[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effectiveness of Mutual Health Groups for Illicit Drug Use Disorders: A Review of the Current Literature

  • Published:
Current Addiction Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Evaluate literature examining whether mutual help groups (MHGs) for illicit drug use disorders benefit participants.

Recent Findings

Recent studies consistently show that MHG attendance and involvement predict reductions in drug use and addiction severity. More rigorous methodologies offer stronger evidence of effectiveness, but additional controlled trials are needed. Drug-focused MHG challenges include lower success rates of professionally-delivered interventions to facilitate participation compared to alcohol-focused MHGs, and stigma towards opioid agonist medications. Culturally-tailored MHG formats may benefit specific populations (e.g., racial/ethnic minorities). Non-12 step MHGs like SMART Recovery show promise, but research is limited. Online delivery formats positively affect retention.

Summary

Evidence on the benefits of MHGs for drug use disorders is encouraging but incomplete. MHG engagement may be enhanced by cultural adaptations and reduced stigma towards medications. Future research should focus on non-12 step MHGs, treatment integration, optimizing online formats, and understudied groups (e.g. Indigenous populations). Selection bias remains a challenge in evaluations of MHG effectiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Humphreys K. Circles of recovery: Self-help organizations for addictions. 2003.

  2. Kelly JF, Abry AW, Fallah-Sohy N. Mutual help and peer support models for opioid use disorder recovery. Treating opioid addiction. 2019:139– 67.

  3. White W, Galanter M, Humphreys K, Kelly J. We do recover: scientific studies on Narcotics Anonymous. Selected Papers of William L. White; 2020.

  4. Kelly JF, Humphreys K, Ferri M. Alcoholics Anonymous and other 12-step programs for alcohol use disorder. Cochrane Database Syst Reviews. 2020;(3).

  5. Kelly JF, Magill M, Stout RL. How do people recover from alcohol dependence? A systematic review of the research on mechanisms of behavior change in alcoholics Anonymous. Addict Res Theory. 2009;17(3):236–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Humphreys K. Alcoholics Anonymous and 12-step alcoholism treatment programs. Recent Developments in Alcoholism: Research on Alcoholism Treatment. 2002:149– 64.

  7. Goldstrom ID, Campbell J, Rogers JA, Lambert DB, Blacklow B, Henderson MJ, et al. National estimates for mental health mutual support groups, self-help organizations, and consumer-operated services. Adm Policy Mental Health Mental Health Serv Res. 2006;33:92–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zemore SE, Kaskutas LA, Ammon LN. In 12-step groups, helping helps the helper. Addiction. 2004;99(8):1015–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Walitzer KS, Dermen KH, Barrick C. Facilitating involvement in alcoholics Anonymous during out-patient treatment: a randomized clinical trial. Addiction. 2009;104(3):391–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02467.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kelly JF, Greene MC, Bergman BG. Recovery benefits of the therapeutic alliance among 12-step mutual-help organization attendees and their sponsors. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016;162:64–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Christo G, Franey C. Drug users’ spiritual beliefs, locus of control and the disease concept in relation to Narcotics Anonymous attendance and six-month outcomes. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1995;38(1):51–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kelly JF, Stout RL, Magill M, Tonigan JS, Pagano ME. Spirituality in recovery: A lagged mediational analysis of Alcoholics Anonymous’ principal theoretical mechanism of behavior change. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. 2011;35(3):454– 63.

  13. Litt MD, Kadden RM, Tennen H, Kabela-Cormier E, Network Support II. Randomized controlled trial of Network Support treatment and cognitive behavioral therapy for alcohol use disorder. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016;165:203–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Humphreys K, Mankowski ES, Moos RH, Finney JW. Do enhanced friendship networks and active coping mediate the effect of self-help groups on substance abuse? Ann Behav Med. 1999;21(1):54–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bøg M, Filges T, Brännström L, Jørgensen AMK, Fredrikksson MK. 12-step programs for reducing illicit drug use. Campbell Syst Reviews. 2017;13(1):1–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Humphreys K, Barreto NB, Alessi SM, Carroll KM, Crits-Christoph P, Donovan DM, et al. Impact of 12 step mutual help groups on drug use disorder patients across six clinical trials. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020;215:108213.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Costello MJ, Li Y, Zhu Y, Walji A, Sousa S, Remers S, et al. Using conventional and machine learning propensity score methods to examine the effectiveness of 12-step group involvement following inpatient addiction treatment. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021;227:108943.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zemore SE, Gilbert PA, Pinedo M, Tsutsumi S, McGeough B, Dickerson DL. Racial/ethnic disparities in mutual help group participation for substance use problems. Alcohol Research: Curr Reviews. 2021;41(1).

  19. Kepner W, Courchesne-Krak NS, Satybaldiyeva N, Narasimhan R, Marienfeld CB. Emergency care utilization in persons with substance related diagnoses. Addict Behav Rep. 2024;20:100573.

  20. Mendola A, Gibson RL, Addiction. 12-step programs, and evidentiary standards for ethically and clinically sound treatment recommendations: what should clinicians do? AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(6):646–55.

  21. Wall R, Sondhi A, Day E. What influences referral to 12-step mutual self-help groups by treatment professionals? Eur Addict Res. 2014;20(5):241–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. McLellan AT, Luborsky L, Cacciola J, Griffith J, Evans F, Barr HL, et al. New data from the Addiction Severity Index reliability and validity in three centers. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1985;173(7):412–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Leurent M, Ducasse D, Courtet P, Olie E. Efficacy of 12-step mutual-help groups other than alcoholics Anonymous: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin NeuroSci. 2024;274(2):375–422.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Toumbourou JW, Hamilton M, U’Ren A, Stevens-Jones P, Storey G. Narcotics Anonymous participation and changes in substance use and social support. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2002;23(1):61–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wright PJ. Sexual compulsivity and 12-step peer and sponsor supportive communication: a cross-lagged panel analysis. Sex Addict Compulsivity. 2010;17(2):154–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Laudet AB, Cleland CM, Magura S, Vogel HS, Knight EL. Social support mediates the effects of dual-focus mutual aid groups on abstinence from substance use. Am J Community Psychol. 2004;34(3–4):175–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Efrati Y, Gola M. Compulsive sexual behavior: a twelve-step therapeutic approach. J Behav Addictions. 2018;7(2):445–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Galanter M, Dermatis H, Post S, Sampson C. Spirituality-based recovery from drug addiction in the twelve-step fellowship of narcotics anonymous. J Addict Med. 2013;7(3):189–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Galanter M, White WL, Hunter BD. Cross-cultural applicability of the 12-Step model: a comparison of Narcotics Anonymous in the USA and Iran. J Addict Med. 2019;13(6):493–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wnuk M, Charzyńska E. Involvement in sexaholics anonymous and life satisfaction: the mediating role of meaning in life and hope. J Behav Addict. 2022;11(2):544–56.

  31. Rosenblum A, Matusow H, Fong C, Vogel H, Uttaro T, Moore TL, et al. Efficacy of dual focus mutual aid for persons with mental illness and substance misuse. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014;135:78–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Galanter M, White WL, Hunter B. Narcotics Anonymous members in recovery from methamphetamine use disorder. Am J Addictions. 2023;32(1):54–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Beck AK, Larance B, Deane FP, Baker AL, Manning V, Hides L, et al. The use of Australian SMART Recovery groups by people who use methamphetamine: analysis of routinely-collected nationwide data. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021;225:108814.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hornsey MJ, Olsen S, Barlow FK, Oei TP. Testing a single-item visual analogue scale as a proxy for cohesiveness in group psychotherapy. Group Dynamics: Theory Res Pract. 2012;16(1):80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kepner W, Meacham MC, Nobles AL. Types and sources of Stigma on Opioid Use Treatment and Recovery communities on Reddit. Subst Use Misuse. 2022;1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2022.2091786.

  36. Lin LA, Casteel D, Shigekawa E, Weyrich MS, Roby DH, McMenamin SB. Telemedicine-delivered treatment interventions for substance use disorders: a systematic review. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019;101:38–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Mark TL, Treiman K, Padwa H, Henretty K, Tzeng J, Gilbert M. Addiction treatment and telehealth: review of efficacy and provider insights during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychiatric Serv. 2022;73(5):484–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Valdez D, Patterson MS. Computational analyses identify addiction help-seeking behaviors on the social networking website Reddit: insights into online social interactions and addiction support communities. PLOS Digit Health. 2022;1(11):e0000143.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Kelly PJ, McCreanor K, Beck AK, Ingram I, O’Brien D, King A, et al. SMART Recovery International and COVID-19: expanding the reach of mutual support through online groups. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021;131:108568.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Timko C, Mericle A, Vest N, Delk J, Zemore SE. Mode of mutual-help group attendance: predictors and outcomes in a US national longitudinal survey of adults with lifetime alcohol use disorder. J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024;164:209395.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Galanter M, White WL, Hunter B. Virtual twelve step meeting attendance during the COVID-19 period: a study of members of narcotics anonymous. J Addict Med. 2022;16(2):e81–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Galanter M, White WL, Hunter B, Khalsa J. Internet-based, continuously available narcotics anonymous meetings: a new resource for access to twelve step support for abstinence. Am J Drug Alcohol Abus. 2024;50(3):321–7.

  43. Beck AK, Larance B, Manning V, Hides L, Baker AL, Deane FP, et al. Online SMART Recovery mutual support groups: characteristics and experience of adults seeking treatment for methamphetamine compared to those seeking treatment for other addictive behaviours. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2023;42(1):20–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Beck AK, Larance B, Baker AL, Deane FP, Manning V, Hides L, et al. Supporting people affected by problematic alcohol, substance use and other behaviours under pandemic conditions: a pragmatic evaluation of how SMART recovery Australia responded to COVID-19. Addict Behav. 2023;139:107577.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bergman BG, Kelly JF. Online digital recovery support services: an overview of the science and their potential to help individuals with substance use disorder during COVID-19 and beyond. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021;120:108152.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Krentzman AR. Helping clients engage with remote mutual aid for addiction recovery during COVID-19 and beyond. Alcoholism Treat Q. 2021;39(3):348–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Mohseni F, Rahimi K, Sarvandani MN, Jamali Z, Tamijani SMS, Rafaiee R. Lapse and Relapse Rates in Narcotics Anonymous versus Methadone maintenance treatment: a 12-Month prospective study. Iran J Psychiatry. 2022;17(1):1.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Aramideh Z, Sahbaeiroy F. Sustained remission from drug addiction among the attendees of the meetings of anonymous addicts and rehabilitation centers in Mashhad, Iran, during 2017. J Social Behav Community Health. 2019;3(2):378–84.

  49. Bazazkahani H, Moghaddam AS, Vaghee S, Hamedi A. Comparison of the quality of life of addicts participating in either Narcotics Anonymous or, therapeutic community group sessions or receiving methadone-therapy a cohort study in Mashhad in 2013. J Community Health Res. 2022;11(3):165–74.

  50. Martinelli TF, van de Mheen D, Best D, Vanderplasschen W, Nagelhout GE. Are members of mutual aid groups better equipped for addiction recovery? European cross-sectional study into recovery capital, social networks, and commitment to sobriety. Drugs: Educ Prev Policy. 2021;28(5):389–98.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Vilsaint CL, Kelly JF, Bergman BG, Groshkova T, Best D, White W. Development and validation of a brief Assessment of Recovery Capital (BARC-10) for alcohol and drug use disorder. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;177:71–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Dekkers A, Vos S, Vanderplasschen W. Personal recovery depends on NA unity: an exploratory study on recovery-supportive elements in Narcotics Anonymous Flanders. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2020;15:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Asheh AM, Courchesne-Krak N, Kepner W, Marienfeld C. Adverse childhood experiences are Associated with History of Overdose among patients presenting for Outpatient Addiction Care. J Addict Med. 2023;17(3):333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Sievwright KM, Stangl AL, Nyblade L, Lippman SA, Logie CH, Veras MASM, et al. An expanded definition of intersectional stigma for public health research and praxis. American Public Health Association; 2022. pp. S356–61.

  55. Oser CB, Moody MD, Hansen AC, Stevens-Watkins D, Staton M, Bunting AM. Predictors of substance use disorder treatment and mutual support group participation among black women across the criminal legal spectrum: a latent class approach. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2024;260:111326.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Paloutzian RF, Ellison CW. Spiritual well-being scale. A spiritual strategy for counseling and psychotherapy. 1982.

  57. Humphreys K, Woods MD. Researching mutual help group participation in a segregated society. J Appl Behav Sci. 1993;29(2):181–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Dale E, Kelly PJ, Lee KK, Conigrave JH, Ivers R, Clapham K. Systematic review of addiction recovery mutual support groups and indigenous people of Australia, New Zealand, Canada, the United States of America and Hawaii. Addict Behav. 2019;98:106038.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Madden EF, Prevedel S, Light T, Sulzer SH. Intervention stigma toward medications for opioid use disorder: a systematic review. Subst Use Misuse. 2021;56(14):2181–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Krawczyk N, Negron T, Nieto M, Agus D, Fingerhood MI. Overcoming medication stigma in peer recovery: a new paradigm. Substance Abuse. 2018;39(4):404–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Wen H, Druss BG, Saloner B. Self-Help groups and Medication Use in opioid addiction treatment: a National Analysis: an analysis of the relative use of self-help groups and medications (buprenorphine, methadone, and naltrexone) in opioid addiction treatment. Health Aff. 2020;39(5):740–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Andraka-Christou B, Nguyen T, Harris S, Madeira J, Totaram R, Randall-Kosich O, et al. A pilot study of US college students’ 12-step orientation and the relationship with medications for opioid use disorder. J Am Coll Health. 2022;70(8):2383–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Andraka-Christou B, Totaram R, Randall-Kosich O. Stigmatization of medications for opioid use disorder in 12-step support groups and participant responses. Substance Abuse. 2022;43(1):415–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Larochelle MR, Bernson D, Land T, Stopka TJ, Wang N, Xuan Z, et al. Medication for opioid use disorder after nonfatal opioid overdose and association with mortality: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(3):137–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Sordo L, Barrio G, Bravo MJ, Indave BI, Degenhardt L, Wiessing L et al. Mortality risk during and after opioid substitution treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. BMJ. 2017;357.

  66. Tanum L, Solli KK, Benth JŠ, Opheim A, Sharma-Haase K, Krajci P, et al. Effectiveness of injectable extended-release naltrexone vs daily buprenorphine-naloxone for opioid dependence: a randomized clinical noninferiority trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74(12):1197–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Somaini L, Vecchio S, Corte C, Coppola C, Mahony A, Pitts A et al. Prolonged-release buprenorphine therapy in opioid use disorder can address stigma and improve patient quality of life. Cureus. 2021;13(10).

  68. Parsons G, Ragbir C, D’Agnone O, Gibbs A, Littlewood R, Hard B. Patient-reported outcomes, experiences and satisfaction with weekly and monthly injectable prolonged-release buprenorphine. Subst Abuse Rehabil. 2020;11:41–7.

  69. McCurdy LY, Kong G, Krishnan-Sarin S, Kiluk BD, Potenza MN. A non-randomized pilot study protocol of a novel social support intervention for individuals in early recovery from hazardous alcohol use. PLoS ONE. 2023;18(10):e0292293.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Kelly JF, Levy S, Matlack M. A systematic qualitative study investigating why individuals attend, and what they like, dislike, and find most helpful about, smart recovery, alcoholics anonymous, both, or neither. J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024;161:209337.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Kelly JF, Levy S, Matlack M, Hoeppner BB. Who affiliates with SMART recovery? A comparison of individuals attending SMART recovery, alcoholics anonymous, both, or neither. Alcohol: Clin Experimental Res. 2023;47(10):1926–42.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute On Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number T32DA035165. Keith Humphreys was supported by a Career Research Scientist Award from the Veterans Health Administration. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or Veterans Health Administration.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

W.K. and K.H. wrote the main manuscript text.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wayne Kepner.

Ethics declarations

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

No human subjects by the authors were used in this study.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kepner, W., Humphreys, K. Effectiveness of Mutual Health Groups for Illicit Drug Use Disorders: A Review of the Current Literature. Curr Addict Rep 12, 12 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-025-00635-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-025-00635-w

Keywords

Navigation