[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

introduction: undoing the demos

  • Review Symposium
  • Published:
European Political Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution, Wendy Brown argues that neo-liberalism has undermined democracy in a hitherto unprecedented form. To be specific, neo-liberalism has undermined what is at the heart of democracy: popular sovereignty, the demos – it has, in a word, undone the demos and, hence, democracy. Analysing neo-liberalism and its relationship to democracy, Brown draws on the works of Michel Foucault and Karl Marx. The exchange here between the three reviewers – Mitchell Dean, Alen Toplišek and Anne Barron – and Wendy Brown focuses on a number of issues: the use and usefulness of Michel Foucault’s notion of governmentality and Karl Marx’s analysis of capitalism for analysing neo-liberalism; the way that neoliberalism ‘economises’ everything including politics and democracy; the nature of the state and of sovereignty, and how the left should relate to these; and the nature of critique in its different forms (Kantian, Foucauldian, Marxist and others). These are issues that are important not only for the specific argument of Undoing the Demos, but more generally for social and political theory today.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For etymology throughout, I have used the Online Etymological Dictionary, www.etyomonline.com, and cross-referenced the Oxford English Dictionary, www.oed.com.

  2. Contemporary tendencies in the transformation of political rule are discussed under headings such as ‘governance’ and ‘benchmarking’, but in ways that do not engage with other contrasting discussions that cite Foucault as an influence. See for instance on ‘governance’, Rose, 1999: Chapter 1.

References

  • Agamben, G. (2009) The Signature of all Things: On Method. Translated by L. D’Isanto and K. Atell, New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agamben, G. (2015) Stasis: Civil War as Political Paradigm. Translated by N. Heron, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, A. (2001) Political Machines: Governing a Technological Society, London: Athlone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, A., Osborne, T. and Rose, N. (eds.) (1996) Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism and Rationalities of Government, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, A. and Slater, D. (eds.) (2004) The Technological Economy, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. (1988) Manhood and Politics: A Feminist Reading in Political Theory, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. (1995) States of Injury, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. (2001) Politics Out of History, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. (2008) Regulating Aversion: Tolerance in the Age of Identity and Empire, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. (2010) Walled States, Waning Sovereignty, Cambridge, MA: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. (2015) Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution, Cambridge, MA: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. and Halley, J. (eds.) (2002) Left Legalism/Left Critique, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burchell, G., Gordon, C. and Miller, P. (eds.) (1991) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. (2001) ‘“Demonic Societies”: Liberalism, Biopolitics and Sovereignty’, in T.B. Hansen and F. Stepputat (eds.) States of Imagination, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 41–64.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Forst, R. (2013) Justification and Critique: Towards a Critical Theory of Politics, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1981) ‘Omnes et singulatim: Towards a Criticism of “Political Reason”’, in S. McMurrin (ed.) The Tanner Lectures on Human Values. vol. 2, Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, pp. 223–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2003) ‘Society Must Be Defended’: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975-76. Translated by D. Macey, New York: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2008) The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978-1979. Translated by G. Burchell, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2008) The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–79, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2009) Security. Territory. Population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–78, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1979) The History of Sexuality Volume I: An Introduction, Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980) ‘Two Lectures’, in C. Gordon (ed.) Power/Knowledge, London: Harvester, pp. 78–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1983) ‘The Subject and Power’, in H. Dreyfus and P. Rabinow (eds.) Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1984) ‘What is Enlightenment?’ in P. Rabinow (ed.) The Foucault Reader, New York: Pantheon Books, pp. 32–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1991) ‘Questions of Method’, in G. Burchell, C. Gordon and P. Miller (eds.) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp. 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2007) Security Territory, Population, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2008) The Birth of Biopolitics, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1996) Between Facts and Norms, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, M. and Negri, A. (2004) Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire, New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (1949) Individualism and Economic Order, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1998) On the Citizen. eds. and trans. R. Tuck and M. Silverthorne, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1998a) ‘On the Common Saying: That may be Correct in Theory, But it is No Use in Practice’, in M.J. Gregor (ed.) Immanuel Kant: Practical Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 279–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1998b) ‘An Answer to the Question: “What is Enlightenment?”’, in M.J. Gregor (ed.) Immanuel Kant: Practical Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazzarato, M. (2015) Governing by Debt. Translated by J. D. Jordan, Pasadena, CA, Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. and Rose, N. (2008) Governing the Present, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1999) Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J.-J. (2011) ‘A Discourse on Political Economy’, in D.A. Cress trans. and ed., The Basic Political Writings, 2nd ed., Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, C. (1985) The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy. Translated by E. Kennedy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, C. (1996) The Concept of the Political. Translated by G. Schwab, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, C. (2003) ‘Nomos – Nahme – Name’, in The Nomos of the Earth in the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum. Translated by G. L. Ulmen, New York: Telos Press, pp. 336–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderberg, J. and Delfanti, A. (2015) ‘Repurposing the Hacker. Three Temporalities of Recuperation’, 23 June, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2622106 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2622106, accessed 29 September 2015.

  • Tribe, K. (1978) Land, Labour and Economic Discourse, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1978) in G. Roth and C. Wittich (eds.) Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, vol. 2, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to mitchell dean.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

dean, m., toplišek, a., barron, a. et al. introduction: undoing the demos. Eur Polit Sci 16, 263–289 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2016.11

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2016.11

Keywords

Navigation