Abstract
Electronic health records have a crucial role for communication and information management in health care organizations. Electronic health records have improved the access to up-dated medical information at the point-of-care, but they have also been linked to usability issues and user problems. This paper presents a study about the user experience among health care professionals regarding an electronic health record system in Norway. Qualitative research methods were used, with interviews and observations made at a university hospital, where 14 clinical end-users of an electronic health record system contributed. The aim was to study the user experiences and the user satisfaction regarding the system. The study concluded that the health care professionals in general were satisfied with the system, but they had to make some work arounds to efficiently carry out care in their daily work practice.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. https://www.healthit.gov/patients-families/basics-health-it
Shortliffe, E.H., Cimino, J.J.: Biomedical Informatics: Computer Applications in Health Care and Biomedicine, 4th edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Coiera, E.: Guide to Health Informatics, 3rd edn. CRC Press/Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton (2015)
Menachemi, N., Taleah, H.C.: Benefits and drawbacks of electronic health record systems. Risk Manag. Healthc. Policy 4, 47–55 (2011)
The Norwegian Directorate of eHealth, National E-health strategy and goals 2017-2022. https://ehelse.no/publikasjoner/nasjonal-e-helsestrategi-og-mal-2017-2022
Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services, One citizen- one health record, Report N. 9. (2012-2013) to the Storting (white paper). https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/33a159683925472aa15ad74f27ad04cc/no/pdfs/stm201220130009000dddpdfs.pdf
Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services, The Coordination Reform: Proper treatment – at the right place and right time, Report No. 47 (2008-2009) to the Storting. https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/d4f0e16ad32e4bbd8d8ab5c21445a5dc/no/pdfs/stm200820090047000dddpdfs.pdf
Norwegian Ministry of Health and Social Affairs, Health Records Act 2016 (Pasientjournalloven). https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/2014-06-20-42
Edwards, P.J., Moloney, K.P., Jacko, J.A., Sainfort, F.: Evaluating usability of a commercial electronic health record: a case study. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 66(10), 718–728 (2008)
Zahabi, M., Kaber, D.B., Swangnetr, M.: Usability and safety in electronic medical records interface design: a review of recent literature and guideline formulation. Hum. Factors 57(5), 805–834 (2015)
Stanziola, E., Uznayo, M.Q., Ortiz, J.M., Simón, M., Otero, C., Campos, F., Luna, D.: User-centered design of health care software development: towards a cultural change. Stud. Health Tech. Inform. 216, 368–371 (2015)
Faxvaag, A., Johansen, T.S., Heimly, V., Melby, L., Grimsmo, A.: Healthcare professionals’ experiences with EHR-system access control mechanisms. Stud. Health Tech. Inform. 169, 601–605 (2011)
Martinez, S., Smaradottir, B., Vatnøy, T., Bjønness, M.: Usability evaluation of a geolocation technology: safemate. In: 22nd IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications, pp. 187–192. IEEE Press, New York (2017)
Borycki, E.M., Kushniruk, A.W., Bellwood, P., Brender, J.: Technology-induced errors. Methods Inf. Med. 51(02), 95–103 (2012)
Borycki, E.M.: Technology-induced errors: where do they come from and what can we do about them. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 194, 20–26 (2013)
Schumacher, R.M., Lowry, S.Z.: NIST guide to the processes approach for improving the usability of electronic health records. National Institute of Standards and Technology (2010)
Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S. (eds.): The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage, Newcastle upon Tyne (2011)
Morse, J.M., Field, P.A.: Qualitative Research Methods for Health Professionals. Sage, Newcastle upon Tyne (1995)
The Norwegian Centre for Research Data. http://www.nsd.uib.no/nsd/english/index.html
Smaradottir, B.F.: Patient accessible electronic health records: impacts on nursing documentation practices at a university hospital. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 250, 14–18 (2018)
The Norwegian National Health Portal. https://helsenorge.no/other-languages/english
Smaradottir, B.F., Fensli, R.W.: Evaluation of technology use in an inter-disciplinary patient-centered health care team. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 257, 388–392 (2019)
Norwegian Centre for E-health Research. Patients and Professionals in Productive Teams (3P). https://ehealthresearch.no/prosjekter/3p
Helseforsk. http://www.forskningsradet.no/no/Utlysning/HELSEFORSK/1253996563868
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the informants of the study for their disinterested contribution. Special thanks to the Head of the hospital departments for collaboration in the organization of the data collection. Financial support was provided by the Faculty of Engineering and Science at the University of Agder in Norway through grant number 53965 and from the research project 3P- Patients and Professionals in Productive Teams with grant number 243857 from Helseforsk [23, 24].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Smaradottir, B.F., Fensli, R.W. (2020). User Experiences and Satisfaction with an Electronic Health Record System. In: Ahram, T., Falcão, C. (eds) Advances in Usability and User Experience. AHFE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 972. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19135-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19135-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19134-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19135-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)