Abstract
This chapter examines the significance of the educational climate and learning environment in the field of clinical transfusion medicine. It begins by defining the learning environment and highlights its essential components crucial for facilitating effective learning experiences in transfusion medicine. The chapter explores the diverse stakeholders involved in shaping the learning environment, including educators, learners, and healthcare institutions. It delves into the regulatory and legislative framework that governs the educational setting, ensuring compliance and quality standards. Entry criteria’s role in the educational environment is explored, emphasizing its impact on creating a cohesive and competent learner cohort. The chapter further explores the pivotal role of teaching staff, their competence, and their influence on the educational atmosphere. Auditing and accreditation processes are discussed as crucial mechanisms to maintain and improve the learning environment’s standards. The psychosocial aspects of the learning environment are also explored, recognizing their impact on learner well-being and performance. Outcomes and assessment are identified as key elements, determining the effectiveness of the learning environment and learner proficiency. The chapter advocates for continuous professional development to keep learners and educators updated with advancements in clinical transfusion medicine. In conclusion, the chapter underscores the importance of fostering a supportive and dynamic learning environment in transfusion medicine. By addressing the identified elements, stakeholders can create an optimal setting that empowers learners and ensures the delivery of safe and proficient clinical transfusion practices.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Friedman CP, Donaldson KM, Vantsevich AV. Educating medical students in the era of ubiquitous information. Med Teach. 2016;38(5):504–9.
Johnston SC. Anticipating and training the physician of the future: the importance of caring in an age of artificial intelligence. Acad Med. 2018;293(8):1105–6.
Ryan E, Poole C. Impact of virtual learning environment on students’ satisfaction, engagement, recall, and retention. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2019;50(3):408–15.
Dai Z, Xiong J, Zhao L, Zhu X. Smart classroom learning environment preferences of higher education teachers and students in China: an ecological perspective. Heliyon. 2023;9(6):e16769.
World Economic Forum. The Future of Jobs Report. 2023. https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-jobs-report-2023/infographics-2128e451e0/#report-nav.
Smit Sibinga CT, Louw VJ, Nedelcu E, et al. Modeling global transfusion medicine education. Transfusion. 2021;61(10):3040–9.
Smit Sibinga CT. Chapter 8. Transfusion medicine: from AB0 to AI (artificial intelligence). In: Digital health. Brisbane, AU: Exon Publications; 2022. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35605070.
Al-Riyami AZ, Peterson D, Vanden Broeck J, et al. E-learning/online education in transfusion medicine: a cross-sectional international survey. Transfus Med. 2022;32(6):499–504.
Al-Riyami AZ, Louw VJ, Indrikovs AJ, et al. Global survey of transfusion medicine curricula in medical schools: challenges and opportunities. Transfusion. 2021;61(2):617–26.
Hauser RG, Kwon RJ, Ryder A, et al. Transfusion medicine equations made internet accessible. Transfus Med Rev. 2020;34:15–9.
Eichbaum Q, Shan H, Goncalez TT, et al. Global health and transfusion medicine: education and training in developing countries. Transfusion. 2014;254(7):1893–8.
Pershing S, Fuchs VR. Restructuring medical education to meet current and f. uture health care needs. Acad Med. 2013;88(12):1798–801.
Han ER, Yeo S, Kim MJ, et al. Medical education trends for future physicians in the era of advanced technology and artificial intelligence: an integrative review. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):460.
The Blood Project. What is an electronic crossmatch? 2022. https://www.thebloodproject.com/ufaq/what-is-an-electronic-crossmatch/.
Al-Riyami AZ, Al-Nomani I, Panchatcharam SM, et al. Transfusion knowledge of medical and surgical specialty board residents: a cohort study. Transfus Med. 2018;28(6):440–50.
Flott EA, Linden L. The clinical learning environment in nursing education: a concept analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2016;72(3):501–13.
Buhari M, Nwannadi I, Oghagbon E, Bello J. Students’ perceptions of their learning environment at the College of Medicine, University of Ilorin, southwest, Nigeria. West African J Med. 2014;33(2):141–5.
Gifford KA, Choi E, Kieffer KA. Resources for clinical learning environment orientation. Med Educ Online. 2022;27(1):2013404.
Ovid D, Rice MM, Luna JV, et al. Investigating student perceptions of instructor talk: alignment with researchers’ categorizations and analysis of remembered language. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2021;20(4):ar61.
Dai Y, Li H, Xie W, Deng T. Power distance belief and workplace communication: the mediating role of fear of authority. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(5):2932.
Hoff TJ, Pohl H, Bartfield J. Creating a learning environment to produce competent residents: the roles of culture and context. Acad Med. 2004;79(6):532–9.
Pienaar M, Orton AM, Botma Y. A supportive clinical learning environment for undergraduate students in health sciences: an integrative review. Nurse Educ Today. 2022;119:105572.
Levett-Jones T, Lathlean J. The ascent to competence conceptual framework: an outcome of a study of belongingness. J Clin Nurs. 2009;18(20):2870–9.
Rambiritch V, Vermeulen M, Bell H, et al. Transfusion medicine and blood banking education and training for blood establishment laboratory staff: a review of selected countries in Africa. Transfusion. 2021;61(6):1955–65.
Louw VJ. The difference in scope of practice between a specialist in transfusion medicine and the clinician who deals with transfusion on an ad hoc basis. Transfus Apher Sci. 2014;51(3):33–7.
Moscaritolo LM. Interventional strategies to decrease nursing student anxiety in the clinical learning environment. J Nurs Educ. 2009;48(1):17–23.
Rivard SJ, Kemp MT, Evans J, Sandhu G. Resident perceptions of faculty behaviors promoting learner operative skills and autonomy. J Surg Educ. 2022;79(2):431–40.
Jumpp S. Evidence-based competency training program for blood product administration. Worldviews Evid-Based Nurs. 2021;18(4):308–10.
Fan SY, Yu ZY, Zheng X, Gao CH. Relationship between psychological adaptability and work engagement of college teachers within smart teaching environments: the mediating role of digital information literacy self-efficacy. Front Psychol. 2023;14:1057158.
Li J. Analysis of professional psychological adaptability of students majoring in hotel management and digital operation for higher vocational education under deep learning. Wirel Commun Mob Com. 2022;2022:e7114630.
Collie RJ, Granziera H, Martin AJ. Teachers’ perceived autonomy support and adaptability: an investigation employing the job demands-resources model as relevant to workplace exhaustion, disengagement, and commitment. Teach Teach Educ. 2018;74:125–36.
Holliman AJ, Revill-Keen A, Waldeck D. University lecturers’ adaptability: examining links with perceived autonomy support, organisational commitment, and psychological wellbeing. Teach Educ. 2022;33(1):42–55.
Martin AJ, Strnadova I, Nemec Z, Hajkova V, Kvetonova L. Teacher assistants working with students with disability: the role of adaptability in enhancing their workplace wellbeing. Int J Inclusive Educ. 2021;25(5):565–87.
Project Echo. Moving knowledge, not people. 2023. https://hsc.unm.edu/echo/.
Joubert J, Joubert S, Raubenheimer J, Louw V. The long-term effects of training interventions on transfusion practice: a follow-up audit of red cell concentrate utilisation at Kimberley Hospital, South Africa. Transfus Apher Sci. 2014;51(3):25–32.
Gushulak B, Weekers J, Macpherson D. Migrants and emerging public health issues in a globalized world: threats, risks and challenges, an evidence-based framework. Emerg Health Threats J. 2009;2:e10.
Louw VJ, Nel MM, Hay JF. Postgraduate education in transfusion medicine in the absence of formal residency training: assessment of factors needed to develop and sustain a postgraduate diploma program. Transfus Apher Sci. 2013;49(3):681–6.
Henry D, West DC. The clinical learning environment and workplace-based assessment: frameworks, strategies, and implementation. Pediatr Clin N Am. 2019;66(4):839–54.
Louw VJ. Determining the outcomes for clinicians completing a postgraduate diploma in transfusion medicine. Transfus Apher Sci. 2014;51(3):38–43.
Wormald BW, Schoeman S, Somasunderam A, Penn M. Assessment drives learning: an unavoidable truth? Anat Sci Educ. 2009;2(5):199–204.
Yeung KCY, Kapitany C, Charge S, et al. Transfusion camp: a retrospective study of self-reported impact on postgraduate trainee transfusion practice. Transfusion. 2023;63(4):839–48.
Sargeant J, Wong BM, Campbell CM. CPD of the future: a partnership between quality improvement and competency-based education. Med Educ. 2018;52(1):125–35.
Kathuria I, Mandal S, Negi S, et al. An audit to estimate the quality of practices followed during bedside blood transfusion in a tertiary care hospital and role of continuous medical education in it. Transfus Clin Biol. 2022;29(3):209–12.
Robinson JD, Persky AM. Developing self-directed learners. Am J Pharm Educ. 2020;84(3):847512.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Prof. Cees Smit Sibinga for his encouragement, support, and editorial guidance during the writing of this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Louw, V.J., Barrett, C.L., Rambiritch, V. (2024). The Importance of Educational Environment and Climate in Transfusion Medicine Education. In: Smit Sibinga, C.T., Abdella, Y.E. (eds) Clinical Use of Blood. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67332-0_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67332-0_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-67331-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-67332-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)