Abstract
Return-Oriented Programming (ROP) is a new technique that helps the attacker construct malicious code mounted on x86/SPARC executables without any function call at all. Such technique makes the ROP malicious code contain no instruction, which is different from existing attacks. Moreover, it hides the malicious code in benign code. Thus, it circumvents the approaches that prevent control flow diversion outside legitimate regions (such as W ⊕ X ) and most malicious code scanning techniques (such as anti-virus scanners). However, ROP has its own intrinsic feature which is different from normal program design: (1) uses short instruction sequence ending in “ret”, which is called gadget, and (2) executes the gadgets contiguously in specific memory space, such as standard GNU libc. Based on the features of the ROP malicious code, in this paper, we present a tool DROP, which is focused on dynamically detecting ROP malicious code. Preliminary experimental results show that DROP can efficiently detect ROP malicious code, and have no false positives and negatives.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
The pax project (2004), http://pax.grsecurity.net/
linux/x86 execve(“/bin/sh”, [“/bin/sh”, null]). milw0rm (2006), http://www.milw0rm.com/shellcode/1635
linux/x86 execve(rm -rf /) shellcode. milw0rm (2006), http://www.milw0rm.com/shellcode/2801
linux/x86 normal exit w/ random (so to speak) return value. milw0rm (2006), http://www.milw0rm.com/shellcode/1435
linux/x86 portbind (define your own port). milw0rm (2006), http://www.milw0rm.com/shellcode/1979
linux/x86 /sbin/iptables -f. milw0rm (2007), http://www.milw0rm.com/shellcode/3445
linux/x86 edit /etc/sudoers for full access. milw0rm (2008), http://www.milw0rm.com/shellcode/7161
linux/x86 chmod (“/etc/shadow”,666) & exit(0). milw0rm (2009), http://www.milw0rm.com/shellcode/8081
linux/x86 killall5 shellcode. milw0rm (2009), http://www.milw0rm.com/shellcode/8972
linux/x86 push reboot(). milw0rm (2009), http://www.milw0rm.com/shellcode/7808
linux/x86 setreuid(geteuid(),geteuid()),execve(“/bin/sh”,0,0). milw0rm (2009), http://www.milw0rm.com/shellcode/8972
Abadi, M., Budiu, M., Ligatti, J.: Control-flow integrity. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security(CCS), pp. 340–353. ACM Press, New York (2005)
Baratloo, A., Singh, N., Tsai, T.: Transparent run-time defense against stack smashing attacks. In: Proceedings of the Annual Conference on USENIX Annual Technical Conference, p. 21. USENIX Association, Berkeley (2000)
Buchanan, E., Roemer, R., Shacham, H., Savage, S.: When good instructions go bad: generalizing return-oriented programming to risc. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security(CCS), pp. 27–38. ACM, New York (2008)
Cavallaro, L., Lanzi, A., Mayer, L., Monga, M.: Lisabeth: automated content-based signature generator for zero-day polymorphic worms. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Software Engineering for Secure Systems(SESS), pp. 41–48. ACM, New York (2008)
Costa, M., Crowcroft, J., Castro, M., Rowstron, A., Zhou, L., Zhang, L., Barham, P.: Vigilante: End-to-end containment of internet worm epidemics. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems (TOCS) 26(4), 1–68 (2008)
Cowan, C., Pu, C., Maier, D., Walpole, J., Bakke, P., Beattie, S., Grier, A., Wagle, P., Zhang, Q.: Stackguard: automatic adaptive detection and prevention of buffer-overflow attacks. In: Proceedings of the 7th Conference on USENIX Security Symposium, p. 5. USENIX Association, Berkeley (1998)
Cowan, C., Barringer, M., Beattie, S., Kroah-Hartman, G., Frantzen, M., Lokier, J.: Formatguard: Automatic protection from printf format string vulnerabilities. In: Proceedings of the 10th conference on USENIX Security Symposium, p. 2003 (2000)
Cowan, C., Beattie, S., Johansen, J., Wagle, P.: Pointguardtm: protecting pointers from buffer overflow vulnerabilities. In: Proceedings of the 12th Conference on USENIX Security Symposium, p. 7. USENIX Association, Berkeley (2003)
Crandall, J.R., Su, Z., Wu, S.F., Chong, F.T.: On deriving unknown vulnerabilities from zero-day polymorphic and metamorphic worm exploits. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security(CCS), pp. 235–248 (2005)
Hund, R., Holz, T., Freiling, F.C.: Return-oriented rootkits: Bypassing kernel code integrity protection mechanisms. In: Proceedings of 18th USENIX Security Symposium (2009)
Kim, H.A., Karp, B.: Autograph: toward automated, distributed worm signature detection. In: Proceedings of the 13th Conference on USENIX Security Symposium, p. 19. USENIX Association, Berkeley (2004)
Krahmer, S.: X86-64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunks exploitation technique. Phrack Magazine (2005), http://www.suse.de/krahmer/no-nx.pdf
Kreibich, C., Crowcroft, J.: Honeycomb: creating intrusion detection signatures using honeypots. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 34(1), 51–56 (2004)
Li, Z., Sanghi, M., Chen, Y., Kao, M.Y., Chavez, B.: Hamsa: Fast signature generation for zero-day polymorphic worms with provable attack resilience. In: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 32–47 (2006)
Luk, C.K., Cohn, R., Muth, R., Patil, H., Klauser, A., Lowney, G., Wallace, S., Reddi, V.J., Hazelwood, K.: Pin: building customized program analysis tools with dynamic instrumentation. In: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, pp. 190–200. ACM, New York (2005)
McDonald, J.: Defeating solaris/sparc non-executable stack protection. Bugtraq (1999)
Nergal: The advanced return-into-lib(c) exploits (pax case study). Phrack Magazine (2001), http://www.phrack.org/archives/58/p58-0x04
Nethercote, N., Seward, J.: Valgrind: a framework for heavyweight dynamic binary instrumentation. In: Proceedings of the 2007 PLDI Conference, vol. 42(6), pp. 89–100 (2007)
Newsome, J., Brumley, D., Song, D.: Vulnerability-specific execution filtering for exploit prevention on commodity software. In: Proceedings of the 13th Annual Network and Distributed System Security Symposium, NDSS (2006)
Newsome, J., Karp, B., Song, D.: Polygraph: Automatically generating signatures for polymorphic worms. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 226–241 (2005)
Newsome, J., Song, D.: Dynamic taint analysis for automatic detection, analysis, and signature generation of exploits on commodity software (2005)
Paxson, V.: Bro: a system for detecting network intruders in real-time. In: Proceedings of the 7th Conference on USENIX Security Symposium, Berkeley, CA, USA, p. 3 (1998)
Polychronakis, M., Anagnostakis, K.G., Markatos, E.P.: Network-level polymorphic shellcode detection using emulation. In: Büschkes, R., Laskov, P. (eds.) DIMVA 2006. LNCS, vol. 4064, pp. 54–73. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Polychronakis, M., Anagnostakis, K.G., Markatos, E.P.: Emulation-based detection of non-self-contained polymorphic shellcode. In: Kruegel, C., Lippmann, R., Clark, A. (eds.) RAID 2007. LNCS, vol. 4637, pp. 87–106. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Roemer, R., Buchanan, E., Shacham, H., Savage, S.: Return-oriented programming: Systems, languages, and applications (2009) (in review)
Roesch, M.: Snort - lightweight intrusion detection for networks. In: Proceedings of the 13th USENIX Conference on System Administration, pp. 229–238. USENIX Association, Berkeley (1999)
Ruwase, O., Lam, M.S.: A practical dynamic buffer overflow detector. In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS), pp. 159–169 (2004)
Shacham, H.: The geometry of innocent flesh on the bone: return-into-libc without function calls (on the x86). In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS), pp. 552–561. ACM, New York (2007)
Shimamura, M., Kono, K.: Yataglass: Network-level code emulation for analyzing memory-scanning attacks. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Detection of Intrusions and Malware, and Vulnerability Assessment, pp. 68–87 (2009)
Singh, S., Estan, C., Varghese, G., Savage, S.: Automated worm fingerprinting. In: Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Symposium on Opearting Systems Design & Implementation(OSDI), p. 4. USENIX Association, Berkeley (2004)
Wang, X., Pan, C.C., Liu, P., Zhu, S.: Sigfree: A signature-free buffer overflow attack blocker. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing 99(2) (2006)
Xu, W., Bhatkar, S., Sekar, R.: Taint-enhanced policy enforcement: a practical approach to defeat a wide range of attacks. In: Proceedings of the 15th Conference on USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX-SS 2006). USENIX Association, Berkeley (2006)
Zhang, Q., Reeves, D.S., Ning, P., Iyer, S.P.: Analyzing network traffic to detect self-decrypting exploit code. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Symposium on Information, Computer and Communications Security, pp. 4–12. ACM, New York (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chen, P., Xiao, H., Shen, X., Yin, X., Mao, B., Xie, L. (2009). DROP: Detecting Return-Oriented Programming Malicious Code. In: Prakash, A., Sen Gupta, I. (eds) Information Systems Security. ICISS 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5905. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10772-6_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10772-6_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-10771-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-10772-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)