[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Modelling Trust for System Design Using the i * Strategic Actors Framework

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Trust in Cyber-societies

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2246))

Abstract

The i *framework was developed to support requirement analysis and high-level design in an agent-oriented system development paradigm. It models intentional dependency relationships among strategic actors and their rationales. As actors depend on each other for goals to be achieved, tasks to be performed, and resources to be furnished, the trust relationships among these actors need to be considered to reason about the opportunities and vulnerabilities these dependencies bring. The concept of softgoal is used to model quality attributes for which there are no a priori, clear-cut criteria for satisfaction, but are judged by actors as being sufficiently met (≪satisficed≫) on a case-by-case basis. In this paper, trustworthiness is treated as a softgoal to be satisficed from the viewpoint of each stakeholder. Contributions to trustworthiness are considered using a qualitative reasoning approach. Examples from the smart card domain are used to illustrate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Birk, A.: Trust in an N-Player Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma. Proc. of Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies Workshop, Autonomous Agent 1999, Seattle, USA, May 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Biswas, A., Mundhe, M., Debnath, S., Sen, S.:ABayesian Network Based Approach for Modeling Agent Relationships. Proc. of Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies Workshop, Autonomous Agent 1999, Seattle, USA, May 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Camp, L.J.: Trust and Risk in Internet Commerce. MIT Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Castelfranchi, C. and Falcone, R.: The Dynamics of Trust: From Beliefs to Action. Proc. of Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies Workshop, Autonomous Agent 1999, Seattle, USA, May 1999. 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Castelfranchi, C. and Falcone, R.: Does Control Reduce or Increase Trust? A complex relationship. Proc. of Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies workshop, Autonomous Agent 2000, Barcelona, Spain, June 2000. 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chung, L.: Representing and Using Non-Functional Requirements for the Information System Development: A Process-Oriented Approach, Ph.D. Thesis, also Tech. Report DKBS-TR-93-1, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Toronto, June 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chung, L., Nixon, B. A., Yu, E., Mylopoulos, J.: Non-Functional Requirements in Software Engineering. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jonker, C. M., Treur, J.: Formal Analysis of Models for the Dynamics of Trust Based on Experiences. Proc. of Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent SocietiesWorkshop, Autonomous Agent 1999, Seattle, USA, May 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Marsh, S., Meech, J.F., Dabbour, A.: Putting Trust into E-Commerce-One Page at a Time. Proc. of Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies Workshop, Autonomous Agents’2000. Barcelona, Spain, June 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D.:AnIntegration Model of Organizational Trust, Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20(3), Jul 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mylopoulos, J., Chung, L., Wang, H.Q., Liao, S., Yu, E.: Extending Object-Oriented Analysis to Explore Alternatives. IEEE Software. January/February 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mylopoulos, J., Chung, L., Nixon, B.: Representing and Using the Non-Functional Requirements: A Process-Oriented Approach, IEEE Trans. Software Engineering. 18(6), June 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mylopoulos, J., Chung, L., Yu, E.: From Object-Oriented to Goal-Oriented Requirements Analysis, Communications of the ACM, 42(1): 31–37, January 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Salter, S., Saydjari, O., Schneier, B., Wallner, J.: Toward a Secure System Engineering Methodology, Proc. of New Security Paradigms Workshop 1998, IEEE Computer Society Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schillo, M., Funk, P., Rovatsos, M.: Who Can You Trust: Dealing with Deception. Proc. of Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies Workshop, Autonomous Agent 1999, Seattle, USA, May 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schneider, F. B.: Trust in Cyberspace. Committee on Information Systems Trustworthiness, Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, National Research Council. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1999. Also available at http://cryptome.org/tic.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schneier, B.: Attack Trees Modelling Security Threats. Dr.Dobb’s Journal, December 1999. Also available at http://www.counterpane.com/attacktrees-ddj-ft.html.

  18. Schneier, B., Shostack, A.: Breaking Up Is Hard To Do: Modelling Security Threats for Smart Cards.Available at http://www.counterpane.com/smart-card-threats.html. Also First USENIX Symposium on Smart Cards, USENIX Press, to appear.

  19. Serban, R, van de Riet, R.: Hiding in a Group: Who is Responsible? Proc. of Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies Workshop, Autonomous Agents’2000. Barcelona, Spain, June, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stalder, F., Clement, A.: Exploring Policy Issues of Electronic Cash: The Mondex Case, Canadian Journal of Communication, 24(2). 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tan, Y., Thoen, W.: Formal Aspects of a Generic Model of Trust for Electronic Commerce. Proc. of Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies Workshop, Autonomous Agents’2000. Barcelona, Spain, June 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tan, Y., Thoen, W.: Towards a Generic Model of Trust for Electronic Commerce. Proc. of Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies Workshop, Autonomous Agent 1999, Seattle, USA, May 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yu, E.: Modelling Strategic Relationships for Process Reengineering, Ph.D. thesis, also Tech. Report DKBS-TR-94-6, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Toronto, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yu, E.: Towards Modelling and Reasoning Support for Early-Phase Requirements Engineering, Proc. 3rd IEEE Int. Symp. On Requirements Engineering (RE’97), Annapolis, Maryland, USA, January 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yu, E., Mylopoulos, J.: From E-R to ‘A-R’-Modelling Strategic Relationships for Business Process Reengineering, Int. Journal of Intelligent and Cooperative Information Systems, 4(2&3), 1995, pp.125–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yu, E., Mylopoulos, J.: Understanding ‘Why’ in Software Process Modelling, Analysis, and Design, Proceedings of 16th International Conference On Software Engineering, May 1994, pp. 159–168.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yu, E., Mylopoulos, J., Lespérance, Y.: AI Models for Business Process Reengineering, IEEE Expert, August 1996, pp.16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zacharia, G.: Trust Management through Reputation Mechanisms. Proc. of Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies Workshop, Autonomous Agent 1999, Seattle, USA, May 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Information Studies, University of Toronto, M5S 3G6, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    Eric Yu & Lin Liu

Authors
  1. Eric Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lin Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Group of Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive and Interacting Modelling, National Research Council, Institute for Cognitive Science and Technology, Viale Marx 15, 00137, Rome, Italy

    Rino Falcone

  2. Department of Computer Science, North Carolina State University, 940 Main Campus Drive, Suite 110, 27606, Raleigh, NC, USA

    Munindar Singh

  3. Department of Economics and Business Administration, Free University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081, HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Yao-Hua Tan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yu, E., Liu, L. (2001). Modelling Trust for System Design Using the i * Strategic Actors Framework. In: Falcone, R., Singh, M., Tan, YH. (eds) Trust in Cyber-societies. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2246. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45547-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45547-7_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43069-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45547-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation