[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Co-creation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Springer Handbook of Internet of Things

Part of the book series: Springer Handbooks ((SHB))

  • 275 Accesses

Abstract

The production of Internet of Things (IoT) applications will grow even more extensively, as the IoT has far from reached its full potential. Engaging end users, in IoT development processes, can potentially contribute to building more ethical, responsible, and inclusive IoT applications. IoT ecosystems are however complex, not only due to IoT as technology but also due to the broad landscape of actors. Involving actors from, that is, government, academia, industry and business, and society, by means of co-creation can yield insight in different needs. This chapter provides a comprehensive overview on co-creation, as a collaborative design approach in IoT ecosystems. Not only co-creative benefits and enablers but also possible risks and barriers are discussed. There is elaboration on how co-creation can be applied in large-scale IoT projects. Co-creative dimensions, placeholders, processes, and tools and techniques are described. There is reflected on a tailor-made co-creative workshop method that enables multidisciplinary co-creation of IoT concepts. Scalability of iterative co-creative cycles is investigated to stimulate local development of IoT applications, while simultaneously enabling the exchange of insights on a higher level. Due to the complex nature of IoT ecosystems and their innovation processes, inevitably challenges occur. The chapter ends with a selection of challenges identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 199.50
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
GBP 249.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Statista: IoT number of connected devices worldwide 2012–2025, “No Title,” 2016. [Online]. http://www.statista.com/statistics/471264/iot-number-of-connected-devices-worldwide/. Accessed 05 Jun 2019

  2. Ikävalko, H., Turkama, P., Smedlund, A.: Enabling the mapping of Internet of Things ecosystem business models through roles and activities in value co-creation. In: 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 9, pp. 4954–4963 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Saarikko, T., Westergren, U.H., Blomquist, T.: The Internet of Things: are you ready for what’s coming? Bus. Horiz. 60(5), 667–676 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sanders, E.B.-N., Stappers, P.J.: Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign. 4(1), 5–18 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sanders, E.B.-N.: Information, inspiration and co-creation. In: 6th European Academy of Design, pp. 1–14 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fullerton, B.: Co-creation in service design. Interactions. 16(2), 6–9 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ind, N., Coates, N.: The meanings of co-creation. Eur. Bus. Rev. 25(1), 86–95 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bogers, M., Afuah, A., Bastian, B.: Users as innovators: a review, critique, and future research directions. J. Manag. 36(4), 857–875 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Weber, M.E.A.: Customer Co-Creation in Innovations: A Protocol for Innovating with End Users. Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alves, H., Fernandes, C., Raposo, M.: Value co-creation: concept and contexts of application and study. J. Bus. Res. 69(5), 1626–1633 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Buchanan, R.: Wicked problems in design thinking. Des. Issues. 8(2), 5–21 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Füller, J., Mühlbacher, H., Matzler, K., Jawecki, G.: Consumer empowerment through internet-based co-creation. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 26(3), 71–102 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Steen, M., Manschot, M., De Koning, N.: Benefits of co-design in service design projects. Int. J. Des. 5(2), 53–60 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Salomão, D., Sabiescu, A., Cantoni, L.: Co-design with communities. A reflection on the literature. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Development Informatics Association Conference, no. 2013, pp. 152–166 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brown, T., Wyatt, J.: Design thinking for social innovation. Dev. Outreach. 12(1), 29–43 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. De Roeck, D., et al.: I would DiYSE for it! In: NordiCHI ‘12, October 14–17, 2012 Copenhagen, Denmark (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. West, S., Mueller-Csernetzky, P., Kuenzli, M., Huonder, M.: Ecosystems Innovation for Smart Connected Services (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ståhlbröst, A., Bergvall-Kareborn, B., Eriksson, C.I.: Stakeholders in Smart City living lab processes. In: 21st Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2015), Puerto Rico, pp. 1–11 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hyysalo, S., Johnson, M.: The user as relational entity options that deeper insight into user representations opens for human-centered design. Inf. Technol. People. 28(1), 72–89 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nicolescu, R., Huth, M., Radanliev, P., De Roure, D.: Mapping the values of IoT. J. Inf. Technol. 33(4), 345–360 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Manzini, E.: Making things happen: social innovation and design. Des. Issues. 30(1), 57–66 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. van Kranenburg, R., et al.: Co-creation as the key to a public, thriving, inclusive and meaningful EU IoT. In: International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing and Ambient Intelligence, pp. 396–403 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bernabe, J.B., et al.: SocIoTal – the development and architecture of a social IoT framework. In: GIoTS 2017 – Global Internet of Things Summit, Proceedings, pp. 1–9 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stembert, N.: Co-Creative Workshop Handbook, 2nd ed. User Engagement for Large Scale Pilots in the Internet of Things (U4IoT) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schaffers, H., Sallstrom, A., Pallot, M., Hernandez-Munoz, J.M., Santoro, R., Trousse, B: Integrating living labs with future internet experimental platforms for co-creating services within Smart Cities. In: Concurrent Enterprising (ICE), 2011 17th International Conference on, pp 1–11 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Medrano-Gil, A.M., et al.: Definition of technological solutions based on the Internet of Things and smart cities paradigms for active and healthy ageing through cocreation. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. 2018, 15 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Choque, J., Diez, L., Medela, A., Muñoz, L.: Experimentation management in the co-created smart-city: incentivization and citizen engagement. Sensors. 19(2), 1–17 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Spagnoli, F., van der Graaf, S., Brynskov, M.: The paradigm shift of living labs in service co-creation for smart cities: SynchroniCity validation. Lect. Notes Inf. Syst. Organ. 27, 135–147 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sanders, L., Simons, G.: A Social Vision for Value Co-creation in Design. Open Source Business Resource [Online]. http://timreview.ca/article/310 (2009). Accessed 05 June 2019

  30. Kristensson, P., Matthing, J., Johansson, N.: Key strategies for the successful involvement of customers in the co-creation of new technology-based services. Int. J. Serv. Ind. Manag. 19(4), 474–491 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zwass, V.: Co-creation: toward a taxonomy and an integrated research perspective. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 15(1), 11–48 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ekman, P., Raggio, R.D., Thompson, S.M.: Service network value co-creation: defining the roles of the generic actor. Ind. Mark. Manag. 56, 51–62 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Stahlbrost, A.: A set of key principles to assess the impact of living labs. Int. J. Prod. Dev. 17(1–2), 60–75 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Prahalad, C.K., Ramaswamy, V.: Co-creation experiences: the next practice in value creation. J. Interact. Mark. 18(3), 5–14 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Grönroos, C., Voima, P.: Critical service logic: making sense of value creation and co-creation. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 41(2), 133–150 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Payne, A.F., Storbacka, K., Frow, P.: Managing the co-creation of value. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 36(1), 83–96 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Vargo, S.L., Maglio, P.P., Akaka, M.A.: On value and value co-creation: a service systems and service logic perspective. Eur. Manag. J. 26(3), 145–152 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Frow, P., Nenonen, S., Payne, A., Storbacka, K.: Managing co-creation design: a strategic approach to innovation. Br. J. Manag. 26(3), 463–483 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Franz, Y., Tausz, K., Thiel, S.-K.: Contextuality and co-creation matter: a qualitative case study comparison of living lab concepts in urban research. Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. [Online]. https://timreview.ca/article/952 (2015). Accessed 05 June 2019

  40. De Koning, J.I.J.C., Crul, M.R.M., Wever, R.: Models of co-creation. In: ServDes. 2016 Fifth Service Design and Innovation Conference, vol. 125, pp. 266–278 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mukhtar, M., Ismail, M.N., Yahya, Y.: A hierarchical classification of co-creation models and techniques to aid in product or service design. Comput. Ind. 63(4), 289–297 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Grönroos, C.: Conceptualising value co-creation: a journey to the 1970s and back to the future. J. Mark. Manag. 28, 1520–1534 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sanders, E.B.-N., Brandt, E., Binder, T.: A framework for organizing the tools and techniques of participatory design. In: 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference, pp. 195–198 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Romero, D., Molina, A.: Collaborative networked organisations and customer communities: value co-creation and co-innovation in the networking era. Prod. Plan. Control. 22(5–6), 447–472 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Boukhris, A., Fritzsche, A., Möslein, K.: Co-creation in the early stage of product-service system development. Proc. CIRP. 63, 27–32 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kujala, S.: User involvement: a review of the benefits and challenges. Behav. Inf. Technol. 22(1), 1–16 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Gouillart, F.J.: The race to implement co-creation of value with stakeholders: five approaches to competitive advantage. Strategy Leadersh. 42(1), 2–8 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Meinel, C., Leifer, L.: Design thinking. Understand – improve – apply. In: Plattner, H. (ed.) Understanding Innovation, pp. 1525–1535. Springer (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ulla, J.-S., Jill, W., Mehves, Ç.: Design thinking: past, present and possible futures. Creat. Innov. Manag. 22(2), 121–146 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Steen, M.: Co-design as a process of joint inquiry and imagination. Des. Issues. 29(2), 16–28 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Alam, I.: An exploratory investigation of user involvement in new service development. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 30(3), 250 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Spinuzzi, C.: The methodology of participatory design. Tech. Commun. 52(2), 163–174 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Visser, F.S., Stappers, P.J., van der Lugt, R., Sanders, E.B.-N.: Contextmapping: experiences from practice. CoDesign Int. J. CoCreat. Design Arts. 1(2), 119–149 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Delgado, M.T., et al.: Value Co-Creation Mechanisms – Supporting Internet of Things Activities on Innovation Ecosystems (UNIFY-IoT) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Wellsandt, S., Kalverkamp, M., Eschenbächer, J., Thoben, K.D.: Living lab approach to create an Internet of Things service. In: 18th International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation, ICE 2012, 2012, no. May (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Vaisutis, K., et al.: Invisible connections: investigating older people’s emotions and social relations around objects. In: CHI 2014, April 26–May 01 2014, Toronto, ON, Canada, no. May (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Heidenreich, S., Wittkowski, K., Handrich, M., Falk, T.: The dark side of customer co-creation: exploring the consequences of failed co-created services. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 43(3), 279–296 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Pirinen, A.: The barriers and enablers of co-design for services. Int. J. Des. 10(3), 27–42 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Gkouskos, D., Burgos, J.: I’m in! Towards participatory healthcare of elderly through IOT. Proc. Comput. Sci. 113, 647–652 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Kleinsmann, M., Valkenburg, R.: Barriers and enablers for creating shared understanding in co-design projects. Des. Stud. 29(4), 369–386 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Ehlen, C., van der Klink, M., Stoffers, J., Boshuizen, H.: The co-creation-wheel: a four-dimensional model of collaborative, interorganisational innovation. Eur. J. Train. Dev. 41(7), 628–646 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Stein, P., Dobers, J.: Quadruple Helix Co-creation in SSH: Experiences, Considerations, Lessons Learned (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Voorberg, W.H., Bekkers, V.J.J.M., Tummers, L.G.: A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Manag. Rev. 17, 1333 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Pera, R., Occhiocupo, N., Clarke, J.: Motives and resources for value co-creation in a multi-stakeholder ecosystem: a managerial perspective. J. Bus. Res. 69(10), 4033–4041 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Mazhelis, O., Luoma, E., Warma, H.: Defining an Internet-of-Things ecosystem. In: Internet of Things, Smart Spaces, and Next Generation Networking, pp. 1–14. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  66. Mejtoft, T.: Internet of Things and co-creation of value. In: Proceedings – 2011 IEEE International Conferences on Internet of Things and Cyber, Physical and Social Computing, iThings/CPSCom 2011, pp. 672–677 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  67. Hefnawy, A., et al.: IoT for Smart City services: lifecycle approach. In: Second International Conference on Internet of Things and Cloud Computing, Mar 2016, Cambridge, UK, p. 55 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  68. van Kranenburg, R., Bassi, A.: IoT challenges. Commun. Mobile Comput. 1(1), 9 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Bagheri, S., Kusters, R.J., Trienekens, J.J.M.: Customer knowledge transfer challenges in a co-creation value network: toward a reference model. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 47, 198–214 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Lee, B., Cooper, R., Hands, D., Coulton, P.: [Re]-imagining vision and values: design as a driver for value creation in the Internet of Things. (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  71. Lea, R., Blackstock, M., Giang, N., Vogt, D.: Smart cities: Engaging users and developers to foster innovation ecosystems. In: Adjunct Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers, pp. 1535–1542 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  72. Gutiérrez, V., et al.: Co-creating the cities of the future. Sensors. 16(11), 1–27 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Vicini, S., Bellini, S., Sanna, A.: The city of the future living lab. Int. J. Automat. Smart Technol. 2(3), 201–208 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Schuck-Zöller, S., Cortekar, J., Jacob, D.: Evaluating co-creation of knowledge: from quality criteria and indicators to methods. Adv. Sci. Res. 14, 305–312 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Laamanen, M., Skålén, P.: Collective–conflictual value co-creation: a strategic action field approach. Mark. Theory. 15(3), 381–400 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Lusch, R.F., Nambisan, S.: Service innovation: a service-dominant logic perspective. MIS Q. Serv. Innov. Digital Age. 39(1), 12 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  77. Smit, D., Oogjes, D., de Rocha, B.G., Trotto, A., Hur, Y., Hummels, C.: Ideating in skills: developing tools for embodied co-design. In: TEI ‘16, February 14–17, 2016, Eindhoven, Netherlands, pp. 78–85 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  78. Carayannis, E.G., Campbell, D.F.J.: Mode 3′ and ‘quadruple helix’: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 46(3/4), 201–234 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Waart, P., Mulder, I.J., de Bont, C.: Participatory prototyping for future cities. In: Proceedings of the 4th Participatory Innovation Conference 2015, no. June, pp. 337–343 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  80. Coley, F.J.S., Lemon, M.: Supporting multiple stakeholders in the design of more sustainable and systemic solutions. Des. Princ. Pract. Int. J. 2(2), 27–34 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  81. Badke-Schaub, P., Neumann, A., Lauche, K., Mohammed, S.: Mental models in design teams: a valid approach to performance in design collaboration? CoDesign. 3(1), 5–20 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Broadley, C., Champion, K., Pierre, M., McHattie, L.: From participation to collaboration: reflections on the co-creation of innovative business ideas. In: DRS 2016, Design Research Society 50th Anniversary Conference (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  83. Füller, J., Hutter, K., Faullant, R.: Why co-creation experience matters? Creative experience and its impact on the quantity and quality of creative contributions. R&D Manag. 41(3), 259–274 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Bittner, E.A.C., Leimeister, J.M.: Creating shared understanding in heterogeneous work groups: why it matters and how to achieve it. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 31(1), 111–143 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Almirall, E., Lee, M., Wareham, J.: Mapping living labs in the landscape of innovation methodologies. Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 2(9), 12–18 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Von Hipple, E.: Lead users: an important source of novel product concepts. Manag. Sci. 32(7), 791–805 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Schuurman, D., Coorevits, L., Logghe, S., Vandenbroucke, K., Georges, A., Baccarne, B.: Co-creation in living labs: exploring the role of user characteristics on innovation contribution. Int. J. Serv. Sci. 5(3/4), 199–219 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  88. Leask, C.F., et al.: Framework, principles and recommendations for utilising participatory methodologies in the co-creation and evaluation of public health interventions. Res. Involv. Engagem. 5(1), 2 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Liedtka, J.: Perspective: linking design thinking with innovation outcomes through cognitive bias reduction. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 32(6), 925–938 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Stembert, N.: Co-creation in the Public Domain. Delft University of Technology, Stichting Toekomstbeeld der Techniek (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  91. Malone, T.W., Laubacher, R., Dellarocas, C.: Harnessing crowds: Mapping the genome of collective intelligence, 2009–001 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  92. van Rijn, H., Stappers, P.: Expressions of ownership: motivating users in a co-design process. In: PDC ‘08 Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design, pp. 178–181 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  93. Fernandes, T., Remelhe, P.: How to engage customers in co-creation: customers’ motivations for collaborative innovation. J. Strateg. Mark. 24(3–4), 311–326 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Roser, T., DeFillippi, R., Samson, A.: Managing your co-creation mix: co-creation ventures in distinctive contexts. Eur. Bus. Rev. 25(1), 20–41 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Roberts, D., Hughes, M., Kertbo, K.: Exploring consumers’ motivations to engage in innovation through co-creation activities. Eur. J. Mark. 48(1/2), 147–169 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Stahlbrost, A., Kareborn, B.B.: Exploring users motivation in innovation communities. Int. J. Entrep. Innov. Manag. 14(4), 298–314 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  97. Leminen, S., Westerlund, M., Nyström, A.-G.: Living labs as open-innovation networks. Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 2(9), 6–11 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Juujärvi, S., Pesso, K.: Actor roles in an urban living lab: what can we learn from Suurpelto, Finland? Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 3(11), 22–27 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Logghe, S., Oelbrandt, K., Schuurman, D.: Innovation is created by humans, not by systems. An exploration of user involvement in Living Labs: user motivation versus Lead User criteria. In: 5th ENoLL Living Lab Summer School 2014. European. European Network of Living Labs, no. December (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  100. Menny, M., Voytenko Palgan, Y., McCormick, K.: Urban living labs and the role of users in co-creation. Gaia. 27(1), 68–77 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Hamalainen, M., Tyrvainen, P.: A framework for IoT service experiment platforms in smart-city environments. In: In ISC2 2016: IEEE Second International Smart Cities Conference. Improving the Citizens Quality of Life, pp. 664–671 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  102. Pallot, M., Trousse, B., Senach, B., Scapin, D.: Living lab research landscape: from user centred design and user experience towards user cocreation. In: First European Summer School “Living Labs”, Aug 2010, Paris, France (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  103. Schaffers, H., Komninos, N., Pallot, M., Trousse, B., Nilsson, M., Oliveira, A.: Smart cities and the future internet: towards cooperation frameworks for open innovation. In: The Future Internet Assembly, pp. 431–446 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  104. Pallot, M., Trousse, B., Senach, B., Schaffers, H., Komninos, N.: Future internet and living lab research domain landscapes: filling the gap between technology push and application pull in the context of smart cities. In: eChallenges e-2011 Conference Proceedings, IIMC International Information Management Corporation, pp. 1–8 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  105. Skaržauskaitė, M.: Measuring and managing value co-creation process: overview of existing theoretical models. Soc. Technol. 3(1), 115–129 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  106. Goodyear-Smith, F., Jackson, C., Greenhalgh, T.: Co-design and implementation research: challenges and solutions for ethics committees. BMC Med. Ethics. 16(1), 1–5 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Piller, F., Ihl, C., Vossen, A.: A typology of customer co creation in the innovation process. In: New Forms of Collaborative Production and Innovation: Economic, Social, Legal and Technical Characteristics and Conditions, vol. 4, pp. 1–26. Universitätsverlag, Göttingen (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  108. Russo-Spena, T., Mele, C.: ‘Five co-s’ in innovating: a practice-based view. J. Serv. Manag. 23(4), 527–553 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Ramaswamy, V., Gouillart, F.: Building the co-creative enterprise. Harv. Bus. Rev. 88, 100–109 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  110. Wiegmann, M., Pappers, J., Keserü, I., Macharis, C.: Guidelines for the co-design of alternatives – learning loops in the public realm (LOOPER) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  111. Lindtner, S., Hertz, G.D., Dourish, P.: Emerging sites of HCI innovation: hackerspaces, hardware startups & incubators. In: SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 439–448 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  112. Piller, F., Vossen, A., Ihl, C.: From social media to social product development: the impact of social media on co-creation of innovation. Die Unternehmung. 65(1), 7 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Moreau, C.P., Herd, K.B.: To each his own? How comparisons with others influence consumers’ evaluations of their self-designed products. J. Consum. Res. 36(5), 806–819 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Cvijikj, I.P., Michahelles, F.: The toolkit approach for end-user participation in the Internet of Things. In: Architecting the Internet of Things, pp. 65–96. Springer, Berlin (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  115. Lember, V.: The increasing role of digital technologies in co-production (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  116. Blake, M.K.: Formality and friendship: research ethics review and participatory action research. ACME. 6(3), 411–421 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  117. Li, K., Tiwari, A., Alcock, J., Bermell-Garcia, P.: Categorisation of visualisation methods to support the design of human-computer interaction systems. Appl. Ergon. 55, 85–107 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Sanders, E.B.N.: From user-centered to participatory design approaches. In: Design and the Social Sciences. Taylor & Francis, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  119. Sanders, E.B.-N., Stappers, P.J.: Convivial Toolbox: Generative Research for the Front End of Design. BIS, Amsterdam (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  120. Negri, A., Trousse, B., Senach, B.: Ideation of IoT services with citizen: coupling GenIoT and AloHa! Methods. In: ServDes 2012-Service Design and Innovation Conference (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  121. Heitlinger, S., Bryan-Kinns, N., Comber, R., Nick, B.-K., Comber, R.: Connected seeds and sensors: co-designing Internet of Things for sustainable smart cities with urban food-growing communities. In: Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Situated Actions, Workshops and Tutorial, vol. 2, p. 18. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  122. Balestrini, M., Diez, T., Marshall, P., Gluhak, A., Rogers, Y.: IoT community technologies: leaving users to their own devices or orchestration of engagement? EAI Endorsed Trans. Internet Things. 1(1), e7 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. Quesada Rodriguez, A., et al.: End-user engagement, protection and education. In: Ziegler, S. (ed.) Internet of Things Security and Data Protection, pp. 173–189. Springer, Cham (2019)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  124. de Roeck, D.: IoT Ideation Cards. [Online]. http://www.know-cards.myshopify.com. Accessed 05 June 2019

  125. Aspiala, T., Deschamps-Sonsino, A.: Know-Cards. [Online]. http://www.know-cards.myshopify.com. Accessed 05 June 2019

  126. Angelini, L., Couture, N., Khaled, O.A., Mugellini, E.: Internet of Tangible Things (IoTT): challenges and opportunities for tangible interaction with IoT. Informatics. 5(1), 1–34 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. Dibitonto, M., Tazzi, F., Leszczynska, K., Medaglia, C.M.: The IoT design deck: a tool for the co-design of connected products. In: Advances in Usability and User Experience, pp. 217–227. Springer, Cham (2018)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  128. Mora, S., Gianni, F., Divitini, M.: Tiles: a card-based ideation toolkit for the Internet of Things. In: DIS 2017-Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems 2017, pp. 231–232 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  129. Futurice: IoT Service Kit. [Online]. http://www.iotservicekit.com. Accessed 05 June 2019

  130. Star, S.L.: Chapter 2 – The structure of ill-structured solutions: boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. In: Gasser, L., Huhns, M.N. (eds.) Distributed Artificial Intelligence, pp. 37–54. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1989)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  131. Berger, A., Odom, W., Storz, M., Bischof, A., Kurze, A., Hornecker, E.: The inflatable cat: idiosyncratic ideation of smart objects for the home. In: CHI2019, May 4–9, 2019, Glasgow, Scotland, UK, pp. 1–12 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  132. Ambe, A.H., Brereton, M., Soro, A., Chai, M.Z., Buys, L., Roe, P.: Older people inventing their personal Internet of Things with the IoT un-kit experience. In: 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Proceedings (CHI 2019), p. 15. ACM, New York (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  133. Ghajargar, M., Longo, L., Gargiulo, E., Giannantonio, R.: Empathy workshop: when project team and pilot users exchange experiences. Des. J. 20(sup1), S3837–S3848 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  134. Ambe, A.H., Brereton, M., Soro, A., Roe, P.: Technology individuation: the foibles of augmented everyday objects. In: CHI 2017, May 06–11, 2017, Denver, CO, USA, no. May, pp. 6632–6644 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  135. Hribernik, K.A., Ghrairi, Z., Hans, C., Thoben, K.-D.: Co-creating the Internet of Things – first experiences in the participatory design of Intelligent Products with Arduino. In: 17th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising, pp. 1–9 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  136. Mora, S., Divitini, M., Gianni, F.: Tiles: an inventor toolkit for interactive objects. In: AVI ‘16, June 07–10, 2016, Bari, Italy (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  137. Mora, S., Gianni, F., Divitini, M.: RapIoT toolkit: rapid prototyping of collaborative Internet of Things applications. In: International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems, CTS 2016, pp. 438–445. IEEE, Orlando (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  138. Drajic, D., et al.: User engagement for large scale pilots in the Internet of Things. In: 2019 14th International Conference on Advanced Technologies, Systems and Services in Telecommunications, TELSIKS 2019 – Proceedings, pp. 46–53 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  139. Sanders, E.B.-N.: Generative tools for co-designing. In: Collaborative Design, pp. 3–12. Springer, Berlin (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  140. Friedman, B., Kahn, P.H., Borning, A.R.: Value sensitive design and information systems. In: Zhang, P., Galletta, D. (eds.) Human-Computer Interaction in Management Information Systems: Foundations, pp. 1–27. M.E. Sharpe, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  141. Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations, 4th edn. Free Press, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  142. Robertson, T., Leong, T.W., Durick, J., Koreshoff, T.: Mutual learning as a resource for research design. In: 13th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Industry Cases, Workshop Descriptions, Doctoral Consortium papers, and Keynote Abstracts, pp. 25–28 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  143. Nold, C., van Kranenburg, R.: The Internet of People for a Post-Oil World, vol. 8. The Architectural League, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  144. Angoso-Gonzalez, J.L., et al.: Internet of Things – The Next Revolution a Strategic Reflection About a European Approach to the Internet of Things. European Commission, Brussels (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This chapter describes work undertaken in the context of the U4IoT project – User Engagement for Large-Scale Pilots in the Internet of Things (http://www.u4iot.eu). The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Commission’s H2020-ICT-2016-2017 Programme under grant agreement n° 732078.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathalie Stembert .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stembert, N. (2024). Co-creation. In: Ziegler, S., Radócz, R., Quesada Rodriguez, A., Matheu Garcia, S.N. (eds) Springer Handbook of Internet of Things. Springer Handbooks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39650-2_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39650-2_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-39649-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-39650-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics