Abstract
The classification and scaling of occupations constitutes the foundation of much, if not most, research on social stratification. Whether one studies access to desirable positions in societies (such as education or income), consumer styles, health outcomes, social interaction patterns, or social values and attitudes, measures of social background will more likely than not include a measure of social position derived from occupational position. In addition, the study of access to occupations is an important research topic in its own right. Ever since it was recognised that the division of labour is the kernel of social inequality, stratification researchers have developed ways to derive social status measures from information on occupations. Typically, this involves two steps. First, information about occupations is secured in a detailed classification of several hundred categories, often census or other official classifications. In comparative research with existing data, the task is often to reconcile the various classifications that have been used to code detailed occupational information in the component studies. In a second step, these detailed occupational classifications are recoded into status measures of more manageable size and sociological relevance, depending on the preferences of researchers and the nature of their research questions. There are many derived scales and broad classifications in circulation (Grusky and van Rompaey 1992).
This paper digests and updates two earlier publications (Ganzeboom, De Graaf and Treiman 1992; Ganzeboom and Treiman 1996).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bomschier, V. 1986. “Social Stratification in Six Western Countries: The General Pattern and Some Differences.” Social Science Information 25:797–824.
De Graaf, P.M., H.B.G. Ganzeboom, and M. Kalmijn. 1989. “Cultural and Economic Dimensions of Occupational Status.” Pp. 53–74 in Similar or Different? Continuities in Dutch Research on Social Stratification and Social Mobility, edited by W. Jansen, J. Dronkers, and K. Verrips. Amsterdam: SISWO.
Duncan, O.D. 1961. “A Socio-economic Index for All Occupations and Properties and Characteristics of the Socioeconomic Index.” Pp. 109–161 in Occupations and Social Status, edited by A.J. Reiss, Jr. Glencoe, Il: Free Press.
Duncan-Jones, P. 1972. “Social Mobility, Canonical Scoring and Occupational Classification.” Pp. 191–210 in The Analysis of Social Mobility: Methods and Approaches, edited by K. Hope. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Erikson, R., and J.H. Goldthorpe. 1992. The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Erikson, R., J.H. Goldthorpe, W. König, P. Lüttinger, and W. Müller. 1989. The International Mobility Superfile (IMS) — Documentation. Mannheim: Universität Mannheim, Institut für Sozialwissenschaften.
Erikson, R., J.H. Goldthorpe, and L. Portocarero. 1979. “Intergenerational Class Mobility in Three Western European Societies: England, France and Sweden.” British Journal of Sociology 30:415–451.
Featherman, D.L., F. Lancaster Jones, and R.M. Häuser. 1975. “Assumptions of Social Mobility Research in the U.S.: The Case of Occupational Status.” Social Science Research 4:329–360.
Ganzeboom, H.B.G., P.M. De Graaf, and D.J. Treiman. 1992. “A Standard International Socio-economic Index of Occupational Status.” Social Science Research 21:1–56.
Ganzeboom, H.B.G., R. Luijkx, and D.J. Treiman. 1989. “Intergenerational Class Mobility in Comparative Perspective.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 8:3–84.
Ganzeboom, H.B.G., and D.J. Treiman. 1996. “Internationally Comparable Measures of Occupational Status for the 1988 International Standard Classification of Occupations.” Social Science Research 25:201–239.
Goldthorpe, J.H. 1980. Social Mobility and Class Structure in Modern Britain. Oxford: Clarendon.
Grusky, D.B., and S.E. Van Rompaey. 1992. “The Vertical Scaling of Occupations: Some Cautionary Comments and Reflections.” American Journal of Sociology 97:1712–1728.
Hauser, R.M., and J.R. Warren. 1997. “Socioeconomic Indexes for Occupations: A Review, Update, and Critique.” Pp. 177–298 in Sociological Methodology 1997, edited by Adrian E. Raftery. Washington DC: The American Sociological Association.
Hodge, R.W. 1981. “The Measurement of Occupational Status.” Social Science Research 10:396–415.
ILO. 1969. International Standard Classification of Occupations, revised edition 1968. Geneva: ILO.
ILO. 1990. International Standard Classification of Occupations: ISCO-88. Geneva: ILO.
Krymkowski, D.H. 1988. “Measurement in the Comparative Study of the Process of Stratification.” Social Science Research 17:191–205.
Treiman, D.J. 1977. Occupational Prestige in Comparative Perspective. New York: Academic Press.
Treiman, D.J., and I. Szelenyi. 1993. “Social Stratification in Eastern Europe after 1989.” Pp. 163–178 in Transformation Processes in Eastern Europe: Proceedings of a Workshop held at the Dutch National Science Foundation [NWO], 3-4 December 1992. The Hague: NWO.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1971a. 1970 Census of Population Alphabetical Index of Industries and Occupations. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1971b. 1970 Census of Population Classified Index of Industries and Occupations. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Department of Labor. 1977. Dictionary of Occupational Titles, fourth edition. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ganzeboom, H.B.G., Treiman, D.J. (2003). Three Internationally Standardised Measures for Comparative Research on Occupational Status. In: Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik, J.H.P., Wolf, C. (eds) Advances in Cross-National Comparison. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9186-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9186-7_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4828-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-9186-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive