Prospects for Multipolarity and Multilateralism in World Politics

• Armijo, L.E. (2007) ‘The BRICs Countries (Brazil, Russia, India, and China) as Analytical Category: Mirage or Insight?’, Asian Perspective, 31(4): 7–41.

  Google Scholar 

• Bendiek, A. (2010) ‘Neuer Europäischer Realismus: Abschied von der Idee einer einheitlichen Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik’, SWP-Aktuell, 2010/A 10.

  Google Scholar 

• Bull, H. (1977) The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

  Book  Google Scholar 

• —. (1982) ‘Civilian Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 21(2): 149–164.

  Google Scholar 

• Burkman, T.W. (2008) Japan and the League of Nations: Empire and World Order, 1914–1938 (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press).

  Google Scholar 

• Clark, I. (2011) Hegemony in International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Carta, C. (2012) The European Union Diplomatic Service: Ideas, Preferences and Identities (Abingdon: Routledge).

  Google Scholar 

• Clinton, H. (2011) America’s Pacific Century, Foreign Policy, November.

  Google Scholar 

• Council (2003) A Secure Europe in a Better World. European Security Strategy (Luxembourg: Official Publications).

  Google Scholar 

• Cox, M. (2011) ‘Power Shift and The Death of the West? Not yet!’, European Political Science, 10(3): 416–424.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Damro, C. (2012) ‘Market Power Europe’ Journal of European Public Policy (Abingdon: Routledge) 19 (5): 682–699.

  Google Scholar 

• Debaere, P. and Orbie, J. (2013) ‘The European Union in the Gx System: Representation and Coordination’, in K.E. Jørgensen and K. Laatikainen (eds.) The European Union in International Institutions: Performance, Policy, Power (Abingdon: Routledge), pp. 311–323.

  Google Scholar 

• Donnelly, J. (2000) Realism and International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Ferguson, R.J. (2003) ‘India, Multipolarity and Contested Globalization’, in R.N. Gosh, M.A.B. Siddique and R. Gabbay (eds.) Essays on Development Issues: India and the Indian Ocean Region (New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers), pp. 114–157.

  Google Scholar 

• Ferreira-Pereira, L.C. (2010) ‘Human Rights, Peace, and Democracy: Is “model power Europe” a Contradiction in Terms?’, in F. Bindi (ed.) The Foreign Policy of the European Union: Assessing Europe’s Role in the World (Washington: Brookings), pp. 290–302.

  Google Scholar 

• Fox, W.T.R. (1944) The Superpowers: The United States, Britain and the Soviet Union and Their Responsibility for Peace (New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.).

  Google Scholar 

• Higgott, R. (2010) ‘Multi-Polarity and Trans-Atlantic Relations: Normative Aspirations and Practical Limits of EU Foreign Policy’, GARNET Working Paper No. 76/10.

  Google Scholar 

• Hyde-Price, A.G.V. (2007) European Security in the Twenty-First Century: The Challenge of Multipolarity (Abingdon: Routledge).

  Google Scholar 

• Ikenberry, J. (2008) ‘The Rise of China and the Future of the West Can the Liberal System Survive?’, Foreign Affairs, 87(1): 23–37.

  Google Scholar 

• Jørgensen, K.E., S. Oberthür and J. Shahin (eds.) (2011) ‘The Performance of the EU in International Institutions’, Journal of European Integration, 33(6): 599–757.

  Google Scholar 

• Karns, M.P. and K.A. Mingst (1990) The United States and Multilateral Institutions: Patterns of Changing Instrumentality and Influence (London: Routledge).

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Kennedy, D. (1987) ‘The Move to Institutions’, Cardozo Law Review, 8(5): 841–988.

  Google Scholar 

• Kirton, J. (2010) Making Global Economic Governance Effective: Hard and Soft Law Institutions in a Crowded World, with Marina Larionova and Paolo Savona (Farnham: Asghate).

  Google Scholar 

• Koops, J.A. (2010) The European Union as an Integrative Power? Assessing the EU’s ‘Effective Multilateralism’ towards NATO and the United Nations (Brussels: ASP).

  Google Scholar 

• Krauthammer, C. (1990) ‘The Unipolar Moment’, Foreign Affairs, 70(1): 23–33.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• —. (2002) ‘The Unipolar Moment Revisited’, The National Interest, 70: 5–17.

  Google Scholar 

• Lipson, C. (1991) ‘Why are Some International Agreements Informal?’, International Organization,4.

  Google Scholar 

• Laidi, Z. (2010) Europe as a Risk Averse Power: A Hyphotesis, GARNET Policy Brief, No 11.

  Google Scholar 

• Malona, D.M. (2011) Does the Elephant Dance? Contemporary Indian Foreign Policy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Manners, I. (2002) ‘Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40: 235–258.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mead, W.R. (2002) Special Providence. American Foreign Policy and How It has Changed the World (London: Routledge).

  Google Scholar 

• Mearsheimer, J. (1990) ‘Back to the Future. Instability in Europe after the Cold War’, International Security, 15: 5–56.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mohan, C.R. (2005) Crossing the Rubicon. The Shaping of India’s New Foreign Policy (London: Penguin).

  Google Scholar 

• Moravcsik, A. (2010) ‘Europe: Quietly Rising Superpower in a Bipolar World’, in A. Alexandroff and A. Cooper (eds.) Rising States, Rising Institutions (Washington: Brookings Institution Press), pp. 151–176.

  Google Scholar 

• Nau, H.R. (2002) At Home Abroad. Identity and Power in American Foreign Policy (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).

  Google Scholar 

• Posen, B. (2006) ‘European Union Security and Defense Policy: Response to Unipolarity?’ Security Studies, 15(2): 149–186.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Risse, T. and T.A. Börzel (2009) ‘The Transformative Power of Europe. The European Union and the Diffusion of Ideas’, Kolleg-Forschergruppe Transformative Power of Europe, Working Paper No. 1.

  Google Scholar 

• Rogers, J. (2009) ‘From Suez to Shanghai: the European Union and Eurasian maritime security’ in European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS), Occasional Paper No. 77.

  Google Scholar 

• Ruggie, J. (1993) Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form (New York: Columbia University Press).

  Google Scholar 

• Stewart, P. and S. Forman (eds.) (2002) Multilateralism and US Foreign Policy: Ambivalent Engagement (Boulder: Lynne Rienner).

  Google Scholar 

• Stewart, P. (2010) ‘Irresponsible Stakeholders? The Difficulty of Integrating Rising Powers’, Foreign Affairs, 89(6): 44–53.

  Google Scholar 

• Smith, G.C. (1974) ‘The Vital Triangle’, The World Today, 30(4):141–150.

  Google Scholar 

• Walt, S.M. (2011) The Coming Erosion of the European Union, Blog on Foreign Policy Website, November, accessed 28 October 2011.

  Google Scholar 

• Waltz, K.N. (1993) ‘The Emerging Structure of International Politics’, International Security, 18(2): 44–79.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Woolcock, S. (2012) European Union Economic Diplomacy, The Role of the EU in External Economic Relations (Aldershot: Ashgate).

  Google Scholar 

• Youngs, R. (2010) Europe’s Decline and Fall: The Struggle against Global Irrelevance (London: Profile Books).

  Google Scholar 

Download references