In this chapter we offer a framework for thinking about the design of technology. Our approach draws on critical perspectives from both social theory and science and technology studies (STS). We understand design to be the process of consciously shaping an artifact to adapt it to specific goals and environments. Our framework conceptualizes design as a process whereby technical and social considerations converge to produce concrete devices that fit specific contexts. How this happens – and the possibility that it might happen differently – is a crucial point for philosophers and other students of technology to consider.
To date, design studies have been focused predominantly on the work of what we might call proximate designers, while work in the field of STS has focused on the role of non-designers such as clients, stakeholders, and other socially relevant groups. However, little attention has been paid to ways in which historical choices and cultural assumptions about technology shape the design process. Our goal is to address this oversight. We begin by posing a seemingly simple question: is design intentional? A review of the literature draws our attention to at least three possible levels of analysis: that of proximate designers, the immediate design environment, and broader society. We then present a critical theory of technology that provides a non-deterministic, non-essentialist approach to the study of technology. We argue that critical theory, with its emphasis on examining taken-for-granted assumptions, offers a theoretical space for thinking differently about design. Finally, we discuss the possibilities opened up by critical theory and some of the obstacles that stand in the way of realizing a richer world of design.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbate, J., 1999, Inventing the Internet, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Bowker, G. C., and Star, S. L., 2000, Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Bucciarelli, L. L., 1994, Designing Engineers, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Chandler, A. D., 1977, The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business, Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.
David, P. A., 1985, Clio and the economics of QWERTY, Am. Econ. Rev. 72(2):332-337.
Downey, G., 1998, The Machine in Me: An Anthropologist Sits Among Computer Engineers, Routledge, NJ.
Edwards, P., 1996, The Closed World: Computers and the Politics of Discourse in Cold War America, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Feenberg, A., 1999, Questioning Technology, Routledge, New York.
Feenberg, A., 2002, Transforming Technology: A Critical Theory Revisited, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Kunda, G., 1993, Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in a High Tech Culture, Temple University Press, Philadelphia.
Noble, D., 1977, America by Design: Science, Technology, and the Rise of Corporate Capitalism, Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
Norman, D., 1988, The Design of Everyday Things, Basic Books, New York.
Pinch, T., and Bijker, W. E., 1987, The social construction of facts and artifacts, in: The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, and T. Pinch, eds., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Sclove, R., 1995, Democracy and Technology, Guilford Press, New York.
Winner, L., 1986, The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Woodhouse, E., and Patton, J. W., 2004, Introduction: design by society: science and technology studies and the social shaping of design, Des. Issues 20(3):1-12.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Feng, P., Feenberg, A. (2008). Thinking about Design: Critical Theory of Technology and the Design Process. In: Philosophy and Design. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6591-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6591-0_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6590-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6591-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)