[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Anonymity, ordinal preference proximity and imposed social choices

  • Published:
Social Choice and Welfare Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Extending on an impossibility result by Baigent [1], it is shown that an anonymous social choice procedure which preserves preference proximity cannot satisfy the weakest possible form of non-imposition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Public Economics, University of Graz, Universitätsstrasse 15, A-3010 Graz, Austria (e-mail: Daniel.Eckert@kfunigraz.ac.at; BenjaminDLane@aol.com), , , , , , AT

    Daniel Eckert & Benjamin Lane

Authors
  1. Daniel Eckert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Benjamin Lane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Received: 20 September 1999/Accepted: 11 May 2001

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eckert, D., Lane, B. Anonymity, ordinal preference proximity and imposed social choices. Soc Choice Welfare 19, 681–684 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s003550100147

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003550100147

Keywords