Spatial Reasoning via Rough Sets

1. B. L. Clarke, A calculus of individuals based on connection, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 22(2), 1981, pp.204–218.

   Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

2. A. G. Cohn, Calculi for qualitative spatial reasoning, in: J. Calmet, J. A. Campbell, J. Pfalzgraf (eds.), Artificial Intelligence and Symbolic Mathematical Computation, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1138, Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp. 124–143.

   Google Scholar 

3. A. G. Cohn, A. C. Varzi, Connections relations in mereotopology, in: H. Prade (ed.), Proceedings ECAI'98. 13th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 1998, pp. 150–154.

   Google Scholar 

4. A. G. Cohn, N. M. Gotts, The “egg-yolk” representation of regions with indeterminate boundaries, in: P. Burrough, A. M. Frank (eds.), Proceedings GISDATA Specialist Meeting on Spatial Objects with Undetermined Boundaries, Fr. Taylor, 1996, pp.171–187.

   Google Scholar 

5. J. Srzednicki, S. J. Surma, D. Barnett, V. F. Rickey (eds.), Collected Works of Stanislaw Leśniewski, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1992.

   Google Scholar 

6. E. Čech, Topological Spaces, Academia, Praha, 1966.

   Google Scholar 

7. C. Freksa, D. M. Mark (eds.), Spatial Information Theory. Cognitive and Computational Foundations of Geographic Information Science, Lecture Notes in Computer Science,vol. 1661, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1999.

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

8. N. Guarino, The ontological level, in: R. Casati, B. Smith, G. White (eds.), Philosophy and the Cognitive Sciences, Hoelder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna, 1994.

   Google Scholar 

9. R. Kruse, J. Gebhardt, F. Klawonn, Foundations of Fuzzy Systems, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1984.

   Google Scholar 

10. S. Leśniewski On the foundations of mathematics, Topoi 2, 1982, pp. 7–52.

    Google Scholar 

11. C. Masolo, L. Vieu, Atomicity vs. in finite divisibility of space, in: [7], pp. 235–250.

    Google Scholar 

12. Z. Pawlak, Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

13. L. Polkowski and A. Skowron, Rough mereology: a new paradigm for approximate reasoning, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 15(4), 1997, pp. 333–365.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

14. L. Polkowski, On connection synthesis via rough mereology, Fundamenta Informaticae, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

15. B. Smith, Logic and formal ontology, in: J. N. Mohanty, W. McKenna (eds.), Husserl’s Phenomenology: A Textbook, Lanham: University Press of America, 1989, pp. 29–67.

    Google Scholar 

16. B. Smith, Boundaries: an essay in mereotopology, in: L. Hahn (ed.), The Philosophy of Roderick Chisholm, Library of Living Philosophers, La Salle: Open Court, 1997, pp. 534–561.

    Google Scholar 

17. J. G. Stell, Granulation for graphs, in: [7], pp. 416–432.

    Google Scholar 

18. T. Topaloglou, First-order theories of approximate space, in Working Notes of the AAAI Workshop on Spatial and Temporal Reasoning, Seattle, 1994, pp. 47–53.

    Google Scholar 

19. M. F. Worboys, Imprecision in finite resolution spatial data, Geoinformatica, 1998, pp. 257–279.

    Google Scholar 

Download references