Cross-Domain and Cross-Language Irony Detection: The Impact of Bias on Models’ Generalization

1. Baeza-Yates, R.: Bias on the web. Commun. ACM 61(6), 54–61 (2018)

   Article  Google Scholar 

2. Barbieri, F., Basile, V., Croce, D., Nissim, M., Novielli, N., Patti, V.: Overview of the Evalita 2016 SENTIment POLarity classification task. In: Proceedings of Third Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics (CLiC-it 2016) & Fifth Evaluation Campaign of Natural Language Processing and Speech Tools for Italian. Final Workshop (EVALITA 2016) (2016)

   Google Scholar 

3. Baroni, M., Bernardini, S., Ferraresi, A., Zanchetta, E.: The WaCky wide web: a collection of very large linguistically processed web-crawled corpora. Lang. Resour. Eval. 43(3), 209–226 (2009)

   Article  Google Scholar 

4. Basile, V., Lai, M., Sanguinetti, M.: Long-term social media data collection at the university of Turin. In: Fifth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics (CLiC-it 2018), pp. 1–6. CEUR-WS (2018)

   Google Scholar 

5. Benamara, F., Grouin, C., Karoui, J., Moriceau, V., Robba, I.: Analyse d’Opinion et langage figuratif dans des tweets: présentation et Résultats du défi fouille de textes DEFT2017. In: Actes de l’atelier DEFT2017 Associé à la Conférence TALN. Orléans, France (2017)

   Google Scholar 

6. Beukeboom, C.J., Burgers, C.: Seeing bias in irony: how recipients infer speakers’ stereotypes from their ironic remarks about social-category members. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 23(7), 1085–1102 (2020)

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Cañete, J., Chaperon, G., Fuentes, R., Ho, J.H., Kang, H., Pérez, J.: Spanish pre-trained BERT model and evaluation data. In: PML4DC at ICLR 2020 (2020)

   Google Scholar 

8. Cardellino, C.: Spanish billion words corpus and embeddings (2016). https://crscardellino.me/SBWCE/, https://crscardellino.me/SBWCE/. Accessed 14 Mar 2023

9. Carvalho, P., Sarmento, L., Silva, M.J., De Oliveira, E.: Clues for detecting irony in user-generated contents: oh...!! it’s “so easy”;-. In: Proceedings of the 1st International CIKM Workshop on Topic-Sentiment Analysis for Mass Opinion, pp. 53–56 (2009)

   Google Scholar 

10. Chakhachiro, R.: Translating irony in political commentary texts from English into Arabic. Babel 53(3), 216 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. Cignarella, A.C., et al.: Overview of the Evalita 2018 task on irony detection in Italian tweets (IronITA). In: Proceedings of the 6th evaluation campaign of Natural Language Processing and Speech tools for Italian (EVALITA’18). CEUR.org, Turin (2018)

    Google Scholar 

12. Cignarella, A.T., Basile, V., Sanguinetti, M., Bosco, C., Rosso, P., Benamara, F.: Multilingual irony detection with dependency syntax and neural models. In: 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 1346–1358. Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

13. Cignarella, A.T., Bosco, C., Patti, V., Lai, M.: Twittirò: an Italian twitter corpus with a multi-layered annotation for irony. IJCoL. Ital. J. Comput. Linguist. 4(4–2), 25–43 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

14. Clark, H.H., Gerrig, R.J.: On the pretense theory of irony. J. Exp. Psychol. Gener. 113(1), 121–126 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Clear, J.H.: The British national corpus. In: The Digital World, pp. 163–187 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

16. Colston, H.L.: Irony as indirectness cross-linguistically: on the scope of generic mechanisms. In: Capone, A., García-Carpintero, M., Falzone, A. (eds.) Indirect Reports and Pragmatics in the World Languages. PPPP, vol. 19, pp. 109–131. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78771-8_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

17. del Pilar Salas-Zárate, M., Alor-Hernández, G., Sánchez-Cervantes, J.L., Paredes-Valverde, M.A., García-Alcaraz, J.L., Valencia-García, R.: Review of English literature on figurative language applied to social networks. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 62(6), 2105–2137 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. Devlin, J., Chang, M.W., Lee, K., Toutanova, C.: BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the NAACL: HLT, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), pp. 4171–4186. ACL, Minneapolis (2019)

    Google Scholar 

19. Famiglini, L., Fersini, E., Rosso, P.: On the generalization of figurative language detection: the case of irony and sarcasm. In: Métais, E., Meziane, F., Horacek, H., Kapetanios, E. (eds.) NLDB 2021. LNCS, vol. 12801, pp. 178–186. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80599-9_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

20. Farías, D.I.H., Patti, V., Rosso, P.: Irony detection in Twitter: the role of Affective content. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 16(3), 1–24 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

21. Frenda, S., Cignarella, A.T., Basile, V., Bosco, C., Patti, V., Rosso, P.: The unbearable hurtfulness of sarcasm. Expert Syst. Appl. 193, 116398 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

22. Garrido-Muñoz, I., Montejo-Ráez, A., Martínez-Santiago, F., Ureña-López, L.A.: A survey on bias in deep NLP. Appl. Sci. (Switz.) 11(7), 3184 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

23. Ghanem, B., Karoui, J., Benamara, F., Moriceau, V., Rosso, P.: IDAT at FIRE2019: overview of the track on irony detection in Arabic tweets. In: Proceedings of the 11th Forum for Information Retrieval Evaluation, pp. 10–13 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

24. Ghanem, Bilal, Karoui, Jihen, Benamara, Farah, Rosso, Paolo, Moriceau, Véronique.: Irony detection in a multilingual context. In: Jose, J.M., et al. (eds.) ECIR 2020. LNCS, vol. 12036, pp. 141–149. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45442-5_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

25. Giora, R.: On irony and negation. Discour. Process. 19(2), 239–264 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

26. González, J.Á., Hurtado, L.F., Pla, F.: Transformer based contextualization of pre-trained word embeddings for irony detection in Twitter. Inf. Process. Manage. 57, 1–15 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

27. Grice, H.P.: Logic and conversation. In: Cole, P., Morgan., J. (eds.) Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, pp. 41–58. Academic Press, New York (1975)

    Google Scholar 

28. Howard, J., Ruder, S.: Universal language model fine-tuning for text classification. In: Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the ACL, pp. 328–339. Association for Computational Linguistics (2018)

    Google Scholar 

29. Karoui, J., Benamara, F., Moriceau, V.: Automatic Detection of Irony, 1st edn. Wiley, Hoboken (2019)

    Book  Google Scholar 

30. Maynard, D., Greenwood, M.A.: Who cares about sarcastic tweets ? Investigating the impact of sarcasm on sentiment Analysis. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2014). European Language Resources Association (2014)

    Google Scholar 

31. Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., Galstyan, A.: A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Comput. Surv. 54(6), 1–35 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3457607

    Article  Google Scholar 

32. Mohammad, S.M., Zhu, X., Kiritchenko, S., Martin, J.: Sentiment, emotion, purpose, and style in electoral tweets. Inf. Process. Manage. 51(4), 480–499 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

33. Nguyen, D.Q., Vu, T., Tuan Nguyen, A.: BERTweet: a pre-trained language model for English tweets. In: Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations, pp. 9–14. Association for Computational Linguistics (2020)

    Google Scholar 

34. Ortega-Bueno, R., Chulvi, B., Rangel, F., Paolo, R., Fersini, E.: Profiling irony and stereotype spreaders on twitter (IROSTEREO) at PAN 2022. CEUR-WS. org (2022)

    Google Scholar 

35. Ortega-Bueno, R., Rangel, F., Hernández Farıas, D., Rosso, P., Montes-y Gómez, M., Medina Pagola, J.E.: Overview of the task on irony detection in Spanish variants. In: Proceedings of the Iberian Languages Evaluation Forum (IberLEF 2019), Co-located with 34th Conference of the Spanish Society for Natural Language Processing (SEPLN 2019), vol. 2421, pp. 229–256. CEUR-WS. org (2019)

    Google Scholar 

36. Poletto, F., Basile, V., Sanguinetti, M., Bosco, C., Patti, V.: Resources and benchmark corpora for hate speech detection: a systematic review. Lang. Resour. Eval. 55, 1–47 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

37. Polignano, M., Basile, V., Basile, P., de Gemmis, M., Semeraro, G.: ALBERTo: modeling Italian social media language with BERT. IJCoL. Ital. J. Comput. Linguist. 5(5–2), 11–31 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

38. Ptáček, T., Habernal, I., Hong, J.: Sarcasm detection on Czech and English Twitter. In: Proceedings of COLING 2014, the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 213–223. Dublin City University and Association for Computational Linguistics, Dublin (2014)

    Google Scholar 

39. Riloff, E., Qadir, A., Surve, P., De Silva, L., Gilbert, N., Huang, R.: Sarcasm as contrast between a positive sentiment and negative situation. In: Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2013), pp. 704–714 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

40. Sánchez-Junquera, J., Rosso, P., Montes, M., Chulvi, B., et al.: Masking and BERT-based models for stereotype identication. Procesamiento Lenguaje Nat. 67, 83–94 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

41. Sánchez-Junquera, J., Rosso, P., Montes, M., Ponzetto, S.P.: Masking and transformer-based models for hyperpartisanship detection in news. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP 2021), pp. 1244–1251 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

42. Sánchez-Junquera, J., Villaseñor-Pineda, L., Montes-y Gómez, M., Rosso, P., Stamatatos, E.: Masking domain-specific information for cross-domain deception detection. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 135, 122–130 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

43. Sanguinetti, M., Poletto, F., Bosco, C., Patti, V., Stranisci, M.: An Italian twitter corpus of hate speech against immigrants. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

44. Sap, M.: Positive AI with social commonsense models. Ph.D. thesis (2021)

    Google Scholar 

45. Sperber, D., Wilson, D.: Irony and the use-mention distinction. In: Cole, P. (ed.) Radical Pragmatics, pp. 295–318. Academic Press, New York (1981)

    Google Scholar 

46. Van Hee, C., Lefever, E., Hoste, V.: SemEval-2018 task 3: irony detection in English tweets. In: Proceedings of The 12th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, pp. 39–50. Association for Computational Linguistics, New Orleans (2018)

    Google Scholar 

47. Veale, T.: Creative language retrieval: a robust hybrid of information retrieval and linguistic creativity. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp. 278–287. Association for Computational Linguistics, Portland (2011)

    Google Scholar 

48. Wiegand, M., Ruppenhofer, J., Kleinbauer, T.: Detection of abusive language: the problem of biased datasets. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), pp. 602–608. Association for Computational Linguistics, Minneapolis (2019)

    Google Scholar 

49. Wilson, D., Sperber, D.: On verbal irony. Lingua 87, 53–76 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

50. Zhuang, L., Wayne, L., Ya, S., Jun, Z.: A robustly optimized BERT pre-training approach with post-training. In: Proceedings of the 20th Chinese National Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 1218–1227. Chinese Information Processing Society of China (2021)

    Google Scholar 

Download references