Summary
OntoClean is a methodology for validating the ontological adequacy of taxonomic relationships. It is based on highly general ontological notions drawn from philosophy, like essence, identity, and unity,which are used to characterize relevant aspects of the intended meaning of the properties, classes, and relations that make up an ontology. These aspects are represented by formal metaproperties, which impose several constraints on the taxonomic structure of an ontology. The analysis of these constraints helps in evaluating and validating the choices made. In this chapter we present an informal overview of the philosophical notions involved and their role in OntoClean, review some common ontological pitfalls, and walk through the example that has appeared in pieces in previous papers and has been the basis of numerous tutorials and talks.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fan, James, Ken Barker, Bruce Porter, and Peter Clark. 2001. Representing Roles and Purpose. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Knowledge Capture (KCap’01). Vancouver: ACM Press.
Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Masolo, C., and Oltramari, A. 2003. Restructuring Wordnet’s Top-level. To appear on AI Magazine.
Guarino, N. 1998. Formal Ontology in Information Systems. In N. Guarino (ed.) Formal Ontology in Information Systems. Proceedings of FOIS’98, Trento, Italy, 6–8 June 1998. IOS Press, Amsterdam: 3–15.
Guarino, Nicola and Chris Welty. 2000a. Identity, Unity, and Individuality: Towards a formal toolkit for ontological analysis. In, Horn, W. ed., Proceedings of ECAI-2000: The European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Pp. 219–223. Berlin: IOS Press. August, 2000.
Guarino, Nicola and Chris Welty. 2000b. A Formal Ontology of Properties. In, Dieng, R., and Corby, O., eds, Proceedings of EKA W-2000: The 12th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. Spring-Verlag LNCS Vol. 1937:97–112. October, 2000.
Guarino, Nicola and Chris Welty. 2000c. Ontological Analysis of Taxonomic Relationships. In, Veda Storey and Alberto Laender, eds., Proceedings of ER-2000: The 19thInternational Conference on Conceptual Modeling Springer-Verlag LNCS Vol. 1920:210–224. October, 2000.
Guarino, Nicola and Chris Welty. 2002. Identity and Subsumption. In Rebecca Green, Carol Bean, and Sung Hyon Myaeng, eds., The Semantics of Relationships: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Pp 111–125. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Lowe, E. Jonathan. 1989. Kinds of Being: A Study of Individuation, Identity, and the Logic of Sortal Terms. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Quine, Willard. 1969. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press.
Rector, Allan. 2002. Are top-level ontologies worth the effort? Panel at KR-2002. Toulouse, April, 2002.
Simons, Peter. 1987. Parts: A study in ontology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Welty, C. and Guarino, N. 2001. Supporting Ontological Analysis of Taxonomic Relationships. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 39 (1): 51–74.
Wiggins, David. 1980. Sameness and Substance. Oxford: Blackwell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Guarino, N., Welty, C.A. (2004). An Overview of OntoClean. In: Staab, S., Studer, R. (eds) Handbook on Ontologies. International Handbooks on Information Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24750-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24750-0_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-11957-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24750-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive