Abstract
Failure is a central aspect of almost every game experience, driving player perceptions of difficulty and impacting core game user experience concepts such as flow. At the heart of failure in many game genres is player death. While techniques such as dynamic difficulty adjustment have addressed tweaking game parameters to control the frequency of player death occurrence, there is a surprisingly limited amount of research examining how games handle what happens when a player actually dies. We posit that this is a rich, underexplored space with significant implications for player experience and related techniques. This chapter presents our exploration into the space of player death and rebirth through the creation of a generalized taxonomy of death in platformer games—one of the genres that features player death and respawning most heavily. In order to create this taxonomy, we collected and catalogued examples of death and respawning mechanics from 62 recent platformer games released on the digital distribution platform Steam after January 2018. Games selected varied equally across positive, mixed, and negative overall reviews in order to provide a broader range of mechanics, both good and bad. We observed gameplays of each individual game and noted the processes of death and rebirth, respectively. A grounded theory approach was then employed to develop the taxonomy of game death and respawning, resulting in five notable dimensions: (1) obstacles, (2) death conditions, (3) aesthetics, (4) changes to player progress, and (5) respawn locations. Finally, we discuss how the different dimensions and mechanics highlighted in our taxonomy have implications for key aspects of player experience, as well as how they could be used to improve the effectiveness of related techniques such as dynamic difficulty adjustment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alharthi, S.A., Alsaedi, O., Toups, Z.O., Tanenbaum, J., Hammer, J. (2018). Playing to wait: A taxonomy of idle games. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (p. 621). ACM.
Antle, A.N. & Wise, A.F. (2013). Getting down to details: Using theories of cognition and learning to inform tangible user interface design. Interacting with Computers, 25(1), pp.1–20.
Aarseth, E., Smedstad, S.M., SunnanÃě, L. (2003). A multidimensional typology of games. In Proceedings of the Digital Games Research Association (DiGRA) Conference.
Bopp, J. A., Mekler, E., Opwis, K. (2016). Negative Emotion, Positive Experience? Emotionally Moving Moments in Digital Games. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2996–3006). ACM.
Brandse, M. (2017). The Shape of Challenge. In International Conference of Design, User Experience, and Usability (pp. 362–376). Springer, Cham, Switzerland.
Carter, M., Gibbs, M., Wadley, G. (2013). Death and dying in DayZ. In Proceedings of The 9th Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment: Matters of Life and Death (p. 22). ACM.
Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded Theory Methodology: Objectivist and Constructivist Qualitative Methods in N. K. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 509–535).
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.
Chittaro, L. and Sioni, R. (2018). Existential video games: Proposal and evaluation of an interactive reflection about death. Entertainment Computing, 26, (pp. 59–77).
Clarke, D. & Duimering, P.R. (2006). How computer gamers experience the game situation: a behavioral study. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 4(3), p.6.
Constant, T. and Levieux, G. (2019). Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment Impact on Players’ Confidence. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM.
Copcic, A., McKenzie, S., Hobbs, M. (2013). Permadeath: A review of literature. In 2013 IEEE International Games Innovation Conference (IGIC) (pp. 40–47). IEEE.
Dahlskog, S. & Togelius, J. (2012). Patterns and procedural content generation: revisiting Mario in world 1 level 1. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Design Patterns in Games (p. 1). ACM.
De Lope, R.P. & Medina-Medina, N. (2017). A comprehensive taxonomy for serious games. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(5), pp.629–672.
Deterding, S. (2011). Situated motivational affordances of game elements: A conceptual model. In Gamification: Using game design elements in non-gaming contexts, a workshop at CHI.
Denisova, A. & Cairns, P. (2015). Adaptation in digital games: the effect of challenge adjustment on player performance and experience. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (pp. 97–101). ACM.
Denisova, A. & Cook, E. (2019). Power-Ups in Digital Games: The Rewarding Effect of Phantom Game Elements on Player Experience. In Proceedings of the 2019 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. ACM.
Dormann, C. (2016). Toward Ludic Gerontechnology: a Review of Games for Dementia Care. Proceedings of the 1st International Joint Conference of DiGRA and FDG.
Elverdam, C. & Aarseth, E. (2007). Game classification and game design: Construction through critical analysis. Games and Culture, 2(1), pp.3–22.
Enger, M. (2012). What is “Nintendo hard”?. http://bnbgaming.com/2011/02/08/what-is-nintendo-hard/. Accessed 8 Aug 2019.
Ens, B., Hincapié-Ramos, J.D., Irani, P. (2014). Ethereal planes: a design framework for 2D information space in 3D mixed reality environments. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM symposium on Spatial user interaction (pp. 2–12). ACM.
Frasca, G. (2007). Ephemeral games: Is it barbaric to design videogames after Auschwitz?. Cybertext yearbook, 2, pp.172–180.
Gilleade, K. and Dix, A. (2004). Using frustration in the design of adaptive videogames. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGCHI International Conference on Advances in computer entertainment technology (pp. 228–232). ACM.
Glaser, B.G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergence vs forcing. Sociology press.
Glaser, B.G. & Strauss, A.L. (2017). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge.
Harrer, S. (2013). From Losing to Loss: Exploring the Expressive Capacities of Videogames Beyond Death as Failure. Culture Unbound. Journal of Current Cultural Research (pp. 607–620).
Hook, N. (2015). Grounded theory. In Game Research Methods (pp. 309–320). ETC Press.
Hunicke, R., LeBlanc, M., Zubek, R. (2004). MDA: A formal approach to game design and game research. In Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Challenges in Game AI (Vol. 4, No. 1, p. 1722).
Hunicke, R. (2005). The case for dynamic difficulty adjustment in games. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGCHI International Conference on Advances in computer entertainment technology (pp. 429–433). ACM.
Ijsselsteijn, W., van den Hoogen, W., Klimmt, C., de Kort, Y., Lindley, C., Mathiak, K., Poels, K., Ravaja, N., Turpeinen, M, Vorderer, P. (2008). Measuring the Experience of Digital Game Enjoyment. In Proceedings of Measuring Behavior.
Isaksen, A., Gopstein, D., Nealen, A. (2015). Exploring Game Space Using Survival Analysis. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games.
Jennings-Teats, M., Smith, G., Wardrip-Fruin, N. (2010). Polymorph: Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment Through Level Generation. In Proceedings of the 2010 Workshop on Procedural Content Generation in Games.
Johnson, D., Gardner, M.J., Perry, R. (2018). Validation of two game experience scales: The Player Experience of Need Satisfaction (PENS) and Game Experience Questionnaire (GEQ). International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (pp. 38–46). 118.
Juul, J. (2009). Fear of failing? the many meanings of difficulty in video games. The video game theory reader, 2(237–252).
Juul, J. (2013). The art of failure: An essay on the pain of playing video games. MIT press.
Kallinen, K. (2004). The effects of background music on using a pocket computer in a cafeteria: Immersion, emotional responses, and social richness of medium. In CHI’04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1227–1230). ACM.
Kao, D. & Harrell, D.F. (2016). Exploring the impact of avatar color on game experience in educational games. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1896–1905). ACM.
Keehl, O. & Melcer, E. (2019). Radical tunes: exploring the impact of music on memorization of stroke order in logographic writing systems. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games. ACM.
Keogh, B. (2013). When game over means game over: using permanent death to craft living stories in minecraft. In Proceedings of The 9th Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment: Matters of Life and Death (p. 20). ACM.
Ketcheson, M., Ye, Z., Graham, T.C. (2015). Designing for exertion: how heart-rate power-ups increase physical activity in exergames. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (pp. 79–89). ACM.
Kim, K., Schmierbach, M.G., Chung, M.Y., Fraustino, J.D., Dardis, F., Ahern, L. (2015). Is it a sense of autonomy, control, or attachment? Exploring the effects of in-game customization on game enjoyment. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, pp.695–705.
Klastrup, L. (2006). Why death matters: understanding gameworld experiences. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGCHI international conference on Advances in computer entertainment technology (p. 29). ACM.
Klabbers, J.H. (2003). The gaming landscape: a taxonomy for classifying games and simulations. In Proceedings of the Digital Games Research Association (DiGRA) Conference.
Klimmt, C., Blake, C., Hefner, D., Vorderer, P., Roth, C. (2009). Player performance, satisfaction, and video game enjoyment. In International Conference on Entertainment Computing (pp. 1–12). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Kreminski, M., Samuel, B., Melcer, E., Wardrip-Fruin, N. (2019). Evaluating AI-Based Games Through Retellings. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment (AIIDE-19). AAAI.
Lange-Nielsen, F. (2011). The Power-up Experience: A study of Power-ups in Games and their Effect on Player Experience. In Proceedings of the Digital Games Research Association (DiGRA) Conference.
Lara-Cabrera, R. & Camacho, D., (2019). A taxonomy and state of the art revision on affective games. Future Generation Computer Systems, 92, pp.516–525.
Lessel, A. (2013). Nintendo Hard, or Hardly Working?. https://venturebeat.com/community/2013/09/27/nintendo-hard-or-hardly-working/. Accessed 10 Sep 2019.
Lewis, C., Whitehead, J., Wardrip-Fruin, N. (2010). What went wrong: a taxonomy of video game bugs. In Proceedings of the fifth international conference on the foundations of digital games (pp. 108–115). ACM.
Lomas, D., Patel, K., Forlizzi, J., Koedinger, K. (2013). Optimizing Challenge in an Educational Game Using Large-Scale Design Experiments. In Proceedings of the 2013 SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 89–98).
Mäkelä, V., Sharma, S., Hakulinen, J., Heimonen, T., Turunen, M. (2017). Challenges in public display deployments: A taxonomy of external factors. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3426–3475). ACM.
McCallum, S. & Boletsis, C. (2013). A taxonomy of serious games for dementia. In Games for Health (pp. 219–232). Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden.
Melcer, E.F. & Isbister, K. (2016). Bridging the physical divide: a design framework for embodied learning games and simulations. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2225–2233). ACM.
Melcer, E. & Isbister, K. (2016). Motion, Emotion, and Form: Exploring Affective Dimensions of Shape. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1430–1437). ACM.
Melcer, E.F., Hollis, V., Isbister, K. (2017). Tangibles vs. Mouse in Educational Programming Games: Influences on Enjoyment and Self-Beliefs. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1901–1908). ACM.
Melcer, E.F. & Isbister, K. (2018). Bots & (Main) Frames: exploring the impact of tangible blocks and collaborative play in an educational programming game. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (p. 266). ACM.
Melnic, D. & Melnic, V. (2018). Saved games and respawn timers: The dilemma of representing death in video games. In University of Bucharest Review: Literary and Cultural Studies Series (pp. 29–37). VII.
Mueller, F.F., Gibbs, M.R., Vetere, F. (2008). Taxonomy of exertion games. In Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Designing for Habitus and Habitat (pp. 263–266). ACM.
Mukherjee, S. (2009). ‘Remembering How You Died’: Memory, Death and Temporality in Videogames. In Proceedings of the Digital Games Research Association (DiGRA) Conference.
Nacke, L.E. & Grimshaw, M. (2011). Player-game interaction through affective sound. In Game sound technology and player interaction: Concepts and developments (pp. 264–285). IGI global.
Niedenthal, S. (2009). What we talk about when we talk about game aesthetics. In Proceedings of the Digital Games Research Association (DiGRA) Conference.
Plass, J.L., Heidig, S., Hayward, E.O., Homer, B.D., Um, E. (2014). Emotional design in multimedia learning: Effects of shape and color on affect and learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, pp.128–140.
Rego, P., Moreira, P.M., Reis, L.P. (2010). Serious games for rehabilitation: A survey and a classification towards a taxonomy. In 5th Iberian conference on information systems and technologies (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
Robinett, W. (1992). Synthetic experience: A proposed taxonomy. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 1(2), pp.229–247.
Rusch, D. (2009). Mechanisms of the Soul-Tackling the Human Condition in Videogames. In Proceedings of the Digital Games Research Association (DiGRA) Conference.
Ryan, R., Rigby, C.S., Przybylski, A. (2006). The Motivational Pull of Video Games: A Self-Determination Theory Approach. Motivation and Emotion, pp. 344–360, 30(4).
Salisbury, J.H. and Cole, T., 2016. Grounded Theory in Games Research: Making the Case and Exploring the Options. In Proceedings of the 1st International Joint Conference of DiGRA and FDG.
Sanders, T. & Cairns, P. (2010). Time perception, immersion and music in videogames. In Proceedings of the 24th BCS interaction specialist group conference (pp. 160–167). British Computer Society.
Sarkar, A. and Cooper, S. (2019). Transforming Game Difficulty Curves using Function Composition. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM.
Schneider, E., Lang, A., Shin, M., Bradley, S., 2004. Death with a Story: How Story Impacts Emotional, Motivational, and Physiological Responses to First-Person Shooter Video Games. In Human Communication Research (pp. 361–375), 30(3).
Sedig, K., Parsons, P., Haworth, R. (2017). PlayerâĂŞgame interaction and cognitive gameplay: A taxonomic framework for the core mechanic of videogames. In Informatics (Vol. 4, No. 1, p. 4). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.
Smeddinck, J.D., Mandryk, R.L., Birk, M.V., Gerling, K.M., Barsilowski, D., Malaka, R. (2016). How to present game difficulty choices?: Exploring the impact on player experience. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 5595–5607). ACM.
Smith, G., Cha, M. and Whitehead, J. (2008). A framework for analysis of 2D platformer levels. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGGRAPH symposium on Video games (pp. 75–80). ACM.
Smith, A.M., Lewis, C., Hullett, K., Smith, G., Sullivan, A. (2011). An inclusive taxonomy of player modeling. University of California, Santa Cruz, Tech. Rep. UCSC-SOE-11-13.
Sorenson, N., Pasquier, P., DiPaola, S. (2011). A generic approach to challenge modeling for the procedural creation of video game levels. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games, 3(3), pp.229–244.
Shaker, N., Togelius, J., Nelson, M.J. (2016). Procedural content generation in games. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Um, E., Plass, J.L., Hayward, E.O., Homer, B.D. (2012). Emotional design in multimedia learning. Journal of educational psychology, 104(2), p.485.
Van Den Hoogen, W., Poels, K., Ijsselstein, W., De Kort, Y. (2012). Between Challenge and Defeat: Repeated Player-Death and Game Enjoyment. Media Psychology, 15(4).
Vossen, D.P. (2004) The nature and classification of games. Avante, 10(1).
Wehbe, R.R., Mekler, E.D., Schaekermann, M., Lank, E., Nacke, L.E. (2017). Testing Incremental Difficulty Design in Platformer Games. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 5109–5113). ACM.
Xue, S., Wu, M., Kolen, J., Aghdaie, N., Zaman, K. (2017). Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment for Maximized Engagement in Digital Games. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion (pp. 465–471). ACM.
Yee, N. (2006). Motivations for play in online games. CyberPsychology & behavior, 9(6), pp.772–775.
Zohaib, M. (2018). Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment (DDA) in Computer Games: A Review. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Melcer, E.F., Cuerdo, M.A.M. (2020). Death and Rebirth in Platformer Games. In: Bostan, B. (eds) Game User Experience And Player-Centered Design. International Series on Computer Entertainment and Media Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37643-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37643-7_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37642-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37643-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)