Data Quality Issues in Data Integration Systems

1. Arenas M, Bertossi LE, Chomicki J (1999) Consistent Query Answers in Inconsistent Databases. In: Proceedings of the PODS’99

   Google Scholar 

2. Berti-Équille L (2004) Quality-adaptive query processing over distributed sources. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Information Quality (IQ 2004), pp 285–296

   Google Scholar 

3. Berti-Équille L (2001) Integration of biological data and quality-driven source negotiation. In: Proceedings of the ER 2001, Yokohama, pp 256–269

   Google Scholar 

4. Bleiholder J, Naumann F (2008) Data fusion. ACM Computing Surveys

   Google Scholar 

5. Boag A, Chamberlin D, Fernandez MF, Florescu D, Robie J, Simèon J (2003) XQuery 1.0: An XML Query Language. http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery

6. Bravo L, Bertossi LE (2003) Logic Programming for Consistently Querying Data Integration Systems. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI 2003, pp 10–15

   Google Scholar 

7. Cali A, Calvanese D, De Giacomo G, Lenzerini M (2002) On the role of integrity constraints in data integration. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin 25(3):39–45

   MATH  Google Scholar 

8. Calì A, Lembo D, Rosati R (2003) On the decidability and complexity of query answering over inconsistent and incomplete databases. In: Proceedings of the PODS 2003, pp 260–271

   Google Scholar 

9. Calì A, Lembo D, Rosati R (2003) Query rewriting and answering under constraints in data integration systems. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI 2003, pp 16–21

   Google Scholar 

10. Charnes A, Cooper W, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of operational research 2

    Google Scholar 

11. Dayal U (1985) Query processing in a multidatabase system. In: Query Processing in Database Systems. Springer, New York, pp 81–108

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

12. De Giacomo G, Lembo D, Lenzerini M, Rosati R (2004) Tackling inconsistencies in data integration through source preferences. In: Proceedings of the IQIS 2004 (SIGMOD Workshop), pp 27–34

    Google Scholar 

13. Fan W, Lu H, Madnick S, Cheungd D (2001) Discovering and reconciling value conflicts for numerical data integration. Information Systems 26(8):635–656

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

14. Fuxman A, Fazli E, Miller RJ (2005) ConQuer: efficient management of inconsistent databases. In: Proceedings of the SIGMOD 2005, pp 155–166

    Google Scholar 

15. Geerts F, Mecca G, Papotti P, Santoro D (2014) Mapping and cleaning. In: IEEE 30th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE 2014), Chicago, March 31–April 4, 2014, pp 232–243

    Google Scholar 

16. Geerts F, Mecca G, Papotti P, Santoro D (2014) That’s all folks! LLUNATIC goes open source. PVLDB 7(13):1565–1568

    Google Scholar 

17. Greco G, Lembo D (2004) Data integration with preferences among sources. In: Proceedings of the ER 2004, pp 231–244

    Google Scholar 

18. Greco G, Greco S, Zumpano E (2003) A logical framework for querying and repairing inconsistent databases. Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 15(6):1389–1408

    Article  Google Scholar 

19. Kim W, Seo J (1991) Classifying schematic and data heterogeneity in multidatabase systems. IEEE Computer 24(12):12–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

20. Lenzerini M (2002) Data integration: a theoretical perspective. In: Proceedings of the PODS 2002, pp 233–246

    Google Scholar 

21. Levy AY, Mendelzon AO, Sagiv Y, Srivastava D (1995) Answering queries using views. In: Proceedings of the PODS 1995, pp 95–104

    Google Scholar 

22. Lim EP, Chiang RH (1998) A global object model for accommodating instance heterogeneities. In: Proceedings of the ER’98, Singapore, pp 435–448

    Google Scholar 

23. Lin J, Mendelzon AO (1998) Merging databases under constraints. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems 7(1):55–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

24. Motro A, Anokhin P (2005) Fusionplex: Resolution of Data Inconsistencies in the Data Integration of Heterogeneous Information Sources. Information Fusion

    Google Scholar 

25. Naumann F, Häussler M (2002) Declarative data merging with conflict resolution. In: 7th International Conference on Information Quality, pp 212–214

    Google Scholar 

26. Naumann F, Leser U, Freytag JC (1999) Quality-driven integration of heterogenous information systems. In: Proceedings of the VLDB’99, pp 447–458

    Google Scholar 

27. Papakonstantinou Y, Abiteboul S, Garcia-Molina H (1996) Object fusion in mediator systems. In: Proceedings of the VLDB 1996, pp 413–424

    Google Scholar 

28. Papotti P, Naumann F, Kruse S (2015) Estimating data integration and cleaning effort. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Extending Database Technology (EDBT 2015), Brussels, March 23–27, 2015, pp 61–72

    Google Scholar 

29. Saaty TL (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

30. Scannapieco M, Virgillito A, Marchetti C, Mecella M, Baldoni R (2004) The DaQuinCIS architecture: a platform for exchanging and improving data quality in cooperative information systems. Information Systems 29(7):551–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

31. Scannapieco M, Pernici B, Pierce EM (2005) IP-UML: a methodology for quality improvement based on IP-MAP and UML. In: Wang RY, Pierce EM, Madnick SE, Fisher CW (eds) Advances in Management Information Systems - Information Quality (AMIS-IQ) Monograph, Sharpe ME

    Google Scholar 

32. Schallehn E, Sattler KU, Saake G (San Jose, CA, 2002) Extensible and similarity-based grouping for data integration. In: Proceedings of the ICDE 2002, pp 277–277

    Google Scholar 

33. Ullman JD (1988) Principles of Database and Knowledge-Base Systems. Computer Science Press, Rockville

    Google Scholar 

34. Wiederhold G (1992) Mediators in the architecture of future information systems. IEEE Computer 25(3):38–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

35. Yan LL, Ozsu T (1999) Conflict tolerant queries in AURORA. In: Proceedings of the CoopIS’99, pp 279–290

    Google Scholar 

Download references