[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Towards a New Chemistry Learning Platform with Virtual Reality and Haptics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Learning and Collaboration Technologies: Games and Virtual Environments for Learning (HCII 2021)

Abstract

With COVID-19, colleges had to change the way they handle education. Students had to adapt to remote learning instead of the face-to-face learning they are used to. The transition to remote learning has proved to be difficult, but most courses have translated over without any problems. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said for the lab courses, which traditionally have students conduct hands-on experiments. In order to achieve the same level of effectiveness that the labs had prior to COVID-19; a new system is required. The long-term goal of this work is to develop a complete immersive Virtual Reality (VR) chemistry lab. In the VR lab space, the student can handle chemicals and equipment to simulate an actual chemistry lab. Using a VR headset and haptic gloves, the user will be able to freely move and interact with the virtual lab, fellow students, and their teacher. Due to COVID-19 restrictions, instead of the students testing the virtual experience, we presented a 6-min video demonstration of our immersive VR chemistry lab to 109 General Chemistry students. Students filled out pre- and post-questionnaires. 80% of the students either strongly agreed or agreed with the statement, “I think learning general chemistry with VR and haptics will be more engaging than a standard lecture”. For the statement, “I think undergoing the chemistry lab training in a VR environment rather than watching videos will help me learn the basics of chemistry lab better”, 71.8% of the students strongly agreed or agreed with the statement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 47.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 59.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arnaud, C.H.: Questioning the value of general chemistry labs. Chem. Eng. News 98(18) (2020). https://cen.acs.org/education/undergraduate-education/Questioning-value-general-chemistry-labs/98/i18

  2. Colson, C.J.: Virtualizing Organic Chemistry Labs. DELTA News (2018). https://delta.ncsu.edu/news/2018/12/19/virtualizing-organic-chemistry-labs/

  3. Bretz, S.L.: Evidence for the importance of laboratory courses. J. Chem. Educ. 96(2), 193–195 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hofstein, A., Lunetta, V.N.: The laboratory in science education: foundations for the twenty-first century. Sci. Educ. 88, 28–54 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jones, N.: Simulated labs are booming. Nature 562, S5–S7 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-06831-1

  6. Johnstone, A.H.: Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 7(75), 701–703 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gabel, D.: Improving teaching and learning through chemistry education research: a look to the future. J. Chem. Educ. 76(4), 548 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1021/ed076p548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Slater, M., Sanchez-Vives, M.V.: Enhancing our lives with immersive virtual reality. Front. Robot. AI 3, 74 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2016.00074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Merchant, Z., Goetz, E.T., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., Kwok, O., Cifuentes, L., Davis, T.J.: The learner characteristics, features of desktop 3D virtual reality environments, and college chemistry instruction: a structural equation modeling analysis. Comput. Educ. 59(2), 551–568 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Clemons, T.D., Fouché, L., Rummey, C., Lopez, R.E., Spagnoli, D.: Introducing the first year laboratory to undergraduate chemistry students with an interactive 360° experience. J. Chem. Educ. 96(7), 1491–1496 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bandura, A.A.: Self-efficacy: The exercise of control (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zimmerman, B.J., Bandura, A., Martinez-Pons, M.: Self-motivation for academic attainment: the role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. Am. Educ. Res. J. 29(3), 663–676 (1992). https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312029003663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chemers, M.M., Hu, L., Garcia, B.F.: Academic self-efficacy and first year college student performance and adjustment. J. Educ. Psychol. 93(1), 55–64 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bandura, A.: Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educ. Psychol. 28(2), 117–148 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vogel, J., Vogel, D., Cannon-Bowers, J., Bowers, C., Muse, K., Wright, M.: Computer gaming and interactive simulations for learning: a meta-analysis. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 34, 229–243 (2006). https://doi.org/10.2190/FLHV-K4WA-WPVQ-H0YM

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Merchant, Z., Goetz, E.T., Cifuentes, L., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., Davis, T.J.: Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students’ learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: a meta-analysis. Comput. Educ. 70, 29–40 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Makransky, G., Borre-Gude, S., Mayer, R.E.: Motivational and cognitive benefits of training in immersive virtual reality based on multiple assessments. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 35(6), 691–707 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ding, D., Brinkman, W.-P., Neerincx, M.A.: Simulated thoughts in virtual reality for negotiation training enhance self-efficacy and knowledge. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 139, 102400 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nissim, Y.W., Eyal, : Virtual reality (VR) as a source for self-efficacy in teacher training. Int. Educ. Stud. 10(8), 52–59 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Moore, C., Smith, S., Avner, R.A.: Facilitation of laboratory performance through CAI. J. Chem. Educ. 57(3), 196 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1021/ed057p196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Krummel, T.M.: Surgical simulation and virtual reality: the coming revolution. Ann. Surg. 228(5) (1998). https://journals.lww.com/annalsofsurgery/Fulltext/1998/11000/Surgical_Simulation_and_Virtual_Reality__The.2.aspx

  22. Marescaux, J., et al.: Virtual reality applied to hepatic surgery simulation: the next revolution. Ann. Surg. 228(5) (1998). https://journals.lww.com/annalsofsurgery/Fulltext/1998/11000/Virtual_Reality_Applied_to_Hepatic_Surgery.1.aspx

  23. Seymour, N.E.: Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann. Surg. 236(4) (2002). https://journals.lww.com/annalsofsurgery/Fulltext/2002/10000/Virtual_Reality_Training_Improves_Operating_Room.8.aspx

  24. Dunnagan, C.L., Dannenberg, D.A., Cuales, M.P., Earnest, A.D., Gurnsey, R.M., Gallardo-Williams, M.T.: Production and evaluation of a realistic immersive virtual reality organic chemistry laboratory experience: infrared spectroscopy. J. Chem. Educ. 97(1), 258–262 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Barrett, R., et al.: Social and tactile mixed reality increases student engagement in undergraduate lab activities. J. Chem. Educ. 95(10), 1755–1762 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bennie, S.J., et al.: Teaching enzyme catalysis using interactive molecular dynamics in virtual reality. J. Chem. Educ. 96(11), 2488–2496 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bibic, L., Druskis, J., Walpole, S., Angulo, J., Stokes, L.: Bug off pain: an educational virtual reality game on spider venoms and chronic pain for public engagement. J. Chem. Educ. 96(7), 1486–1490 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Labster. A million-dollar lab, one click away. https://www.labster.com

  29. EduChemVR Improving Chemistry Learning with Virtual Reality. http://educhem-vr.com/

  30. Virvou, M., Katsionis, G.: On the usability and likeability of virtual reality games for education: the case of VR-ENGAGE. Comput. Educ. 50(1), 154–178 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Virtual Reality at UCSF (2020). http://vr.ucsf.edu/#education

  32. MEL Science experiments for kids, delivered to your door. https://melscience.com/US-en/

  33. Pharr, M., Jakob, W., Humphreys, G.: Physically Based Rendering: From Theory to Implementation (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Schlick, C.: An inexpensive BRDF model for physically-based rendering. Comput. Graph. Forum 13(3), 233–246 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ashikhmin, M., Shirley, P.: An anisotropic phong BRDF model. J. Graph. Tools 5(2), 25–32 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ashikmin, M., Premože, S., Shirley, P.: A microfacet-based BRDF generator. In: Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, pp. 65–74 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1145/344779.344814

  37. MySQL AB (2001) MySQL.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Doga Demirel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Demirel, D., Hamam, A., Scott, C., Karaman, B., Toker, O., Pena, L. (2021). Towards a New Chemistry Learning Platform with Virtual Reality and Haptics. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds) Learning and Collaboration Technologies: Games and Virtual Environments for Learning. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12785. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77943-6_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77943-6_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77942-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77943-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics