Improving Artificial Immune System Performance: Inductive Bias and Alternative Mutations

1. Blum, C., Roli, A.: Metaheuristics in combinatorial optimization: Overview and conceptual comparison. ACM Computing surveys 35, 268–308 (2003)

   Article  Google Scholar 

2. Nagar, A., Haddock, J., Heragu, S.: Multiple and bicriteria scheduling: A literature survey. European Journal of Operational Research 81, 88–104 (1995)

   Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

3. Chen, K., Ji, P.: A mixed integer programming model for advanced planning and scheduling (APS). European Journal of Operational Research 181, 515–522 (2007)

   Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

4. Brucker, P., Knust, S., Schoo, A., Thiele, O.: A branch and bound algorithm for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem. European Journal of Operational Research 107, 272–288 (1998)

   Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

5. Choi, J., Realff, M.J., Lee, J.H.: Dynamic programming in a heuristically confined state space: a stochastic resource-constrained project scheduling application. Computers & Chemical Engineering 28, 1039–1058 (2004)

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Engin, O., Doyen, A.: Artificial immune systems and applications in industrial problems. G. U. Journal of Science. 17, 71–84 (2004)

   Google Scholar 

7. Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C.D., Vecchi, M.P.: Optimisation by simulated annealing. Science 220, 671–679 (1983)

   Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

8. Glover, F.: Tabu search - part I. ORSA Journal on Computing 1, 190–206 (1986)

   Google Scholar 

9. Haykin, S.: Neural networks: A comprehensive foundation, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1999)

   MATH  Google Scholar 

10. Goldberg, D.E.: Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimisation and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts (1989)

    Google Scholar 

11. Eusuff, M., Lansey, K., Pasha, F.: Shuffled frog-leaping algorithm: a memetic meta-heuristic for discrete optimization. Engineering Optimization 38, 129–154 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

12. Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R.C.: Swarm Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (2001)

    Google Scholar 

13. Dorigo, M., Stutzle, T.: Ant Colony Optimization. Bradford Book, Massachusetts (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

14. Hart, E.A., Timmis, J.: Application areas of AIS: The past, the present and the future. Applied Soft Computing 8, 191–201 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Aytug, H., Knouja, M., Vergara, F.E.: Use of genetic algorithms to solve production and operations management problems: a review. International Journal of Production Research 41, 3955–4009 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

16. Chaudhry, S.S., Luo, W.: Application of genetic algorithms in production and operations management: a review. International Journal of Production Research 43, 4083–4101 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

17. Dorigo, M., Blum, C.: Ant colony optimization theory: A survey. Theoretical Computer Science 344, 243–278 (2005)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

18. Dasgupta, D.: Artificial Immune Systems and Their Applications. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Google Scholar 

19. De Castro, L.: Artificial Immune Systems: Theory and Applications. In: Brazilian Symposium on Neural Networks, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (2000)

    Google Scholar 

20. Timmis, J.: Artificial Immune Systems - today and tomorrow. Natural Computing 6, 1–18 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

21. Freitas, A., Timmis, J.: Revisiting the Foundations of Artificial Immune Systems: A Problem-Oriented Perspective. In: Timmis, J., Bentley, P.J., Hart, E. (eds.) ICARIS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2787, pp. 229–241. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

22. Chandrasekaran, M., Asokan, P., Kumanan, S., Balamurugan, T., Nickolas, S.: Solving job shop scheduling problems using artificial immune system. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 31, 580–593 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

23. Engin, O., Doyen, A.: A new approach to solve hybrid flow shop scheduling problems by artificial immune system. Future Generation Computer Systems 20, 1083–1095 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

24. Pongcharoen, P., Chainate, W., Thapatsuwan, P.: Exploration of genetic parameters and operators through travelling salesman problem. Science Asia 33, 215–222 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

25. Pongcharoen, P., Stewardson, D.J., Hicks, C., Braiden, P.M.: Applying designed experiments to optimize the performance of genetic algorithms used for scheduling complex products in the capital goods industry. Journal of Applied Statistic 28, 441–455 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

26. Murata, T., Ishibuchi, H.: Performance evaluation of genetic algorithms for flowshop scheduling problems. In: Proceedings of the First IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 812–817 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

27. Murphy, K., Travers, P., Walport, M.: Janeway’s Immunobiology. Garland Science (2007)

    Google Scholar 

28. Dasgupta, D.: Advances in artificial immune systems. IEEE computational intelligence magazine, 40-49 (November 2006)

    Google Scholar 

29. TSPLIB. Travelling salesman problem library, http://www.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de/groups/comopt/software/TSPLIB95/

30. Agarwal, R., Tiwari, M.K., Mukherjee, S.K.: Artificial immune system based approach for solving resource constraint project scheduling problem. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 34, 584–593 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

31. Lundy, M., Mees, A.: Convergence of an annealing algorithm. Mathematical Programming 34, 111–124 (1986)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

32. Glass, C.A., Potts, C.N.: A comparison of local search methods for flow shop scheduling. Annals of Operations Research 63, 489–509 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

33. Azimi, Z.N.: Hybrid heuristics for Examination Timetabling problem. Applied Mathematics and Computation 163, 705–733 (2005)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

34. Pongcharoen, P., Promtet, W.: Exploring and determining genetic algorithms parameters through experimental design and analysis. In: Proceedings of the 33rd international conference on computers and industrial engineering, Jeju, Korea (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references