Abstract
This study investigates the effects of social presence and synchronicity on the creation of mutual trust and understanding between conflicting parties in negotiations. An experimental study was conducted in which participants negotiated either face-to-face, through synchronous chat or through asynchronous e-mail. The results show that the high social presence in FtF communication seems to enhance the feelings of trust and understanding the negotiator has in the other party compared to the online negotiations, but not the amount of understanding and trust the other party has in him/her. Synchronicity does not seem to have an influence on the negotiation processes since both the synchronous chat and the asynchronous e-mail condition have equal scores on mutual trust and understanding.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bains, G., Andrade, K., Gallant, M.M.: The potential for mediating disputes online (2013). http://www.cfcj-fcjc.org/sites/default/files/docs/hosted/17436-mediating_disputes_online.pdf
Silbey, S.S., Merry, S.E.: Mediator settlement strategies. Law policy 8(1), 7–32 (1986)
Winslade, J., Monk, G., Cotter, A.: A narrative approach to the practice of mediation. Negot. J. 14(1), 21–41 (1998)
Kydd, A.H.: When can mediators build trust? Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 100(3), 449–462 (2006)
Butler Jr., J.K.: Trust expectations, information sharing, climate of trust, and negotiation efficiency. Group Organ. Manage. 24(2), 217–238 (1999)
Rosenoer, J., Armstrong, D., Gates, J.R.: Click with Trust. Free Press, New York (1999)
Keen, P., Ballance, C., Chan, S., Schrump, S.: Electronic Commerce Relationships: Trust by Design. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2000)
Deutsch, M.: Trust and suspicion. J. Conflict Resolut. 2(4), 265–279 (1958)
Parks, C., Hulbert, L.: High and low trusters’ responses to fear in a payoff matrix. J. Conflict Resolut. 39(4), 718–730 (1995)
Duarte, D., Snyder, N.: Mastering virtual teams; strategies, tools, and techniques that suceed. Jossey-Bass, New York (1999)
Short, J., Williams, E., Christie, B.: The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. John Wiley & Sons, London (1976)
Kiesler, S., Sproull, L.: Group decision making and communication technology. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 52, 96–123 (1992)
Alonzo, M., Aiken, M.: Flaming in electronic communication. Decis. Support Syst. 36, 205–213 (2004)
Anderson, E.D., Ansfield, M.E., DePaulo, B.M.: Love’s best habit: deception in the context of relationships. In: Philippot, P., Feldman, R., Coats, E. (eds.) The Social Context of Nonverbal Behavior: Studies in Emotion and Social Interaction, pp. 372–409. Cambridge University Press, New York (1999)
Valley, K.L., Moag, J., Bazerman, M.H.: A matter of trust: effects of communication on the efficiency and distribution of out-comes. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 34, 211–238 (1998)
Morris, M.W., Nadler, J., Kurtzberg, T., Thompson, L.: Schmooze or Lose: Social Friction and Lubrication in E-mail Negotiation. Northwestern Unviersity, Evanston (2000)
McGrath, J.E.: Time, interaction, and performance (TIP): a theory of groups. Small Group Res. 22(2), 147–174 (1991)
Walther, J.B., Burgoon, J.K.: Relational communication in computer mediated interaction. Hum. Commun. Res. 19(1), 50–88 (1992)
Katsh, E., Rifkin, J.: Online dispute resolution: resolving conflicts in cyberspace. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2001)
Spears, R., Lea, M.: Social influence and the influence of the social in computer-mediated communication. In: Context of computer-mediated communication, pp. 30–65. Harvester-Wheatsheaf, London (1992)
Thompson, L., Nadler, J.: Negotiating via information technology: theory and application. J. Soc. issues 58(1), 109–124 (2002)
Pesendorfer, E.A., Koeszegi, S.T.: Hot versus cool behavioural styles in electronic negotiations: the impact of communication mode. Group Decis. Negot. 15(2), 141–155 (2006)
Naquin, C.E., Paulson, G.D.: Online bargaining and interpersonal trust. J. Appl. Psychol. 88, 113–120 (2003)
Tidwell, L.C., Walther, J.B.: Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations getting to know one another a bit at a time. Hum. Commun. Res. 28(3), 317–348 (2002)
Antheunis, M.L., Valkenburg, P.M., Jochen, P.: Computer-mediated communication and interpersonal attraction: an experimental test of two explanatory hypotheses. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 10(6), 831–835 (2007)
Coleman, L.H., Paternite, C.E., Sherman, R.C.: A reexamination of deindividuation in synchronous computer-mediated communication. Comput. Hum. Behav. 15, 51–65 (1999)
Mallen, M.J., Day, S.X., Green, M.A.: Online versus face-to-face conversations: an examination of relational and discourse variables. Psychother. Theory Res. Pract. Train. 40(1/2), 155–163 (2003)
Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., McGuire, T.W.: Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 37, 157–187 (1986)
Scheffé, H.: The Analysis of Variance. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1959)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
van der Toorn, Y., van der Wijst, P., Damen, D. (2015). Trust and Understanding in Face-to-Face and Online Negotiations. In: Linden, I., Liu, S., Dargam, F., Hernández, J.E. (eds) Decision Support Systems IV – Information and Knowledge Management in Decision Processes. EWG-DSS EWG-DSS 2014 2014. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 221. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21536-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21536-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21535-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21536-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)