Abstract
In Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution, Wendy Brown argues that neo-liberalism has undermined democracy in a hitherto unprecedented form. To be specific, neo-liberalism has undermined what is at the heart of democracy: popular sovereignty, the demos – it has, in a word, undone the demos and, hence, democracy. Analysing neo-liberalism and its relationship to democracy, Brown draws on the works of Michel Foucault and Karl Marx. The exchange here between the three reviewers – Mitchell Dean, Alen Toplišek and Anne Barron – and Wendy Brown focuses on a number of issues: the use and usefulness of Michel Foucault’s notion of governmentality and Karl Marx’s analysis of capitalism for analysing neo-liberalism; the way that neoliberalism ‘economises’ everything including politics and democracy; the nature of the state and of sovereignty, and how the left should relate to these; and the nature of critique in its different forms (Kantian, Foucauldian, Marxist and others). These are issues that are important not only for the specific argument of Undoing the Demos, but more generally for social and political theory today.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For etymology throughout, I have used the Online Etymological Dictionary, www.etyomonline.com, and cross-referenced the Oxford English Dictionary, www.oed.com.
Contemporary tendencies in the transformation of political rule are discussed under headings such as ‘governance’ and ‘benchmarking’, but in ways that do not engage with other contrasting discussions that cite Foucault as an influence. See for instance on ‘governance’, Rose, 1999: Chapter 1.
References
Agamben, G. (2009) The Signature of all Things: On Method. Translated by L. D’Isanto and K. Atell, New York: Zone Books.
Agamben, G. (2015) Stasis: Civil War as Political Paradigm. Translated by N. Heron, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Barry, A. (2001) Political Machines: Governing a Technological Society, London: Athlone Press.
Barry, A., Osborne, T. and Rose, N. (eds.) (1996) Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism and Rationalities of Government, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Barry, A. and Slater, D. (eds.) (2004) The Technological Economy, London: Routledge.
Brown, W. (1988) Manhood and Politics: A Feminist Reading in Political Theory, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Brown, W. (1995) States of Injury, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Brown, W. (2001) Politics Out of History, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Brown, W. (2008) Regulating Aversion: Tolerance in the Age of Identity and Empire, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Brown, W. (2010) Walled States, Waning Sovereignty, Cambridge, MA: Zone Books.
Brown, W. (2015) Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution, Cambridge, MA: Zone Books.
Brown, W. and Halley, J. (eds.) (2002) Left Legalism/Left Critique, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Burchell, G., Gordon, C. and Miller, P. (eds.) (1991) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Dean, M. (2001) ‘“Demonic Societies”: Liberalism, Biopolitics and Sovereignty’, in T.B. Hansen and F. Stepputat (eds.) States of Imagination, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 41–64.
Forst, R. (2013) Justification and Critique: Towards a Critical Theory of Politics, Cambridge: Polity.
Foucault, M. (1981) ‘Omnes et singulatim: Towards a Criticism of “Political Reason”’, in S. McMurrin (ed.) The Tanner Lectures on Human Values. vol. 2, Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, pp. 223–54.
Foucault, M. (2003) ‘Society Must Be Defended’: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975-76. Translated by D. Macey, New York: Picador.
Foucault, M. (2008) The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978-1979. Translated by G. Burchell, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Foucault, M. (2008) The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–79, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Foucault, M. (2009) Security. Territory. Population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–78, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Foucault, M. (1979) The History of Sexuality Volume I: An Introduction, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Foucault, M. (1980) ‘Two Lectures’, in C. Gordon (ed.) Power/Knowledge, London: Harvester, pp. 78–108.
Foucault, M. (1983) ‘The Subject and Power’, in H. Dreyfus and P. Rabinow (eds.) Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Foucault, M. (1984) ‘What is Enlightenment?’ in P. Rabinow (ed.) The Foucault Reader, New York: Pantheon Books, pp. 32–50.
Foucault, M. (1991) ‘Questions of Method’, in G. Burchell, C. Gordon and P. Miller (eds.) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp. 73–86.
Foucault, M. (2007) Security Territory, Population, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Foucault, M. (2008) The Birth of Biopolitics, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Habermas, J. (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1996) Between Facts and Norms, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hardt, M. and Negri, A. (2004) Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire, New York: Penguin.
Hayek, F.A. (1949) Individualism and Economic Order, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Hobbes, T. (1998) On the Citizen. eds. and trans. R. Tuck and M. Silverthorne, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (1998a) ‘On the Common Saying: That may be Correct in Theory, But it is No Use in Practice’, in M.J. Gregor (ed.) Immanuel Kant: Practical Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 279–309.
Kant, I. (1998b) ‘An Answer to the Question: “What is Enlightenment?”’, in M.J. Gregor (ed.) Immanuel Kant: Practical Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 17–22.
Lazzarato, M. (2015) Governing by Debt. Translated by J. D. Jordan, Pasadena, CA, Semiotext(e).
Miller, P. and Rose, N. (2008) Governing the Present, Cambridge: Polity.
Rose, N. (1999) Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rousseau, J.-J. (2011) ‘A Discourse on Political Economy’, in D.A. Cress trans. and ed., The Basic Political Writings, 2nd ed., Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
Schmitt, C. (1985) The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy. Translated by E. Kennedy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Schmitt, C. (1996) The Concept of the Political. Translated by G. Schwab, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
Schmitt, C. (2003) ‘Nomos – Nahme – Name’, in The Nomos of the Earth in the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum. Translated by G. L. Ulmen, New York: Telos Press, pp. 336–50.
Söderberg, J. and Delfanti, A. (2015) ‘Repurposing the Hacker. Three Temporalities of Recuperation’, 23 June, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2622106 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2622106, accessed 29 September 2015.
Tribe, K. (1978) Land, Labour and Economic Discourse, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Weber, M. (1978) in G. Roth and C. Wittich (eds.) Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, vol. 2, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
dean, m., toplišek, a., barron, a. et al. introduction: undoing the demos. Eur Polit Sci 16, 263–289 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2016.11
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2016.11