A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

  Google Scholar 

• Shenoy, P.P. and G. Shafer: 1990, ‘Axioms for Probability and Belief-Function Propagation’. In R. D. Shachter, T. S. Levitt, L. N. Kanal and J. F. Lemmer (eds.),Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Volume 4, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 169–198.

  Google Scholar 

• Shortliffe, E. H.: 1976,Computer Based Medical Consultations: MYCIN. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

  Google Scholar 

• Smets, P.: 1988, ‘Belief Functions versus Probability Functions’. In B. Bouchon, L. Saitta and R. Yager (eds.),Uncertainty and Intelligent Systems, Volume 313 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 17–24.

• Tessem, B.: 1993, ‘Approximations for Efficient Computation in the Theory of Evidence’.Artificial Intelligence 61, 315–329.

  Google Scholar 

• Wilson, N.: 1993, ‘Decision-Making with Belief Functions and Pignistic Probabilities’. In M. Clarke, R. Kruse and S. Moral (eds.),Proceedings of the European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty, Granada, Spain. Volume 747 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer-Verlag, pp. 364–371.

• Yen, J.: 1986, ‘A Reasoning Model Based on an Extended Dempster-Shafer Theory’. In AAAI (1986), pp. 125–131.

• Yen, J.: 1989, ‘GERTIS: A Dempster-Shafer Approach to Diagnosing Hierarchical Hypotheses’.Communications of the ACM 32(5), 573–585.

  Google Scholar 

Download references