Abstract
Nowadays numerous efforts and promising results are obtained in medical imaging processing, although reproducible segmentation and classification of tumors is still a challenging task. The difficulty consists of the different shapes, locations and image intensities of these tissues. In this article we present our discriminative segmentation system for brain tumor delimitation from multimodal MR images. The detection of tumor requires a well-defined process-sequence on every analyzed MRI including preprocessing, feature extraction, classification and post-processing. The discriminative models are trained from annotated image databases and build their decision function around a classifier algorithm. In machine learning there are a lot of advanced classifiers that can be used for segmentation task. The choice of the most adequate classifiers is not straightforward. The SVM, the AdaBoost and the Random Forest (RF) are among the most 10 best classifiers and are often used in image segmentation. The goal of this paper is to analyze and compare these three classification techniques and their obtainable performances or the same segmentation framework. First, we present our framework for brain tumor segmentation. In the theoretical part we briefly present each classifier, emphasizing the advantages and disadvantages of them. In practice, we trained all these three classifiers on the same data set and tested them on 10 image sets, which were not used during training phase. The segmentation performance was evaluated with the Dice coefficients, computing them in each test case separately. Finally, we statistically compared the provided results. At the end, we evaluated the dependence of segmentation accuracy on training set size, providing practical information for possible users of the classifiers created.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wu X, Kumar V, Quinlan JR, Ghosh J, Yang Q, Motoda H, et al. Top 10 algorithms in data mining. Knowledge and information systems. 2008; 14(1): p. 1-37.
Niculescu-Mizil A, Caruana R. Predicting good probabilities with supervised learning. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Machine learning; 2005. p. 625-632.
Caruana R, Karampatziakis N, Yessenalina A. An empirical evaluation of supervised learning in high dimensions. In Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning; 2008. p. 96-103.
Nivetha P, Vaijayanthi N. Detection and segmentation of brain tumors based on multifractal features. 2015.
Rangini M, Jiji GW. Identification of Alzheimer’s Disease Using Adaboost Classifier. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science; 2013. p. 229.
Nichat AM, Ladhake SA. Brain Tumor Segmentation and Classification Using Modified FCM and SVM Classifier. Brain. 2016; 5(4).
Shahare PD, Giri RN. Comparative Analysis of Artificial Neural Network and Support Vector Machine Classification for Breast Cancer Detection. 2015.
Reza S, Iftekharuddin KM. Improved Brain Tumor Tissue Segmentation Using Texture Features. In MICCAI-BRATS Challenge on Multimodal Brain Tumor Segmentation; 2014.
Zikic D, Glocker B, Konukoglu E, Shotton J, Criminisi A, Ye D, et al. Context-sensitive classification forests for segmentation of brain tumor tissues. In MICCAI-BRATS Challenge on Multimodal Brain Tumor Segmentation; 2012.
Lefkovits L, Lefkovits Sz, Szilágyi L. Brain Tumor Segmentation with Optimized Random Forest. In Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) BrainLes Workshop; 2016, under review.
Menze BH, Jakab A, Bauer S, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Farahani K, Kirby J, et al. The Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BRATS). IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. 2015 Oct; 34(10): p. 1993-2024.
The Interactive Learning and Segmentation Toolkit ITK.
Lefkovits L, Lefkovits Sz, Emerich S, Vaida MF. Random Forest Feature Selection Approach for Image Segmentation. In Advanced Concepts for Intelligent Vision Systems ACIVS; 2016, under review.
Breiman L. Random forests. Machine learning. 2001; 45(1): p. 5-32.
Schapire RE. The boosting approach to machine learning: An overview. In Nonlinear estimation and classification.: Springer; 2003. p. 149-171.
Lefkovits Sz, Lefkovits L. Distance based k-NN Classification of Gabor Jet Local Descriptors. In 9th International Conference, Interdisciplinarity in Engineering, Tîrgu-Mureș; 2015 8-9 October. p. 780-785.
Mayr A, Binder H, Gefeller O, Schmid M, others. The evolution of boosting algorithms. Methods of information in medicine. 2014; 53(6): p. 419-427.
Cortes C, Vapnik V. Support-vector networks. Machine learning. 1995; 20(3): p. 273-297.
Cristianini N, Shawe-Taylor J. An introduction to support vector machines and other kernel-based learning methods: Cambridge university press; 2000.
Lefkovits Sz, Lefkovits L. Enhanced Gabor Filter Based Facial Feature Detector. In The 5th International Conference European Integration - Between Tradition and Modernity IETM, Tîrgu-Mureș; 2013 5-7 October. p. 1204-1214.
Platt JC. Sequential Minimal Optimization: A Fast Algorithm for Training Support Vector Machines. Tech. rep. ADVANCES IN KERNEL METHODS - SUPPORT VECTOR LEARNING; 1998.
Criminisi A, Shotton J, Konukoglu E. Decision forests: A unified framework for classification, regression, density estimation, manifold learning and semi-supervised learning. Foundations and Trends® in Computer Graphics and Vision. 2012; 7(2–3): p. 81-227.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lefkovits, L., Lefkovits, S., Vaida, M.F., Emerich, S., Măluțan, R. (2017). Comparison of Classifiers for Brain Tumor Segmentation. In: Vlad, S., Roman, N. (eds) International Conference on Advancements of Medicine and Health Care through Technology; 12th - 15th October 2016, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 59. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52875-5_43
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52875-5_43
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52874-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52875-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)