A Perspective on Computer Assisted Assessment Techniques for Short Free-Text Answers

1. The hewlett foundation: Short answer scoring. http://www.kaggle.com/c/asap-sas, Accessed on 6 March 2015

2. Bachman, L., Carr, N., Kamei, G., Kim, M., Pan, M., Salvador, C., Sawaki, Y.: A reliable approach to automatic assessment of short answer free responses. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 1–4 (2002)

   Google Scholar 

3. Basu, S., Jacobs, C., Vanderwende, L.: Powergrading: a clustering approach to amplify human effort for short answer grading. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. 1, 391–402 (2013)

   Google Scholar 

4. Burstein, J., Wolff, S., Lu, C.: Using lexical semantic techniques to classify free responses. In: Viegas, E. (ed.) Breadth and Depth of Semantic Lexicons, vol. 10, pp. 227–244. Springer, The Netherlands (1999)

   Google Scholar 

5. Butcher, P.G., Jordan, S.E.: A comparison of human and computer marking of short free-text student responses. Comput. Educ. 55(2), 489–499 (2010)

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Callear, D., Jerrams-Smith, J., Soh, V., Dr. Jerrams-smith, J., Ae. H.P.: CAA of short non-MCQ answers. In: Proceedings of the 5th International CAA Conference (2001)

   Google Scholar 

7. Dikli, S.: An overview of automated scoring of essays. J. Technol. Learn. Assess. (JTLA) 5(1), 36 (2006)

   Google Scholar 

8. Dzikovska, M., Bell, P., Isard, A., Moore, J.D.: Evaluating language understanding accuracy with respect to objective outcomes in a dialogue system. In: EACL, pp. 471–481. The Association for Computer Linguistics (2012)

   Google Scholar 

9. Dzikovska, M., Nielsen, R.D., Brew, C.: Towards effective tutorial feedback for explanation questions: a dataset and baselines. In: HLT-NAACL, pp. 200–210. The Association for Computational Linguistics (2012)

   Google Scholar 

10. Gomaa, W.H., Fahmy, A.A.: Tapping into the power of automatic scoring. In: The Eleventh International Conference on Language Engineering, Egyptian Society of Language Engineering (ESOLEC) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

11. Fahmy, A.A., Gomaa, W.H.: Short answer grading using string similarity and corpus-based similarity. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. (IJACSA) 3(11), 210–214 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

12. Graesser, A.C., Person, N.K.: Question asking during tutoring. Am. Edu. Res. J. 31, 104–137 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. Graesser, A.C., Wiemer-Hastings, P.M., Wiemer-Hastings, K., Harter, D., Person, N.K.: Using latent semantic analysis to evaluate the contributions of students in autotutor. Interact. Learn. Environ. 8(2), 129–147 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. Grundspenkis, J.: Development of concept map based adaptive knowledge assessment system. In: IADIS International Conference e-Learning, pp. 395–402 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

15. Guest, E., Brown, S.: A new method for parsing student text to support computer-assisted assessment of free text answers. In: 11th CAA International Computer Assisted Assessment Conference, pp. 223–236. Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK, July 2007

    Google Scholar 

16. Gütl, C.: Moving towards a fully automatic knowledge assessment tool. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. (iJET), 3(1) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

17. Hahn, M., Meurers, D.: Evaluating the meaning of answers to reading comprehension questions a semantics-based approach. In: The 7th Workshop on the Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, ACL, pp. 326–336 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

18. Jordan, S., Mitchell, T.: e-assessment for learning? the potential of short-answer free-text questions with tailored feedback. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 40(2), 371–385 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

19. Jordan, S.: Student engagement with assessment and feedback: some lessons from short-answer free-text e-assessment questions. Comput. Educ. 58(2), 818–834 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

20. Jordan, S.: Short-answer e-assessment questions: five years on (2012)

    Google Scholar 

21. Kanejiya, D., Kumar, A., Prasad, S.: Automatic evaluation of students’ answers using syntactically enhanced LSA. In: Proceedings of the HLT-NAACL Workshop on Building Educational Applications Using Natural Language Processing, vol. 2, pp. 53–60. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

22. Klein, SP., et al.: Characteristics of hand and machine-assigned scores to college students answers to open-ended tasks. In: Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honor of David A. Freedman, pp. 76–89. Institute of Mathematical Statistics (2008)

    Google Scholar 

23. Leacock, C., Chodorow, M.: C-rater: automated scoring of short-answer questions. Comput. Humanit. 37(4), 389–405 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

24. Madnani, N., Burstein, J., Sabatini, J., OReilly, T.: Automated scoring of a summary writing task designed to measure reading comprehension. In: Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Innovative use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, pp. 163–168. Citeseer (2013)

    Google Scholar 

25. Manohar, P., Roy, S.: Crowd, the teaching assistant: educational assessment crowdsourcing. In: HCOMP, AAAI (2013)

    Google Scholar 

26. McNamara, D.S., Graesser, A.C., McCarthy, P.M., Cai, Z.: Automated evaluation of text and discourse with Coh-Metrix. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2014)

    Google Scholar 

27. Mintz, L., DMello, S., Stefanescu, D., Graesser, A.C., Feng, S.: Automatic assessment of student reading comprehension from short summaries. In: Educational Data Mining Conference (2014)

    Google Scholar 

28. Mitchell, T., Russell, T., Broomhead, P., Aldridge, N.: Towards robust computerized marking of free-text responses. In: Proceedings of 6th International Computer Aided Assessment Conference (2002)

    Google Scholar 

29. Mohler, M., Bunescu, R.C., Mihalcea, R.: Learning to grade short answer questions using semantic similarity measures and dependency graph alignments. In: The Association for Computer Linguistics, ACL, pp. 752–762 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

30. Mohler, M., Mihalcea, R.: Text-to-text semantic similarity for automatic short answer grading. In: Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 567–575. Association for Computational Linguistics (2009)

    Google Scholar 

31. Nielsen, R.D., Buckingham, J., Knoll, G., Marsh, B., Palen, L.: A taxonomy of questions for question generation. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on the Question Generation Shared Task and Evaluation Challenge (2008)

    Google Scholar 

32. Nielsen, R.D., Ward, W., Martin, J.H.: Recognizing entailment in intelligent tutoring systems. Nat. Lang. Eng. 15(4), 479–501 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

33. Nielsen, R.D., Ward, W., Martin, J.H., Palmer, M.: Annotating students’ understanding of science concepts. In: LREC, European Language Resources Association (2008)

    Google Scholar 

34. Page, E.B.: The imminence of grading essays by computer. Phi Delta Kappan, vol. 48, pp. 238–243 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

35. Pulman, S.G., Sukkarieh, J.Z.: Automatic short answer marking. In: Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Building Educational Applications Using NLP, EdAppsNLP 05, pp. 9–16. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA (2005)

    Google Scholar 

36. Resnik, P.: Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1, pp. 448–453 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

37. Rodriguez, M.C.: Construct equivalence of multiple-choice and constructed-response items: a random effects synthesis of correlations. J. Educ. Meas. 40(2), 163–184 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

38. Shermis, M.D., Burstein, J., Higgins, D., Zechner, K.: Automated essay scoring: writing assessment and instruction. In: International Encyclopedia of Education, pp. 20–26 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

39. Siddiqi, R., Harrison, C.: A systematic approach to the automated marking of short-answer questions. In: IEEE International Multitopic Conference, 2008, INMIC 2008, pp. 329–332 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

40. Siddiqi, R., Harrison, C.J., Siddiqi, R.: Improving teaching and learning through automated short-answer marking. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 3(3), 237–249 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

41. Sil, A., Ketelhut, D.J., Shelton, A., Yates, A.: Automatic grading of scientific inquiry. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Building Educational Applications Using NLP, pp. 22–32. Association for Computational Linguistics (2012)

    Google Scholar 

42. Singley, M.K., Taft, H.L.: Open-ended approaches to science assessment using computers. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 4(1), 7–20 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

43. Sukkarieh, J.Z., Bolge, E.: Building a textual entailment suite for the evaluation of automatic content scoring technologies. In: LREC, European Language Resources Association (2010)

    Google Scholar 

44. Sukkarieh, J.Z., Mohammad-Djafari, A., Bercher, J.-F., Bessie’re, P.: Using a maxent classifier for the automatic content scoring of free-text responses. In: AIP Conference Proceedings-American Institute of Physics, vol. 1305, p. 41 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

45. Sukkarieh, J.Z., Pulman, S.G.: Information extraction and machine learning: auto-marking short free text responses to science questions. In: Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education: Supporting Learning Through Intelligent and Socially Informed Technology, pp. 629–637. IOS Press (2005)

    Google Scholar 

46. Sukkarieh, J.Z., Pulman, S.G., Raikes, N.: Auto-marking: using computational linguistics to score short, free text responses. In: International Association of Educational Assessment, Philadephia (2004)

    Google Scholar 

47. Sukkarieh, J.Z., Pulman, S.G., Raikes, N.: Auto-marking 2: an update on the ucles-oxford university research into using computational linguistics to score short, free text responses. In: International Association of Educational Assessment, Philadephia (2004)

    Google Scholar 

48. Sukkarieh, J.Z., Blackmore, J.: c-rater: Automatic content scoring for short constructed responses. In: FLAIRS Conference, AAAI Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

49. Valenti, S., Neri, F., Cucchiarelli, A.: An overview of current research on automated essay grading. J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res. 2, 319–330 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

50. Voorhees, E.M., Tice, D.M.: Building a question answering test collection. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 200–207 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

51. Wang, H.-C., Chang, C.-Y., Li, T.-Y.: Assessing creative problem-solving with automated text grading. Comput. Educ. 51(4), 1450–1466 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

52. Wiemer-Hastings, P., Graesser, A.C., Harter, D.: The foundations and architecture of autotutor. In: Goettl, B.P., Halff, H.M., Redfield, C.L., Shute, V.J. (eds.) ITS 1998. LNCS, vol. 1452, pp. 334–343. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

53. Wiemer-Hastings, P., Wiemer-Hastings, K., Graesser, A.: Improving an intelligent tutor’s comprehension of students with latent semantic analysis. In: Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol. 99 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

54. Wiemer-Hastings, P., Zipitria, I.: Rules for syntax, vectors for semantics. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, NJ (2001)

    Google Scholar 

55. Ziai, R., Ott, N., Meurers, D.: Short answer assessment: establishing links between research strands. In: The 7th Workshop on the Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, ACL, pp. 190–200 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references