Method Chunks for Interoperability

1. Botta-Genoulaz, V., Millet, P.-A., Grabot, B.: A survey on the recent research literature on ERP systems. Computers in Industry (56), 510–522 (2005)

   Google Scholar 

2. Brinkkemper, S.: Method Engineering with Web-enabled Methods. In: Brinkkemper, S., Lindencrona, E., Sölvberg, A. (eds.) Information Systems Engineering: State of the Art and Research Themes, pp. 124–133. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

   Google Scholar 

3. Brinkkemper, S., Saeki, M., Harmsen, F.: Assembly Techniques for Method Engineering. In: Pernici, B., Thanos, C. (eds.) CAiSE 1998. LNCS, vol. 1413, pp. 381–400. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

4. Chen, D., Doumeingts, G.: European initiatives to develop interoperability of enterprise applications — basic concepts, framework and roadmap. Annual Reviews in Control (27), 153–162 (2003)

   Google Scholar 

5. Domínguez, E., Zapata, M.A.: Mappings and Interoperability: A Meta-modelling Approach. In: Yakhno, T. (ed.) ADVIS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1909, pp. 352–362. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

6. Firesmith, D., Henderson-Sellers, B.: The OPEN Process Framework. An Introduction. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2001)

   Google Scholar 

7. Garlan, D., Allen, R., Ockerbloom, J.: Architectural mismatch or why it’s hard to build systems out of existing parts. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on Software engineering, pp. 179–185. ACM Press, New York (1995)

   Google Scholar 

8. Hasselbring, W.: Information system integration. Communications of the ACM 43(6), 32–38 (2000)

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. Hirschheim, R., Klein, H.: Crisis in the IS Field? A Critical Reflection on the State of the Discipline. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 4, 237–293 (2003)

   Google Scholar 

10. INTEROP (2005) Interop Network of Excellence IST – 508011 Presentation of the Project 2005, http://interop-noe.org/INTEROP/presentation (last accessed November 02, 2005)

11. Iivari, J.: Information Systems Development as Knowledge Work: The body of systems development process knowledge. In: Kawaguchi, E., Hamid, I.A., Jaakkola, H., Kangassalo, H. (eds.) Information Modelling and Knowledge Bases XI, pp. 41–56. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2000)

    Google Scholar 

12. Johannesson, P., Perjons, E.: Design principles for application integration. In: Wangler, B., Bergman, L.D. (eds.) CAiSE 2000. LNCS, vol. 1789, p. 212. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

13. Kumar, K., Welke, R.J.: Method Engineering, A Proposal for Situation-specific Methodology Construction. In: Cotterman, Senn (eds.) Systems Analysis and Design: A Research Agenda, pp. 257–268. Wiley, Chichester (1992)

    Google Scholar 

14. Kühn, H., Murzek, M.: Interoperability in Metamodelling Platforms. In: Konstantas, D., Bourrières, J.-P., Léonard, M., Boudjlida, N. (eds.) Interoperability of Enterprise Software and Applications, pp. 215–226. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

15. Mak, K.-T., Ramaprasad, A.: An Interpretation of the Changing IS/IT-Standard Game, Circa 2001. Knowledge, Technology & Policy (14), 20–30 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

16. Mirbel, I., Ralyté, J.: Situational Method Engineering: Combining Assembly-Based and Roadmap-Driven Approaches. Requirements Engineering 11(1), 58–78 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

17. Ottoson, A.: An Analysis of a Content of a Method Chunk Repository concerning Interoperability Problems. Master Thesis HS-EA-DVA-2005-001, University of Skövde (2005)

    Google Scholar 

18. Rahm, E., Bernstein, P.A.: A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching. The VLDB Journal 10, 334–350 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

19. Ralyté, J.: Reusing Scenario Based Approaches in Requirement Engineering Methods: CREWS Method Base. In: 10th Int. Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA 1999), pp. 305–309. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

20. Ralyté, J., Rolland, C.: An Approach for Method Reengineering. In: Kunii, H.S., Jajodia, S., Sølvberg, A. (eds.) ER 2001. LNCS, vol. 2224, pp. 471–484. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

21. Ralyté, J., Rolland, C.: An Assembly Process Model for Method Engineering. In: Dittrich, K.R., Geppert, A., Norrie, M.C. (eds.) CAiSE 2001. LNCS, vol. 2068, pp. 267–283. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

22. Schulz, K., et al.: A Gap Analysis; Required Activities in Research, Technology and Standardisation to close the RTS Gap; Roadmaps and Recommendations on RTS activities. Deliverables D 3.4, D 3.5, D 3.6. IDEAS Thematic Network - No.: IST-2001-37368 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

23. Xu, X.W., Newman, S.T.: Making CNC machine tools more open, interoperable and intelligent—a review of the technologies. Computers in Industry 57(2), 141–152 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

24. Wainwright, D., Waring, T.: Three domains for implementing integrated information systems: redressing the balance between technology, strategic and organisational analysis. International Journal of Information Management 24(2004), 329–346 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

25. van Wendel de Joode, R., Tineke, E.M.: Handling variety: the tension between adaptability and interoperability of open source software. Computer Standards and Interfaces (28), 109–121 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

26. Troux Technologies, Metis by Troux (March 30, 2006), Online: http://www.troux.com/products/metis/

27. BOC Information Technologies Consulting, Adonis by BOC Online (March 30, 2006), http://www.boc-eu.com/

28. ConceptBase Team, ConceptBase Online (March 30, 2006), http://conceptbase.cc

Download references