[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

The Projection of Not-at-issue Meaning via Modal Support: The Meaning and Use of the Japanese Counter-Expectational Adverbs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence (JSAI-isAI 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10091))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1350 Accesses

Abstract

This paper discusses the phenomenon of what I call the “projection of non-at issue meaning via modal support” shown in the Japanese counter-expectational intensifier yoppodo and the counter expectational scale-reversal adverb kaette, and considers the variation of projective content from a new perspective. I show that, unlike the typical conventional implicatures (CIs) like appositives and expressives (e.g., Potts [19]), kaette and yoppodo can project out of the complement of a belief predicate only if there is a modal in the main clause. I argue that yoppodo and kaette belong to a new class of projective content that requires consistency between an at-issue meaning and a CI meaning in terms of a judge. This paper provides a new perspective for the typology of projective content.

O. Sawada—I would like to thank Chris Davis, Ikumi Imani, Robert Henderson, Magdalena Kaufmann, Stefan Kaufmann, Koji Kawahara, Susumu Kubo, Ai Kubota, Yusuke Kubota, Takeo Kurafuji, Lars Larm, Eric McCready, Kenta Mizutani, David Oshima, Harumi Sawada, Jun Sawada, Ayaka Sugawara, Eri Tanaka, Jérémy Zehr and the reviewers of LENLS 12 for their valuable comments and discussions. Parts of this paper were presented at the International Modality Workshop at Kansai Gaidai (2015), the Semantics Workshop in Tokai (2015), and LSA (2016), and I thank the audiences for their valuable comments and discussions. This paper is based upon work supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 26770140. All remaining errors are of course my own.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 35.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 44.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that there are also other uses of yoppodo, e.g. comparative-intensifier use, a conditional use, or an eventive/volitive use, and these do not require an evidential modal:

    figure e
    figure f

    In this paper, I mainly focus on the evidential/adjective use of yoppodo.

  2. 2.

    Notice, however, that there is also an expressive/CI use of totemo, which intensifies an unlikelihood/impossibility of a given proposition (Sawada [22]).

  3. 3.

    See McCready [14] for a detailed discussion on the difference between a resource-sensitive CI application(shunting application) and Potts’ resource-insensitive one.

  4. 4.

    There is also a possibilty that the evidential component of nichigainai is not-at-issue (CI/presupposition). See, e.g., Portner [16], von Fintel and Gillies [3], and McCready [14] for the discussions on the semantic status of evidentiality.

  5. 5.

    Note that kaette is a kind of degree adverb. Although it does not intensify a degree, it reverses the polarity of a gradable predicate. As illustrated in (i), if an attached predicate is not gradable, the resulting sentence becomes ill-formed:

    figure y

    .

  6. 6.

    However, it may be possible to analyze the meaning of kaette in terms of ‘pragmatic presupposition’ (Stalnaker [25]). In the pragmatic presupposition approach, presuppositions are considered to be “the background beliefs of the speaker”— propositions whose truth he takes for granted, or seems to take for granted, in making his statement (Stalnaker [25], pp. 48). It seems that the meaning triggered by kaette often corresponds to a common knowledge. Whether the meaning of kaette is a CI or a presupposition needs further investigation. I leave this question for future research. In this paper, I will assume that kaette is a CI.

  7. 7.

    Recall that appositives and expressives can have a non-speaker orientation as well.

References

  1. Amaral, P., Roberts, C., Smith, A.: Review of the logic of conventional implicatures by chris potts. Linguist. Philos. 30, 707–749 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cresswell, M.J.: The semantics of degree. In: Partee, B. (ed.) Montague Grammar, pp. 261–292. Academic Press, New York (1976)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. von Fintel, K., Gillies, A.: Must \(\ldots \) Stay \(\ldots \) Strong!. Nat. Lang. Seman. 18, 351–383 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Grice, P.H.: Logic and conversation. In: Cole, P., Morgan, J. (eds.) Syntax and Semantics, iii: Speech Acts, pp. 43–58. Academic Press, New York (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Grosz, P.: Grading modality: a new approach to modal concord and its relatives. In: Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 14, pp. 185–201 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gutzmann, D.: Use-conditional Meaning: studies in multidimensional semantics. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Frankfurt (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harris, J.A., Potts, C.: Perspective-shifting with appositives and expressive. Linguist. Philos. 32(6), 523–552 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Karttunen, L.: Presuppositions of compound sentences. Linguist. Inq. 4(2), 169–193 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Karttunen, L., Zaenen, A.: Veridicity. In: Katz, G., Pustejovsky, J., Schilder, F. (eds.) Annotating, Extracting and Reasoning about Time and Events. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings 05151. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kaufmann, M.: Discourse particle ‘Ruhig’: discourse effects, desires, and modality. In: 3rd Cornell Workshop in Linguistics and Philosophy: Modal Talk and Reasoning (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kennedy, C., McNally, L.: Scale structure, degree modification, and the semantics of gradable predicates. Language 81(2), 345–381 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kennedy, C.: Vagueness and grammar: the semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives. Linguist. Philos. 30(1), 1–45 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Klein, E.: Comparatives. In: von Stechow, A., Wunderlich, D. (eds.) Semantik: Ein Internationales Handbuch der Zeitgenossischen Forschung, pp. 673–691. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  14. McCready, E.: Varieties of conventional implicature. Semant. Pragmatics 3, 1–57 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. McCready, E., Sudo, Y.: Operating on presuppositions: ‘Sekkaku’ revisited. In: Proceedings of Formal Approaches to Japanese Linguistics 5, pp. 155–166. MA: MITWPL, Cambridge (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Portner, P.: Modality. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Potts, C.: Presupposition and implicature. In: Lappin, S., Fox, C. (eds.) The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, 2nd edn, pp. 168–202. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford (2015)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Potts, C.: The expressive dimension. Theor. Linguist. 33(2), 165–197 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Potts, C.: The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sauerland, U.: Beyond unpluggability. Theor. Linguist. 33(2), 231–236 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sawada, H.: Modaritii (Modality). Kaitakusya, Tokyo (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sawada, O.: Polarity sensitivity and update refusal: the case of the Japanese negative totemo ‘very’. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Logic and Engineering of Natural Language Semantics (LENLS 11), pp. 313–326 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sawada, O.: Pragmatic aspects of scalar modifiers. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Chicago (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Seuren, P.A.M.: The comparative. In: Kiefer, F., Ruwet, N. (eds.) Generative Grammar in Europe, pp. 528–564. Reidel, Dordrecht (1973)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Stalnaker, R.C.: Pragmatic presupposition. In: Munitz, M.K., Unger, P.K. (eds.) Semantics and Philosophy, pp. 197–214. New York University Press, New York (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sudo, Y.: On the semantics of phi features on pronouns. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tonhauser, J., Beaver, D., Roberts, C., Simons, M.: Toward a taxonomy of projective content. Language 89, 66–109 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. von Stechow, A.: Comparing semantic theories of comparison. J. Seman. 3, 1–77 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang, L., Brian, R., McCready, E.: The projection problem of nominal appositives. Snippets 10, 13–14 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Watanabe, M.: Hikakufukushi yohodo ni tuite (On the Comparative Adverb Yohodo.) Sophia University, Kokubungakka kiyoo 4, 39–52 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Osamu Sawada .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sawada, O. (2017). The Projection of Not-at-issue Meaning via Modal Support: The Meaning and Use of the Japanese Counter-Expectational Adverbs. In: Otake, M., Kurahashi, S., Ota, Y., Satoh, K., Bekki, D. (eds) New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. JSAI-isAI 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10091. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50953-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50953-2_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50952-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50953-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics