Abstract
The network form of organizing is usually considered to provide organizations with the strategic flexibility needed to survive in increasingly turbulent environments. At the same time, empirical research demonstrates that the network form—not least strategic alliances, regional networks and clusters, and global production and supply networks—runs the risk of becoming inert over time, reducing not only the networks’ strategic flexibility but also making organizational change increasingly difficult. Upon closer inspection, some of the structural inertia or institutional persistencies of this form may turn out to result from organizational path dependencies which are particularly difficult to detect and to overcome. It is argued that the emerging theory of organizational path dependence that builds on previous economic and institutional approaches in this field may be particularly helpful in this respect.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002). Social capital—prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40.
Armenakis, A. A., Harris, S. G., & Feild, H. S. (2000). Making change permanent. A model for institutionalizing change interventions. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 12, 97–128.
Arthur, W. B. (Ed.) (1994). Increasing returns and path dependency in the economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Bakker, R. M. (2010). Taking stock of temporary organizational forms: A systematic review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(4), 466–486.
Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.
Beyer, J. (2010). The same or not the same—on the variety of mechanisms of path dependence. International Journal of Social Science, 5(1), 1–11.
Bourgeois, III, L. J., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1988). Strategic decision processes in high velocity environments: Four cases in the microcomputer industry. Management Science, 34(7), 816–835.
Burger, M., & Sydow, J. (2014). How inter-organizational networks can become path-dependent: Bargaining practices in the photonics industry. Schmalenbach Business Review, 66(1), 73–99.
Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation. London: Tavistock.
Colpan, A. M., Hikino, T., & Lincoln, J. R. (Eds.). (2010). The Oxford handbook of corporate groups. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
D’Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition. New York: Free Press.
David, P. A. (1985). Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review, 75, 332–337.
Dobusch, L., & Schüßler, E. (2013). Theorizing path dependence: A review of positive feedback mechanisms in prominent cases. Industrial and Corporate Change, 22(3), 617–647.
Duncan, R. B. (1976). The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. In R. H. Kilmann, L. R. Pondy, & D. P. Slevin (Eds.), The management of organization design: Strategies and implementation (vol. 1, pp. 167–188). New York: Elsevier.
Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679.
Emery, F. E., & Trist, E. L. (1965). The causal texture of organizational environments. Human Relations, 18, 21–32.
Evans, P. A. L., & Doz, Y. (1989). The dualistic organization. In P. A. L Evans, Y. Doz, & A. Laurent (Eds.), Human resource management in international firms (pp. 219–242). London: Macmillan
Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94–118.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity.
Gilbert, C. (2005). Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource versus routine rigidity. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 741–763.
Grabher, G., & Powell, W. W. (Eds.). (2004). Networks. Cheltenham: Elgar.
Grant, R. M., & Baden-Fuller, C. (2004). A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management Studies, 41(1), 61–84.
Gulati, R., & Puranam, P. (2009). Renewal through reorganization: The value of inconsistencies between formal and informal organization. Organization Science, 20(2), 422–440.
Hedlund, G. (1986). The hypermodern MNC—a heterarchy? Human Resource Management, 25(1), 9–36.
Hedlund, G. (1994). A model of knowledgement and the N-form corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 15(summer special issue), 73–90.
Khanna, T. (1998). The scope of alliance. Organization Science, 9(3), 340–355.
Kim, T., Oh, H., & Swaminathan, A. (2006). Framing interorganizational network change: A network inertia perspective. Academy of Management Review, 31, 704–720.
Koch, J. (2011). Inscribed strategies: Exploring the organizational nature of strategic lock-in. Organization Studies, 32, 337–363.
Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. Boston: Harvard University Press.
Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 111–126.
Li, S. X., & Rowley, T. J. (2002). Inertia and evaluation mechanisms in interorganizational partner selection: Syndicate formation among US investment banks. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1104–1118.
Manning, S., & Sydow, J. (2011). Projects, paths, practices: Sustaining and leveraging project-based relationships. Industrial & Corporate Change, 20(5), 1369–1402.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploitation and exploration in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71–87.
Marquis, C., & Tilcsik, A. (2013). Imprinting: Toward a multilevel theory. Annuals of the Academy of Management, 7(1), 195–245.
Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(4), 395–437.
Maurer, I., & Ebers, M. (2006). Dynamics of social capital and their performance implications: Lessons from biotechnology start-ups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 262–292.
Meyer, U., & Schubert, C. (2007). Integrating path dependency and path creation in a general understanding of path constitution. Science, Technology & Innovation, 3, 23–44.
Müller-Seitz, G. (2012). Leadership in interorganizational networks: A literature review and suggestions for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(4), 428–443.
Oliver, D., & Ross, J. (2005). Decision-making in high-velocity environments: The importance of guiding principles. Organization Studies, 26(6), 889–913.
Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94, 251–267.
Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295–336.
Provan, K. G., Fish, A., & Sydow, J. (2007). Interorganizational networks at the network level: A review of the empirical literature on whole networks. Journal of Management, 33, 479–516.
Raab, J., & Kenis, P. (2009). Heading toward a society of networks: Empirical developments and theoretical challenges. Journal of Management Inquiry, 18(3), 198–210.
Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34, 375–409.
Schreyögg, G., & Sydow, J. (2010). Organizing for fluidity? On the dilemmas of new organizational forms. Organization Science, 21(6), 1251–1262.
Schüßler, E. (2009). Strategische Prozesse und Persistenzen: Pfadabhängige Organisation und Wertschöpfung in der deutschen Bekleidungsindustrie. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
Selznick, P. (1948). Foundations of the theory of organization. American Sociological Review, 13(1), 25–35.
Simmel, G. (1950). The sociology of Georg Simmel. New York: Free Press.
Staber, U., & Sydow, J. (2002). Organizational adaptive capacity: A structuration perspective. Journal of Management Inquiry, 11(4), 408–424.
Starkey, K., Barnatt, C., & Tempest, S. (2000). Beyond networks and hierarchies: Latent organizations in the UK television industry. Organization Science, 11(3), 299–305.
Sydow, J., & Duschek, S. (2011). Management interorganisationaler Beziehungen. Netzwerke-Cluster-Allianzen. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
Sydow, J., & Schreyögg, G. (2013). Self-reinforcing processes in organizations, networks and fields—an introduction. In J. Sydow, & G. Schreyögg (Eds.), Self-reinforcing processes in and among Organizations (pp. 3–13). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sydow, J., Schreyögg, G., & Koch, J. (2009). Organizational path dependence: Opening the black box. Academy of Management Review, 34, 689–709.
Sydow, J., Schüßler, E., & Müller-Seitz, G. (in press). Managing interorganizational relations. Debates and cases. London: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Sydow, J., Windeler, A., Schubert, C., & Möllering, G. (2012). Organizing R & D consortia for path creation and extension: The case of semiconductor manufacturing technologies. Organization Studies, 33(7), 907–936.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–534.
Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 35–67.
Vergne, J. P., & Durand, R. (2011). The path of most persistence: An evolutionary perspective on path dependency and dynamic capabilities. Organization Studies, 32(3), 365–382.
Walker, G., Kogut, B., & Shan, W. (1997). Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network. Organization Science, 8, 109–125.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sydow, J. (2015). Networks, Persistence and Change—A Path Dependence Perspective. In: Albach, H., Meffert, H., Pinkwart, A., Reichwald, R. (eds) Management of Permanent Change. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05014-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05014-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-05013-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-05014-6
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)