[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Genetic redundancy caused by gene duplications and its evolution in networks of transcriptional regulators

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In various organisms loss-of-function mutations of individual genes with unexpectedly weak or no phenotypic effects in the homozygous state have been observed. In several of these cases, independent evidence shows that the respective gene products do have essential biological functions. An explanation emerging from detailed biochemical and genetic studies on such genes is that two or more genetically redundant genes contribute to that function, i.e., a group of genes that is able to substitute partially for a loss of function in one member of that group. The often-observed sequence similarity among redundant genes suggests gene duplications as a frequent source of genetic redundancy. Aside from this observation, the evolution of genetic redundancy is poorly understood. Genetic redundancy is potentially of great relevance to organismal evolution, since it may (i) ‘protect’ organisms from potentially harmful mutations, and (ii) maintain pools of functionally similar, yet diverse gene products, and thus represent a source of evolutionary novelty at the biochemical level. The question of how genetic redundancy evolves should ideally be answered by experimentation. However, the large time scales involved and insufficient quantitative understanding of the underlying regulatory pathways are likely to preclude such an approach in the foreseeable future. Preliminary answers are sought here by using a biochemically motivated model of a small but central part of a developmental pathway. Sets of transcription regulators are modeled that mutually regulate each other's expression and thereby form stable gene expression patterns. It is then studied how genetic redundancy caused by gene duplications might evolve in such networks. The results obtained suggest that redundancy may, at least in some cases, be a global property of gene interactions within a regulatory pathway, rather than a local property of genes in that pathway. They also raise the possibility that duplications of a whole regulatory gene network, as may have taken place during the evolution of HOM/Hox genes in chordates, are less likely to be reversible (by gene deletions) than duplications of individual network genes. These findings are discussed with reference to experimental evidence on the evolution of HOM/Hox genes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Amit DJ (1989) Modeling brain function. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bienz M, Tremml G (1988) Domain of Ultrabithorax expression in Drosophila visceral mesoderm from autoregulation and exclusion. Nature 333:576–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright P, Dick M, Buss LW (1993) HOM/Hox type homeoboxes in the chelicerate Limulus polyphemus. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2:185–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisaka O, Capecchi MR (1991) Regionally restricted developmental defects result from targeted disruption of the mouse homeobox gene hox-1.5. Nature 350:473–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes R, Dawson I, Falciani F, Tear G, Akam M (1994) Dax, a locust Hox gene related to fushi-tarazu but showing no pair rule expression. Development 120:1561–1572

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrier DEK, Akam ME (1994) The HOM/Hox cluster of the locust. Proceedings of Spring Meeting of the British Society for Developmental Biology, 5–8 April 1994, Edinburgh, UK

  • Gatherer D (1993) Gene knockouts and murine development. Dev Growth Differ 35:365–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzáles-Reyes A, Morata G (1990) The developmental effect of overexpressing a Ubx product in Drosophila embryos is dependent on its interaction with other homeotic products. Cell 61:515–522

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartl DL, Clark AG (1989) Principles of population genetics. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopfeld JJ, Tank DW (1986) Computing with neural circuits: a model. Science 233:625–633

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingham W (1988) The molecular genetics of embryonic pattern formation in Drosophila. Nature 335:25–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson PF, McKnight SL (1989) Eukaryotic transcriptional regulatory proteins. Annu Rev Biochem 58:799–839

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyner AL, Herrup K, Auerbach BA, Davis CA, Rossant J (1991) Subtle cerebellar phenotype in mice homozygous for a targeted deletion of the en-2 homeobox. Science 251:1239–1243

    Google Scholar 

  • Kappen C, Schughart K, Ruddle FH (1989) Two steps in the evolution of Antennapedia-class vertebrate homeobox genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:5459–5463

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman SA (1969) Metabolic stability and epigenesis in randomly connected nets. J Theor Biol 22:437

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman SA (1993) The origins of order. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumlauf R (1994) Hox genes in vertebrate development. Cell 78:191–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis EB (1978) A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila. Nature 276:565–570

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Noll M (1994) Evolution of distinct developmental functions of three Drosophila genes by acquisition of different cis-regulatory regions. Nature 367:83–87

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinnis W, Krumlauf R (1992) Homeobox genes and axial patterning. Cell 68:283–302

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinnis N, Kuziora MA, McGinnis W (1990) Human hox-4.2 and Drosophila deformed encode similar regulatory specificities in Drosophila embryos and larvae. Cell 63:969–976

    Google Scholar 

  • Mermelstein FH, Flores O, Reinberg D (1989) Initiation of transcription by RNA polymerase II. Biochim Biophys Acta 1009:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Misof BY, Wagner GP (1996) Evidence for four Hox clusters in the Killifish, Fundulus heteroclitus (Teleostei). Mol Phylogenet Evol (in press)

  • Misof BY, Blanco MJ, Wagner GP (1996) Hox genes of the Zebrafish. Genomics (submitted)

  • Mjolsness E, Sharp DH, Reinitz J (1991) A connectionist model of development. J Theor Biol 152:429–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Murtha MM, Leckman JF, Ruddle FH (1991) Detection of homeobox genes in development and evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:10711–10715

    Google Scholar 

  • Nusse R, Varmus HE (1992) Wnt genes. Cell 69:1073–1087

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson E (1990) MyoD family: a paradigm for development. Genes Dev 4:1454–1461

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinitz J, Sharp D (1995) Mechanism of formation of eve stripes. Mech Dev 49:133–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinitz J, Mjolsness E, Sharp D (1995) Cooperative control of positional information in Drosophila by bicoid and maternal hunchback. J Exp Zool 271:47–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Rendel JM (1979) Canalisation and selection. In: Thompson JN Jr, Thoday JM (eds) Quantitative genetic variation. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld MG (1991) POU-domain transcription factors: pou-er-ful developmental regulators. Genes Dev 5:897–907

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert FR, Nieselt-Struwe K, Gruss P (1993) The Antennapedia-type homeobox genes have evolved from three precursors early in metazoan evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:143–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Schughart K, Kappen C, Ruddle FH (1989) Duplication of large genomic region during the evolution of vertebrate homeobox genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:7067–7071

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott MP (1992) Vertebrate homeobox gene nomenclature. Cell 71:551–553

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeger MA, Kaufman TC (1987) Homeotic genes of the Antennapedia complex (ANT-C) and their molecular variability in the phylogeny of the Drosophilidae. In: Raff RA, Raff EA (eds) Development as an evolutionary process. Alan Press, New York, pp 179–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer R, Tautz D (1991) Segmentation gene expression in the house-fly Musca domestica. Development 113:419–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart JJ, Brown SJ, Beeman RW, Denell RE (1991) A deficiency of the homeotic complex of the beetle Tribolium. Nature 350:71–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Sucov HM, Murakami KK, Evans RM (1990) Characterization of an autoregulated response element in the mouse retinoic receptor type β gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:5392–5396

    Google Scholar 

  • Tautz D (1992) Redundancies, development and the flow of information. BioEssays 14:263–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JH (1993) Thinking about genetic redundancy. Trends Genet 9:395–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Turelli M (1985) Effects of pleiotropy on predictions concerning mutation-selection balance for polygenic traits. Genetics 111:165–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner A (1994) Evolution of gene networks by gene duplications: a mathematical model and its implications on genome organization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:4387–4391

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner A (1996) Does evolutionary plasticity evolve? Evolution (in press)

  • Wagner A, Wagner GP, Similon P (1994) Epistasis can facilitate the evolution of reproductive isolation by peak shifts: a two-locus two-allele model. Genetics 138:533–545

    Google Scholar 

  • Walldorf U, Fleig R, Gehring WJ (1989) Comparison of the homeobox containing genes of the honeybee and Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:9971–9975

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng Z-B, Cockerham CC (1993) Mutation models and quantitative genetic variation. Genetics 133:729–736

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Advanced Study (‘Wissenschaftskolleg’) Berlin, Wallotstrasse 19, D-14193, Berlin, Germany

    Andreas Wagner

Authors
  1. Andreas Wagner
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wagner, A. Genetic redundancy caused by gene duplications and its evolution in networks of transcriptional regulators. Biol. Cybern. 74, 557–567 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00209427

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00209427

Keywords