Getting Rid of It: An Unlearning Perspective on Digital Government Competences

1. Akgün, A.E., Byrne, J.C., Lynn, G.S., Keskin, H.: Organizational unlearning as changes in beliefs and routines in organizations. J. Organ. Change Manag. 20, 794–812 (2007)

   Article  Google Scholar 

2. Becker, K.: Organizational unlearning: the challenges of a developing phenomenon. Learn. Organ. 26, 534–541 (2019)

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. Bettis, R.A., Prahalad, C.K.: The dominant logic: retrospective and extension. Strateg. Manag. J. 16, 5–14 (1995)

   Article  Google Scholar 

4. Bittner, E.: The concept of organization. Soc. Res. (1965)

   Google Scholar 

5. Bloom, B.S., Engelhart, E.J., Furst, W.H., R., K.D.: Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals. In: Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. Longman (1956)

   Google Scholar 

6. Brinkmann, S.: Qualitative Interviewing. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2013)

   Book  Google Scholar 

7. Casey, A.J., Olivera, F.: Reflections on organizational memory and forgetting. J. Manag. Inquiry 20, 305–310 (2011)

   Article  Google Scholar 

8. Cegarra-Navarro, J.G., Wensley, A.K., Sánchez Polo, M.T.: A conceptual framework for unlearning in a homecare setting. Knowl. Manag. Res. Pract. 12, 375–386 (2014)

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. Chen, H.M., Chang, W.Y.: The essence of the competence concept: adopting an organization’s sustained competitive advantage viewpoint. J. Manag. Organ. 16, 677–699 (2010)

   Article  Google Scholar 

10. Cubillas-Para, C., Cegarra-Navarro, J.G., Wensley, A.: Unlearning as a future challenge for knowledge management. In: Bratianu, C., Handzic, M., Bolisani, E. (eds.) The Future of Knowledge Management. IAKM, vol. 12, pp. 149–168. Springer, Cham (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38696-1_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

11. Danneels, L., Viaene, S.: Simple rules strategy to transform government: an ADR approach. Gov. Inf. Q. 32, 516–525 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

12. Di Maria, M., Walter, D., Schoormann, T., Knackstedt, R.: Practical support for unlearning - a systematic review to organize the field. In: Proceedings of the 31st ECIS, Kristiansand, Norway (2023)

    Google Scholar 

13. Distel, B., Ogonek, N., Becker, J.: eGovernment Competences revisited – a literature review on necessary competences in a digitalized public sector. In: Wirtschaftsinformatik Proceedings (2019)

    Google Scholar 

14. Dull, M.: Leadership and organizational culture: sustaining dialogue between practitioners and scholars. Public Adm. Rev. 70, 857–866 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Easterby-Smith, M., Lyles, M.A.: In praise of organizational forgetting. J. Manag. Inquiry 20, 311–316 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

16. Fiol, M., O’Connor, E.: Unlearning established organizational routines - Part I & II. Learn. Organ. 24, 13–29 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

17. Flak, L.S., Hofmann, S.: The impact of smart city initiatives on human rights. In: EGOV-CeDEM-ePart (2020)

    Google Scholar 

18. Grisold, T., Klammer, A., Kragulj, F.: Two forms of organizational unlearning: insights from engaged scholarship research with change consultants. Manag. Learn. 51, 598–619 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

19. Grönlund, Å., Hatakka, M., Ask, A.: Inclusion in the E-service society – investigating administrative literacy requirements for using E-services. In: Wimmer, M.A., Scholl, J., Grönlund, Å. (eds.) EGOV 2007. LNCS, vol. 4656, pp. 216–227. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74444-3_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

20. Halsbenning, S., Koddebusch, M., Niemann, M., Becker, J.: How to foster e-competence in the public sector? A mixed-method study using the case of BPM. In: EGOV-CeDEM-ePart (2021)

    Google Scholar 

21. Haug, N., Dan, S., Mergel, I.: Digitally-induced change in the public sector: a systematic review and research agenda. Public Manag. Rev. 26, 1963–1987 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

22. Hunnius, S., Paulowitsch, B., Schuppan, T.: Does e-government education meet competency requirements? An analysis of the German university system from international perspective. In: HICSS Proceedings (2015)

    Google Scholar 

23. Kitzinger, J.: Qualitative research: introducing focus groups. Br. Med. J. 311, 299–302 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

24. Klammer, A., Grisold, T., Nguyen, N., Hsu, S.: Organizational unlearning as a process: what we know, what we don’t know, what we should know. Manag. Rev. Q. (2024)

    Google Scholar 

25. Klammer, A., Gueldenberg, S.: Unlearning and forgetting in organizations: a systematic review of literature. J. Knowl. Manag. 23, 860–888 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

26. Koddebusch, M., Halsbenning, S., Kruse, P., Räckers, M., Becker, J.: The increasing e-competence gap: developments over the past five years in the German public sector. In: Fui-Hoon Nah, F., Siau, K. (eds.) HCII 2022. LNCS, vol. 13327, pp. 73–86. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05544-7_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

27. Lahti, R.K.: Identifying and integrating individual level and organizational level core competencies. J. Bus. Psychol. 14, 59–75 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

28. Lei, D., Slocum, J., Pitts, R.A.: Designing organizations for competitive advantage: the power of unlearning and learning. Organ. Dyn. 27, 24–38 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

29. Leonard-Barton, D.: Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development. Strateg. Manag. J. 13, 111–125 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

30. Martignoni, D., Keil, T.: It did not work? Unlearn and try again – unlearning success and failure beliefs in changing environments. Strateg. Manag. J. 42, 1057–1082 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

31. Matsuo, M.: Goal orientation, critical reflection, and unlearning: an individual-level study. Hum. Resour. Dev. Q. 29, 49–66 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

32. Mayring, P.: Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. AUT (2014)

    Google Scholar 

33. Mehrizi, M.H.R., Rodon Mòdol, J., Zafarnejad, M.: Managing obsolete knowledge: towards a clarified and contextualized conception of unlearning. In: ECIS Proceedings (2012)

    Google Scholar 

34. Mehrizi, M.H.R., Romero Velasco, M.: A multiple psychological perspective of individual unlearning. In: Academy of Management Proceedings (2013)

    Google Scholar 

35. Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., Haug, N.: Defining digital transformation: results from expert interviews. Gov. Inf. Q. 36, 101385 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

36. Mller, S.D., Skau, S.A.: Success factors influencing implementation of e-government at different stages of maturity: a literature review. Int. J. Electron. Gov. 7, 136–170 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

37. O. Nyumba, T., Wilson, K., Derrick, C.J., Mukherjee, N.: The use of focus group discussion methodology: insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 20–32 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

38. Ogonek, N., Distel, B., Becker, J.: Let’s play\(\ldots \) egovernment! A simulation game for competence development among public administration students. In: HICCS Proceedings (2019)

    Google Scholar 

39. Pan, G., Pan, S.L., Newman, M., Flynn, D.: Escalation and de-escalation of commitment: a commitment transformation analysis of an e-government project. Inf. Syst. J. 16, 3–21 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

40. Peschl, M.F.: Unlearning towards an uncertain future: on the back end of future-driven unlearning. Learn. Organ. 26, 454–469 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

41. Polites, G.L., Karahanna, E.: Shackled to the status quo: the inhibiting effects of incumbent system habit, switching costs, and inertia on new system acceptance. MIS Q. (2012)

    Google Scholar 

42. Prabowo, H.Y., Sriyana, J., Syamsudin, M.: Forgetting corruption: unlearning the knowledge of corruption in the Indonesian public sector. J. Financ. Crime 25, 28–56 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

43. Sinkula, J.M., Baker, W.E., Noordewier, T.: A framework for market-based organizational learning: linking values, knowledge, and behavior. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 25, 305–318 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

44. Stahl, B.C., Tremblay, M.C., LeRouge, C.M.: Focus groups and critical social IS research: how the choice of method can promote emancipation of respondents and researchers. EJIS 20, 378–394 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

45. Tangi, L., Janssen, M., Benedetti, M., Noci, G.: Barriers and drivers of digital transformation in public organizations: results from a survey in the Netherlands. In: Viale Pereira, G., et al. (eds.) EGOV 2020. LNCS, vol. 12219, pp. 42–56. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57599-1_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

46. Tangi, L., Janssen, M., Benedetti, M., Noci, G.: Digital government transformation: a structural equation modelling analysis of driving and impeding factors. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 60, 102356 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

47. Tremblay, M.C., Hevner, A.R., Berndt, D.J.: Focus groups for artifact refinement and evaluation in design research. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 26, 27 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

48. Vial, G.: Understanding digital transformation: a review and a research agenda. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. (2019)

    Google Scholar 

49. Wessel, L., Baiyere, A., Ologeanu-Taddei, R., Cha, J., Blegind-Jensen, T.: Unpacking the difference between digital transformation and it-enabled organizational transformation. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 22, 102–129 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

Download references