Evaluation Patterns for Design Science Research Artefacts

1. March, S.T., Smith, G.: Design and Natural Science Research on Information Technology. Decision Support Systems 15(4), 251–266 (1995)

   Article  Google Scholar 

2. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design Science in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly 28(1), 75–105 (2004)

   Google Scholar 

3. Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R., Venable, J.: Strategies for Design Research Evaluation. In: 16th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2008, Galway, Ireland (2008)

   Google Scholar 

4. Cleven, A., Gubler, P., Hüner, K.M.: Design Alternatives for the Evaluation of Design Science Research Artifacts. In: 4th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology, Philadelphia, PA (2009)

   Google Scholar 

5. March, S.T., Stortey, V.C.: Design Science in the Information Systems Discipline: An Introduction to the Special Issue one Design Science Reseaerch. MIS Quarterly 32(4), 725–730 (2008)

   Google Scholar 

6. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S.: A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research. Journal of Management Information Systems 24(3), 45–77 (2007)

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Sein, M.K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., Lindgren, R.: Action Design Research. MIS Quarterly 35(1), 37–56 (2011)

   Google Scholar 

8. Aier, S., Fischer, C.: Criteria for Progress for Information Systems Design Theories. Information Systems and E-Business Management 9(1), 133–172 (2011)

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. Rosemann, M., Vessey, I.: Toward Improving the Relevance of Information Systems Research to Practice: The Role of Applicability Checks. MIS Quarterly 32(1), 1–22 (2008)

   Google Scholar 

10. Sun, Y., Kantor, P.B.: Cross-Evaluation: A new model for information system evaluation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57(5), 614–628 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. Vaishnavi, V.K., Kuechler, W.: Improving and Innovating Information & Communication Technology: Design Science Research Methods and Patterns. Taylor Francis (2008)

    Google Scholar 

12. Zelkovitz, M.V., Wallace, D.R.: Experimental Models for Validating Technology. IEEE Computer 31(5), 21–31 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

13. Chen, P.P.: The Entity-Relationship Model. Towards a unified view of data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 1(1), 9–36 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

14. vom Brocke, J., Sonnenberg, C., Baumoel, U.: Linking Accounting and Process-aware Information Systems – Towards a Generalized Information Model For Process-oriented Accounting. In: 19th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2011, Helsinki, Finland (2011)

    Google Scholar 

15. Lee, J., Wyner, G.M., Pentland, B.T.: Process Grammar as a Tool for Business Process Design. MIS Quarterly 23(4), 757–778 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

16. Sonnenberg, C., Huemer, C., Hofreiter, B., Mayrhofer, D., Braccini, A.: The REA-DSL: A Domain Specific Modeling Language for Business Models. In: Mouratidis, H., Rolland, C. (eds.) CAiSE 2011. LNCS, vol. 6741, pp. 252–266. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references