[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

Deduction in non-Horn databases

  • Published:
Journal of Automated Reasoning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The class of non-Horn, function-free databases is investigated and several aspects of the problem of using theorem proving techniques for such databases are considered. This includes exploring the treatment of negative information and extending the existing method, suggested by Minker, to accept non-unit negative clauses. It is shown that the algorithms based on the existing methods for the treatment of negative information can be highly inefficient. An alternative approach is suggested and a simpler algorithm based on it is given. The problems associated with query answering in non-Horn databases are addressed and compared with those for the Horn case. It is shown that the query evaluation process can be computationaly difficult in the general case. Conditions under which the process is simplified are discussed. The topic of non-Horn general laws is considered and some guidelines are suggested to divide such laws into derivation rules and integrity constraints. The effect of such a division on the query evaluation process is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Chang, C. L., ‘ On evaluation of queries containing derived relations’, in Formal Bases for Databases, Preprints, Toulouse, France (1979).

  2. Chang C. L. and Lee R. C. T., Symbolic Logic and Mechanical Theorem Proving, Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, Series, Academic Press, New York, (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clark K. L., ‘Negation as failure’, in Logic and Databases (eds. H.Gallaire and J.Minker), Plenum Press, New York, 293–324, (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Codd E. F., ‘Extending the database relational model to capture more meaning’, ACM Transactions on Database Systems 4, 4, 339–434 (December, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Date C. J., An Introduction to Database Systems, 3rd. Ed., Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, Mass. (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gallaire H., Minker J., and Nicolas J. M., ‘An overview and introduction to logic and databases’, in Logic and Databases (eds. H.Gallaire and J.Minker), Plenum Press, New York, 3–32 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ghafarzade, M., ‘Function symbols in first-order databases’, Ph.D. Dissertation, EECS Department Northwestern University, Evanston, I11. (1981).

  8. Henschen L. and Naqvi S., ‘On compiling queries in recursive first-order databases’, Accepted JACM 31, 1, 47–85 (January, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Henschen L. and Wos L., ‘Unit refutation and Horn sets’, JACM 21, 4, 590–605 (October, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kowalski R., ‘Logic for data description’, in Logic and Databases (eds. H.Gallaire and J.Minker) Plenum Press, New York, 77–106 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lipski W.Jr., ‘On semantic issues connected with incomplete information databases’, ACM Transactions on Database Systems 4, 3, 262–301 (September 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Minker J., ‘On indefinite databases and the closed world assumption’, Technical Report, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, (July, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Minker J., ‘On theories of definite and indefinite databases’, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, 1983. Submitted for publication to the JACM.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Minker J. and Grant J., ‘Answering queries in indefinite databases and the null value problem’, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nicolas J. M. and Yazadanian K., ‘Logic and database integrity’, in Logic and Databases (eds. H.Gallaire and J.Minker), Plenum Press, New York, 325–346, (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Reiter R., ‘Deductive question-answering in relational databases’, in Logic and Databases (eds. H.Gallaire and J.Minker.), Plenum Press, New York, 149–178 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Reiter R., ‘Equality and domain closure in first-order databases’, JACM 27, 4, 235–250 (April 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Reiter R., ‘On closed world databases’, in Logic and Databases (eds. H.Gallaire and J.Minker) Plenum Press, New York 55–76 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  19. VanEmden M. H. and Kowalski R. A., ‘The semantics of predicate logic as a programming language’, JACM 23, 733–742 (October, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vassiliou, Y., ‘Null values in database management: a denotational semantics approach’, ACM/SIGMOD International Symposium on Management of Data, 162–169 (May–June, 1977).

  21. Yahya, A., ‘Deduction in non-Horn databases’, Ph.D. Dissertation, EECS Department North-western University, Evanston, I11. (1984).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yahya, A., Henschen, L.J. Deduction in non-Horn databases. J Autom Reasoning 1, 141–160 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00244994

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00244994

Key words

Navigation