[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 59))

Abstract

Nowadays numerous efforts and promising results are obtained in medical imaging processing, although reproducible segmentation and classification of tumors is still a challenging task. The difficulty consists of the different shapes, locations and image intensities of these tissues. In this article we present our discriminative segmentation system for brain tumor delimitation from multimodal MR images. The detection of tumor requires a well-defined process-sequence on every analyzed MRI including preprocessing, feature extraction, classification and post-processing. The discriminative models are trained from annotated image databases and build their decision function around a classifier algorithm. In machine learning there are a lot of advanced classifiers that can be used for segmentation task. The choice of the most adequate classifiers is not straightforward. The SVM, the AdaBoost and the Random Forest (RF) are among the most 10 best classifiers and are often used in image segmentation. The goal of this paper is to analyze and compare these three classification techniques and their obtainable performances or the same segmentation framework. First, we present our framework for brain tumor segmentation. In the theoretical part we briefly present each classifier, emphasizing the advantages and disadvantages of them. In practice, we trained all these three classifiers on the same data set and tested them on 10 image sets, which were not used during training phase. The segmentation performance was evaluated with the Dice coefficients, computing them in each test case separately. Finally, we statistically compared the provided results. At the end, we evaluated the dependence of segmentation accuracy on training set size, providing practical information for possible users of the classifiers created.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 103.50
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 129.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wu X, Kumar V, Quinlan JR, Ghosh J, Yang Q, Motoda H, et al. Top 10 algorithms in data mining. Knowledge and information systems. 2008; 14(1): p. 1-37.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Niculescu-Mizil A, Caruana R. Predicting good probabilities with supervised learning. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Machine learning; 2005. p. 625-632.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Caruana R, Karampatziakis N, Yessenalina A. An empirical evaluation of supervised learning in high dimensions. In Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning; 2008. p. 96-103.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nivetha P, Vaijayanthi N. Detection and segmentation of brain tumors based on multifractal features. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rangini M, Jiji GW. Identification of Alzheimer’s Disease Using Adaboost Classifier. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science; 2013. p. 229.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nichat AM, Ladhake SA. Brain Tumor Segmentation and Classification Using Modified FCM and SVM Classifier. Brain. 2016; 5(4).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shahare PD, Giri RN. Comparative Analysis of Artificial Neural Network and Support Vector Machine Classification for Breast Cancer Detection. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Reza S, Iftekharuddin KM. Improved Brain Tumor Tissue Segmentation Using Texture Features. In MICCAI-BRATS Challenge on Multimodal Brain Tumor Segmentation; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zikic D, Glocker B, Konukoglu E, Shotton J, Criminisi A, Ye D, et al. Context-sensitive classification forests for segmentation of brain tumor tissues. In MICCAI-BRATS Challenge on Multimodal Brain Tumor Segmentation; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lefkovits L, Lefkovits Sz, Szilágyi L. Brain Tumor Segmentation with Optimized Random Forest. In Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) BrainLes Workshop; 2016, under review.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Menze BH, Jakab A, Bauer S, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Farahani K, Kirby J, et al. The Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BRATS). IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. 2015 Oct; 34(10): p. 1993-2024.

    Google Scholar 

  12. The Interactive Learning and Segmentation Toolkit ITK.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lefkovits L, Lefkovits Sz, Emerich S, Vaida MF. Random Forest Feature Selection Approach for Image Segmentation. In Advanced Concepts for Intelligent Vision Systems ACIVS; 2016, under review.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Breiman L. Random forests. Machine learning. 2001; 45(1): p. 5-32.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schapire RE. The boosting approach to machine learning: An overview. In Nonlinear estimation and classification.: Springer; 2003. p. 149-171.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lefkovits Sz, Lefkovits L. Distance based k-NN Classification of Gabor Jet Local Descriptors. In 9th International Conference, Interdisciplinarity in Engineering, Tîrgu-Mureș; 2015 8-9 October. p. 780-785.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mayr A, Binder H, Gefeller O, Schmid M, others. The evolution of boosting algorithms. Methods of information in medicine. 2014; 53(6): p. 419-427.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cortes C, Vapnik V. Support-vector networks. Machine learning. 1995; 20(3): p. 273-297.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cristianini N, Shawe-Taylor J. An introduction to support vector machines and other kernel-based learning methods: Cambridge university press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lefkovits Sz, Lefkovits L. Enhanced Gabor Filter Based Facial Feature Detector. In The 5th International Conference European Integration - Between Tradition and Modernity IETM, Tîrgu-Mureș; 2013 5-7 October. p. 1204-1214.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Platt JC. Sequential Minimal Optimization: A Fast Algorithm for Training Support Vector Machines. Tech. rep. ADVANCES IN KERNEL METHODS - SUPPORT VECTOR LEARNING; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Criminisi A, Shotton J, Konukoglu E. Decision forests: A unified framework for classification, regression, density estimation, manifold learning and semi-supervised learning. Foundations and Trends® in Computer Graphics and Vision. 2012; 7(2–3): p. 81-227.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Lefkovits .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lefkovits, L., Lefkovits, S., Vaida, M.F., Emerich, S., Măluțan, R. (2017). Comparison of Classifiers for Brain Tumor Segmentation. In: Vlad, S., Roman, N. (eds) International Conference on Advancements of Medicine and Health Care through Technology; 12th - 15th October 2016, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 59. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52875-5_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52875-5_43

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52874-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52875-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics